Help me understand Republican women in their 30s and 40s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

Not an answer.

Yes it is...you just don't like to be called out incel.

This is getting old. Conservatives are statistically the most likely to be married and have kids-- the opposite of celibacy.

Conservatives are more likely to follow expectations and marry young but also more likely to cheat or have unhappy relationships. But they are NOT more likely to be in a relationship (marriage isn't the only kind of relationship). Conservative relationships are also more likely to be lopsided in power dynamic, where the woman is not treated as an equal to the man. And unlike conservatives, you don't find hordes of liberal males terminally moping around online because they are so toxic that no woman wants anything to do with them.

Have you heard of Reddit.

Ya, we have - and the reddit incels are right wingers.

😳

Man, your delusions are quite something. Reddit is crawling with leftist men that despise
women. It takes about ten seconds to find them. Of course there are hordes of right-wing incels as well, but it’s absolutely delusional to believe pretend Reddit isn’t infested with left-wing misogynists.

Reddit is where men who hate women hang out. Political affiliation matters less to them than their unified hatred of women.

Have never seen these alleged left wing misogynists. You must hang out on some really weird subs.

You haven’t seen them because you are one of them. The place is crawling with dirty misogynists of both the left- and right-wing variety. You just don’t choose to see the left-wing ones because you are left-wing misogynist yourself.

Woman-hating is one of Reddit’s primary purposes these days.

Wild, clueless and unhinged accusations. You don't even know me. Most of the subs I am on have absolutely nothing to do with anything even remotely related to "women hating" or gender-relevant politics of any kind.

[Anonymous]

Republicans are forcing poor women to have babies they can’t feed, cloth, raise. Why?
I’m an educator. Do you know how hard it is to educate an unwanted child?
But, that’s what repubs want right? More factory workers. Servants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are forcing poor women to have babies they can’t feed, cloth, raise. Why?
I’m an educator. Do you know how hard it is to educate an unwanted child?
But, that’s what repubs want right? More factory workers. Servants.

Which states have banned adoption?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

They want to be Republican because I point out that Trump is a sleazy sex abuser? Umm, okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

They want to be Republican because I point out that Trump is a sleazy sex abuser? Umm, okay.

It’s everything else you support that is driving women to Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

They want to be Republican because I point out that Trump is a sleazy sex abuser? Umm, okay.

And presumably also a "misogynist" for being rightly concerned about people like Trump who display predatory behavior toward underaged girls, who engage in sexual assault against women and brag about it, who cheat on their wives, who refer to STDs as their "personal Vietnam" and so on. Sure. I'm the "problem" - maybe in a world where up is down and red is blue. And again, note that I'm the person who above said that prisoners who pose a risk to other prisoners should be separated, out of which somehow you also arrived at that upside-down conclusion of "misogyny." I have nothing whatsoever to do with the rest of the strawman above.

Or maybe you just like emptily calling anyone who disagrees with you for any reason whatsoever a misogynist, or you like blaming "people like me" for the behavior of others as if they have zero control over their own decisions. And particularly bizarre, suggesting I'm somehow driving people into Trump's arms by pointing out Trump's actual history and actual behaviors. Sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

They want to be Republican because I point out that Trump is a sleazy sex abuser? Umm, okay.

It’s everything else you support that is driving women to Republicans.

This is a weird take, given that polling shows that women are not flocking to the GOP, instead it's the exact opposite - they are becoming more liberal, and by a wide margin. For example, Gen Z women are 30% more liberal than Gen Z males in the US. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/gen-z-women-more-liberal-than-men-study-finds/vi-BB1hA6lV

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

They want to be Republican because I point out that Trump is a sleazy sex abuser? Umm, okay.

It’s everything else you support that is driving women to Republicans.

This is a weird take, given that polling shows that women are not flocking to the GOP, instead it's the exact opposite - they are becoming more liberal, and by a wide margin. For example, Gen Z women are 30% more liberal than Gen Z males in the US. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/gen-z-women-more-liberal-than-men-study-finds/vi-BB1hA6lV

Gen Z women are indeed more liberal than Gen Z men, at least according to polls. But if you are around Gen Z women, and they trust you, you’ll find a lot of quiet but deep anger about how Democrats are betraying women the way Republicans always have.

What that means for the election will be interesting. Can Democrats afford to alienate Gen Z women the way they’ve alienated Gen Z men? Just how inaccurate are the polls?

[Anonymous]

I am a 44 year old Jewish Republican woman and proud of it.

Before around a year ago I was a very Liberal Democrat, then Biden proceeded to ally him with Hamas and helped them invade Isreal in their genocidal attacks on 10/7 and continue to be Hamas’ biggest supporter on the international stage, feeding them through the disgusting pier and ignoring Israel’s desperate pleas to honor our alliance by sending the might of the US Military to aid the IDF in their noble goal of complete destruction of Hamas and retrieval of every single innocent Israeli hostage.

