Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The right verdict.

Signed, a liberal feminist me-too supporting woman who thinks Amber used the me-too movement to up her notoriety and has now had it rightfully backfire in her face.

I think Heard was using MeToo for her career AND that Depp was an abuser. Her behavior sucks but I don’t understand how that makes her guilty of defamation. If Depp didn’t want to be called out as an abuser, he should not have engaged in abusive behavior.

Agree with this take generally. To me the audio tapes prove they both abused each other so I’m not really convinced there was any defamation occurring. I am very sure they both need massive amounts of therapy and no normal person should be in a relationship with either of them.

ita.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heard said in a statement she is "heartbroken" over the verdict.

"The disappointment I feel today is beyond words. I'm heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence, and sway of my ex-husband," Heard said.

That's her story and she's sticking to it! It was all because of Depp's sway, despite a "mountain of evidence." SMH.

She’s right and I’m heartbroken for her. Depp was abusive and she had every right to write her op Ed and share her experience with an abuser. That she is imperfect as a victim doesn’t negate his abuse. It also doesn’t mean she defamed him. Sad day for women but this is the direction our country is headed in so not a total surprise. Soon you’ll be able to beat and terrify women with impunity.

+1 sad day for women

Oh please.

This is a case where a woman who is desperate for fame saw the value of leveraging the me too movement for her own narcissistic goals. She too advantage of the “believe all women” stance to ruin a man for her own gain.

I have experienced SA myself and am disgusted by her.

She had proof. More than most. Regardless if you believe her, you do understand how this verdict will negatively impact victims? As a supposed survivor of SA, I’d think you’d have some empathy for them, but sounds like you want them to shut up and stay silent.

Most survivors aren’t photoshopping photos to try to make it look like she had injuries. Most aren’t claiming to have a broken nose and going on a TV show with no sign of injury. Putting herself out as a spokesperson for abused women offends me so, so much.

DP. I’ve had a broken nose that left me with nothing but the slightest hint of shadows under my eyes that were easily covered with concealer.

The next day? lol

Yes, the next day. I was really grateful for the lack of bruising because it happening when my then-boyfriend accidentally elbowed me in the nose (a legit accident), and might after it happened I was afraid it would leave me terribly bruised and people would think my boyfriend was abusing me. I later had to have surgery to fix the deviated septum, but no noticeable bruising when it happened.

But since that doesn’t fit your preferred narrative, I’m sure you will accuse me of lying.

Getting elbowed accidentally and the ensuing injury is completely different from being punched in the face multiple times so hard that she thought he had broken her nose (according to her testimony).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Massive slamdunk win for Depp. All of his charges against her were sustained with compensatory AND punitive damages totaling over $10M.

Only one of her counter-claims was successful and that wasn't even against Depp but his agent and was for only $2M.

Furthermore, in the court of public opinion, I don't think Depp has ever been more popular. She, though....I don't think she's going to have many opportunities going forward.

No. Any decent human thinks he’s a POS after this.

The campaign online to clear Depp is just another form of MAGA in this country.

Like literally…when you’re a star, they let you do it - here - the “it” is beat your wife.

Completely unsurprised by the disgusting Pieces of Sh!T that surround us here in the good ol’ USA!

He didn't beat his wife.

The UK court found he did.

It wasn't a jury trial. One magistrate made that decision, and what were the standard in the uK court?

The Sun was required to prove that each of the statements was true on the balance of probability, which is essentially the same as the "greater weight of the evidence" standard that applied to whether the statements were false in this case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Massive slamdunk win for Depp. All of his charges against her were sustained with compensatory AND punitive damages totaling over $10M.

Only one of her counter-claims was successful and that wasn't even against Depp but his agent and was for only $2M.

Furthermore, in the court of public opinion, I don't think Depp has ever been more popular. She, though....I don't think she's going to have many opportunities going forward.

No. Any decent human thinks he’s a POS after this.

The campaign online to clear Depp is just another form of MAGA in this country.

Like literally…when you’re a star, they let you do it - here - the “it” is beat your wife.

