Another pit bull attack

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#


Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.


If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.


Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#


Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.


If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.


Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently

I’m glad you’re coming around! Because there are more attacks, they’re just not widely reported. Simpler bites, though still violent and frequently unprovoked, don’t make the news. And the news doesn’t report on all the small animals and livestock that pit bulls still take down. Oh ever now and again someone will have footage of one of these hell dogs biting a horse, like on the streets in New York, or a pit bull going after a bison, but the actual numbers of animals they kill isn’t publicized.

And *my* personal rule for bumping this thread is that the attack has to be fatal and it has to be in the United States. I don’t list the mauled kids until they die.

So that’s the deal. These dogs have a high body count and it doesn’t seem to matter to their supporters. You can’t profess to “love dogs” when Diesel and Blue pick off a Pomeranian or a toy poodle every few months.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#


Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.


If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.


Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently

I’m glad you’re coming around! Because there are more attacks, they’re just not widely reported. Simpler bites, though still violent and frequently unprovoked, don’t make the news. And the news doesn’t report on all the small animals and livestock that pit bulls still take down. Oh ever now and again someone will have footage of one of these hell dogs biting a horse, like on the streets in New York, or a pit bull going after a bison, but the actual numbers of animals they kill isn’t publicized.

And *my* personal rule for bumping this thread is that the attack has to be fatal and it has to be in the United States. I don’t list the mauled kids until they die.

So that’s the deal. These dogs have a high body count and it doesn’t seem to matter to their supporters. You can’t profess to “love dogs” when Diesel and Blue pick off a Pomeranian or a toy poodle every few months.


Wrong.....I blame attacks on humans. Why when a doberman attack you blame owners but when a "pir bull" attacks its solely the dog's fault?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#


Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.


If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.


Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently

I’m glad you’re coming around! Because there are more attacks, they’re just not widely reported. Simpler bites, though still violent and frequently unprovoked, don’t make the news. And the news doesn’t report on all the small animals and livestock that pit bulls still take down. Oh ever now and again someone will have footage of one of these hell dogs biting a horse, like on the streets in New York, or a pit bull going after a bison, but the actual numbers of animals they kill isn’t publicized.

And *my* personal rule for bumping this thread is that the attack has to be fatal and it has to be in the United States. I don’t list the mauled kids until they die.

So that’s the deal. These dogs have a high body count and it doesn’t seem to matter to their supporters. You can’t profess to “love dogs” when Diesel and Blue pick off a Pomeranian or a toy poodle every few months.


Wrong.....I blame attacks on humans. Why when a doberman attack you blame owners but when a "pir bull" attacks its solely the dog's fault?


The analogy to gun-nuts was on point. “Pit bulls don’t kill people, people kill people”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#


Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.


If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.


Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently

I’m glad you’re coming around! Because there are more attacks, they’re just not widely reported. Simpler bites, though still violent and frequently unprovoked, don’t make the news. And the news doesn’t report on all the small animals and livestock that pit bulls still take down. Oh ever now and again someone will have footage of one of these hell dogs biting a horse, like on the streets in New York, or a pit bull going after a bison, but the actual numbers of animals they kill isn’t publicized.

And *my* personal rule for bumping this thread is that the attack has to be fatal and it has to be in the United States. I don’t list the mauled kids until they die.

So that’s the deal. These dogs have a high body count and it doesn’t seem to matter to their supporters. You can’t profess to “love dogs” when Diesel and Blue pick off a Pomeranian or a toy poodle every few months.


Wrong.....I blame attacks on humans. Why when a doberman attack you blame owners but when a "pir bull" attacks its solely the dog's fault?


The analogy to gun-nuts was on point. “Pit bulls don’t kill people, people kill people”


Dogs just don't attack for no reason. Humans are the ones trainung them or mustreating them.

Again a grrman shepherd attacks and you say bad owner. And a pit bull attacka you say bad dog. How can borh be true?

Hint..it can not
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#


Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.


If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.


Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently

I’m glad you’re coming around! Because there are more attacks, they’re just not widely reported. Simpler bites, though still violent and frequently unprovoked, don’t make the news. And the news doesn’t report on all the small animals and livestock that pit bulls still take down. Oh ever now and again someone will have footage of one of these hell dogs biting a horse, like on the streets in New York, or a pit bull going after a bison, but the actual numbers of animals they kill isn’t publicized.

And *my* personal rule for bumping this thread is that the attack has to be fatal and it has to be in the United States. I don’t list the mauled kids until they die.

So that’s the deal. These dogs have a high body count and it doesn’t seem to matter to their supporters. You can’t profess to “love dogs” when Diesel and Blue pick off a Pomeranian or a toy poodle every few months.


Wrong.....I blame attacks on humans. Why when a doberman attack you blame owners but when a "pir bull" attacks its solely the dog's fault?


