Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Macy's didn't waste time putting up Johnny's commercial for Sauvage (cologne) back up. I saw it this morning, it was originally shot in 2016 (?), but was pulled for awhile.

That's hot

This was the ad that Amber pretty told him he is a loser and she don’t know why Dior would want him to be the face of the cologne?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He didn’t need to pursue this trial to “get his life back” or whatever that means. The verdict is wrong regardless of whether she lied. He’s vindictive and should not work in major films again.

He should work in any major film as pong as people want to cast him and watch him. Luckily, you don’t have any saying.

Either do you. Considering Disney released him from pirates without knowledge of the op-ed, major studios are not interested in an alcoholic, drug addicted man. Add on his abusive behavior and they are right to steer clear.

He'll be back in movies. He's very much in demand now. He's riding a popularity wave.

Maybe right wing propaganda movies

Right wing propaganda? Have you heard him speak about politics?

I’m aware of his politics but his fans are magats. Plenty of posters here are regurgitating talking points created by right wing shows celebrating and promoting backlash against #metoo.

You with that was true, but it ain't

Too bad about your horrible grammar. What are you even saying? Do you know?

Just laughing at your poor reasoning: "his fans are magats".

Not my quite you’re referring to. … Reading comprehension also a challenge?

“Not my quite” and you’re judging OTHER people? Get over yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shambolic jury decision
1. Male dominated jury obviously biased
2. They find both were abusive and defamatory and yet award him more than five times as much in damages
3. The jury did not consider all the evidence carefully as reached decision way too quickly
4. JD said he brought trial because AH ruined his career - Disney testified he did that all by himself through beinf late, drunk, high, unprofessional and ill
Prepared for lines.
5. Tons of evidence he was also an abuser, drunk and drug addict and his texts contained violent vulgar and creepy threats against her and yet social media exclusively focussed on her bad behavior.

We need to advise our children and youth to not get their news from social media but from credible news sources with editors and fact checkers.

Also this dude is old enough to be a grandfather and was a dating a woman half his age but has never accepted responsibility for his share of wrong doing. Not healthy at all.

That woman dated a man twice her age, far more famous with a larger net worth. Why?

In what other context do we presume that the substantially younger, less experienced, less powerful and lesser resourced person must be the perpetrator and the older, more powerful, better resourced and more influential person must the victim?

Clearly we need to re-evaluate who can be a victim, and who can be an abuser.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:During the trial, Amber rented a 13,000 sq ft mansion on an acre in Virginia, $22,500/month

https://www.cinemablend.com/movies/wait-the-house-amber-heard-rented-during-the-johnny-depp-trial-cost-how-much-a-month

Guess she's not as broke as she claims.

Good. She can move to a cheap apartment and have more money to pay him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:During the trial, Amber rented a 13,000 sq ft mansion on an acre in Virginia, $22,500/month

https://www.cinemablend.com/movies/wait-the-house-amber-heard-rented-during-the-johnny-depp-trial-cost-how-much-a-month

That seems like it would be cheaper than renting a hotel.

Especially when you consider the cost of accommodations for a security team in addition to Heard herself. If the story is correct (which is u likely since TMZ took it off its site), she probably spent less on trial accommodations than Depp did.

Nobody needs a 13k sq ft rental especially if they are teetering on being insolvent. She didn't seem to have much security and looked like she was relying on the court bailiffs to escort her in and out. When she left she looked like she had a driver in a black pickup truck that she got into with her sister.

Listen, I’m not her fan, at all, but regardless renting was cheaper then a hotel.

If only there were rental options that weren’t 13,000 sq feet and $22,500 a month. Oh wait! There were.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Shambolic jury decision
1. Male dominated jury obviously biased
2. They find both were abusive and defamatory and yet award him more than five times as much in damages
3. The jury did not consider all the evidence carefully as reached decision way too quickly
4. JD said he brought trial because AH ruined his career - Disney testified he did that all by himself through beinf late, drunk, high, unprofessional and ill
Prepared for lines.
5. Tons of evidence he was also an abuser, drunk and drug addict and his texts contained violent vulgar and creepy threats against her and yet social media exclusively focussed on her bad behavior.

Yawwwwwnnnnn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:During the trial, Amber rented a 13,000 sq ft mansion on an acre in Virginia, $22,500/month

https://www.cinemablend.com/movies/wait-the-house-amber-heard-rented-during-the-johnny-depp-trial-cost-how-much-a-month

That seems like it would be cheaper than renting a hotel.

Especially when you consider the cost of accommodations for a security team in addition to Heard herself. If the story is correct (which is u likely since TMZ took it off its site), she probably spent less on trial accommodations than Depp did.

Nobody needs a 13k sq ft rental especially if they are teetering on being insolvent. She didn't seem to have much security and looked like she was relying on the court bailiffs to escort her in and out. When she left she looked like she had a driver in a black pickup truck that she got into with her sister.

The misogyny runs deep.