After that, I knew I could never vote for a democrat or liberal ever again. I am going to be proud to vote for Donald Trump, who has been a true friend to the Jewish people, a hero worthy of succeeding David, Moses, and the other greats!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

NP. I’m the black woman who posted about my abortion and your comment is what it comes down to. There’s a lot more to consider than abortion. I’m so disgusted by Democrats’ positions on so many other issues that I won’t vote for Biden this election. It’s a measure of how far this country has fallen that we have to choose between a party that would allow adult male crossdressers, a disproportionate number of whom are sex offenders, into girls’ bathrooms versus a party that would force a raped girl to carry the crossdressing degenerate’s child to term.

Good grief woman. None of this is happening. You're being manipulated and they're using your bigotry to do it. One day the fascists will come to round up people that look like you and me, and you'll have empowered them because you were afraid of imaginary cross-dressing rapists. Get it together! There are real and present dangers, and I promise you trans people are not the danger you should fear.

BW Hold on. You mean the old man in a miniskirt and 4” clear stiletto heels who I encountered in the women’s bathroom at the YMCA three weeks ago wasn’t actually there? Or the at least 6’4 man with long hair who entered the women’s bathroom at the AMC movie theater while I was alone there three months ago also didn’t exist?

Wow, either Republicans have perfected a mind control ray that makes women see cross-dressing men in the bathroom or Democrats like you are lying, gaslighting, hateful pieces of sh!t who endanger women with this disgusting social agenda and then attack us when we speak plainly on what is happening.

While you figure that puzzle out, I’ll be voting Republican for the first time because of fools like you.

NP I never call troll until now. You shared your tragic abortion story a few pages back. Received shared sorrow and attention. You posted again and now. Let’s assume you’re a real person who had an abortion to save your life. The one who said, if it weren’t for the “pill” you would have used a “hanger to rip your daughter” out in order to live for your two kids. In your 2nd post, you said something like, “yeh I did it for my kids, but mostly did it for myself bc I had the right to live.” Ok, not mutually exclusive. Now here you are identifying yourself as a new poster, which you are not. Then going off on the “good grief” poster who responds rationally to you as a black woman herself.

You go from being calm, articulate, and measured in your 1st post to garner empathy and attention. Now you’re a raging Republican voter for the 1st time bc of fools like her? saying democrats are [i]hateful pieces of sh!t bc you allegedly encountered not 1, but 2 cross dressed men, one being old, and the other being 6’4” GUURRRL you’re trolling hard. Welcome to DCUM newbie where you will be called out for bullsh!t. I’m gonna guess you’re not voting for anyone. Probably a dude.

I’m the black woman you called out and I’m not going to trade words with a delusional handmaid who thinks men can be women and welcomes predators to women’s spaces. You’re a traitor and a coward, and no better than the right wing nutjobs who would have preferred my pregnancy kill me. What a tragic, deluded, ill-intentioned disgrace you are.

I reiterated how you went from zero to attack. I said nothing about my political stance. I am not a Republican. I don’t welcome predators anywhere, and I’d protect myself and others from them. Women’s spaces should be protected. I don’t care how anyone identifies or how they present themselves, but if they have a penis, then no access to women's spaces. I’d never support risking a mother’s life. What’s disturbing is your quick shift to voting for Trump after benefitting from a life saving abortion. Glad you had the option. Many women’s lives have been saved just like yours. So, what about other women? You won’t vote to protect them? You’re a single issue voter. Selfish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am a 44 year old Jewish Republican woman and proud of it.

Before around a year ago I was a very Liberal Democrat, then Biden proceeded to ally him with Hamas and helped them invade Isreal in their genocidal attacks on 10/7 and continue to be Hamas’ biggest supporter on the international stage, feeding them through the disgusting pier and ignoring Israel’s desperate pleas to honor our alliance by sending the might of the US Military to aid the IDF in their noble goal of complete destruction of Hamas and retrieval of every single innocent Israeli hostage.

After that, I knew I could never vote for a democrat or liberal ever again. I am going to be proud to vote for Donald Trump, who has been a true friend to the Jewish people, a hero worthy of succeeding David, Moses, and the other greats!

Biden gets criticized for a lot of things (some for good reason) but he has never allied with Hamas. It's also worth noting that Biden decided to enter the 2020 race after seeing torch-carrying Trump supporters chant "Jews will not replace us!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

NP. I wonder if you know that you make Republican voting women sound incredibly stupid and immature, reactive to non-important stimulus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a 44 year old Jewish Republican woman and proud of it.

Before around a year ago I was a very Liberal Democrat, then Biden proceeded to ally him with Hamas and helped them invade Isreal in their genocidal attacks on 10/7 and continue to be Hamas’ biggest supporter on the international stage, feeding them through the disgusting pier and ignoring Israel’s desperate pleas to honor our alliance by sending the might of the US Military to aid the IDF in their noble goal of complete destruction of Hamas and retrieval of every single innocent Israeli hostage.

After that, I knew I could never vote for a democrat or liberal ever again. I am going to be proud to vote for Donald Trump, who has been a true friend to the Jewish people, a hero worthy of succeeding David, Moses, and the other greats!

Biden gets criticized for a lot of things (some for good reason) but he has never allied with Hamas. It's also worth noting that Biden decided to enter the 2020 race after seeing torch-carrying Trump supporters chant "Jews will not replace us!"

They were Trump’s very fine people.