Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Archie isn't important to the line of succession, but he is important to the Palace. Archie, like Meghan and Kate and Harry and Will and Will's children, are imminently marketable. They are pretty and/or cute and very useful for keeping a charming face on the monarchy. The courtiers who run the palace are perfectly willing to prevent Archie from leaving the UK if they thought it was best for the palace.

Archie is no more important than the Yorklets.

Right and the Queen thought that they are important enough to warrant a splashy royal wedding.

What's your point? They are still royal. Nothing to do with custody and not raising a child in the UK.

The point is that even the distant York’s were important enough to the queen to warrant extravagant weddings. Archie (and his parents) is a thousand times more important.

You’re the one arguing he’s irrelevant. Everyone else sees the reality that he’s very important to the queen and the royal family. Especially right now.

Lol why is Archie a thousand times more important?

For starters his father is the most popular of the royal family. More popular than the queen, more popular than the future king, and the second in line for the throne. That’s why he’s more important to the palace than the York’s.

Secondly, he’s more important in terms of succession. He’s further up on the succession chain than the York’s.

Have you lost your marbles? Archie now takes a backseat to William’s children and grandchildren.

Do you know how to read?

Archie is absolutely further up the succession chain than the Yorks! Isn’t that obvious? In case you’ve forgotten, you were the one comparing him to Beatrice and Eugenie! You said he’s no more important than the York’s. I said he absolutely is!

Now you’re getting the York’s and Cambridge’s confused??? It actually makes perfect sense, your arguments are in line with that level of understanding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Archie isn't important to the line of succession, but he is important to the Palace. Archie, like Meghan and Kate and Harry and Will and Will's children, are imminently marketable. They are pretty and/or cute and very useful for keeping a charming face on the monarchy. The courtiers who run the palace are perfectly willing to prevent Archie from leaving the UK if they thought it was best for the palace.

Archie is no more important than the Yorklets.

Right and the Queen thought that they are important enough to warrant a splashy royal wedding.

What's your point? They are still royal. Nothing to do with custody and not raising a child in the UK.

The point is that even the distant York’s were important enough to the queen to warrant extravagant weddings. Archie (and his parents) is a thousand times more important.

You’re the one arguing he’s irrelevant. Everyone else sees the reality that he’s very important to the queen and the royal family. Especially right now.

Lol why is Archie a thousand times more important?

For starters his father is the most popular of the royal family. More popular than the queen, more popular than the future king, and the second in line for the throne. That’s why he’s more important to the palace than the York’s.

Secondly, he’s more important in terms of succession. He’s further up on the succession chain than the York’s.

Have you lost your marbles? Archie now takes a backseat to William’s children and grandchildren.

Do you know how to read?

Archie is absolutely further up the succession chain than the Yorks! Isn’t that obvious? In case you’ve forgotten, you were the one comparing him to Beatrice and Eugenie! You said he’s no more important than the York’s. I said he absolutely is!

Now you’re getting the York’s and Cambridge’s confused??? It actually makes perfect sense, your arguments are in line with that level of understanding.

Academic at best, since none of these are getting within 100 feet of the throne barring a total calamity. But enjoy getting your panties in a twist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Archie isn't important to the line of succession, but he is important to the Palace. Archie, like Meghan and Kate and Harry and Will and Will's children, are imminently marketable. They are pretty and/or cute and very useful for keeping a charming face on the monarchy. The courtiers who run the palace are perfectly willing to prevent Archie from leaving the UK if they thought it was best for the palace.

Archie is no more important than the Yorklets.

Right and the Queen thought that they are important enough to warrant a splashy royal wedding.

What's your point? They are still royal. Nothing to do with custody and not raising a child in the UK.

The point is that even the distant York’s were important enough to the queen to warrant extravagant weddings. Archie (and his parents) is a thousand times more important.

You’re the one arguing he’s irrelevant. Everyone else sees the reality that he’s very important to the queen and the royal family. Especially right now.

Lol why is Archie a thousand times more important?

For starters his father is the most popular of the royal family. More popular than the queen, more popular than the future king, and the second in line for the throne. That’s why he’s more important to the palace than the York’s.

Secondly, he’s more important in terms of succession. He’s further up on the succession chain than the York’s.

Have you lost your marbles? Archie now takes a backseat to William’s children and grandchildren.

Do you know how to read?

Archie is absolutely further up the succession chain than the Yorks! Isn’t that obvious? In case you’ve forgotten, you were the one comparing him to Beatrice and Eugenie! You said he’s no more important than the York’s. I said he absolutely is!

