Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A running of list of celebs who liked one of their post-verdict posts:

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/kelseyweekman/johnny-depps-instagram-statement-liked-by-celebrities?d_id=3757244&ref=bffbbuzzfeed&utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bffbbuzzfeed&fbclid=IwAR1BXE-yjF0ny4mME9lDnA8fOSxOzN94mZct_ARdL9hn4KtjYOPFOZndTeI

What stood out for me is Gabby Douglas liking JD's post. She was part of the Me too wave against Larry Nassar. As a true victim of abuse, maybe she doesn't see the verdict as setting the clock back for women and doesn't want AH as their spokesperson?

Plenty of abuse victims have decided they are subject matter experts in how someone can present as an abuse victim and therefore disregard any experience that isn't their own. That list of celebrities man, there are some BIG disappointments in there for me.

Yes and there are also plenty of people who have insisted on believing AH because no women could possibly lie about being victim of abuse

I believe her because of the texts, the 7 medical professionals who were not allowed to testify that they saw injuries she reported, the video of him acting insane, the multiple people who did testify to seeing her injuries and his legal campaign against her.

Yes!!! Thank you!!!! How can anyone ignore his texts and his groveling drivel apologies about his “Monster” alias!??? Are people categorically ignoring that because there’s not enough room in their brain for two villains, or anything that paints JD in a real-life asshole light?

Evidence was excluded from both sides. Listen to the excluded audio from Australia. Amber cut his finger off and is yelling about it with witnesses. She's pacing in high heels when supposedly her feet are full of broken glass. Also Amber didn't turn over her devices and got away with it. Would have been good to have her texts and emails.

[Anonymous]

And Gal Gadot stopped following AH on Insta.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Johnny Depp is kind of hot...

Ew!

ew.. WAS kinda hot like 30 years ago. he is so gross now and I completely agree that he verbally abused her in response to her physical, emotional and verbal abuse so she's the worse one in a toxic stew. he's also closer b/c he broke up his longtime partner and went after a woman 20 years his jr, he was famous for being cool and that isn't cool its typical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am really appalled at the number of people who are ready to throw the book at JD over a proven liar’s accusations when the only evidence is a single facial bruise that literally could have come from anything. The moral of the story here is that if you are going to publicly accuse someone of something you have to have hard evidence of the accusation. I thought this was already a widely accepted fact.

Thank you. I agree.

It looked like she tried to get evidence by video and didn’t even succeed.

She apparently was so scared of him that her friends and family lived for free in JD’s apartments and she cuddled with Elon Musk and some Hollywood dude in the elevators of JD’s apartments. Give me a break.

She lied so much. It reminded me of my relative with borderline personality disorder. Their lies begin to contradict each other.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A running of list of celebs who liked one of their post-verdict posts:

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/kelseyweekman/johnny-depps-instagram-statement-liked-by-celebrities?d_id=3757244&ref=bffbbuzzfeed&utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bffbbuzzfeed&fbclid=IwAR1BXE-yjF0ny4mME9lDnA8fOSxOzN94mZct_ARdL9hn4KtjYOPFOZndTeI

What stood out for me is Gabby Douglas liking JD's post. She was part of the Me too wave against Larry Nassar. As a true victim of abuse, maybe she doesn't see the verdict as setting the clock back for women and doesn't want AH as their spokesperson?

Plenty of abuse victims have decided they are subject matter experts in how someone can present as an abuse victim and therefore disregard any experience that isn't their own. That list of celebrities man, there are some BIG disappointments in there for me.

Yes and there are also plenty of people who have insisted on believing AH because no women could possibly lie about being victim of abuse

I believe her because of the texts, the 7 medical professionals who were not allowed to testify that they saw injuries she reported, the video of him acting insane, the multiple people who did testify to seeing her injuries and his legal campaign against her.

NP. Lies. Are you a part of the new AH PR team. AH testified that she never sought medical treatment. No judge would disqualify every medical professional who treated AH and she alleged abuse. Not even the worse judge would prevent such testimony when the entire case is about abuse. Lies, lies, and more lies and you have people running with them and spreading them on SM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all of you who think the verdict was "wrong," do you not agree that the Jury was perhaps in the best position to weigh the evidence and the credibility of the parties? Do you not agree that the jurors were free to disbelieve AH after her credibility was impeached multiple times? Or do you think all of the jurors are biased, misogynistic Depp fans who are unable to recognize domestic violence or understand the law?

I disagree with how the jury evaluated the evidence. I also think there was a lot of evidence exclude (some on questionable grounds) that might had changed the outcome. There is a reason the UK court found that Depp abused Heard on multiple occasions.