Completely unsurprised by the disgusting Pieces of Sh!T that surround us here in the good ol’ USA!

He didn't beat his wife.

The UK court found he did.

It wasn't a jury trial. One magistrate made that decision, and what were the standard in the uK court?

I thought the uk case was specifically determining whether the sun had reasonable grounds to believe that their source (heard) was telling the truth, which the magistrate ruled that they did. It was not a ruling on whether JD was a wife beater; it was a ruling on whether the sun has reasonable grounds to believe JD was a wife beater. So I don’t actually think the magistrate’s ruling was unreasonable on face value.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heard said in a statement she is "heartbroken" over the verdict.

"The disappointment I feel today is beyond words. I'm heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence, and sway of my ex-husband," Heard said.

That's her story and she's sticking to it! It was all because of Depp's sway, despite a "mountain of evidence." SMH.

She’s right and I’m heartbroken for her. Depp was abusive and she had every right to write her op Ed and share her experience with an abuser. That she is imperfect as a victim doesn’t negate his abuse. It also doesn’t mean she defamed him. Sad day for women but this is the direction our country is headed in so not a total surprise. Soon you’ll be able to beat and terrify women with impunity.

+1 sad day for women

Oh please.

This is a case where a woman who is desperate for fame saw the value of leveraging the me too movement for her own narcissistic goals. She too advantage of the “believe all women” stance to ruin a man for her own gain.

I have experienced SA myself and am disgusted by her.

She had proof. More than most. Regardless if you believe her, you do understand how this verdict will negatively impact victims? As a supposed survivor of SA, I’d think you’d have some empathy for them, but sounds like you want them to shut up and stay silent.

Most survivors aren’t photoshopping photos to try to make it look like she had injuries. Most aren’t claiming to have a broken nose and going on a TV show with no sign of injury. Putting herself out as a spokesperson for abused women offends me so, so much.

DP. I’ve had a broken nose that left me with nothing but the slightest hint of shadows under my eyes that were easily covered with concealer.

The next day? lol

Yes, the next day. I was really grateful for the lack of bruising because it happening when my then-boyfriend accidentally elbowed me in the nose (a legit accident), and might after it happened I was afraid it would leave me terribly bruised and people would think my boyfriend was abusing me. I later had to have surgery to fix the deviated septum, but no noticeable bruising when it happened.

But since that doesn’t fit your preferred narrative, I’m sure you will accuse me of lying.

Getting elbowed accidentally and the ensuing injury is completely different from being punched in the face multiple times so hard that she thought he had broken her nose (according to her testimony).

Ah, so I had the wrong kind of injury because my broken nose was the result of an elbow. How about you give us a medical explanation of how a broken nose from an elbow (one severe enough to at it requires surgery to fix ) is different from a broken nose from a punch, such that one would cause bruising but the other could not cause bruising. I’ll wait.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heard said in a statement she is "heartbroken" over the verdict.

"The disappointment I feel today is beyond words. I'm heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence, and sway of my ex-husband," Heard said.

That's her story and she's sticking to it! It was all because of Depp's sway, despite a "mountain of evidence." SMH.

She’s right and I’m heartbroken for her. Depp was abusive and she had every right to write her op Ed and share her experience with an abuser. That she is imperfect as a victim doesn’t negate his abuse. It also doesn’t mean she defamed him. Sad day for women but this is the direction our country is headed in so not a total surprise. Soon you’ll be able to beat and terrify women with impunity.

+1 sad day for women

Oh please.

This is a case where a woman who is desperate for fame saw the value of leveraging the me too movement for her own narcissistic goals. She too advantage of the “believe all women” stance to ruin a man for her own gain.

I have experienced SA myself and am disgusted by her.

She had proof. More than most. Regardless if you believe her, you do understand how this verdict will negatively impact victims? As a supposed survivor of SA, I’d think you’d have some empathy for them, but sounds like you want them to shut up and stay silent.

Most survivors aren’t photoshopping photos to try to make it look like she had injuries. Most aren’t claiming to have a broken nose and going on a TV show with no sign of injury. Putting herself out as a spokesperson for abused women offends me so, so much.

DP. I’ve had a broken nose that left me with nothing but the slightest hint of shadows under my eyes that were easily covered with concealer.

The next day? lol

Yes, the next day. I was really grateful for the lack of bruising because it happening when my then-boyfriend accidentally elbowed me in the nose (a legit accident), and might after it happened I was afraid it would leave me terribly bruised and people would think my boyfriend was abusing me. I later had to have surgery to fix the deviated septum, but no noticeable bruising when it happened.

But since that doesn’t fit your preferred narrative, I’m sure you will accuse me of lying.

Getting elbowed accidentally and the ensuing injury is completely different from being punched in the face multiple times so hard that she thought he had broken her nose (according to her testimony).

I'm a PP who experienced physical (and other abuse growing up). IME and that of other victims in my family, the bruising from blows to the face may not appear right away but the swelling sure did. I had surgery in my early 40s to repair the damage. It wasn't anywhere near as bad as the blows I took in my youth and I still had a lot of swelling. The physical abuse Amber described just isn't believable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Massive slamdunk win for Depp. All of his charges against her were sustained with compensatory AND punitive damages totaling over $10M.

Only one of her counter-claims was successful and that wasn't even against Depp but his agent and was for only $2M.

Furthermore, in the court of public opinion, I don't think Depp has ever been more popular. She, though....I don't think she's going to have many opportunities going forward.

No. Any decent human thinks he’s a POS after this.

The campaign online to clear Depp is just another form of MAGA in this country.

Like literally…when you’re a star, they let you do it - here - the “it” is beat your wife.

Completely unsurprised by the disgusting Pieces of Sh!T that surround us here in the good ol’ USA!

He didn't beat his wife.

The UK court found he did.

The UK courts would find your post to be deformation.

UK courts are more respected than American juries. Maybe his name is cleared here, but movie stars still need international appeal

PP just made up so much BS. On top of that the U.K. box office is a smidgen of proceeds. Look at Top Gun - a $20 million opening is the best weekend possible. U.S. opening weekend is $160 million.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heard said in a statement she is "heartbroken" over the verdict.

"The disappointment I feel today is beyond words. I'm heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence, and sway of my ex-husband," Heard said.

That's her story and she's sticking to it! It was all because of Depp's sway, despite a "mountain of evidence." SMH.

She’s right and I’m heartbroken for her. Depp was abusive and she had every right to write her op Ed and share her experience with an abuser. That she is imperfect as a victim doesn’t negate his abuse. It also doesn’t mean she defamed him. Sad day for women but this is the direction our country is headed in so not a total surprise. Soon you’ll be able to beat and terrify women with impunity.

+1 sad day for women

Oh please.

This is a case where a woman who is desperate for fame saw the value of leveraging the me too movement for her own narcissistic goals. She too advantage of the “believe all women” stance to ruin a man for her own gain.

I have experienced SA myself and am disgusted by her.

She had proof. More than most. Regardless if you believe her, you do understand how this verdict will negatively impact victims? As a supposed survivor of SA, I’d think you’d have some empathy for them, but sounds like you want them to shut up and stay silent.

Most survivors aren’t photoshopping photos to try to make it look like she had injuries. Most aren’t claiming to have a broken nose and going on a TV show with no sign of injury. Putting herself out as a spokesperson for abused women offends me so, so much.

DP. I’ve had a broken nose that left me with nothing but the slightest hint of shadows under my eyes that were easily covered with concealer.

The next day? lol

Yes, the next day. I was really grateful for the lack of bruising because it happening when my then-boyfriend accidentally elbowed me in the nose (a legit accident), and might after it happened I was afraid it would leave me terribly bruised and people would think my boyfriend was abusing me. I later had to have surgery to fix the deviated septum, but no noticeable bruising when it happened.

But since that doesn’t fit your preferred narrative, I’m sure you will accuse me of lying.

Getting elbowed accidentally and the ensuing injury is completely different from being punched in the face multiple times so hard that she thought he had broken her nose (according to her testimony).

