Kate Middleton looks really happy lately

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And I assume the Royal Family wanted someone who wanted to do the job. So I do not see why people have an issue with her wanting to do this from the beginning.

Lots of folks are social climbers—just not many are to the extent that Kate was. A ten-year commitment takes a lot of dedication.

See?? This is reprehensible. She met someone, they clicked, and didn’t commit to someone else until their story played out. I actually did the same with my husband…. We met at 21 and married at 30… I wasn’t “waiting around” I was actively involved in my own life and living it happily while he lived his… when the time was right he proposed and we are happy married and going on 25 years! Wtf, let them be!

If you also didn’t develop any sort of career or lasting friendships in all that time then yea you were “waiting around”

Oh please. The vast majority of ppl, even college-educated women, don't have these huge impressive meaningful impactful careers. And many women married to wealthy men SAH or serve on BS boards etc as a "job." Who cares that she wasn't busting her butt in some menial 9-5 everyday?

The part about no lasting friendships is an odd dig as well. How would you know?

Listen I’m sorry you are either so old that women didn’t have careers prior to marriage or didn’t go to college but most women do in fact have legitimate careers prior to marriage. Even within their circle, Chelsy Davy was a lawyer at a magic circle firm, Jecca Craig founded a number of influential wildlife conservation organizations, Eugenie had an actual career prior to marriage (also was an art history major like Kate), as did Sophie. But why work a “menial 9-5” when you can do the meaningful work of being a part-time accessories intern at Jigsaw?????

NP. Who cares? Not everyone is career driven. And that’s ok.

Lord knows Kate isn’t.

[Anonymous]

Well, she is living a good life with a lovely family. Her life is a job, representing the BRF.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, she is living a good life with a lovely family. Her life is a job, representing the BRF.

That’s a really good thing for her. Wouldn’t want to strain herself with something more intellectually taxing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate wouldn’t cheat. (And I’m one of the posters whose been accused of being Meghan)

Kate wouldn't cheat and I believe Roger wouldn't cheat on his wife and family either.

Who was that one famous British sailor Kate did some sailing events with years ago? She was beaming around him too. Same speculation - "do we think Kate would cheat with so and so?"

Look, they are good-looking, charismatic athletes. Who wouldn't be beaming in their presence? Anna Wintour probably beams when she's around Roger!

Agree, and this reminds me of this picture, which someone captioned “Every woman meeting Idris Elba.”

Idris Elba began his acting career with a grant from the Prince's Trust that allowed him to move to London and audition for acting jobs. Then Prince Charles started the Trust with his leaving out money from the Royal Navy. Elba is now one of the Trust Ambassadors and is close to both Charles and William. That is why Elba and his wife were invited to Prince Harry's wedding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I made the earlier no-dignity comment about Kate (which I stand by). But I also do think she seems so like a wonderful mom to her kids, as does Meghan. Just calling it like I see it, pretty neutral here. I really don’t like the toxicity of pitting the two women against each other. They’re clearly very different; that’s ok with me. I do think William thinks he’s #1 above Kate, whereas Harry puts Meghan ahead of himself.

+1. I like Kate, I just think William seems like he sucks. My impression is that William treats those close to him fairly poorly, whether it's his younger brother or his wife, and that Kate and Harry have just taken very different approaches to dealing with it, in part because it's different being an adult sibling than being a spouse/mother of his kids.

Well said, PP. I actually admire the hell out of Harry for putting his wife above everything and getting her the hell out of that toxic situation.

I admit that I think Kate is very unhappy with William (and I’ve posted as much), but I feel very confident that she’ll do what she thinks is best for her children.

Your speculation about both marriages and all four individuals sounds like a reflection of your own issues -- not theirs.

I agree. I follow the royal family fairly closely and have not seen all this anger that William supposedly has toward Catherine and others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of this animosity to wards a couple that are doing their jobs. The monarchy does not affect us in any way, so I like watching royals and their often weird rituals, clothes, lifestyles etc..

The same! I would never want to live in a country with a monarchy but u love observing their rituals, traditions and the Pomp and circumstance. Why assume William and Kate are anything but what they appear??? Two independent people who freely chose each other as young adults, took their time being sure before they settled down, and are raising what is visibly a happy family while working in the family biz. Why assume otherwise? Why so much hate?
It’s different to have an opinion on Harry and MM because they constantly put themselves out there and solicit input through their overexposure. It’s not the same thing.

+1 And well said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I made the earlier no-dignity comment about Kate (which I stand by). But I also do think she seems so like a wonderful mom to her kids, as does Meghan. Just calling it like I see it, pretty neutral here. I really don’t like the toxicity of pitting the two women against each other. They’re clearly very different; that’s ok with me. I do think William thinks he’s #1 above Kate, whereas Harry puts Meghan ahead of himself.

+1. I like Kate, I just think William seems like he sucks. My impression is that William treats those close to him fairly poorly, whether it's his younger brother or his wife, and that Kate and Harry have just taken very different approaches to dealing with it, in part because it's different being an adult sibling than being a spouse/mother of his kids.

Well said, PP. I actually admire the hell out of Harry for putting his wife above everything and getting her the hell out of that toxic situation.

I admit that I think Kate is very unhappy with William (and I’ve posted as much), but I feel very confident that she’ll do what she thinks is best for her children.

Your speculation about both marriages and all four individuals sounds like a reflection of your own issues -- not theirs.

I agree. I follow the royal family fairly closely and have not seen all this anger that William supposedly has toward Catherine and others.

