Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amazing how Meghan's activities are happening quietly behind the scenes and still getting more coverage than the blitz W/K did today.

Looking forward to the papers tomorrow with her new visit to Justice For Girls Canada.

She’s already moving forward with plans to do some good. She is an inspiration.

[Anonymous]

Actually it’s pretty offensive to use vulnerable women as props. Her photo op does nothing for those women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Actually it’s pretty offensive to use vulnerable women as props. Her photo op does nothing for those women.

True. She is NPD just using people as she goes. She has claimed to be a victim but please take people who truly suffered on a trip to see the life she had in England. A real victim would be outraged if they understood her sick mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Actually it’s pretty offensive to use vulnerable women as props. Her photo op does nothing for those women.

...those are the managers of the organization...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Archie isn't important to the line of succession, but he is important to the Palace. Archie, like Meghan and Kate and Harry and Will and Will's children, are imminently marketable. They are pretty and/or cute and very useful for keeping a charming face on the monarchy. The courtiers who run the palace are perfectly willing to prevent Archie from leaving the UK if they thought it was best for the palace.

Archie is no more important than the Yorklets.

Right and the Queen thought that they are important enough to warrant a splashy royal wedding.

What's your point? They are still royal. Nothing to do with custody and not raising a child in the UK.

The point is that even the distant York’s were important enough to the queen to warrant extravagant weddings. Archie (and his parents) is a thousand times more important.

You’re the one arguing he’s irrelevant. Everyone else sees the reality that he’s very important to the queen and the royal family. Especially right now.

Lol why is Archie a thousand times more important?

For starters his father is the most popular of the royal family. More popular than the queen, more popular than the future king, and the second in line for the throne. That’s why he’s more important to the palace than the York’s.

Secondly, he’s more important in terms of succession. He’s further up on the succession chain than the York’s.

Have you lost your marbles? Archie now takes a backseat to William’s children and grandchildren.

Oh honey...

(William and Kate’s kids are NOT Yorks. Stop now before you embarrass yourself further.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually it’s pretty offensive to use vulnerable women as props. Her photo op does nothing for those women.

...those are the managers of the organization...

lol

The same people who think Meghan was posing with vulnerable women are probably the same people who think the Yorks are William and Kate’s kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually it’s pretty offensive to use vulnerable women as props. Her photo op does nothing for those women.

...those are the managers of the organization...

lol

The same people who think Meghan was posing with vulnerable women are probably the same people who think the Yorks are William and Kate’s kids.

Probably.

[Anonymous]

No one thinks the photo is of battered women. Megan is using the whole organization to promote herself. It’s gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Archie isn't important to the line of succession, but he is important to the Palace. Archie, like Meghan and Kate and Harry and Will and Will's children, are imminently marketable. They are pretty and/or cute and very useful for keeping a charming face on the monarchy. The courtiers who run the palace are perfectly willing to prevent Archie from leaving the UK if they thought it was best for the palace.

Archie is no more important than the Yorklets.

Right and the Queen thought that they are important enough to warrant a splashy royal wedding.

What's your point? They are still royal. Nothing to do with custody and not raising a child in the UK.

The point is that even the distant York’s were important enough to the queen to warrant extravagant weddings. Archie (and his parents) is a thousand times more important.

You’re the one arguing he’s irrelevant. Everyone else sees the reality that he’s very important to the queen and the royal family. Especially right now.

Lol why is Archie a thousand times more important?

For starters his father is the most popular of the royal family. More popular than the queen, more popular than the future king, and the second in line for the throne. That’s why he’s more important to the palace than the York’s.

Secondly, he’s more important in terms of succession. He’s further up on the succession chain than the York’s.

Have you lost your marbles? Archie now takes a backseat to William’s children and grandchildren.

Oh honey...

(William and Kate’s kids are NOT Yorks. Stop now before you embarrass yourself further.)

Who cares about the Yorks or Archie? They’re nowhere near the line of succession, so why are you getting so wound up?

[Anonymous]

Meghan definitely looks ordinary in those pictures.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meghan definitely looks ordinary in those pictures.

Yes. Just fresh and happy. It’s lovely to see a woman so comfortable in her own skin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meghan definitely looks ordinary in those pictures.

Yes, she does. Not very duchess-like.

What is she doing in Canada? She's an American married to a Brit. She should decide, stay or go. America or England.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan definitely looks ordinary in those pictures.

Yes, she does. Not very duchess-like.

What is she doing in Canada? She's an American married to a Brit. She should decide, stay or go. America or England.

Yes, because who is she to make decisions about her own life? /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan definitely looks ordinary in those pictures.

Yes, she does. Not very duchess-like.

What is she doing in Canada? She's an American married to a Brit. She should decide, stay or go. America or England.

Yes, because who is she to make decisions about her own life? /s

Right? And who cares about international law, visas, work permits and all that? /s/s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan definitely looks ordinary in those pictures.

Yes, she does. Not very duchess-like.

What is she doing in Canada? She's an American married to a Brit. She should decide, stay or go. America or England.

Yes, because who is she to make decisions about her own life? /s

Is she a public figure that we can and should talk about? Or is she a private citizen that we shouldn't gossip about?

Are you as confused as she is? She's a public figure, at least for the time being.