Dad leaves toddler to die in hot car while he plays games on Play Station

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:He’s not smart but he definitely is slick . Doesn’t work to avoid child support .
Leaves toddler in hot car on purpose knowing it would kill her.

These parents aren’t “forgetting” their kids are in the back. They do it on purpose and safety features inside a car wont help. They’ll just say they were listening to a podcast or music on ear pods so they couldn’t hear the alarm. They’ll come up with any story to feign ignorance about leaving their kid behind in the heat


He first told LE he went in to take a nap. Could have taken one in the car with the child.

Another leaving a kid in a hot car case.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/screaming-child-rescued-from-hot-car-in-south-florida-as-mom-shopped-at-walmart/

Serious jail time might help change parental behavior. Caring about the kid doesn't seem to. But, authorities don't hold them accountable either. Boat mom and dad have not been charged in AZ. Her dad is LE. And CS is back home and may not even get jail time given his wife's $ for lawyers and pleas on his behalf.

Cliche, but, would be nice if someone thought of the CHILDREN. Repeated patterns are not one off mistakes.

Info on the boat case - this is horrible. https://abcnews.go.com/amp/GMA/Family/4-month-baby-dies-extreme-heat-wave-tips/story?id=111853523


Mom got the bikini shot 4 mos post partum "snapped back" though, posted before the baby expired, earlier on the 4th. Matching outfits on all for the gram.

Encasing the baby in a too large flotation device on a day it was over 120 likely did not help, nor would the sun reflecting off the water. And they posted photos of them in the hospital with the dying child all over socials. Wonder if those parents were drinking? There is an older child in that family too. Smh. It is a man made lake in a DESERT, does no one have common sense anymore?

Young kids and the elderly do not regulate temps as well. Even in light of that 7/4 tragedy widely covered in media, CS did not alter his chosen patterns of behavior, mere weeks later, also in AZ. "You can't tell me" to his wife, to the Family Court judge - is it callousness? Selfishness? Acting out some kind of antisocial rage? He used doc wife for $, fancy trips and cars and as a way to not pay child support, no income. That she continues to coddle and make excuses for him is as crazy as the other couple posting images from the ICU of their dying infant. Being a parent used to be something that encouraged people to GROW UP and put others first. Even most TEEN parents manage to not kill their small children.


While definitely an error on the parents' part (120 degree heat! omg!) I don't feel it is as egregious or hard to comprehend as the CS case. They didn't understand the danger the heat posed to a child that young and they didn't know the signs that their child was in distress due to the heat (likely because the child was "napping"). Still absolutely awful but I think it's a case of true ignorance and not of willful negligence. Perhaps we should be more forceful in issuing heat advisories for very high temps when it comes to kids and maybe people need to be better educated on the fact that infants don't regulate their own temperature well. I had a baby in August in DC and I remember getting harassed by freinds and family members because I generally didn't put clothes on her when we were out of the house (just a thin blanket or cover to protect her from the sun) because I didn't want her to overheat in DC's 90+ weather with high humidity. A lot of people seem to erroneously believe babies can only be too cold and not to hot and a lot of older people constantly want to put more clothes and blankets on them. There is clearly misunderstanding about this.

But CS had been told by his wife not to leave the kids in the car. And also unlike the people on the boat he left his kid in a car and then totally forgot about her. For hours. As a PP put it upthread the best case scenario here would be that his daughter woke up and spent HOURS crying and hungry and alone in a vehicle while he played video games inside. He didn't just misunderstand the danger the heat posed to his kid (but also that) he straight up neglected a 2 year old and left her totally unattended for several hours. That by itself is child neglect even if it had not been 109 degrees and she had not been inside a car (though obviously these facts make it much much worse).


In the context of this guy, I don't think he forgot. I think he literally did not want to be bothered. He had his VR games and drink to get on. He didn't care what his wife said, "Sorry Babe!" re: KILLING THE CHILD conveys a lot, actually. He pushed the envelope repeatedly, like with the not showing up in court over and over, even after civil arrest warrants had been issued. This poor child, what a horrible death.

I think he will retaliate against the others for "telling" what he was doing at some point. He's not a good guy. His treatment of the first family should have been a clue, but rarely seems to be.
Anonymous
She will advocate for him and spend $$$ on his defense and any outcome other than a lengthy prison sentence will endanger the surviving sisters. Make it make sense.

The bond hearing on YT is insane.
Anonymous
^He's left them in the car repeatedly too. Why wouldn't you want accountability for him and safety for the precious girls that are alive?
Anonymous
Is it possible this was pre-meditated?
Anonymous
I don't live in AZ, but can't even bear to step into my car after it's been baking in the sun unless I open all the windows and let the A/C crank for a few minutes. I don't understand how someone that lives in AZ can even consider leaving a child in a car . I just can't imagine it.
I've raised 4 kids and know how much it sucks sometimes to wake a sleeping child to bring them into the house, but holy crap 109 degrees????? I've never even been anywhere that was 109 degrees!

How awful for that little girl.....
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Is it possible this was pre-meditated?


Anything is possible.

"Sorry Babe!" doesn't really convey horror or wish it had been me type remorse.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is it possible this was pre-meditated?


Anything is possible.

"Sorry Babe!" doesn't really convey horror or wish it had been me type remorse.


Right.
Wife: Did you get eggs when you were at the store?
Husband: No, I forgot. Sorry babe!

vs.