The analogy to gun-nuts was on point. “Pit bulls don’t kill people, people kill people”


Dogs just don't attack for no reason. Humans are the ones trainung them or mustreating them.

Again a grrman shepherd attacks and you say bad owner. And a pit bull attacka you say bad dog. How can borh be true?

Hint..it can not


That analogy makes no sense. Humans don't train guns and then guns just go around suddenly shooting humans. Humans have to be handling guns for them to shoot. Dogs are autonomous; they choose to attack or not. Training can affect that, sure, but it's still the dog itself that attacks. And some dogs DO attack for 'no reason' (and by no reason we mean 'no reason, we, as a human, comprehend' because the dog certainly has a reason).

You're also off base with thinking that all pit attacks are by mistreated dogs or dogs trained to attack specifically. Many of them are family owned dogs that just kill one day.

I personally, blame both the dog and the owner when a dog attacks. However, I also understand that a pit attack is going to almost always be worse.

For pit mixes, I think it depends on the head on the dog. Pit mixes that have lab or shepherd head and jaws I don't think are as dangerous as they won't have the same bite as a mix that has the typical pit jaw makeup.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#


Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.


If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.


Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently

I’m glad you’re coming around! Because there are more attacks, they’re just not widely reported. Simpler bites, though still violent and frequently unprovoked, don’t make the news. And the news doesn’t report on all the small animals and livestock that pit bulls still take down. Oh ever now and again someone will have footage of one of these hell dogs biting a horse, like on the streets in New York, or a pit bull going after a bison, but the actual numbers of animals they kill isn’t publicized.

And *my* personal rule for bumping this thread is that the attack has to be fatal and it has to be in the United States. I don’t list the mauled kids until they die.

So that’s the deal. These dogs have a high body count and it doesn’t seem to matter to their supporters. You can’t profess to “love dogs” when Diesel and Blue pick off a Pomeranian or a toy poodle every few months.


Wrong.....I blame attacks on humans. Why when a doberman attack you blame owners but when a "pir bull" attacks its solely the dog's fault?


The analogy to gun-nuts was on point. “Pit bulls don’t kill people, people kill people”


Dogs just don't attack for no reason. Humans are the ones trainung them or mustreating them.

Again a grrman shepherd attacks and you say bad owner. And a pit bull attacka you say bad dog. How can borh be true?

Hint..it can not

Pit bulls do attack for no reason, all the time. They’re not all mistreated. They were bred for violence.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#


Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.


If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.


Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently

I’m glad you’re coming around! Because there are more attacks, they’re just not widely reported. Simpler bites, though still violent and frequently unprovoked, don’t make the news. And the news doesn’t report on all the small animals and livestock that pit bulls still take down. Oh ever now and again someone will have footage of one of these hell dogs biting a horse, like on the streets in New York, or a pit bull going after a bison, but the actual numbers of animals they kill isn’t publicized.

And *my* personal rule for bumping this thread is that the attack has to be fatal and it has to be in the United States. I don’t list the mauled kids until they die.

So that’s the deal. These dogs have a high body count and it doesn’t seem to matter to their supporters. You can’t profess to “love dogs” when Diesel and Blue pick off a Pomeranian or a toy poodle every few months.


Wrong.....I blame attacks on humans. Why when a doberman attack you blame owners but when a "pir bull" attacks its solely the dog's fault?


DP. It doesn’t matter if it’s the dog or the owners. If it’s the dogs themselves then they don’t belong as pets in dense or suburban areas. If there is something about bad owners causing these dogs to maul others then these dogs shouldn’t be easy to own. Either way, it’s a problem. You’re just trying to do but what about [insert breed that attacks nowhere near as often as pits] because all you have are stupid sound bites and no logic.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#


Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.


If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.


Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently

I’m glad you’re coming around! Because there are more attacks, they’re just not widely reported. Simpler bites, though still violent and frequently unprovoked, don’t make the news. And the news doesn’t report on all the small animals and livestock that pit bulls still take down. Oh ever now and again someone will have footage of one of these hell dogs biting a horse, like on the streets in New York, or a pit bull going after a bison, but the actual numbers of animals they kill isn’t publicized.

And *my* personal rule for bumping this thread is that the attack has to be fatal and it has to be in the United States. I don’t list the mauled kids until they die.

So that’s the deal. These dogs have a high body count and it doesn’t seem to matter to their supporters. You can’t profess to “love dogs” when Diesel and Blue pick off a Pomeranian or a toy poodle every few months.



LOL! You're just making stuff up as you go along...

Nice try but nobody buys it.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:A horrible story. But "another" attack? This was in the UK. Do you go searching for these stories?

I have had pits. So have my parents and friends. Not one has bitten or attacked. But I have been bitten by a poodle on the face. I nearly escaped being mauled by a dalmation. And I've known at least 2 boxers who have bitten people.