Ah, so I had the wrong kind of injury because my broken nose was the result of an elbow. How about you give us a medical explanation of how a broken nose from an elbow (one severe enough to at it requires surgery to fix ) is different from a broken nose from a punch, such that one would cause bruising but the other could not cause bruising. I’ll wait.

F=m*a

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Massive slamdunk win for Depp. All of his charges against her were sustained with compensatory AND punitive damages totaling over $10M.

Only one of her counter-claims was successful and that wasn't even against Depp but his agent and was for only $2M.

Furthermore, in the court of public opinion, I don't think Depp has ever been more popular. She, though....I don't think she's going to have many opportunities going forward.

No. Any decent human thinks he’s a POS after this.

The campaign online to clear Depp is just another form of MAGA in this country.

Like literally…when you’re a star, they let you do it - here - the “it” is beat your wife.

Completely unsurprised by the disgusting Pieces of Sh!T that surround us here in the good ol’ USA!

He didn't beat his wife.

The UK court found he did.

It wasn't a jury trial. One magistrate made that decision, and what were the standard in the uK court?

I thought the uk case was specifically determining whether the sun had reasonable grounds to believe that their source (heard) was telling the truth, which the magistrate ruled that they did. It was not a ruling on whether JD was a wife beater; it was a ruling on whether the sun has reasonable grounds to believe JD was a wife beater. So I don’t actually think the magistrate’s ruling was unreasonable on face value.

No, the Sun had to prove that the statements themselves were substantially true, not just that they reasonably believed them to be true. That's part of why UK defamation law is so plaintiff-friendly in the media context. It's not enough that a publication believes their source to be credible, they are held to the standard of actual substantial truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heard said in a statement she is "heartbroken" over the verdict.

"The disappointment I feel today is beyond words. I'm heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence, and sway of my ex-husband," Heard said.

That's her story and she's sticking to it! It was all because of Depp's sway, despite a "mountain of evidence." SMH.

She’s right and I’m heartbroken for her. Depp was abusive and she had every right to write her op Ed and share her experience with an abuser. That she is imperfect as a victim doesn’t negate his abuse. It also doesn’t mean she defamed him. Sad day for women but this is the direction our country is headed in so not a total surprise. Soon you’ll be able to beat and terrify women with impunity.

+1 sad day for women

Oh please.

This is a case where a woman who is desperate for fame saw the value of leveraging the me too movement for her own narcissistic goals. She too advantage of the “believe all women” stance to ruin a man for her own gain.

I have experienced SA myself and am disgusted by her.

She had proof. More than most. Regardless if you believe her, you do understand how this verdict will negatively impact victims? As a supposed survivor of SA, I’d think you’d have some empathy for them, but sounds like you want them to shut up and stay silent.

Most survivors aren’t photoshopping photos to try to make it look like she had injuries. Most aren’t claiming to have a broken nose and going on a TV show with no sign of injury. Putting herself out as a spokesperson for abused women offends me so, so much.

DP. I’ve had a broken nose that left me with nothing but the slightest hint of shadows under my eyes that were easily covered with concealer.

The next day? lol

Yes, the next day. I was really grateful for the lack of bruising because it happening when my then-boyfriend accidentally elbowed me in the nose (a legit accident), and might after it happened I was afraid it would leave me terribly bruised and people would think my boyfriend was abusing me. I later had to have surgery to fix the deviated septum, but no noticeable bruising when it happened.

But since that doesn’t fit your preferred narrative, I’m sure you will accuse me of lying.

Getting elbowed accidentally and the ensuing injury is completely different from being punched in the face multiple times so hard that she thought he had broken her nose (according to her testimony).

Ah, so I had the wrong kind of injury because my broken nose was the result of an elbow. How about you give us a medical explanation of how a broken nose from an elbow (one severe enough to at it requires surgery to fix ) is different from a broken nose from a punch, such that one would cause bruising but the other could not cause bruising. I’ll wait.

