Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not "zero" evidence, just not enough for a criminal prosecution. Perhaps if thee hadn't been so much obstruction, lying and pleading the Fifth, as Mueller noted, there would have been enough evidence.

Again, if this is your mantra, then you haven't read the report or the other legal cases where people have been convicted or plead guilty.

Give it up: Mueller ruled out conspiracy/conclusion by the Trump campaign. Frankly I was not surprised because they were too incompetent and disjointed to have contrived a conspiracy with Russia.

Focus on winning the 2020 election instead of beating a dead horse. What do the Democrats offer the millions of voters who supported Obama and left the Democratic party to vote for Trump? Now that is the name of the game as opposed to this blather about conspiracy and impeachment. What is the Democratic program for sustaining this economy and promoting additional growth?

And, btw, Trump will be exonerated by the Senate ........ you can take that to the bank!

The Senate cannot exonerate the President. The can not remove him, but he will always be impeached.

An impeachment that will go down in history as the most partisan ever. Not only did ZERO Republicans vote for impeachment, members of the Democratic House voted AGAINST impeachment.
Nancy Pelosi, March 6, 2019:

“I haven’t said this to any press person before. But since you asked, and I’ve been thinking about this, impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”

She will regret taking this move.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not "zero" evidence, just not enough for a criminal prosecution. Perhaps if thee hadn't been so much obstruction, lying and pleading the Fifth, as Mueller noted, there would have been enough evidence.

Again, if this is your mantra, then you haven't read the report or the other legal cases where people have been convicted or plead guilty.

Give it up: Mueller ruled out conspiracy/conclusion by the Trump campaign. Frankly I was not surprised because they were too incompetent and disjointed to have contrived a conspiracy with Russia.

Focus on winning the 2020 election instead of beating a dead horse. What do the Democrats offer the millions of voters who supported Obama and left the Democratic party to vote for Trump? Now that is the name of the game as opposed to this blather about conspiracy and impeachment. What is the Democratic program for sustaining this economy and promoting additional growth?

And, btw, Trump will be exonerated by the Senate ........ you can take that to the bank!

The Senate cannot exonerate the President. The can not remove him, but he will always be impeached.

An impeachment that will go down in history as the most partisan ever. Not only did ZERO Republicans vote for impeachment, members of the Democratic House voted AGAINST impeachment.
Nancy Pelosi, March 6, 2019:

“I haven’t said this to any press person before. But since you asked, and I’ve been thinking about this, impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”

She will regret taking this move.

She had to do it. The whole situation sucks (thanks, amoral MAGA scum!) but she's doing her best to navigate it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not "zero" evidence, just not enough for a criminal prosecution. Perhaps if thee hadn't been so much obstruction, lying and pleading the Fifth, as Mueller noted, there would have been enough evidence.

Again, if this is your mantra, then you haven't read the report or the other legal cases where people have been convicted or plead guilty.

Give it up: Mueller ruled out conspiracy/conclusion by the Trump campaign. Frankly I was not surprised because they were too incompetent and disjointed to have contrived a conspiracy with Russia.

Focus on winning the 2020 election instead of beating a dead horse. What do the Democrats offer the millions of voters who supported Obama and left the Democratic party to vote for Trump? Now that is the name of the game as opposed to this blather about conspiracy and impeachment. What is the Democratic program for sustaining this economy and promoting additional growth?

And, btw, Trump will be exonerated by the Senate ........ you can take that to the bank!

The Senate cannot exonerate the President. The can not remove him, but he will always be impeached.

An impeachment that will go down in history as the most partisan ever. Not only did ZERO Republicans vote for impeachment, members of the Democratic House voted AGAINST impeachment.
Nancy Pelosi, March 6, 2019:

“I haven’t said this to any press person before. But since you asked, and I’ve been thinking about this, impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”

She will regret taking this move.

It is only partisan because apparently the entire GOP has lost its collective mind where "rule of law" "fiscal restraint" and "family values" are concerned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not "zero" evidence, just not enough for a criminal prosecution. Perhaps if thee hadn't been so much obstruction, lying and pleading the Fifth, as Mueller noted, there would have been enough evidence.

Again, if this is your mantra, then you haven't read the report or the other legal cases where people have been convicted or plead guilty.

Give it up: Mueller ruled out conspiracy/conclusion by the Trump campaign. Frankly I was not surprised because they were too incompetent and disjointed to have contrived a conspiracy with Russia.

