Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan definitely looks ordinary in those pictures.

Yes, she does. Not very duchess-like.

What is she doing in Canada? She's an American married to a Brit. She should decide, stay or go. America or England.

Yes, because who is she to make decisions about her own life? /s

Right? And who cares about international law, visas, work permits and all that? /s/s

The Duchess of Success doesn't care about that stuff. La di da.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Archie isn't important to the line of succession, but he is important to the Palace. Archie, like Meghan and Kate and Harry and Will and Will's children, are imminently marketable. They are pretty and/or cute and very useful for keeping a charming face on the monarchy. The courtiers who run the palace are perfectly willing to prevent Archie from leaving the UK if they thought it was best for the palace.

Archie is no more important than the Yorklets.

Right and the Queen thought that they are important enough to warrant a splashy royal wedding.

What's your point? They are still royal. Nothing to do with custody and not raising a child in the UK.

The point is that even the distant York’s were important enough to the queen to warrant extravagant weddings. Archie (and his parents) is a thousand times more important.

You’re the one arguing he’s irrelevant. Everyone else sees the reality that he’s very important to the queen and the royal family. Especially right now.

Lol why is Archie a thousand times more important?

For starters his father is the most popular of the royal family. More popular than the queen, more popular than the future king, and the second in line for the throne. That’s why he’s more important to the palace than the York’s.

Secondly, he’s more important in terms of succession. He’s further up on the succession chain than the York’s.

Have you lost your marbles? Archie now takes a backseat to William’s children and grandchildren.

Oh honey...

(William and Kate’s kids are NOT Yorks. Stop now before you embarrass yourself further.)

Who cares about the Yorks or Archie? They’re nowhere near the line of succession, so why are you getting so wound up?

I love the cognitive dissonance!

You are commenting repeatedly on a thread about Archie and his parents. You’re reading news articles about what Meghan is doing. All the while claiming that “NO ONE” cares!

lol Why don’t you go search for some new polls or more news coverage? Maybe you’ll find some brand new pictures of Meghan and you can come back and rant some more about how “Nobody cares about these people!” Then you can post on one of the biggest most active threads in DCUM history, you know - because “NO ONE CARES!” Especially not you, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Archie isn't important to the line of succession, but he is important to the Palace. Archie, like Meghan and Kate and Harry and Will and Will's children, are imminently marketable. They are pretty and/or cute and very useful for keeping a charming face on the monarchy. The courtiers who run the palace are perfectly willing to prevent Archie from leaving the UK if they thought it was best for the palace.

Archie is no more important than the Yorklets.

Right and the Queen thought that they are important enough to warrant a splashy royal wedding.

What's your point? They are still royal. Nothing to do with custody and not raising a child in the UK.

The point is that even the distant York’s were important enough to the queen to warrant extravagant weddings. Archie (and his parents) is a thousand times more important.

You’re the one arguing he’s irrelevant. Everyone else sees the reality that he’s very important to the queen and the royal family. Especially right now.

Lol why is Archie a thousand times more important?

For starters his father is the most popular of the royal family. More popular than the queen, more popular than the future king, and the second in line for the throne. That’s why he’s more important to the palace than the York’s.

Secondly, he’s more important in terms of succession. He’s further up on the succession chain than the York’s.

Have you lost your marbles? Archie now takes a backseat to William’s children and grandchildren.

Oh honey...

(William and Kate’s kids are NOT Yorks. Stop now before you embarrass yourself further.)

Who cares about the Yorks or Archie? They’re nowhere near the line of succession, so why are you getting so wound up?

I love the cognitive dissonance!

You are commenting repeatedly on a thread about Archie and his parents. You’re reading news articles about what Meghan is doing. All the while claiming that “NO ONE” cares!

lol Why don’t you go search for some new polls or more news coverage? Maybe you’ll find some brand new pictures of Meghan and you can come back and rant some more about how “Nobody cares about these people!” Then you can post on one of the biggest most active threads in DCUM history, you know - because “NO ONE CARES!” Especially not you, right?

You sound off your rocker, to put it mildly.

[Anonymous]

I don't care much about Archie. Harry and Meghan are fascinating in their cake having and cake eating. That's what this entire thread is about. Whether they can. Whether they should.

[Anonymous]

They will get their cake and eat it too. What’s the BRF going to do to prevent it without looking petty?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't care much about Archie. Harry and Meghan are fascinating in their cake having and cake eating. That's what this entire thread is about. Whether they can. Whether they should.

Agreed. I’m really curious to see how this plays out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They will get their cake and eat it too. What’s the BRF going to do to prevent it without looking petty?

They’ll call in the lawyers and slow the process down to a glacial pace. By the time they work through the copyright issues alone, the bloom will be long off the rose and H and M will be pretty much forgotten.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wonder, is there a length limit to DCUM quotes? What's the longest quoted post in the history of this this site?

Haven't you noticed that at some point the quotes just absorb any other posts added to it? It's one giant blue blob of people trying to be heard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Archie isn't important to the line of succession, but he is important to the Palace. Archie, like Meghan and Kate and Harry and Will and Will's children, are imminently marketable. They are pretty and/or cute and very useful for keeping a charming face on the monarchy. The courtiers who run the palace are perfectly willing to prevent Archie from leaving the UK if they thought it was best for the palace.

Archie is no more important than the Yorklets.

Right and the Queen thought that they are important enough to warrant a splashy royal wedding.

What's your point? They are still royal. Nothing to do with custody and not raising a child in the UK.

The point is that even the distant York’s were important enough to the queen to warrant extravagant weddings. Archie (and his parents) is a thousand times more important.

You’re the one arguing he’s irrelevant. Everyone else sees the reality that he’s very important to the queen and the royal family. Especially right now.