F=m*a

And? That doesn't prove anything on its own. Not to mention you're leaving out a significant part of the physics, which is surface area/pressure. Banging a hammer into a piece of wood may barely dent it, but the same force applied to a nail will pierce it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The right verdict.

Signed, a liberal feminist me-too supporting woman who thinks Amber used the me-too movement to up her notoriety and has now had it rightfully backfire in her face.

I think Heard was using MeToo for her career AND that Depp was an abuser. Her behavior sucks but I don’t understand how that makes her guilty of defamation. If Depp didn’t want to be called out as an abuser, he should not have engaged in abusive behavior.

Agree with this take generally. To me the audio tapes prove they both abused each other so I’m not really convinced there was any defamation occurring. I am very sure they both need massive amounts of therapy and no normal person should be in a relationship with either of them.

A big clue into defamation is when two people are engaged in ugly domestic behavior and one publicly accuses the other, the implication being that they themselves hadn't engaged in that kind of behavior (or worse) by the very fact of making the accusation (because who does that?), it's plain to see there is deception going on and you have to ask what the motive is. The facts, including courtroom behavior, supported the deception.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heard said in a statement she is "heartbroken" over the verdict.

"The disappointment I feel today is beyond words. I'm heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence, and sway of my ex-husband," Heard said.

That's her story and she's sticking to it! It was all because of Depp's sway, despite a "mountain of evidence." SMH.

She’s right and I’m heartbroken for her. Depp was abusive and she had every right to write her op Ed and share her experience with an abuser. That she is imperfect as a victim doesn’t negate his abuse. It also doesn’t mean she defamed him. Sad day for women but this is the direction our country is headed in so not a total surprise. Soon you’ll be able to beat and terrify women with impunity.

+1 sad day for women

Oh please.

This is a case where a woman who is desperate for fame saw the value of leveraging the me too movement for her own narcissistic goals. She too advantage of the “believe all women” stance to ruin a man for her own gain.

I have experienced SA myself and am disgusted by her.

She had proof. More than most. Regardless if you believe her, you do understand how this verdict will negatively impact victims? As a supposed survivor of SA, I’d think you’d have some empathy for them, but sounds like you want them to shut up and stay silent.

Most survivors aren’t photoshopping photos to try to make it look like she had injuries. Most aren’t claiming to have a broken nose and going on a TV show with no sign of injury. Putting herself out as a spokesperson for abused women offends me so, so much.

DP. I’ve had a broken nose that left me with nothing but the slightest hint of shadows under my eyes that were easily covered with concealer.

The next day? lol

Yes, the next day. I was really grateful for the lack of bruising because it happening when my then-boyfriend accidentally elbowed me in the nose (a legit accident), and might after it happened I was afraid it would leave me terribly bruised and people would think my boyfriend was abusing me. I later had to have surgery to fix the deviated septum, but no noticeable bruising when it happened.

But since that doesn’t fit your preferred narrative, I’m sure you will accuse me of lying.

Getting elbowed accidentally and the ensuing injury is completely different from being punched in the face multiple times so hard that she thought he had broken her nose (according to her testimony).

Ah, so I had the wrong kind of injury because my broken nose was the result of an elbow. How about you give us a medical explanation of how a broken nose from an elbow (one severe enough to at it requires surgery to fix ) is different from a broken nose from a punch, such that one would cause bruising but the other could not cause bruising. I’ll wait.

F=m*a

And? That doesn't prove anything on its own. Not to mention you're leaving out a significant part of the physics, which is surface area/pressure. Banging a hammer into a piece of wood may barely dent it, but the same force applied to a nail will pierce it.

I wrote a ridiculous answer to a ridiculous question. If you can't imagine an impact having a greater or lesser effect than being elbowed, take a creative writing class.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amber lied on the stand. She screwed herself over. An expert testified that some of her photos had been edited, or dates changed. Police officers testified that they saw no marks on her when she claimed to have been beaten. The make up that seemed to have worked miracles didn't exist when she claimed to have used it.

Where were the recordings of him being abusive? She recorded herself.

How could the jury believe anything she said?

Actually the jury found that she was telling the truth in the count where they ruled against Depp.