The only misogynist is Heard. She make a mockery of female victims.

Worse, she sought to exploit a movement for her own selfish purposes.

+1000

+2000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shambolic jury decision
1. Male dominated jury obviously biased
2. They find both were abusive and defamatory and yet award him more than five times as much in damages
3. The jury did not consider all the evidence carefully as reached decision way too quickly
4. JD said he brought trial because AH ruined his career - Disney testified he did that all by himself through beinf late, drunk, high, unprofessional and ill
Prepared for lines.
5. Tons of evidence he was also an abuser, drunk and drug addict and his texts contained violent vulgar and creepy threats against her and yet social media exclusively focussed on her bad behavior.

Yawwwwwnnnnn.

Exactly lol! I don't agree with any of this post, but bored of explaining what I heard and witnessed in 6 weeks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:During the trial, Amber rented a 13,000 sq ft mansion on an acre in Virginia, $22,500/month

https://www.cinemablend.com/movies/wait-the-house-amber-heard-rented-during-the-johnny-depp-trial-cost-how-much-a-month

That seems like it would be cheaper than renting a hotel.

Especially when you consider the cost of accommodations for a security team in addition to Heard herself. If the story is correct (which is u likely since TMZ took it off its site), she probably spent less on trial accommodations than Depp did.

Nobody needs a 13k sq ft rental especially if they are teetering on being insolvent. She didn't seem to have much security and looked like she was relying on the court bailiffs to escort her in and out. When she left she looked like she had a driver in a black pickup truck that she got into with her sister.

Listen, I’m not her fan, at all, but regardless renting was cheaper then a hotel.

If only there were rental options that weren’t 13,000 sq feet and $22,500 a month. Oh wait! There were.

The JD psycho fangirls would have loved the easy access to stare into her windows and terrorize her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:During the trial, Amber rented a 13,000 sq ft mansion on an acre in Virginia, $22,500/month

https://www.cinemablend.com/movies/wait-the-house-amber-heard-rented-during-the-johnny-depp-trial-cost-how-much-a-month

That seems like it would be cheaper than renting a hotel.

Especially when you consider the cost of accommodations for a security team in addition to Heard herself. If the story is correct (which is u likely since TMZ took it off its site), she probably spent less on trial accommodations than Depp did.

Nobody needs a 13k sq ft rental especially if they are teetering on being insolvent. She didn't seem to have much security and looked like she was relying on the court bailiffs to escort her in and out. When she left she looked like she had a driver in a black pickup truck that she got into with her sister.

Listen, I’m not her fan, at all, but regardless renting was cheaper then a hotel.

If only there were rental options that weren’t 13,000 sq feet and $22,500 a month. Oh wait! There were.

The JD psycho fangirls would have loved the easy access to stare into her windows and terrorize her.

I’m bored with this idea of “psycho” fan girls. More misogyny. Who shot a President to impress an actress? That would be a man. Who are most celebrity stalkers? Men again. Psycho men, I guess.

[Anonymous]

Both cases should have been thrown out.

JD is am extremely immature and narcissistic old man. He has accepted no responsibility for the fact that he destroyed his own career through being routinely late, drunk, and high. He has made many vulgar and violent threats against AH.

AH also a train wreck and behaved badly.

However social media had 250 posts to support JD for every one for AH. The trial by social media was not a fair match.

It is so sad that this trial was public and that the jury was so biased in weighing evidence. Was not surprised to read the court stenographer reported that several jurors slept throughout much of the trial.

Any jury trials involving domestic violence should be required to have at least half female jurors and that they stay fully awake.

[Anonymous]

For those who believe the jury got it wrong, do you not believe in the US justice system? What would you change?

[Anonymous]

I knew as soon as I read this case was going to trial in Virginia that he would win. It's obvious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Both cases should have been thrown out.

JD is am extremely immature and narcissistic old man. He has accepted no responsibility for the fact that he destroyed his own career through being routinely late, drunk, and high. He has made many vulgar and violent threats against AH.

AH also a train wreck and behaved badly.

However social media had 250 posts to support JD for every one for AH. The trial by social media was not a fair match.

It is so sad that this trial was public and that the jury was so biased in weighing evidence. Was not surprised to read the court stenographer reported that several jurors slept throughout much of the trial.

Any jury trials involving domestic violence should be required to have at least half female jurors and that they stay fully awake.

How could a juror be allowed to go to sleep?? Mistrial!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For those who believe the jury got it wrong, do you not believe in the US justice system? What would you change?

Everything. How can we believe in a justice system that denies us the right to abortion? Tl out rights? That vilifies a woman and is a misogynist? He used the old, she is a crazy, hysterical woman defense and it worked in 2022!
All I got from this is that men can still and do still get away with abusing women, calling us crazy, hysterical, talk about the yellow wallpaper. The fact that this trial even happened is an appalling lack of justice system. Notice that a judge in England did not put up with his BS?
This was a witch trial, no doubt about it. I would like to have a justice system that is not a witch trial