Lol why is Archie a thousand times more important?

For starters his father is the most popular of the royal family. More popular than the queen, more popular than the future king, and the second in line for the throne. That’s why he’s more important to the palace than the York’s.

Secondly, he’s more important in terms of succession. He’s further up on the succession chain than the York’s.

Have you lost your marbles? Archie now takes a backseat to William’s children and grandchildren.

Oh honey...

(William and Kate’s kids are NOT Yorks. Stop now before you embarrass yourself further.)

Who cares about the Yorks or Archie? They’re nowhere near the line of succession, so why are you getting so wound up?

I love the cognitive dissonance!

You are commenting repeatedly on a thread about Archie and his parents. You’re reading news articles about what Meghan is doing. All the while claiming that “NO ONE” cares!

lol Why don’t you go search for some new polls or more news coverage? Maybe you’ll find some brand new pictures of Meghan and you can come back and rant some more about how “Nobody cares about these people!” Then you can post on one of the biggest most active threads in DCUM history, you know - because “NO ONE CARES!” Especially not you, right?

You sound off your rocker, to put it mildly.

lol Tell us again how much you “don’t care”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They will get their cake and eat it too. What’s the BRF going to do to prevent it without looking petty?

They’ll call in the lawyers and slow the process down to a glacial pace. By the time they work through the copyright issues alone, the bloom will be long off the rose and H and M will be pretty much forgotten.

This is how I see it happening too. Harry and Meghan will still be miserable. I feel a bit sorry for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't care much about Archie. Harry and Meghan are fascinating in their cake having and cake eating. That's what this entire thread is about. Whether they can. Whether they should.

Agreed. I’m really curious to see how this plays out.

I'd say its already played out. When Harry had the pull to have the Queen cancel her weekend plans and get in a room for 2.5 hours with him, the Prince of Wales, and the heir presumptive I'd say he won.

And everyone knows it - courtiers and royals alike.



Besides they protected Andrew's pedo bum for 15 years and never once stripped him of anything. They can't touch Harry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Archie isn't important to the line of succession, but he is important to the Palace. Archie, like Meghan and Kate and Harry and Will and Will's children, are imminently marketable. They are pretty and/or cute and very useful for keeping a charming face on the monarchy. The courtiers who run the palace are perfectly willing to prevent Archie from leaving the UK if they thought it was best for the palace.

Archie is no more important than the Yorklets.

Right and the Queen thought that they are important enough to warrant a splashy royal wedding.

What's your point? They are still royal. Nothing to do with custody and not raising a child in the UK.

The point is that even the distant York’s were important enough to the queen to warrant extravagant weddings. Archie (and his parents) is a thousand times more important.

You’re the one arguing he’s irrelevant. Everyone else sees the reality that he’s very important to the queen and the royal family. Especially right now.

Lol why is Archie a thousand times more important?

For starters his father is the most popular of the royal family. More popular than the queen, more popular than the future king, and the second in line for the throne. That’s why he’s more important to the palace than the York’s.

Secondly, he’s more important in terms of succession. He’s further up on the succession chain than the York’s.

Have you lost your marbles? Archie now takes a backseat to William’s children and grandchildren.

Oh honey...

(William and Kate’s kids are NOT Yorks. Stop now before you embarrass yourself further.)

Who cares about the Yorks or Archie? They’re nowhere near the line of succession, so why are you getting so wound up?

I love the cognitive dissonance!

You are commenting repeatedly on a thread about Archie and his parents. You’re reading news articles about what Meghan is doing. All the while claiming that “NO ONE” cares!

lol Why don’t you go search for some new polls or more news coverage? Maybe you’ll find some brand new pictures of Meghan and you can come back and rant some more about how “Nobody cares about these people!” Then you can post on one of the biggest most active threads in DCUM history, you know - because “NO ONE CARES!” Especially not you, right?

You sound off your rocker, to put it mildly.

lol Tell us again how much you “don’t care”

I hope you get the help you need. On the other hand, it’s amusing seeing crazies like you in action.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They will get their cake and eat it too. What’s the BRF going to do to prevent it without looking petty?

They’ll call in the lawyers and slow the process down to a glacial pace. By the time they work through the copyright issues alone, the bloom will be long off the rose and H and M will be pretty much forgotten.

Why would they be vindictive, though? It’s not like Diana’s situation where there was so much bad blood on all sides. By all accounts Harry is beloved by his dad and grandmother.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't care much about Archie. Harry and Meghan are fascinating in their cake having and cake eating. That's what this entire thread is about. Whether they can. Whether they should.

Agreed. I’m really curious to see how this plays out.

I'd say its already played out. When Harry had the pull to have the Queen cancel her weekend plans and get in a room for 2.5 hours with him, the Prince of Wales, and the heir presumptive I'd say he won.

And everyone knows it - courtiers and royals alike.



Besides they protected Andrew's pedo bum for 15 years and never once stripped him of anything. They can't touch Harry.

You are probably the same idiot who was guaranteeing Meghan was pregnant with twins about a year ago. Your crystal ball seems to be defective. You know nothing about what the future holds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't care much about Archie. Harry and Meghan are fascinating in their cake having and cake eating. That's what this entire thread is about. Whether they can. Whether they should.

Agreed. I’m really curious to see how this plays out.

I'd say its already played out. When Harry had the pull to have the Queen cancel her weekend plans and get in a room for 2.5 hours with him, the Prince of Wales, and the heir presumptive I'd say he won.

And everyone knows it - courtiers and royals alike.



Besides they protected Andrew's pedo bum for 15 years and never once stripped him of anything. They can't touch Harry.

Technical note: once an heir can no longer be displaced in the line of succession. Charles is not the presumptive heir. He is the heir. Same with William and George. The birth of another child cannot change this.