Focus on winning the 2020 election instead of beating a dead horse. What do the Democrats offer the millions of voters who supported Obama and left the Democratic party to vote for Trump? Now that is the name of the game as opposed to this blather about conspiracy and impeachment. What is the Democratic program for sustaining this economy and promoting additional growth?

And, btw, Trump will be exonerated by the Senate ........ you can take that to the bank!

The Senate cannot exonerate the President. The can not remove him, but he will always be impeached.

An impeachment that will go down in history as the most partisan ever. Not only did ZERO Republicans vote for impeachment, members of the Democratic House voted AGAINST impeachment.
Nancy Pelosi, March 6, 2019:

“I haven’t said this to any press person before. But since you asked, and I’ve been thinking about this, impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”

She will regret taking this move.

Well it's true, Republicans are SO PARTISAN they won't even call out corruption among their own when they see it right before their eyes. Shame on them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not "zero" evidence, just not enough for a criminal prosecution. Perhaps if thee hadn't been so much obstruction, lying and pleading the Fifth, as Mueller noted, there would have been enough evidence.

Again, if this is your mantra, then you haven't read the report or the other legal cases where people have been convicted or plead guilty.

Give it up: Mueller ruled out conspiracy/conclusion by the Trump campaign. Frankly I was not surprised because they were too incompetent and disjointed to have contrived a conspiracy with Russia.

Focus on winning the 2020 election instead of beating a dead horse. What do the Democrats offer the millions of voters who supported Obama and left the Democratic party to vote for Trump? Now that is the name of the game as opposed to this blather about conspiracy and impeachment. What is the Democratic program for sustaining this economy and promoting additional growth?

And, btw, Trump will be exonerated by the Senate ........ you can take that to the bank!

The Senate cannot exonerate the President. The can not remove him, but he will always be impeached.

An impeachment that will go down in history as the most partisan ever. Not only did ZERO Republicans vote for impeachment, members of the Democratic House voted AGAINST impeachment.
Nancy Pelosi, March 6, 2019:

“I haven’t said this to any press person before. But since you asked, and I’ve been thinking about this, impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”

She will regret taking this move.

Well it's true, Republicans are SO PARTISAN they won't even call out corruption among their own when they see it right before their eyes. Shame on them.

Bless your heart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not "zero" evidence, just not enough for a criminal prosecution. Perhaps if thee hadn't been so much obstruction, lying and pleading the Fifth, as Mueller noted, there would have been enough evidence.

Again, if this is your mantra, then you haven't read the report or the other legal cases where people have been convicted or plead guilty.

Give it up: Mueller ruled out conspiracy/conclusion by the Trump campaign. Frankly I was not surprised because they were too incompetent and disjointed to have contrived a conspiracy with Russia.

Focus on winning the 2020 election instead of beating a dead horse. What do the Democrats offer the millions of voters who supported Obama and left the Democratic party to vote for Trump? Now that is the name of the game as opposed to this blather about conspiracy and impeachment. What is the Democratic program for sustaining this economy and promoting additional growth?

And, btw, Trump will be exonerated by the Senate ........ you can take that to the bank!

The Senate cannot exonerate the President. The can not remove him, but he will always be impeached.

An impeachment that will go down in history as the most partisan ever. Not only did ZERO Republicans vote for impeachment, members of the Democratic House voted AGAINST impeachment.
Nancy Pelosi, March 6, 2019:

“I haven’t said this to any press person before. But since you asked, and I’ve been thinking about this, impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”

She will regret taking this move.

Well it's true, Republicans are SO PARTISAN they won't even call out corruption among their own when they see it right before their eyes. Shame on them.

Partisan isn’t the correct word. It’s COMPLICIT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Trump is so innocent, why is he threatening to block Bolton's testimony?

Executive privilege.

Here, read about it. And, it is the reason the House's obstruction of Congress charge is such a joke.

Executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to maintain confidential communications under certain circumstances within the executive branch and to resist some subpoenas and other oversight by the legislative and judicial branches of government in pursuit of particular information or personnel relating to those confidential communications. The right comes into effect when revealing information would impair governmental functions. Neither executive privilege nor the oversight power of Congress is explicitly mentioned in the United States Constitution.[1] However, the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that executive privilege and congressional oversight each are a consequence of the doctrine of the separation of powers, derived from the supremacy of each branch in its own area of Constitutional activity.[2]

The Supreme Court confirmed the legitimacy of this doctrine in United States v. Nixon in the context of a subpoena emanating from the judiciary, instead of emanating from Congress.[3] The Court held that there is a qualified privilege, which once invoked, creates a presumption of privilege, and the party seeking the documents must then make a "sufficient showing" that the "presidential material" is "essential to the justice of the case". Chief Justice Warren Burger further stated that executive privilege would most effectively apply when the oversight of the executive would impair that branch's national security concerns.[3] Regarding requests from Congress (instead of from the courts) for executive branch information, as of a 2014 study by the Congressional Research Service,[4] only two federal court cases had addressed the merits of executive privilege in such a context, and neither of those cases reached the Supreme Court.[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_privilege

They aren't citing executive privilege, but rather "absolute immunity" - something that doesn't exist in law or practice.

Also, Executive Privilege is nullified when criminal behavior is being investigated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Trump is so innocent, why is he threatening to block Bolton's testimony?

Executive privilege.

Here, read about it. And, it is the reason the House's obstruction of Congress charge is such a joke.

Executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to maintain confidential communications under certain circumstances within the executive branch and to resist some subpoenas and other oversight by the legislative and judicial branches of government in pursuit of particular information or personnel relating to those confidential communications. The right comes into effect when revealing information would impair governmental functions. Neither executive privilege nor the oversight power of Congress is explicitly mentioned in the United States Constitution.[1] However, the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that executive privilege and congressional oversight each are a consequence of the doctrine of the separation of powers, derived from the supremacy of each branch in its own area of Constitutional activity.[2]

The Supreme Court confirmed the legitimacy of this doctrine in United States v. Nixon in the context of a subpoena emanating from the judiciary, instead of emanating from Congress.[3] The Court held that there is a qualified privilege, which once invoked, creates a presumption of privilege, and the party seeking the documents must then make a "sufficient showing" that the "presidential material" is "essential to the justice of the case". Chief Justice Warren Burger further stated that executive privilege would most effectively apply when the oversight of the executive would impair that branch's national security concerns.[3] Regarding requests from Congress (instead of from the courts) for executive branch information, as of a 2014 study by the Congressional Research Service,[4] only two federal court cases had addressed the merits of executive privilege in such a context, and neither of those cases reached the Supreme Court.[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_privilege

They aren't citing executive privilege, but rather "absolute immunity" - something that doesn't exist in law or practice.

Also, Executive Privilege is nullified when criminal behavior is being investigated.

Well, now. That is an interesting statement given that neither of the articles of impeachment allege criminal conduct.

[Anonymous]

Will the Democrats ever stop whining when they don't get their way? It is pretty much non-stop between the whining and the endless excuses why they lose elections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Trump is so innocent, why is he threatening to block Bolton's testimony?

Executive privilege.

Here, read about it. And, it is the reason the House's obstruction of Congress charge is such a joke.

Executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to maintain confidential communications under certain circumstances within the executive branch and to resist some subpoenas and other oversight by the legislative and judicial branches of government in pursuit of particular information or personnel relating to those confidential communications. The right comes into effect when revealing information would impair governmental functions. Neither executive privilege nor the oversight power of Congress is explicitly mentioned in the United States Constitution.[1] However, the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that executive privilege and congressional oversight each are a consequence of the doctrine of the separation of powers, derived from the supremacy of each branch in its own area of Constitutional activity.[2]

The Supreme Court confirmed the legitimacy of this doctrine in United States v. Nixon in the context of a subpoena emanating from the judiciary, instead of emanating from Congress.[3] The Court held that there is a qualified privilege, which once invoked, creates a presumption of privilege, and the party seeking the documents must then make a "sufficient showing" that the "presidential material" is "essential to the justice of the case". Chief Justice Warren Burger further stated that executive privilege would most effectively apply when the oversight of the executive would impair that branch's national security concerns.[3] Regarding requests from Congress (instead of from the courts) for executive branch information, as of a 2014 study by the Congressional Research Service,[4] only two federal court cases had addressed the merits of executive privilege in such a context, and neither of those cases reached the Supreme Court.[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_privilege

They aren't citing executive privilege, but rather "absolute immunity" - something that doesn't exist in law or practice.