Wife: You killed our baby!
Husband: Yeah. Sorry babe!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think he bailed on 1st family when got his hooks into young doctor. The docket entries suggest possible overlap.

1st wife spent years and $$$ trying to get child support. He is such a narc he didn't even bother showing in court, there are multiple civil orders for his arrest. Dude thinks rules don't apply to him. I guess the rules of biology, heat and thermodynamics either, or he just doesn't care.

A VR headset and drink were on the coffee table while that poor tot died a horrific and painful death over 3 hours. He was not a teen boy on school break. He could have brought her in and parked her in front of a screen with a snack, but he literally did not want to be bothered by her even to that degree. He told cops he KNEW the car would shut off after 20-30 min from past times doing this. I would unalive myself if I had done this accidentally, never mind deliberately.

I'd be happy for him to be strapped into a hot car in 111 degrees in direct sun. I'd push the remote start and time the ac turning off. Without the car moving the temp would start to rise before then.


Oh so alcohol was involved yet posts to DCUM focus on playstation. You guys have minds clouded with misandry and bias.


No test results have been announced in the media as to what was in the glass. Please stop inventing facts.


Family members if this cretin have arrived, perhaps? Because what he did is indefensible, by any standards.


Completely.

And the mom's behavior baffles me too. The judge was clear he can't be left alone with the remaining kids but mom is going on about him being a pillar of the community. Gaming community, perhaps. An anesthesiologist holds your life in their hands, would never trust her judgement as a doctor or mom. Had she left him in jail, would have had more sympathy, but not as much was if she didn't know he did this often. What a sick family.


If I see a tatted up anesthesiologist before I'm supposed to have surgery, I'm getting dressed and rescheduling at a different hospital. She looks sketchy.


Good luck with that.

I had surgery recently and my OR nurse was covered in tats and was also phenomenally skilled and I was lucky to have her. Surgical specialties tend to attract people with strong personalities because it requires tough fellowships and long hours on your feet and the ability to stay calm under pressure. A lot of OR docs and nurses love fast cars and rock climbing and stuff like that. So unsurprising that many also have tattoos. It's part of the culture.


Yeah...no. Lots of tattoos tend to tease out history of drugs, boozing, low intellect, mental illness, and/or poor decision making skills.


That may have been true 50 years ago but tattoos are incredibly commonplace now. You are welcome to discriminate based on tattoos if you want but you should be aware this will probably be to your own detriment -- some of the most accomplished and intelligent people I know have many visible tattoos. Including doctors and lawyers and businesspeople.


+1
Tats are everywhere now. They really don’t indicate anything about the individual anymore.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is it possible this was pre-meditated?


Anything is possible.

"Sorry Babe!" doesn't really convey horror or wish it had been me type remorse.


Right.
Wife: Did you get eggs when you were at the store?
Husband: No, I forgot. Sorry babe!

vs.

Wife: You killed our baby!
Husband: Yeah. Sorry babe!


But then she immediately shifted into a passive voice, teaming with the killer

WE LOST her.

This level of dysfunction in their relationship is how Parker's life ended and nothing has changed. She got him released and back in the house.

How long is she going to be able to not work? Does anyone genuinely believe the kids won't be coached and pressured to alter stories?

If a daycare worker had this pattern and then killed the kid, you wouldn't move him in with surviving sibs who are also witnesses and plead for his release. From the standpoint of child safety, should NOT matter, but always seems to.

Imagine beng the 7 and 9 year old in this scenario and in that small house.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have intense anxiety about the 5 seconds it takes me to walk around the car to the driver’s side after I load my kid in. Like what happens if I suddenly pass out?


Same!


You should get medication for your generalized anxiety disorder. Seriously, there’s no reason to go through life like that


+1. I truly hope “intense anxiety” is an exaggeration. Because if so… how does PP even drive, or do anything else? You could pass out while driving
Anonymous
Both the boat couple and this guy murdered their kids. These aren’t cases of innocently forgetting your child is in the heat. In these two cases, the children were knowingly and intentionally put and let in the heat.

Horrible deaths.

Not sure how he kept a 7 and 9 year old in a car. It isn’t really contained as cars can be opened from the inside. Even a lot of almost 3 year olds can get out on their own.
Anonymous
Child proof locks and they were trained to accept it.
Anonymous
How would this situation work logistically if he cannot ever be alone with kids but lives in same home? Will the doctor/professor mom have to get a job with more regular hours, say at an outpatient surgery center?

My guess is that he will go to trial in a year, not serve time and the "no time alone" provision may be dropped. But how do they get from here to there, realistically?

Putting myself in the place of the kids, I was also put in unsafe situations as a child, I'd probably rather NOT live with my sister's killer who my mom enables. A stable caregiver and dad in jail so they could turn a page might have provided the stability needed to process trauma, in my opinion.

They may grow up and be focused on outward achievement and fail to protect THEIR kids, repeating the pattern. Hope they make it that far, this whole situation seems volatile and the adults are under a lot of stress. Not ideal.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is it possible this was pre-meditated?


Anything is possible.

"Sorry Babe!" doesn't really convey horror or wish it had been me type remorse.


Right.
Wife: Did you get eggs when you were at the store?
Husband: No, I forgot. Sorry babe!

vs.

Wife: You killed our baby!
Husband: Yeah. Sorry babe!


I haven’t read the whole thread but why were they texting one another in the first place? Why were they not together at the hospital?
Anonymous
He was with LE. She went in the ambulance.
Forum Index » Off-Topic
Go to: