Does your community pool have a dress code?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think there’s a big difference between a revealing swimsuit and sexual behavior.

Totally. But we're not talking about a revealing swimsuit—we're asking if your pool has a dress code, and at what point are some bathing suits TOO revealing. And, if you're a sane or not a pervert, you probably have a good answer. Let's hear it!

I think a good dress code would be: does it violate decency laws if you get into the pool in it. So thongs that stay put are fine, but some of the things I found after googling microbikinis because of this thread (never seen anything like them in real life!) that have maybe three cubic inches of fabric total would not.

There has to be a line and you have to draw it somewhere, but the thong enthusiasts and perverts will always object.

I mean good for them? I think thongs are just bathing suits as long as they don’t fall off when you get in the water. Would I feel confused wearing them? No. Do I care if other people do, even if my kids are present? Also no.

Huh. Is there ANYTHING you think is inappropriate to do at a children's pool or playground?

Again, not a children’s pool.

Answer the question! What is inappropriate to do at a pool built for and primarily used by children?

Where are these children's pools?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, my MoCo pool has a very strict dress code which was approved by the board. Fortunately our pool manager April conducts an inspection which all pool guests must go through prior to entering. Under no circumstances can there be more than 35% of the buttocks exposed. Furthermore, any visible outline of genitalia is strictly forbidden. That rules out most speedos for men. The code was enacted about 8 years ago and the vibe has improved tremendously. The pool is now a safe space for men, women and children to enjoy in harmony without any overt sexual pretenses.

How does one determine 35% coverage on an irregular surface?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, my MoCo pool has a very strict dress code which was approved by the board. Fortunately our pool manager April conducts an inspection which all pool guests must go through prior to entering. Under no circumstances can there be more than 35% of the buttocks exposed. Furthermore, any visible outline of genitalia is strictly forbidden. That rules out most speedos for men. The code was enacted about 8 years ago and the vibe has improved tremendously. The pool is now a safe space for men, women and children to enjoy in harmony without any overt sexual pretenses.

How does one determine 35% coverage on an irregular surface?

If you ever find yourself in a place where you are trying to subvert the rules against performing sex acts in front of children, maybe it’s time to rethink your life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. Cheeky bottoms are one thing. THe suit that made me write the post was a bikini bottom thong showing two full cheeks that looked like underwear. She looked good but I have two boys, one a teenager. If I'm supposed to be keeping him safe from explicit images on the internet why is he seeing near-nudity at the pool?

This does not help your case, op. Why don’t you teach your teen son that staring is rude, and when talking to a girl, keep his eyes on her face.

Why would a girl be out in public displaying her entire @$$ if she wants boys to look at her face?

Some of you REALLY want to have it both ways.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We should probably keep women hidden from the public until age 21. Just to prevent any problems with lusting men.

I like the idea of institutionalizing men until age 26 better

You DO realize that if men were locked away until age 26 the teen girls and young women would stop wearing these BS “bathing suits”? Because their target audience wouldn’t be there to look at them, so they would most likely wear suits that are *actually* comfortable and, more importantly, made for swimming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. Cheeky bottoms are one thing. THe suit that made me write the post was a bikini bottom thong showing two full cheeks that looked like underwear. She looked good but I have two boys, one a teenager. If I'm supposed to be keeping him safe from explicit images on the internet why is he seeing near-nudity at the pool?

This does not help your case, op. Why don’t you teach your teen son that staring is rude, and when talking to a girl, keep his eyes on her face.

Why would a girl be out in public displaying her entire @$$ if she wants boys to look at her face?

Some of you REALLY want to have it both ways.

I can imagine my younger self thinking, "Huh, only 35% exposed. I guess I will look away."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. Cheeky bottoms are one thing. THe suit that made me write the post was a bikini bottom thong showing two full cheeks that looked like underwear. She looked good but I have two boys, one a teenager. If I'm supposed to be keeping him safe from explicit images on the internet why is he seeing near-nudity at the pool?

This does not help your case, op. Why don’t you teach your teen son that staring is rude, and when talking to a girl, keep his eyes on her face.

Why would a girl be out in public displaying her entire @$$ if she wants boys to look at her face?

Some of you REALLY want to have it both ways.

I can imagine my younger self thinking, "Huh, only 35% exposed. I guess I will look away."

The goal is differentiate between those seeking comfort and a good tan women who are trying to lure strangers into sexual encounters and perverted men who want to display their erection. Keep in mind, we’re talking about children’s pools, not a seedy nightclub or Craigslist posting. Children’s pools.

[Anonymous]

Yes. Things and pasties are required for all adults.