Also, Executive Privilege is nullified when criminal behavior is being investigated.

Well, now. That is an interesting statement given that neither of the articles of impeachment allege criminal conduct.

Uh, have you read them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not "zero" evidence, just not enough for a criminal prosecution. Perhaps if thee hadn't been so much obstruction, lying and pleading the Fifth, as Mueller noted, there would have been enough evidence.

Again, if this is your mantra, then you haven't read the report or the other legal cases where people have been convicted or plead guilty.

Give it up: Mueller ruled out conspiracy/conclusion by the Trump campaign. Frankly I was not surprised because they were too incompetent and disjointed to have contrived a conspiracy with Russia.

Focus on winning the 2020 election instead of beating a dead horse. What do the Democrats offer the millions of voters who supported Obama and left the Democratic party to vote for Trump? Now that is the name of the game as opposed to this blather about conspiracy and impeachment. What is the Democratic program for sustaining this economy and promoting additional growth?

And, btw, Trump will be exonerated by the Senate ........ you can take that to the bank!

The Senate cannot exonerate the President. The can not remove him, but he will always be impeached.

An impeachment that will go down in history as the most partisan ever. Not only did ZERO Republicans vote for impeachment, members of the Democratic House voted AGAINST impeachment.
Nancy Pelosi, March 6, 2019:

“I haven’t said this to any press person before. But since you asked, and I’ve been thinking about this, impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”

She will regret taking this move.

+ 1,000,000

[Anonymous]

What a fiasco for Pelosi:

On Sunday’s broadcast of ABC’s “This Week,” Washington Post congressional reporter Rachael Bade said congressional Democrats privately say House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) holding onto the articles of impeachment was a “failed strategy.”

Bade said, “She was clearly putting a positive spin on what a lot of Democrats have privately said was a failed strategy. I mean she and Chuck Schumer, the minority leader in the Senate, set out to number one, try to get a commitment from McConnell on witnesses, firsthand witnesses to testify in a Senate trial. She said she wanted to see a resolution about, you know, how the whole proceedings would be governed. She got neither of those.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What a fiasco for Pelosi:

On Sunday’s broadcast of ABC’s “This Week,” Washington Post congressional reporter Rachael Bade said congressional Democrats privately say House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) holding onto the articles of impeachment was a “failed strategy.”

Bade said, “She was clearly putting a positive spin on what a lot of Democrats have privately said was a failed strategy. I mean she and Chuck Schumer, the minority leader in the Senate, set out to number one, try to get a commitment from McConnell on witnesses, firsthand witnesses to testify in a Senate trial. She said she wanted to see a resolution about, you know, how the whole proceedings would be governed. She got neither of those.”

Well taking a playbook from cons.... "sources" -- yeah right. NAME THEM. I mean, who trusts the MSM anyway? FAKE NEWS!

AMIRITE republicans? Can't deny the MSM only when puts your supreme leader in a bad light. If you don't want to be hypocrites you'll reject the MSM for anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What a fiasco for Pelosi:

On Sunday’s broadcast of ABC’s “This Week,” Washington Post congressional reporter Rachael Bade said congressional Democrats privately say House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) holding onto the articles of impeachment was a “failed strategy.”

Bade said, “She was clearly putting a positive spin on what a lot of Democrats have privately said was a failed strategy. I mean she and Chuck Schumer, the minority leader in the Senate, set out to number one, try to get a commitment from McConnell on witnesses, firsthand witnesses to testify in a Senate trial. She said she wanted to see a resolution about, you know, how the whole proceedings would be governed. She got neither of those.”

Wow.

Dems are losing even the lying media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Will the Democrats ever stop whining when they don't get their way? It is pretty much non-stop between the whining and the endless excuses why they lose elections.

Will the Republicans ever stop lying and obstructing justice? Making clown shows of hearings?

Will they stop:

Supporting coaches who ignore the sexual abuses of their students?

Supporting DWIs?

Supporting a porn star FLOTUS?

Supporting JAVANKA who made $82 mil last year while in office while pointing a finger at Hunter Biden who was never employed by his father?

Stop walking back everything that jackass says with "He was joking" or "It was a mistake." RE:FIRST SNOW OF THE SEASON! Posted by the White House when it was 52 degrees.

What a bunch of morons.

Spare me your "whining" post, PP. Your are obviously challenged in the critical thinking department.