Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A running of list of celebs who liked one of their post-verdict posts:

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/kelseyweekman/johnny-depps-instagram-statement-liked-by-celebrities?d_id=3757244&ref=bffbbuzzfeed&utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bffbbuzzfeed&fbclid=IwAR1BXE-yjF0ny4mME9lDnA8fOSxOzN94mZct_ARdL9hn4KtjYOPFOZndTeI

What stood out for me is Gabby Douglas liking JD's post. She was part of the Me too wave against Larry Nassar. As a true victim of abuse, maybe she doesn't see the verdict as setting the clock back for women and doesn't want AH as their spokesperson?

Why does it have to be all or nothing? Why does Amber heard have to be a "spokesperson" for all domestic abuse victims? I don't understand some of you who think it has to be all or nothing. There WAS abuse. Clearly. It may not have been cut and dry man abuses the woman, but he did threaten her, he did get into physical altercations with her (and yes, so did she against him). Why are you in so much denial? She didn't make it ALL up, you psycho.

Calling someone you disagree with a psycho doesn't really help your case. lol. Her allegations may very well have some truth but she was caught lying under oath many times. That fact alone should disqualify her from being a representative for any cause.

I disagree. And what cause? Loreal? Speaking out against powerful famous men who are dysfunctional and vengeful?

Abuse victims? Speaking out against powerful men who are dysfunctional and vengeful is a fine and dandy cause. The problem is her credibility has been shot for lying on the stand. I don't think any cause would want a liar as their representative.

What about all of *his* lies, which you and many others seem to conveniently overlook? Your double standard is ridiculous.

Well, he has never claimed to be a spokesperson for abuse victims, hasn't he?

He is now the de facto celebrity spokesperson for male “abuse” victims, or something to that effect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched most of the trial. All I can say is that the jury saw Amber caught in a couple of rather large lies (sending photo to TMZ, not having her Kate Miss story right, strangely date stamped photos, among others). When a jury sees a person lie, they have no idea what is true and what is not. So they disbelieved all of it. I think they both enagaged in abuse. How much? How often? What kind? Hard to tell. But the jury found Amber to be not credible and that did her in. I did not expect her to lose all three statements, but she did it to herself.

As for the statement Johnny lost, evidence of the second call was blocked from them.

Why do you think the Kate Moss story was a lie? She could easily heard a rumor that Kate Moss was pushed down the stairs and believed it. You probably have rumors in your head now that you believe, that are actually incorrect.

if she had heard rumors that JOHNNY DEPP had pushed KATE MOSS down the stairs when she was little teen nobody amber heard why did she date Depp when she got a chance? Im a nobody and I certainly have consumed rumors about celebrities and no amount of hotness would induce me to get with them if I miraculously (like heard) got the opportunity. Everyone thinks JLo is just, who's gonna date James Franco?? Nooneeeeee b/c ben fleck is a drunken slob, and Franco is a creeper. If she believed that rumor from "being around in the 90s" as she said then why did she get involved with him??

Because she wanted to date a super famous actor. She might still in that moment believed he was about to push his sister down the stairs. How is that to conceive of?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A running of list of celebs who liked one of their post-verdict posts:

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/kelseyweekman/johnny-depps-instagram-statement-liked-by-celebrities?d_id=3757244&ref=bffbbuzzfeed&utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bffbbuzzfeed&fbclid=IwAR1BXE-yjF0ny4mME9lDnA8fOSxOzN94mZct_ARdL9hn4KtjYOPFOZndTeI

What stood out for me is Gabby Douglas liking JD's post. She was part of the Me too wave against Larry Nassar. As a true victim of abuse, maybe she doesn't see the verdict as setting the clock back for women and doesn't want AH as their spokesperson?

Why does it have to be all or nothing? Why does Amber heard have to be a "spokesperson" for all domestic abuse victims? I don't understand some of you who think it has to be all or nothing. There WAS abuse. Clearly. It may not have been cut and dry man abuses the woman, but he did threaten her, he did get into physical altercations with her (and yes, so did she against him). Why are you in so much denial? She didn't make it ALL up, you psycho.

Calling someone you disagree with a psycho doesn't really help your case. lol. Her allegations may very well have some truth but she was caught lying under oath many times. That fact alone should disqualify her from being a representative for any cause.

I disagree. And what cause? Loreal? Speaking out against powerful famous men who are dysfunctional and vengeful?

Abuse victims? Speaking out against powerful men who are dysfunctional and vengeful is a fine and dandy cause. The problem is her credibility has been shot for lying on the stand. I don't think any cause would want a liar as their representative.

What about all of *his* lies, which you and many others seem to conveniently overlook? Your double standard is ridiculous.

Well, he has never claimed to be a spokesperson for abuse victims, hasn't he?

He is now the de facto celebrity spokesperson for male “abuse” victims, or something to that effect.

Unlike AH (in her Op ed she wrote: "Then two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse..." and the WaPo described her : "Amber Heard is an actress and ambassador on women’s rights at the American Civil Liberties Union"), JD has never claimed to be a spokesperson for male abuse victims. Whether you or the world see him as a spokesperson is irrelevant. And for the record, I don't think he should be a spokesperson for any cause either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And Gal Gadot stopped following AH on Insta.

And yuck.
What a spineless twOt. No sisterhood. There isn’t a sisterhood. If you are abused by your partner you albetter be prepared for a lonely road. Feel deeply for Amber.

[Anonymous]

It’s remarkable - and also deeply depressing - how many activists, attorneys, and leaders in the space of human rights, domestic violence, and women’s rights have come out in support of Amber Heard and have strongly condemned this verdict.

I don’t give a sh*t who Jason Mamoa or Bella Hadid “likes”. The fact that people knowledgeable about domestic violence are speaking out in the wake of this verdict speaks volumes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And Gal Gadot stopped following AH on Insta.

And yuck.
What a spineless twOt. No sisterhood. There isn’t a sisterhood. If you are abused by your partner you albetter be prepared for a lonely road. Feel deeply for Amber.

What about brothers, only sisters?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s remarkable - and also deeply depressing - how many activists, attorneys, and leaders in the space of human rights, domestic violence, and women’s rights have come out in support of Amber Heard and have strongly condemned this verdict.

I don’t give a sh*t who Jason Mamoa or Bella Hadid “likes”. The fact that people knowledgeable about domestic violence are speaking out in the wake of this verdict speaks volumes.

Besides people who live and grift on twitter who came out for her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s remarkable - and also deeply depressing - how many activists, attorneys, and leaders in the space of human rights, domestic violence, and women’s rights have come out in support of Amber Heard and have strongly condemned this verdict.

I don’t give a sh*t who Jason Mamoa or Bella Hadid “likes”. The fact that people knowledgeable about domestic violence are speaking out in the wake of this verdict speaks volumes.

Agreed. The celebrity coven is about power and status, of course they're closing ranks and siding with him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ACLU gets a black eye here, too. If your lawyers are ghost writing an op-Ed that results in a multi-million dollar judgment, that is less than ideal legal work.

I hope JD goes after them next. The ACLU has lost its way.

ACLU is suing him for 86k claiming it’s what it cost them to prepare paperwork evidence for the trial. Hope they never get it.

[Anonymous]

For the AH fans who claimed Johnny will never be in a blockbuster again or whatever -- Wall Street Journal reports his Dior cologne is selling out. His star power is through the roof; a blockbuster comeback is imminent.

https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/1532520000245882880

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For the AH fans who claimed Johnny will never be in a blockbuster again or whatever -- Wall Street Journal reports his Dior cologne is selling out. His star power is through the roof; a blockbuster comeback is imminent.

https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/1532520000245882880

[Anonymous]

Really amazed that people assume Johnny was the first one who laid a hand and therefore Amber must have lived the relationship in self-defense instead of the other way around—especially when she has the proven history of DV and was recorded many times admitting to instigating fights. Mind boggling, really.

[Anonymous]

French person here. France is notoriously patriarchal and objectifies women. Dior has no incentive to drop Johnny Depp from a perfume literally called Wild! It suits him down to the ground.

Also, I couldn't care less who won that trial. They're both rather scummy. Depp has been perfectly understood and perfectly cast multiple times in Hollywood. He's a great pirate - no morals. Hollywood does not sell ethics. It sells dreams, and often dreams are not about good people... just about entertaining people.

[Anonymous]

JD's going to play King Louis, fliming in France this year.

[Anonymous]

I love how Dior stood behind JD and refused to give in to cancel culture nonsense.