[Anonymous]

I don't love the cheeky look but it's what all the stores are selling now . . . imagine the constant wedgies. But that said, I'm pretty "live and let live" when it comes to clothing . . . what should be covered up varies a lot by culture. It's an anthropological question rather than a moral one. It's just a body, and if seeing an inch of someone's skin is a problem for you, that's a you problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, my MoCo pool has a very strict dress code which was approved by the board. Fortunately our pool manager April conducts an inspection which all pool guests must go through prior to entering. Under no circumstances can there be more than 35% of the buttocks exposed. Furthermore, any visible outline of genitalia is strictly forbidden. That rules out most speedos for men. The code was enacted about 8 years ago and the vibe has improved tremendously. The pool is now a safe space for men, women and children to enjoy in harmony without any overt sexual pretenses.

How does one determine 35% coverage on an irregular surface?

If you ever find yourself in a place where you are trying to subvert the rules against performing sex acts in front of children, maybe it’s time to rethink your life.

Wearing a swimsuit =/= performing sex acts in front of children.

What a wild stretch of...logic? It's not even close to logic, I have no idea what to call it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. Cheeky bottoms are one thing. THe suit that made me write the post was a bikini bottom thong showing two full cheeks that looked like underwear. She looked good but I have two boys, one a teenager. If I'm supposed to be keeping him safe from explicit images on the internet why is he seeing near-nudity at the pool?

This does not help your case, op. Why don’t you teach your teen son that staring is rude, and when talking to a girl, keep his eyes on her face.

Why would a girl be out in public displaying her entire @$$ if she wants boys to look at her face?

Some of you REALLY want to have it both ways.

I can imagine my younger self thinking, "Huh, only 35% exposed. I guess I will look away."

The goal is differentiate between those seeking comfort and a good tan women who are trying to lure strangers into sexual encounters and perverted men who want to display their erection. Keep in mind, we’re talking about children’s pools, not a seedy nightclub or Craigslist posting. Children’s pools.

Again, not children's pools. Why do you keep posting factually incorrect information?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. Cheeky bottoms are one thing. THe suit that made me write the post was a bikini bottom thong showing two full cheeks that looked like underwear. She looked good but I have two boys, one a teenager. If I'm supposed to be keeping him safe from explicit images on the internet why is he seeing near-nudity at the pool?

This does not help your case, op. Why don’t you teach your teen son that staring is rude, and when talking to a girl, keep his eyes on her face.

Why would a girl be out in public displaying her entire @$$ if she wants boys to look at her face?

Some of you REALLY want to have it both ways.

I can imagine my younger self thinking, "Huh, only 35% exposed. I guess I will look away."

The goal is differentiate between those seeking comfort and a good tan women who are trying to lure strangers into sexual encounters and perverted men who want to display their erection. Keep in mind, we’re talking about children’s pools, not a seedy nightclub or Craigslist posting. Children’s pools.

Again, not children's pools. Why do you keep posting factually incorrect information?

What do you call pools filled with children?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, my MoCo pool has a very strict dress code which was approved by the board. Fortunately our pool manager April conducts an inspection which all pool guests must go through prior to entering. Under no circumstances can there be more than 35% of the buttocks exposed. Furthermore, any visible outline of genitalia is strictly forbidden. That rules out most speedos for men. The code was enacted about 8 years ago and the vibe has improved tremendously. The pool is now a safe space for men, women and children to enjoy in harmony without any overt sexual pretenses.

How does one determine 35% coverage on an irregular surface?

If you ever find yourself in a place where you are trying to subvert the rules against performing sex acts in front of children, maybe it’s time to rethink your life.

Wearing a swimsuit =/= performing sex acts in front of children.

What a wild stretch of...logic? It's not even close to logic, I have no idea what to call it.

Can we get you to agree that having sex at a children’s pool is wrong?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, my MoCo pool has a very strict dress code which was approved by the board. Fortunately our pool manager April conducts an inspection which all pool guests must go through prior to entering. Under no circumstances can there be more than 35% of the buttocks exposed. Furthermore, any visible outline of genitalia is strictly forbidden. That rules out most speedos for men. The code was enacted about 8 years ago and the vibe has improved tremendously. The pool is now a safe space for men, women and children to enjoy in harmony without any overt sexual pretenses.

How does one determine 35% coverage on an irregular surface?

If you ever find yourself in a place where you are trying to subvert the rules against performing sex acts in front of children, maybe it’s time to rethink your life.

Wearing a swimsuit =/= performing sex acts in front of children.

What a wild stretch of...logic? It's not even close to logic, I have no idea what to call it.

Can we get you to agree that having sex at a children’s pool is wrong?

Again, not a children's pool.

But sure, having sex at a children's pool is wrong. Wearing a swimsuit =/= having sex.

[Anonymous]

The childrens pool poster is clearly a troll. No one is that dumb. Posting the same thing over and over and over again, knowing it's wrong is just to get a rise out of other posters.