So big whoop for you

Doesn’t negate the fact pits are dangerous and should not be near kids
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A horrible story. But "another" attack? This was in the UK. Do you go searching for these stories?

I have had pits. So have my parents and friends. Not one has bitten or attacked. But I have been bitten by a poodle on the face. I nearly escaped being mauled by a dalmation. And I've known at least 2 boxers who have bitten people.


So big whoop for you

Doesn’t negate the fact pits are dangerous and should not be near kids


You're koo-koo - There are literally millions of pits around kids everyday w/o any incidents at all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#


Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.


If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.


Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently

I’m glad you’re coming around! Because there are more attacks, they’re just not widely reported. Simpler bites, though still violent and frequently unprovoked, don’t make the news. And the news doesn’t report on all the small animals and livestock that pit bulls still take down. Oh ever now and again someone will have footage of one of these hell dogs biting a horse, like on the streets in New York, or a pit bull going after a bison, but the actual numbers of animals they kill isn’t publicized.

And *my* personal rule for bumping this thread is that the attack has to be fatal and it has to be in the United States. I don’t list the mauled kids until they die.

So that’s the deal. These dogs have a high body count and it doesn’t seem to matter to their supporters. You can’t profess to “love dogs” when Diesel and Blue pick off a Pomeranian or a toy poodle every few months.



LOL! You're just making stuff up as you go along...

Nice try but nobody buys it.


The PP quoted at 12:03 references being bitten by a Dalmatian and a poodle. Should we say that that person is “just making stuff up as they go along”? I guess we should. If it’s not recorded anywhere, then it’s made up. Obviously.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#


Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.


If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.


Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently

I’m glad you’re coming around! Because there are more attacks, they’re just not widely reported. Simpler bites, though still violent and frequently unprovoked, don’t make the news. And the news doesn’t report on all the small animals and livestock that pit bulls still take down. Oh ever now and again someone will have footage of one of these hell dogs biting a horse, like on the streets in New York, or a pit bull going after a bison, but the actual numbers of animals they kill isn’t publicized.

And *my* personal rule for bumping this thread is that the attack has to be fatal and it has to be in the United States. I don’t list the mauled kids until they die.

So that’s the deal. These dogs have a high body count and it doesn’t seem to matter to their supporters. You can’t profess to “love dogs” when Diesel and Blue pick off a Pomeranian or a toy poodle every few months.


Wrong.....I blame attacks on humans. Why when a doberman attack you blame owners but when a "pir bull" attacks its solely the dog's fault?


The analogy to gun-nuts was on point. “Pit bulls don’t kill people, people kill people”


Dogs just don't attack for no reason. Humans are the ones trainung them or mustreating them.

Again a grrman shepherd attacks and you say bad owner. And a pit bull attacka you say bad dog. How can borh be true?

Hint..it can not


That analogy makes no sense. Humans don't train guns and then guns just go around suddenly shooting humans. Humans have to be handling guns for them to shoot. Dogs are autonomous; they choose to attack or not. Training can affect that, sure, but it's still the dog itself that attacks. And some dogs DO attack for 'no reason' (and by no reason we mean 'no reason, we, as a human, comprehend' because the dog certainly has a reason).

You're also off base with thinking that all pit attacks are by mistreated dogs or dogs trained to attack specifically. Many of them are family owned dogs that just kill one day.

I personally, blame both the dog and the owner when a dog attacks. However, I also understand that a pit attack is going to almost always be worse.

For pit mixes, I think it depends on the head on the dog. Pit mixes that have lab or shepherd head and jaws I don't think are as dangerous as they won't have the same bite as a mix that has the typical pit jaw makeup.


You don't believe that dogs being starved beaten and chained in the backyard wouldn't be more inclined to attack? And i didnt bring uo the gun analogy. Guns arent alive. The way a human treats the dog is the way the dog will be...same way parents teach kids to be racists will be racists.

Lastly your point about the head is laughable. Please provide evidence of your "theory"
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:15 year old boy killed by two pit bulls in Raytown, MO. Attacked November 14, died November 17. https://www.kmbc.com/article/teenager-killed-by-dogs-in-raytown-missouri/45898608?fbclid=IwAR1EZWYS1kfNTj3vAAfLWDPuH5B-BlQ-kSMXpgLy2Y7S0_OEpiNfbGYBBR8_aem_AftesCyZFRJ6gaw6loMZLC8PXplK8Dl_3bAY3qbaL77ES-ChzY6MoE5HxpRPbx6gJAQ#


Bully breed is completely different from a "pit bull" which is different from an "XL Bully" or an "American Staffordshire".

If you can't even identify the breed, you shouldn't be trying to cause alarm. It's like calling a Bassett Hound a Beagle.

Another delusional apologist.