That's not what the UK magistrate found.

Wasn’t that just one guy who has connections at The Sun, the newspaper in question?

The US case had a jury.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A running of list of celebs who liked one of their post-verdict posts:

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/kelseyweekman/johnny-depps-instagram-statement-liked-by-celebrities?d_id=3757244&ref=bffbbuzzfeed&utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bffbbuzzfeed&fbclid=IwAR1BXE-yjF0ny4mME9lDnA8fOSxOzN94mZct_ARdL9hn4KtjYOPFOZndTeI

What stood out for me is Gabby Douglas liking JD's post. She was part of the Me too wave against Larry Nassar. As a true victim of abuse, maybe she doesn't see the verdict as setting the clock back for women and doesn't want AH as their spokesperson?

Plenty of abuse victims have decided they are subject matter experts in how someone can present as an abuse victim and therefore disregard any experience that isn't their own. That list of celebrities man, there are some BIG disappointments in there for me.

Yes and there are also plenty of people who have insisted on believing AH because no women could possibly lie about being victim of abuse

I believe her because of the texts, the 7 medical professionals who were not allowed to testify that they saw injuries she reported, the video of him acting insane, the multiple people who did testify to seeing her injuries and his legal campaign against her.

That seems silly. Plenty of medical professionals testified. Maybe those 7 were quacks for all we know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add this to another awful thing about Va and NoVa. Racist, misogynist state that is a backward hell hole.

yes, bad luck for Amber Heard that the servers for WaPo are located in NoVa. What states do you think she would have won in?

DP. In California the lawsuit likely would have been thrown out on an early motion to dismiss because California has a strong anti-SLAPP statute. Virginia’s is a joke and can only be asserted as a defense, not as ground for dismissal, which is why JD filed suit here. His legal team knew it would never survive in California.

Actually VA is a tough state for plaintiffs California would have dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. VA had jurisdiction because of the WAPO angle.

On what grounds would it have been dismissed in California? They both lived in California when it was filed and many of the underlying events occurred in California. Hard to see how a California court couldn’t have exercised jurisdiction.

The case was about defamation that was written in the WAPO that was printed in Virginia, not California. VA had jurisdiction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was thinking that the AH supporters are MAGA - because they love to support an abuser, no matter gender, and better the underdog, for whatever effed up reasons from your childhood traumas.

Maga is misogynistic and supports Depp. Far right republicans are celebrating his “win.” I’m not sure anyone is supporting AH the way Depp’s loser fans support him. People simply recognize this is a bad verdict for victims.

It's a good verdict for male victims.

It’s not. This verdict will make all abuse victims less likely to come forward, including men (who already face stigma). All abuse victims fear being disbelieved and vilified, for good reason. This trial has been a perfect distillation of that. There are few perfect victims. Amber Heard certainly isn’t perfect, and look how she was destroyed. But Depp did abuse her— there were witnesses, and not just her friends. Depp himself confessed to it in his texts. The plane incident alone constitutes abuse. But because Heard is deeply flawed and guilty of many of her own transgressions, Depp has somehow been exonerated?

If you were a man who had been abused, why would you risk this happening to you?

amber heard's transgressions consist of her being abusive both physically and verbally in public in every romantic relationship she has ever been a part of. . that means she instigates abuse, she is the abuser. Anyone who says- I didn't hit you that hard, you are such a baby regardless of gender is being abusive. JD was abusive to her but that is b/c thats is how her relationships roll- there is abuse, she is the common denominator.

This verdict is terrible for abuse victims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched most of the trial. All I can say is that the jury saw Amber caught in a couple of rather large lies (sending photo to TMZ, not having her Kate Miss story right, strangely date stamped photos, among others). When a jury sees a person lie, they have no idea what is true and what is not. So they disbelieved all of it. I think they both enagaged in abuse. How much? How often? What kind? Hard to tell. But the jury found Amber to be not credible and that did her in. I did not expect her to lose all three statements, but she did it to herself.

As for the statement Johnny lost, evidence of the second call was blocked from them.

Why do you think the Kate Moss story was a lie? She could easily heard a rumor that Kate Moss was pushed down the stairs and believed it. You probably have rumors in your head now that you believe, that are actually incorrect.

if she had heard rumors that JOHNNY DEPP had pushed KATE MOSS down the stairs when she was little teen nobody amber heard why did she date Depp when she got a chance? Im a nobody and I certainly have consumed rumors about celebrities and no amount of hotness would induce me to get with them if I miraculously (like heard) got the opportunity. Everyone thinks JLo is just, who's gonna date James Franco?? Nooneeeeee b/c ben fleck is a drunken slob, and Franco is a creeper. If she believed that rumor from "being around in the 90s" as she said then why did she get involved with him??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add this to another awful thing about Va and NoVa. Racist, misogynist state that is a backward hell hole.

yes, bad luck for Amber Heard that the servers for WaPo are located in NoVa. What states do you think she would have won in?