Now you’re getting the York’s and Cambridge’s confused??? It actually makes perfect sense, your arguments are in line with that level of understanding.

Someone already explained this upthread. Archie's relative importance is the same as the Yorks in their generation/when they were his age. Slightly worse b/c Will has 3 kids and Charles only had 2. When Archie is the age the Yorks are, he will be bumped down by George, Charlotte, and Louis' kids, just like the Yorks were bumped down by the kids of William and Harry. So, yes, Archie is about as important as the York kids were when they were his age. Actually, slightly less, because Archie has three cousins ahead of him and the Yorks had two.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you all think Prince William is against interracial marriage?

He's probably not keen on Americans marrying the BRF.

I think it’s more like he’s not keen on bright, smart women.

Or gold diggers.

All he has to do is look at his wife and his wife’s sister for that.

They came from wealth, they married into very great wealth. BTW, is Kate planning to hawk the royal name for millions?

No they came from a flight attendant and party supply store owner who put every pound into private school so they could land rich husbands.

Meanwhile Uncle Garry financed it and after it worked the son-in-laws paid for their house and $20,000 a week vacations in the West Indies.

Sounds like all the hard work and effort they put into their kids worked better than they could ever have imagined. Kudos to them. The rest of us can only hope to be so lucky in our efforts.

DP. I would not want Kate's life for my daughter. Not in a million years.[/quote
Agreed. Acting like a subordinate in life. Won't she eventually be expecyed to curtsy to her husband? Even now... curtsy to someone because of their place in the family. *barf* Smile pretty for the important people.

And yet - Meghan loves that part of royal life.

If she loves it so much, why is she walking away from it?

She’s only walking away from what she considers the boring parts. She’s planning to use their name to cash in big time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Archie isn't important to the line of succession, but he is important to the Palace. Archie, like Meghan and Kate and Harry and Will and Will's children, are imminently marketable. They are pretty and/or cute and very useful for keeping a charming face on the monarchy. The courtiers who run the palace are perfectly willing to prevent Archie from leaving the UK if they thought it was best for the palace.

Archie is no more important than the Yorklets.

Right and the Queen thought that they are important enough to warrant a splashy royal wedding.

What's your point? They are still royal. Nothing to do with custody and not raising a child in the UK.

The point is that even the distant York’s were important enough to the queen to warrant extravagant weddings. Archie (and his parents) is a thousand times more important.

You’re the one arguing he’s irrelevant. Everyone else sees the reality that he’s very important to the queen and the royal family. Especially right now.

Lol why is Archie a thousand times more important?

For starters his father is the most popular of the royal family. More popular than the queen, more popular than the future king, and the second in line for the throne. That’s why he’s more important to the palace than the York’s.

Secondly, he’s more important in terms of succession. He’s further up on the succession chain than the York’s.

Have you lost your marbles? Archie now takes a backseat to William’s children and grandchildren.

Do you know how to read?

Archie is absolutely further up the succession chain than the Yorks! Isn’t that obvious? In case you’ve forgotten, you were the one comparing him to Beatrice and Eugenie! You said he’s no more important than the York’s. I said he absolutely is!

Now you’re getting the York’s and Cambridge’s confused??? It actually makes perfect sense, your arguments are in line with that level of understanding.

Academic at best, since none of these are getting within 100 feet of the throne barring a total calamity. But enjoy getting your panties in a twist.

Any calamity that would put Archie in striking distance of the throne would literally be SUCH a calamity that the entire insitution of monarchy would be done away with in the UK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They just seem like not-so-smart attention seekers. I guess I will be seeing them a lot on the tabloid covers in the checkout line at the grocery store. Good for them, I guess?

They are the opposite of attention seekers, you fool. Have you read NOTHING about Harry AT ALL? He loathes attention. He wants to protect his wife from it.

Good God, there are so many ill people on this thread insisting the world inside their heads is the real one, when it clearly isn't.

Harry picked the right wife to get him away from his family, from his duty. But the wrong one if he wants to escape attention. She's an actress, of course she wants attention. Lots of attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you all think Prince William is against interracial marriage?

He's probably not keen on Americans marrying the BRF.

I think it’s more like he’s not keen on bright, smart women.

Or gold diggers.

All he has to do is look at his wife and his wife’s sister for that.

They came from wealth, they married into very great wealth. BTW, is Kate planning to hawk the royal name for millions?

No they came from a flight attendant and party supply store owner who put every pound into private school so they could land rich husbands.

Meanwhile Uncle Garry financed it and after it worked the son-in-laws paid for their house and $20,000 a week vacations in the West Indies.

Sounds like all the hard work and effort they put into their kids worked better than they could ever have imagined. Kudos to them. The rest of us can only hope to be so lucky in our efforts.

DP. I would not want Kate's life for my daughter. Not in a million years.[/quote
Agreed. Acting like a subordinate in life. Won't she eventually be expecyed to curtsy to her husband? Even now... curtsy to someone because of their place in the family. *barf* Smile pretty for the important people.

And yet - Meghan loves that part of royal life.

If she loves it so much, why is she walking away from it?

She’s only walking away from what she considers the boring parts. She’s planning to use their name to cash in big time.

You have no idea what she's planning to do. You sound full of self-importance yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Archie isn't important to the line of succession, but he is important to the Palace. Archie, like Meghan and Kate and Harry and Will and Will's children, are imminently marketable. They are pretty and/or cute and very useful for keeping a charming face on the monarchy. The courtiers who run the palace are perfectly willing to prevent Archie from leaving the UK if they thought it was best for the palace.

Archie is no more important than the Yorklets.

Right and the Queen thought that they are important enough to warrant a splashy royal wedding.

What's your point? They are still royal. Nothing to do with custody and not raising a child in the UK.

The point is that even the distant York’s were important enough to the queen to warrant extravagant weddings. Archie (and his parents) is a thousand times more important.

You’re the one arguing he’s irrelevant. Everyone else sees the reality that he’s very important to the queen and the royal family. Especially right now.

Lol why is Archie a thousand times more important?

For starters his father is the most popular of the royal family. More popular than the queen, more popular than the future king, and the second in line for the throne. That’s why he’s more important to the palace than the York’s.

Secondly, he’s more important in terms of succession. He’s further up on the succession chain than the York’s.

Have you lost your marbles? Archie now takes a backseat to William’s children and grandchildren.

Do you know how to read?

Archie is absolutely further up the succession chain than the Yorks! Isn’t that obvious? In case you’ve forgotten, you were the one comparing him to Beatrice and Eugenie! You said he’s no more important than the York’s. I said he absolutely is!

Now you’re getting the York’s and Cambridge’s confused??? It actually makes perfect sense, your arguments are in line with that level of understanding.

Academic at best, since none of these are getting within 100 feet of the throne barring a total calamity. But enjoy getting your panties in a twist.

Any calamity that would put Archie in striking distance of the throne would literally be SUCH a calamity that the entire insitution of monarchy would be done away with in the UK.

So you guys really think the York’s are the same as the Cambridge’s?

Hahaha!!!!!

This actually explains a lot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Archie isn't important to the line of succession, but he is important to the Palace. Archie, like Meghan and Kate and Harry and Will and Will's children, are imminently marketable. They are pretty and/or cute and very useful for keeping a charming face on the monarchy. The courtiers who run the palace are perfectly willing to prevent Archie from leaving the UK if they thought it was best for the palace.

Archie is no more important than the Yorklets.

Right and the Queen thought that they are important enough to warrant a splashy royal wedding.

What's your point? They are still royal. Nothing to do with custody and not raising a child in the UK.

The point is that even the distant York’s were important enough to the queen to warrant extravagant weddings. Archie (and his parents) is a thousand times more important.

You’re the one arguing he’s irrelevant. Everyone else sees the reality that he’s very important to the queen and the royal family. Especially right now.

Lol why is Archie a thousand times more important?

For starters his father is the most popular of the royal family. More popular than the queen, more popular than the future king, and the second in line for the throne. That’s why he’s more important to the palace than the York’s.

Secondly, he’s more important in terms of succession. He’s further up on the succession chain than the York’s.

Have you lost your marbles? Archie now takes a backseat to William’s children and grandchildren.

Do you know how to read?

Archie is absolutely further up the succession chain than the Yorks! Isn’t that obvious? In case you’ve forgotten, you were the one comparing him to Beatrice and Eugenie! You said he’s no more important than the York’s. I said he absolutely is!

Now you’re getting the York’s and Cambridge’s confused??? It actually makes perfect sense, your arguments are in line with that level of understanding.

Academic at best, since none of these are getting within 100 feet of the throne barring a total calamity. But enjoy getting your panties in a twist.

Any calamity that would put Archie in striking distance of the throne would literally be SUCH a calamity that the entire insitution of monarchy would be done away with in the UK.

So you guys really think the York’s are the same as the Cambridge’s?

Hahaha!!!!!

This actually explains a lot.

Are you drunk?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Archie isn't important to the line of succession, but he is important to the Palace. Archie, like Meghan and Kate and Harry and Will and Will's children, are imminently marketable. They are pretty and/or cute and very useful for keeping a charming face on the monarchy. The courtiers who run the palace are perfectly willing to prevent Archie from leaving the UK if they thought it was best for the palace.

Archie is no more important than the Yorklets.

Right and the Queen thought that they are important enough to warrant a splashy royal wedding.

What's your point? They are still royal. Nothing to do with custody and not raising a child in the UK.

The point is that even the distant York’s were important enough to the queen to warrant extravagant weddings. Archie (and his parents) is a thousand times more important.

You’re the one arguing he’s irrelevant. Everyone else sees the reality that he’s very important to the queen and the royal family. Especially right now.

Lol why is Archie a thousand times more important?

For starters his father is the most popular of the royal family. More popular than the queen, more popular than the future king, and the second in line for the throne. That’s why he’s more important to the palace than the York’s.

Secondly, he’s more important in terms of succession. He’s further up on the succession chain than the York’s.

Have you lost your marbles? Archie now takes a backseat to William’s children and grandchildren.

Do you know how to read?

Archie is absolutely further up the succession chain than the Yorks! Isn’t that obvious? In case you’ve forgotten, you were the one comparing him to Beatrice and Eugenie! You said he’s no more important than the York’s. I said he absolutely is!

Now you’re getting the York’s and Cambridge’s confused??? It actually makes perfect sense, your arguments are in line with that level of understanding.

Academic at best, since none of these are getting within 100 feet of the throne barring a total calamity. But enjoy getting your panties in a twist.

Any calamity that would put Archie in striking distance of the throne would literally be SUCH a calamity that the entire insitution of monarchy would be done away with in the UK.

So you guys really think the York’s are the same as the Cambridge’s?

Hahaha!!!!!

This actually explains a lot.

Are you drunk?

Do you know how to read? (In English?)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you all think Prince William is against interracial marriage?

He's probably not keen on Americans marrying the BRF.

I think it’s more like he’s not keen on bright, smart women.

Or gold diggers.

All he has to do is look at his wife and his wife’s sister for that.

They came from wealth, they married into very great wealth. BTW, is Kate planning to hawk the royal name for millions?

No they came from a flight attendant and party supply store owner who put every pound into private school so they could land rich husbands.

Meanwhile Uncle Garry financed it and after it worked the son-in-laws paid for their house and $20,000 a week vacations in the West Indies.

Sounds like all the hard work and effort they put into their kids worked better than they could ever have imagined. Kudos to them. The rest of us can only hope to be so lucky in our efforts.

DP. I would not want Kate's life for my daughter. Not in a million years.[/quote
Agreed. Acting like a subordinate in life. Won't she eventually be expecyed to curtsy to her husband? Even now... curtsy to someone because of their place in the family. *barf* Smile pretty for the important people.

And yet - Meghan loves that part of royal life.

If she loves it so much, why is she walking away from it?

She’s only walking away from what she considers the boring parts. She’s planning to use their name to cash in big time.

You have no idea what she's planning to do. You sound full of self-importance yourself.

They have said plenty about what they plan to do. You sound ignorant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They just seem like not-so-smart attention seekers. I guess I will be seeing them a lot on the tabloid covers in the checkout line at the grocery store. Good for them, I guess?

They are the opposite of attention seekers, you fool. Have you read NOTHING about Harry AT ALL? He loathes attention. He wants to protect his wife from it.

Good God, there are so many ill people on this thread insisting the world inside their heads is the real one, when it clearly isn't.

Harry picked the right wife to get him away from his family, from his duty. But the wrong one if he wants to escape attention. She's an actress, of course she wants attention. Lots of attention.

By all accounts he has a huge ego and wants to be in-charge/prove himself. He is going head to head with his brother, his wife’s ambition’s just amplify his. We shall see how this plays out but I wouldn’t be surprised if he doesn’t become completely estranged after the queen passes.

[Anonymous]

Just thought this today and I was wondering if anyone else thought it or has the answer Would it be possible for just Meghan to leave the Royal family? Harry could do the work and Meghan could be the actress? Just curious.

[Anonymous]

Eh. Probably not. Prince Edward's wife tried to keep her job and got caught up in a conflict of interest scandal. She now does royal duties full time.

[Anonymous]

I wonder, is there a length limit to DCUM quotes? What's the longest quoted post in the history of this this site?