Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the evidence for impeachment is so overwhelming, why are the Democrats whining about additional witnesses and documents?

Because so many Republicans ignored subpoena's issued by the House? Why wouldn't they testify?

Look friend - all but a couple of the Democrats voted FOR impeachment because they found the evidence so overwhelming, so compelling, so ironclad.

Before the articles even have gone to the Senate, they are now crying for additional witnesses and additional documents.

If the evidence was so overwhelming and compelling and ironclad that they voted FOR impeachment, why the need for more?

This is just like Nancy saying that impeachment was so necessary to complete so quickly because there was such a national security risk of keeping Trump in office - and then she proceeds to hold onto the articles for a month.

Christ, you people are tedious. Nobody wants to engage you because YOU DONT LISTEN to anything you don’t want to hear. Same old stupid, tired arguments based on lies and misrepresentations. I’m sorry you can’t handle reality, but we don’t have to humor you.

+1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the evidence for impeachment is so overwhelming, why are the Democrats whining about additional witnesses and documents?

Because so many Republicans ignored subpoena's issued by the House? Why wouldn't they testify?

Look friend - all but a couple of the Democrats voted FOR impeachment because they found the evidence so overwhelming, so compelling, so ironclad.

Before the articles even have gone to the Senate, they are now crying for additional witnesses and additional documents.

If the evidence was so overwhelming and compelling and ironclad that they voted FOR impeachment, why the need for more?

This is just like Nancy saying that impeachment was so necessary to complete so quickly because there was such a national security risk of keeping Trump in office - and then she proceeds to hold onto the articles for a month.

Every republican senator knows he’s guilty. They also know that this is a BFD, but they have idiots for constituents. They have 2 choices:
1) remain feckless chickensh#t cowards and try to hold onto their jobs. Educating their public would take real work, and as evidenced by Trump rallies, his supporters mostly lack the mental acuity to understand what the president did and why it matters.
2) push for witnesses and face Trump and his twitter mob. Possibly risk a primary. Lose their jobs. And Trump is still standing, because 40% of the electorate just doesn’t care for various reasons.
The evidence is clear, we just have a foxnews upside world where 40% of the public gets to pretend the sky is green and grass is red.

Wow. Lots of inflammatory accusations and name calling there, friend. As they say, if you can't support an argument, resort to calling names.
And, you didn't really answer the question....... why do you need MORE witnesses if the evidence is so damn overwhelming?

We aren’t friends. The evidence as presented is more than sufficient, but I want those a-holes to squirm under oath. I’d love to see more of the Dbags in Trumps orbit hauled off the prison.
The loose transcript of the call, and the withheld funds are clear and concise, and supported by public statements by both Trump and Mulvaney. If want to live in make believe land where that isn’t a shake down to f with our electoral process, nothing anyone says is going to convince you. You aren’t worth anyone’s time.

[phone]
(The last three “mathematical” pps have been all me. I’m just seriously impressed with whoever is bringing the anti-stupid fire.)

[Anonymous]

Is Susan Collins posting on DCUM?

Lev Parnas just spoke up AFTER Trump was impeached. His testimony needs to be heard..

I wonder just exactly how many Republican Senators committed perjury today - the same thing Bill Clinton was impeached for?

What a disaster the Republican party has become. In fact, the Republican party is dead. It is now the party of Trump. Best of luck with that

[Anonymous]

And once again, to remind all Trumpsters:

He has been IMPEACHED and will forever be IMPEACHED regardless of whether the Senate votes to remove him. Which I am sure they will not.

But yea! MAGA! IMPEACHED! Forever and always.

[Anonymous]

I suspect Mitch will let Collins vote for testimony. He’ll let three of them take that vote back home for cover, but there won’t be testimony.
I’m trying to reconcile with that now.
We all need to get there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I suspect Mitch will let Collins vote for testimony. He’ll let three of them take that vote back home for cover, but there won’t be testimony.
I’m trying to reconcile with that now.
We all need to get there.

Who is in a swing state who could be prevailed upon to be the fourth?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suspect Mitch will let Collins vote for testimony. He’ll let three of them take that vote back home for cover, but there won’t be testimony.
I’m trying to reconcile with that now.
We all need to get there.

Who is in a swing state who could be prevailed upon to be the fourth?

Collins
Romney
Murkowski
Gardner
Ernst
Alexander (retiring)

These are the possible ones, people are saying...

[Anonymous]

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/16/politics/senate-impeachment-romney-murkowski-collins/index.html

8 senators to watch

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's fake news, pelosi didn't wait, whatever was in the house is what does in the senate. She should be fired

Back away from the booze, Sparky.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And once again, to remind all Trumpsters:

He has been IMPEACHED and will forever be IMPEACHED regardless of whether the Senate votes to remove him. Which I am sure they will not.

But yea! MAGA! IMPEACHED! Forever and always.

I’ve adapted the “POTUS**” moniker for him. It’s a zippy little reminder of what the GOP is.
*had to commit treason to “win”
*impeached

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's fake news, pelosi didn't wait, whatever was in the house is what does in the senate. She should be fired

Back away from the booze, Sparky.

Lord above you "fake news" ppl are really quite dim.

Pelosi is more intelligent than your entire family. Forever, PP. #BeBest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is Susan Collins posting on DCUM?

Lev Parnas just spoke up AFTER Trump was impeached. His testimony needs to be heard..

I wonder just exactly how many Republican Senators committed perjury today - the same thing Bill Clinton was impeached for?

What a disaster the Republican party has become. In fact, the Republican party is dead. It is now the party of Trump. Best of luck with that

I don't think Mitch McConnell wants to make this into a circus. Having Parnas testify would do just that. The statements he has made on the news shows have been inconsistent and for many he has offered no evidence. It's low risk to go on left wing shows and spout accusations. It is totally something else to go under oath. He would be exposed as the fraud he is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Susan Collins posting on DCUM?

Lev Parnas just spoke up AFTER Trump was impeached. His testimony needs to be heard..

I wonder just exactly how many Republican Senators committed perjury today - the same thing Bill Clinton was impeached for?

What a disaster the Republican party has become. In fact, the Republican party is dead. It is now the party of Trump. Best of luck with that

I don't think Mitch McConnell wants to make this into a circus. Having Parnas testify would do just that. The statements he has made on the news shows have been inconsistent and for many he has offered no evidence. It's low risk to go on left wing shows and spout accusations. It is totally something else to go under oath. He would be exposed as the fraud he is.

What are the things he mentioned for which there is no evidence? We already knew Pence, Perrry and Barr were implicated. He simply confirmed that. We already knew the deal was getting Ukraine to announce an investigation in exchange for "dirt" on the Bidens, and we already knew everything was done with full disclosure and knowledge of the President. We also already knew about DiGenova and Toensing and their relationship with Dmitri Firtash. The only new thing was the "hit" on the Ambassador, which Parnas didn't discuss and was only conjectured through the texts he provided.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Susan Collins posting on DCUM?

Lev Parnas just spoke up AFTER Trump was impeached. His testimony needs to be heard..

I wonder just exactly how many Republican Senators committed perjury today - the same thing Bill Clinton was impeached for?

What a disaster the Republican party has become. In fact, the Republican party is dead. It is now the party of Trump. Best of luck with that

I don't think Mitch McConnell wants to make this into a circus. Having Parnas testify would do just that. The statements he has made on the news shows have been inconsistent and for many he has offered no evidence. It's low risk to go on left wing shows and spout accusations. It is totally something else to go under oath. He would be exposed as the fraud he is.

What are the things he mentioned for which there is no evidence? We already knew Pence, Perrry and Barr were implicated. He simply confirmed that. We already knew the deal was getting Ukraine to announce an investigation in exchange for "dirt" on the Bidens, and we already knew everything was done with full disclosure and knowledge of the President. We also already knew about DiGenova and Toensing and their relationship with Dmitri Firtash. The only new thing was the "hit" on the Ambassador, which Parnas didn't discuss and was only conjectured through the texts he provided.

You have been snowed, friend. #SoGullible

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Susan Collins posting on DCUM?

Lev Parnas just spoke up AFTER Trump was impeached. His testimony needs to be heard..

I wonder just exactly how many Republican Senators committed perjury today - the same thing Bill Clinton was impeached for?

What a disaster the Republican party has become. In fact, the Republican party is dead. It is now the party of Trump. Best of luck with that

I don't think Mitch McConnell wants to make this into a circus. Having Parnas testify would do just that. The statements he has made on the news shows have been inconsistent and for many he has offered no evidence. It's low risk to go on left wing shows and spout accusations. It is totally something else to go under oath. He would be exposed as the fraud he is.

Wrong. He has been very concise with his statements, and has the documents to back it up. Also letting us know that it’s not only Trump and Gulliani, but Pompaeo, Barr, Pence, Perry, etc. that broke the law. Let those criminals get their stories straight. I will never understand why anyone would want someone as unintelligent, hateful, racist, and misogynistic as the lying Trump. Sad times for our country. We are a joke.