Forum Index
»
Elementary School-Aged Kids
The others are not joining in because OP was in on the freaking text!! Not because they are suddenly taking some moral high ground. |
Oh, good grief. |
I posted that. I literally said in my post "each person is unique". I never judged their kids for preferring to color over wrestling, or preferring to read a book the explore the woods. Like i said, each kid is unique. But if you bash my kid for preferring to play barefoot (always taking his shoes off in the grass), then trust me, your kid preferring to sit on mom's lap is definitely fair game |
| Have someone else respond back saying “Did you know that Larlos mom is on this list?” Her jaw will drop. |
DP. It does not get more primitive than wrestling. What's "imaginative" and "curious" about that?
|
Are you for real? You literally wrote that you always felt their kids were "boring, incurious, and unimaginative". How is that not being judgmental? |
You thought their kids were boring, incurious and unimaginative. That’s pretty judge-y! |
Thats not judgement. Judgement would be saying they were bad or inferior because they were boring. Calling a boring person boring is just describing them. Saying they are "less than" because of it is judgement. I specifically went out of my way to shrug it off as "each person is unique". There's nothing wrong with boring people. But they are still boring. So not judging, just describing. |
Spare me the eye roll. The wrestling falls under "spirited" |
Great, so then the texting lady was just describing the kid when she said he was loud and there’s no need for this crazy thread! |
Well, no. Because she suggested they need wine and advil; that the spirited child causes headaches. That was the judgement. Calling a child spirit or hyper when they are hyper is fine. Suggesting you need to medicate cause of it is the judgement. Calling a boring child boring is fine. But saying, a boring child is less preferable than a spirited child is the judgement. Likewise, calling a spirited child child spirited is fine. But saying a spirited child is less preferable than the boring child is the judgement (which is what the texter did.) Its nuance, but its important |
|
I think most relevant is whether the poster knew you were on the thread. If they truly forgot, you can ignore. And you are being the bigger person by giving it a pass. The poster is entitled to feel any way she wants towards your child. And voice an opinion. That is an ordinary thing. But it's on her to know her audience. And her comments wouldn't be well received if the audience didn't agree in some way.
If the poster absolutely knew you were on the thread, you have to say something. And whatever you say is fine. She started it. You could strongly defend your son. At a minimum you could say, "Susie, I'm going to assume you would not have posted this, since it's hurtful, if you remembered I was on this thread." And then move on. |
|
Pro tip: If the thread has gone to 26 pages the OP has probably updated in that time. Read the thread if you are going to give advice.
The OP replied to the text lady ages ago. |
|
DP. There is something wrong with your kind of "spirited" people who think they are entitled to creating noise and chaos for everyone. If you are usually the center of attention because you are too loud/obnoxious, you are not spirited; you are rude and badly behaved. OP's child is only a child so he has some growing to do. You, on the other hand ... |