Barr and Durham

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Carter Page’s book is out. Turns out he met with FBI five times in March 2017. Kind of hard to claim it was just an oopsie after all.

Only liberals who refuse to admit this was a blatant attempt at preventing/overturning a presidency think it is only an oopsie.

2017=after Trump was inaugurated.

There was no preventing or overturning.

Clinesmith’s email was later in 2017, but pp is still making stupid assumptions because the FBI is not the Borg. Information is compartmentalized, and for very good reason.

Clinesmith spoke to Page’s attorney in March 2017.

What’s the source for that? I’m having trouble finding a reference through google.

DP.

I think this is what you are looking for.

Carter Page interview with Maria Bartiromo. He says “the next week” so maybe it was the first week of April. The FBI interviews were in March according to his book.

Which interview? He’s done a couple with her.

See Maria’s Twitter feed posted about 4 hours ago.

What’s the time stamp on it? I didn’t hear that in the interview, but maybe i got distracted and missed it.

So... no?

Oh, I thought you were just being a smart aleck. I can’t listen to it for you. I told you where to find it. Trust me or do it yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Carter Page’s book is out. Turns out he met with FBI five times in March 2017. Kind of hard to claim it was just an oopsie after all.

Only liberals who refuse to admit this was a blatant attempt at preventing/overturning a presidency think it is only an oopsie.

2017=after Trump was inaugurated.

There was no preventing or overturning.

Clinesmith’s email was later in 2017, but pp is still making stupid assumptions because the FBI is not the Borg. Information is compartmentalized, and for very good reason.

Clinesmith spoke to Page’s attorney in March 2017.

What’s the source for that? I’m having trouble finding a reference through google.

Carter Page interview with Maria Bartiromo. He says “the next week” so maybe it was the first week of April. The FBI interviews were in March according to his book.

Which interview? He’s done a couple with her.

See Maria’s Twitter feed posted about 4 hours ago.

What’s the time stamp on it? I didn’t hear that in the interview, but maybe i got distracted and missed it.

So... no?

Oh, I thought you were just being a smart aleck. I can’t listen to it for you. I told you where to find it. Trust me or do it yourself.

I did listen to it, and heard nothing to indicate that Clinesmith spoke to Page’s attorney in March 2017 (but perhaps the video I found edited it out or something). Since you’ve declined to verify your statement, I will assume you made it in error.

DP
Here....Start at about the 4:20 mark.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Carter Page’s book is out. Turns out he met with FBI five times in March 2017. Kind of hard to claim it was just an oopsie after all.

Only liberals who refuse to admit this was a blatant attempt at preventing/overturning a presidency think it is only an oopsie.

2017=after Trump was inaugurated.

There was no preventing or overturning.

Clinesmith’s email was later in 2017, but pp is still making stupid assumptions because the FBI is not the Borg. Information is compartmentalized, and for very good reason.

Clinesmith spoke to Page’s attorney in March 2017.

What’s the source for that? I’m having trouble finding a reference through google.

Carter Page interview with Maria Bartiromo. He says “the next week” so maybe it was the first week of April. The FBI interviews were in March according to his book.

Which interview? He’s done a couple with her.

See Maria’s Twitter feed posted about 4 hours ago.

What’s the time stamp on it? I didn’t hear that in the interview, but maybe i got distracted and missed it.

So... no?

Oh, I thought you were just being a smart aleck. I can’t listen to it for you. I told you where to find it. Trust me or do it yourself.

I did listen to it, and heard nothing to indicate that Clinesmith spoke to Page’s attorney in March 2017 (but perhaps the video I found edited it out or something). Since you’ve declined to verify your statement, I will assume you made it in error.

DP
Here....Start at about the 4:20 mark.

He didn’t actually specify the context of that conversation or what was said (nor was he a party to it). It’s interesting, though, that despite knowing about this purported conversation, Durham didn’t include it in Clinesmith’s plea agreement as evidence that Clinesmith knew Page was a source when he amended the email to say otherwise. Given that Durham is going for a sentencing enhancement, that would be significant. Overall, I’m going to maintain a healthy skepticism about Page’s claims here.

[Anonymous]

Ya, this Durham report is going to be on the up and up...

https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-news-john-durham-dannehy-resignation-20200911-20200911-xcsapnq7g5e63kvtw5aqi7cv34-story.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ya, this Durham report is going to be on the up and up...

https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-news-john-durham-dannehy-resignation-20200911-20200911-xcsapnq7g5e63kvtw5aqi7cv34-story.html

A top aide to JOHN DURHAM has quit "out of concern that the investigative team is being pressed for political reasons to produce a report before its work is done, colleagues said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ya, this Durham report is going to be on the up and up...

https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-news-john-durham-dannehy-resignation-20200911-20200911-xcsapnq7g5e63kvtw5aqi7cv34-story.html

A top aide to JOHN DURHAM has quit "out of concern that the investigative team is being pressed for political reasons to produce a report before its work is done, colleagues said.

If Nora Dannehy is blowing the whistle, then there is something truly BAD going on. Dannehy is the US Attorney who found no criminal wrongdoing in the firings of the US Attorneys during the Bush Administration.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

A top aide to JOHN DURHAM has quit "out of concern that the investigative team is being pressed for political reasons to produce a report before its work is done, colleagues said.

Funny. The Courant did not give a source for that statement. It said she had sent an email to staff, but did not say this.

[Anonymous]

Barr is desperate to invent some kind of October surprise. Hopefully Durham has more integrity than that. Either way, anything released before the election will be highly suspect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ya, this Durham report is going to be on the up and up...

https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-news-john-durham-dannehy-resignation-20200911-20200911-xcsapnq7g5e63kvtw5aqi7cv34-story.html

A top aide to JOHN DURHAM has quit "out of concern that the investigative team is being pressed for political reasons to produce a report before its work is done, colleagues said.

They are squeezing every corner of the system for a shred of hope. So many people have debased themselves, that if Trump goes down, they have no future in a GOP administration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ya, this Durham report is going to be on the up and up...

https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-news-john-durham-dannehy-resignation-20200911-20200911-xcsapnq7g5e63kvtw5aqi7cv34-story.html

A top aide to JOHN DURHAM has quit "out of concern that the investigative team is being pressed for political reasons to produce a report before its work is done, colleagues said.

You forgot “partly”. “Partly out of concern” is what it says. Who are these colleagues?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Great! We can count on Nora Dannehy being subpoenaed in the Obstruction of Justice and Abuse of Power trial of Billy Barr. I cannot wait.

[Anonymous]

Brennan will be next.

Things are heating up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Brennan will be next.

Things are heating up.

You’re clearly not following this and are weeks behind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brennan will be next.

Things are heating up.

You’re clearly not following this and are weeks behind.

This was said by Brennan and his spokesperson. Meaningless.