DP. In California the lawsuit likely would have been thrown out on an early motion to dismiss because California has a strong anti-SLAPP statute. Virginia’s is a joke and can only be asserted as a defense, not as ground for dismissal, which is why JD filed suit here. His legal team knew it would never survive in California.

Actually VA is a tough state for plaintiffs California would have dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. VA had jurisdiction because of the WAPO angle.

On what grounds would it have been dismissed in California? They both lived in California when it was filed and many of the underlying events occurred in California. Hard to see how a California court couldn’t have exercised jurisdiction.

The case was about defamation that was written in the WAPO that was printed in Virginia, not California. VA had jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction int either/or; more than one court can have jurisdiction over a case. The only basis for jurisdiction in Virginia was that WaPo servers that hosted the online edition are housed in Virginia, which is a dubious basis to exercise jurisdiction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A running of list of celebs who liked one of their post-verdict posts:

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/kelseyweekman/johnny-depps-instagram-statement-liked-by-celebrities?d_id=3757244&ref=bffbbuzzfeed&utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bffbbuzzfeed&fbclid=IwAR1BXE-yjF0ny4mME9lDnA8fOSxOzN94mZct_ARdL9hn4KtjYOPFOZndTeI

What stood out for me is Gabby Douglas liking JD's post. She was part of the Me too wave against Larry Nassar. As a true victim of abuse, maybe she doesn't see the verdict as setting the clock back for women and doesn't want AH as their spokesperson?

Why does it have to be all or nothing? Why does Amber heard have to be a "spokesperson" for all domestic abuse victims? I don't understand some of you who think it has to be all or nothing. There WAS abuse. Clearly. It may not have been cut and dry man abuses the woman, but he did threaten her, he did get into physical altercations with her (and yes, so did she against him). Why are you in so much denial? She didn't make it ALL up, you psycho.

Calling someone you disagree with a psycho doesn't really help your case. lol. Her allegations may very well have some truth but she was caught lying under oath many times. That fact alone should disqualify her from being a representative for any cause.

I disagree. And what cause? Loreal? Speaking out against powerful famous men who are dysfunctional and vengeful?

Abuse victims? Speaking out against powerful men who are dysfunctional and vengeful is a fine and dandy cause. The problem is her credibility has been shot for lying on the stand. I don't think any cause would want a liar as their representative.

What about all of *his* lies, which you and many others seem to conveniently overlook? Your double standard is ridiculous.

Well, he has never claimed to be a spokesperson for abuse victims, hasn't he?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The ACLU gets a black eye here, too. If your lawyers are ghost writing an op-Ed that results in a multi-million dollar judgment, that is less than ideal legal work.

I hope JD goes after them next. The ACLU has lost its way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A running of list of celebs who liked one of their post-verdict posts:

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/kelseyweekman/johnny-depps-instagram-statement-liked-by-celebrities?d_id=3757244&ref=bffbbuzzfeed&utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bffbbuzzfeed&fbclid=IwAR1BXE-yjF0ny4mME9lDnA8fOSxOzN94mZct_ARdL9hn4KtjYOPFOZndTeI

What stood out for me is Gabby Douglas liking JD's post. She was part of the Me too wave against Larry Nassar. As a true victim of abuse, maybe she doesn't see the verdict as setting the clock back for women and doesn't want AH as their spokesperson?

Why does it have to be all or nothing? Why does Amber heard have to be a "spokesperson" for all domestic abuse victims? I don't understand some of you who think it has to be all or nothing. There WAS abuse. Clearly. It may not have been cut and dry man abuses the woman, but he did threaten her, he did get into physical altercations with her (and yes, so did she against him). Why are you in so much denial? She didn't make it ALL up, you psycho.

Because she made[/i] herself[i] the spokesperson for domestic violence victims. That was the entire point of the OpEd. She painted it as one-sided abuse, with herself as the sole victim. In "traditional" DV, one person has power and control over another and uses that power and control to abuse/control the victim. That's not what seems to have happened here. You have two toxic people being violent and threatening each other. That's not "domestic violence." That's an effed up relationship that needed to end. But DV, by definition, is one sided. And she planted herself on the victim side very publicly and he showed....not so fast.

I disagree. You assumed she made herself out to be a defenseless victim. She said she was standing up and speaking out. Not defenseless victim.

[Anonymous]

#amberturd is trending