I guess you don’t read either.

https://www.theroyalobserver.com/p/prince-william-hot-temper-leads-fiery-rows-kate-middleton

https://www.womanandhome.com/life/royal-news/william-and-catherine-have-terrific-rows-its-not-a-perfect-marriage/

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/royals/prince-william-is-short-tempered/

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a43641700/prince-william-short-tempered-difficult/

https://www.geo.tv/latest/483122-prince-william-has-an-incredibly-short-temper-never-forgives-who-irks-him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of this animosity to wards a couple that are doing their jobs. The monarchy does not affect us in any way, so I like watching royals and their often weird rituals, clothes, lifestyles etc..

The same! I would never want to live in a country with a monarchy but u love observing their rituals, traditions and the Pomp and circumstance. Why assume William and Kate are anything but what they appear??? Two independent people who freely chose each other as young adults, took their time being sure before they settled down, and are raising what is visibly a happy family while working in the family biz. Why assume otherwise? Why so much hate?
It’s different to have an opinion on Harry and MM because they constantly put themselves out there and solicit input through their overexposure. It’s not the same thing.

That’s just not reality, babe. Wills & Kate are just as “out there” and overexposed as how you perceive H & M to be.

What’s good for the goose…….

Cope.

So you are saying that Catherine was over-exposed because in her role as patron of Wimbledon she awarded the trophies to the man and woman who won in the singles category or are you saying that Meghan Markle is over-exposed because she bought flowers at a farmer's market?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, she is living a good life with a lovely family. Her life is a job, representing the BRF.

That’s a really good thing for her. Wouldn’t want to strain herself with something more intellectually taxing.

She leaves the intellectually taxing to women who spend their time writing pithy comments on DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I made the earlier no-dignity comment about Kate (which I stand by). But I also do think she seems so like a wonderful mom to her kids, as does Meghan. Just calling it like I see it, pretty neutral here. I really don’t like the toxicity of pitting the two women against each other. They’re clearly very different; that’s ok with me. I do think William thinks he’s #1 above Kate, whereas Harry puts Meghan ahead of himself.

+1. I like Kate, I just think William seems like he sucks. My impression is that William treats those close to him fairly poorly, whether it's his younger brother or his wife, and that Kate and Harry have just taken very different approaches to dealing with it, in part because it's different being an adult sibling than being a spouse/mother of his kids.

Well said, PP. I actually admire the hell out of Harry for putting his wife above everything and getting her the hell out of that toxic situation.

I admit that I think Kate is very unhappy with William (and I’ve posted as much), but I feel very confident that she’ll do what she thinks is best for her children.

Your speculation about both marriages and all four individuals sounds like a reflection of your own issues -- not theirs.

I agree. I follow the royal family fairly closely and have not seen all this anger that William supposedly has toward Catherine and others.

I guess you don’t read either.

https://www.theroyalobserver.com/p/prince-william-hot-temper-leads-fiery-rows-kate-middleton

https://www.womanandhome.com/life/royal-news/william-and-catherine-have-terrific-rows-its-not-a-perfect-marriage/

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/royals/prince-william-is-short-tempered/

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a43641700/prince-william-short-tempered-difficult/

https://www.geo.tv/latest/483122-prince-william-has-an-incredibly-short-temper-never-forgives-who-irks-him

Oh, goodness, and they said Harry is dim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I made the earlier no-dignity comment about Kate (which I stand by). But I also do think she seems so like a wonderful mom to her kids, as does Meghan. Just calling it like I see it, pretty neutral here. I really don’t like the toxicity of pitting the two women against each other. They’re clearly very different; that’s ok with me. I do think William thinks he’s #1 above Kate, whereas Harry puts Meghan ahead of himself.

+1. I like Kate, I just think William seems like he sucks. My impression is that William treats those close to him fairly poorly, whether it's his younger brother or his wife, and that Kate and Harry have just taken very different approaches to dealing with it, in part because it's different being an adult sibling than being a spouse/mother of his kids.

Well said, PP. I actually admire the hell out of Harry for putting his wife above everything and getting her the hell out of that toxic situation.

I admit that I think Kate is very unhappy with William (and I’ve posted as much), but I feel very confident that she’ll do what she thinks is best for her children.

Your speculation about both marriages and all four individuals sounds like a reflection of your own issues -- not theirs.

I agree. I follow the royal family fairly closely and have not seen all this anger that William supposedly has toward Catherine and others.

I guess you don’t read either.

https://www.theroyalobserver.com/p/prince-william-hot-temper-leads-fiery-rows-kate-middleton

https://www.womanandhome.com/life/royal-news/william-and-catherine-have-terrific-rows-its-not-a-perfect-marriage/

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/royals/prince-william-is-short-tempered/

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a43641700/prince-william-short-tempered-difficult/

https://www.geo.tv/latest/483122-prince-william-has-an-incredibly-short-temper-never-forgives-who-irks-him

Oh, goodness, and they said Harry is dim.

Not surprising. I don't think any of them are particularly smart. Diana flat out called herself dumb.

[Anonymous]

What's wrong with not marrying someone else while love of your life finishes up his military and royal training? She was working and socializing, just not having another BF.

[Anonymous]

They graduated in 2005 and got engaged in 2010. Its not even that long by any means.

[Anonymous]

Even if Cathrine and Meghan are social climbers, how many social climbers actually end up marrying royalty?

[Anonymous]

Was Lady Diana not a social climber? Why would a stunningly gorgeous woman with an inheritance marry a much older, balding, average looking and boring man who is already in love with a forbidden woman?