If you are going to accuse a dog of something at the very least you should know if it is an actual "pit bull"

Yes, and a “pit bull” is any of the freakish dogs, likely descended from the British bull and terrrier, bred for fighting in a pit. Hence the moniker “pit bull.” It includes the American Pit Bull Terrier, Staffies and bullies.

In case anyone is reading this and wondering what the heck this side argument about the breeds that just mauled another child to death, pit bull enthusiasts are kind of like gun nuts. If you’ve ever had a pointless argument with a gun nut who gets tightly wound about nomenclature, but doesn’t mind that their beloved AR-15s are used to rip children in half, it’s the same type of argument. And the pit bull enthusiasts are hoping that we’ll argue their dumb point and it will mean that another couple of pit bulls didn’t destroy another child’s life.

But they did. Because pit bulls were bred to kill; that is their job and what they want to do. If a pit bull wants to maim, it will.


Then why aren't there more attacks? As it has been mentioned before these dogs are no longer being bred to kill. In fact they were bred to gey along with humans and only kill bulls hence the name isn't pit humans!

Mixes are bred accidently

I’m glad you’re coming around! Because there are more attacks, they’re just not widely reported. Simpler bites, though still violent and frequently unprovoked, don’t make the news. And the news doesn’t report on all the small animals and livestock that pit bulls still take down. Oh ever now and again someone will have footage of one of these hell dogs biting a horse, like on the streets in New York, or a pit bull going after a bison, but the actual numbers of animals they kill isn’t publicized.

And *my* personal rule for bumping this thread is that the attack has to be fatal and it has to be in the United States. I don’t list the mauled kids until they die.

So that’s the deal. These dogs have a high body count and it doesn’t seem to matter to their supporters. You can’t profess to “love dogs” when Diesel and Blue pick off a Pomeranian or a toy poodle every few months.


Wrong.....I blame attacks on humans. Why when a doberman attack you blame owners but when a "pir bull" attacks its solely the dog's fault?


The analogy to gun-nuts was on point. “Pit bulls don’t kill people, people kill people”


Dogs just don't attack for no reason. Humans are the ones trainung them or mustreating them.

Again a grrman shepherd attacks and you say bad owner. And a pit bull attacka you say bad dog. How can borh be true?

Hint..it can not


That analogy makes no sense. Humans don't train guns and then guns just go around suddenly shooting humans. Humans have to be handling guns for them to shoot. Dogs are autonomous; they choose to attack or not. Training can affect that, sure, but it's still the dog itself that attacks. And some dogs DO attack for 'no reason' (and by no reason we mean 'no reason, we, as a human, comprehend' because the dog certainly has a reason).

You're also off base with thinking that all pit attacks are by mistreated dogs or dogs trained to attack specifically. Many of them are family owned dogs that just kill one day.

I personally, blame both the dog and the owner when a dog attacks. However, I also understand that a pit attack is going to almost always be worse.

For pit mixes, I think it depends on the head on the dog. Pit mixes that have lab or shepherd head and jaws I don't think are as dangerous as they won't have the same bite as a mix that has the typical pit jaw makeup.


You don't believe that dogs being starved beaten and chained in the backyard wouldn't be more inclined to attack? And i didnt bring uo the gun analogy. Guns arent alive. The way a human treats the dog is the way the dog will be...same way parents teach kids to be racists will be racists.

Lastly your point about the head is laughable. Please provide evidence of your "theory"


This is actually a really sick way of thinking about this. I'm not sure why it seems worse to blame the dogs or the breeds than the humans, but we have seen countless attacks by these dogs where they have been raised in loving homes, often from puppyhood, who have still snapped (See the TN family with the XL bullies who went about family annihilation or the rescue volunteer who went on a walk with her babies who ate her) These people are always online as big supporters of these dogs who would NEVER hurt a fly. Then they snap and you same supporters suggest it MUST be due to being "starved and beaten and chained in a yard?' You're the first to turn on each other but it is NEVER the dog! It's like a cult and it's antisocial towards humans and all other animals at this point to have that view. I worked in rescue for years, there are SO many wonderful people who are lovely owners who believe everything you proselytize and get their pit pups and end up paying for it. We get it though, these dogs over all other dogs, cats, etc. These dogs over other humans.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A horrible story. But "another" attack? This was in the UK. Do you go searching for these stories?

I have had pits. So have my parents and friends. Not one has bitten or attacked. But I have been bitten by a poodle on the face. I nearly escaped being mauled by a dalmation. And I've known at least 2 boxers who have bitten people.


So big whoop for you

Doesn’t negate the fact pits are dangerous and should not be near kids


You're koo-koo - There are literally millions of pits around kids everyday w/o any incidents at all.


Koo-koo?

Oh, honey. You are so dumb, it hurts.
Forum Index » Pets
Go to: