Kamala Harris’ office rife with dissent

[Anonymous]

How is reporting on poll numbers a hit job?

What has been accomplished on the border or voting rights?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There you are! You're so right. We are free to criticize male politicians, but never women! *Especially* not Democratic women. Verboten! Give us all a break. She's an insipid, lightweight politician - regardless of her gender.

When it’s part of a coordinated hit…

There’s only one person that could have issued that hit job……..

I'm listening to Ben Shapiro's podcast right now. He did a deep dive on this and basically theorizes that CNN would only put out this hit piece if it were sanctioned by the WH.

I wonder if mayor Pete could have the juice to preemptively crush his 2024 opponent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She got pretty humiliated at the signing ceremony today. She can’t catch a break.

How so?

The WH had not intended her to have a speaking role. But after last night’s mean girls meltdown they shoe horned here into the agenda. But no one updated the copy given to the announcer and he blew right by her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There you are! You're so right. We are free to criticize male politicians, but never women! *Especially* not Democratic women. Verboten! Give us all a break. She's an insipid, lightweight politician - regardless of her gender.

When it’s part of a coordinated hit…

There’s only one person that could have issued that hit job……..

I'm listening to Ben Shapiro's podcast right now. He did a deep dive on this and basically theorizes that CNN would only put out this hit piece if it were sanctioned by the WH.

CNN needs the ratings. A lot of networks/publications are starting to go more conservative because that's the trend right now. Forbes has been going extra conservative lately in their reporting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She got pretty humiliated at the signing ceremony today. She can’t catch a break.

How so?

The WH had not intended her to have a speaking role. But after last night’s mean girls meltdown they shoe horned here into the agenda. But no one updated the copy given to the announcer and he blew right by her.

Ouch!

[Anonymous]

Maybe the media is just critical of whoever is in the White House? Maybe that’s what sells papers/clinks?
I know I know. Trump is just certain he is the only president to ever face criticism, but… maybe that’s not really true.

[Anonymous]

Part of it is that we were sold Kamala as the mitigation to Joe's issues. Joe is old and decrepit, but Kamala is young and vigorous and be able to carry us through. I bought that.

But Kamala seems to be too much attorney and not enough politician. She has no transparency- she doesn't appear to publish a schedule, she's the only politician in office right now that refuses to disclose information about what she pays staffers. We have no idea what she does and when she does something, it's odd or bizarre, like when she claimed she had gone to the border and that was a lie.

She's just not suited for this role and voters sensed that, which is why she had to drop out so early. Joe did her absolutely no favors when he declared he was looking for a female POC. It made her look like a "diversity hire" and that the only thing she was bringing was her... diversity. And now they are kicking her while she's down.

With our luck, old Joe is going to kick it and we'll be stuck with someone that he hobbled and backstabbed, with staff that rolls their eyes at her and a cabinet that doesn't respect her. And even if they pull it together, and she lives up to her "full potential," she's only going to be as effective as she is capable in this role.

[Anonymous]

It’s pretty evident that she’s being politely brushed aside. Oh well. That’s politics.

[Anonymous]

Harris is terrible. There's NO WAY the Dems can run her in 2024.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Part of it is that we were sold Kamala as the mitigation to Joe's issues. Joe is old and decrepit, but Kamala is young and vigorous and be able to carry us through. I bought that.

But Kamala seems to be too much attorney and not enough politician. She has no transparency- she doesn't appear to publish a schedule, she's the only politician in office right now that refuses to disclose information about what she pays staffers. We have no idea what she does and when she does something, it's odd or bizarre, like when she claimed she had gone to the border and that was a lie.

She's just not suited for this role and voters sensed that, which is why she had to drop out so early. Joe did her absolutely no favors when he declared he was looking for a female POC. It made her look like a "diversity hire" and that the only thing she was bringing was her... diversity. And now they are kicking her while she's down.

With our luck, old Joe is going to kick it and we'll be stuck with someone that he hobbled and backstabbed, with staff that rolls their eyes at her and a cabinet that doesn't respect her. And even if they pull it together, and she lives up to her "full potential," she's only going to be as effective as she is capable in this role.

The only way she was ever going to overcome the fact that she was just a diversity hire was to visibly and successfully tackle a meaningful issue. But she ran away from the border crisis like it was a hot potato and nobody has a clue as to what she’s actually been up to. An utter failure although I don’t see the political gain for Biden’s team to kick her when she’s down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harris is terrible. There's NO WAY the Dems can run her in 2024.

Amtrak Joe is running in '24.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe the media is just critical of whoever is in the White House? Maybe that’s what sells papers/clinks?
I know I know. Trump is just certain he is the only president to ever face criticism, but… maybe that’s not really true.

No, they are not critical of Biden. They should be on several issues, but they give him a pass, and that is why they are going after her. The new person/thing to direct people's disappointment and frustration with Biden. Poor Kamala. They will trample her to prop him up at all costs, because he will lose both houses in historic proportion if he can't turn things around and get his approval numbers up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is terrible. There's NO WAY the Dems can run her in 2024.

Amtrak Joe is running in '24.

In your dreams. He'd be way too old.

[Anonymous]

Cringe

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There you are! You're so right. We are free to criticize male politicians, but never women! *Especially* not Democratic women. Verboten! Give us all a break. She's an insipid, lightweight politician - regardless of her gender.

When it’s part of a coordinated hit…

There’s only one person that could have issued that hit job……..

I'm listening to Ben Shapiro's podcast right now. He did a deep dive on this and basically theorizes that CNN would only put out this hit piece if it were sanctioned by the WH.

I wonder if mayor Pete could have the juice to preemptively crush his 2024 opponent.

Only if he is not on paternity leave