“ Heard, 36, also filed a countersuit against Depp, 58, seeking $100 million in damages and saying his legal team falsely accused her of fabricating claims against Depp. The jury awarded Heard $2 million in damages in that countersuit.”

So she didn’t lie but defamed him by speaking out. Not sure how anyone supporting this verdict can call themselves a feminist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heard said in a statement she is "heartbroken" over the verdict.

"The disappointment I feel today is beyond words. I'm heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence, and sway of my ex-husband," Heard said.

That's her story and she's sticking to it! It was all because of Depp's sway, despite a "mountain of evidence." SMH.

She’s right and I’m heartbroken for her. Depp was abusive and she had every right to write her op Ed and share her experience with an abuser. That she is imperfect as a victim doesn’t negate his abuse. It also doesn’t mean she defamed him. Sad day for women but this is the direction our country is headed in so not a total surprise. Soon you’ll be able to beat and terrify women with impunity.

+1 sad day for women

Oh please.

This is a case where a woman who is desperate for fame saw the value of leveraging the me too movement for her own narcissistic goals. She too advantage of the “believe all women” stance to ruin a man for her own gain.

I have experienced SA myself and am disgusted by her.

She had proof. More than most. Regardless if you believe her, you do understand how this verdict will negatively impact victims? As a supposed survivor of SA, I’d think you’d have some empathy for them, but sounds like you want them to shut up and stay silent.

Most survivors aren’t photoshopping photos to try to make it look like she had injuries. Most aren’t claiming to have a broken nose and going on a TV show with no sign of injury. Putting herself out as a spokesperson for abused women offends me so, so much.

DP. I’ve had a broken nose that left me with nothing but the slightest hint of shadows under my eyes that were easily covered with concealer.

The next day? lol

Yes, the next day. I was really grateful for the lack of bruising because it happening when my then-boyfriend accidentally elbowed me in the nose (a legit accident), and might after it happened I was afraid it would leave me terribly bruised and people would think my boyfriend was abusing me. I later had to have surgery to fix the deviated septum, but no noticeable bruising when it happened.

But since that doesn’t fit your preferred narrative, I’m sure you will accuse me of lying.

Getting elbowed accidentally and the ensuing injury is completely different from being punched in the face multiple times so hard that she thought he had broken her nose (according to her testimony).

Ah, so I had the wrong kind of injury because my broken nose was the result of an elbow. How about you give us a medical explanation of how a broken nose from an elbow (one severe enough to at it requires surgery to fix ) is different from a broken nose from a punch, such that one would cause bruising but the other could not cause bruising. I’ll wait.

F=m*a

And? That doesn't prove anything on its own. Not to mention you're leaving out a significant part of the physics, which is surface area/pressure. Banging a hammer into a piece of wood may barely dent it, but the same force applied to a nail will pierce it.

I wrote a ridiculous answer to a ridiculous question. If you can't imagine an impact having a greater or lesser effect than being elbowed, take a creative writing class.

DP. In other words, you are full of it and have no idea how to distinguish between an elbow and a fist, particularly without more information about the incidents than we have about either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amber lied on the stand. She screwed herself over. An expert testified that some of her photos had been edited, or dates changed. Police officers testified that they saw no marks on her when she claimed to have been beaten. The make up that seemed to have worked miracles didn't exist when she claimed to have used it.

Where were the recordings of him being abusive? She recorded herself.

How could the jury believe anything she said?

Actually the jury found that she was telling the truth in the count where they ruled against Depp.

“ Heard, 36, also filed a countersuit against Depp, 58, seeking $100 million in damages and saying his legal team falsely accused her of fabricating claims against Depp. The jury awarded Heard $2 million in damages in that countersuit.”

So she didn’t lie but defamed him by speaking out. Not sure how anyone supporting this verdict can call themselves a feminist.

That’s not what they found. They found that the cops weren’t called twice and Heard and her cronies didn’t “rough up the place” as Walkman described in the tabloid. They did find that Waldman’s characterization of her story as a “hoax” was not defamation.