Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Question: if they aren’t working royals, then why should they get to keep Frogmore (which was just renovated for them) and their security detail at the expense of British taxpayers?

The royals should cut them loose.

And I wish the media would ignore them.

Watch: they’ll become full blown money seeking celebs. They’ll make people pay to play. And I bet they’ll run into issues with their foundation (using the funds inappropriately to support their lavish lifestyle).

They’ll get security detail for the same reason former U.S. presidents and the families of current and former presidents get secret service detail. They’re too big targets otherwise and that would compromise national interests.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Suck it, haters! Enjoy your sad little tabloid bits about Charles’ sausage fingers and George’s new long pants.

Relative freedom FTW.

DCUM readers —- see what Meghan’s vile stans are like?!!!! They make fun of Prince George’s clothes from his Christmas photo shoot with the Queen. And make fun of Prince Charles’s swollen fingers, obviously due to some unannounced medical condition.

MM attracts the most vicious fans. They are all over Twitter, some even hoping for the death of William and his children so Meghan and Harry will take the throne. They are disgusting followers.

Harry brought all of MM’s unhinged followers into the royal family. That’s what pisses me off. The way her stans attack Kate is despicable. If I were William, I’d never want to be near him again.

Yes, I do. Are you a MM stan? The level of hate from the MM followers towards Kate and her children is unpardonable.

LOL, do you hear yourself?

[Anonymous]

Good on them. It seemed like Harry loved being in the army, sleeping on a campbed and being treated as one of the lads. Hollywood celebrities choose a lifestyle in the public eye. These royals are born into it and don't have a choice of career or a voice regarding their status as involuntary celebrities.

[Anonymous]

So how do they plan to become ‘financially independent’? Instagram influencers? Can you imagine MM hawking a fab fit fun box LMAO

[Anonymous]

Shouldn’t Brits be upset with Harry for dumping them? I mean, he has been afforded every privilege since birth. The only reason he has a platform and the capacity to build his wealth is because of his Royal title. Yet, that’s not enough. He wants to jump ship, forego any responsibility, and build his own fortune. Again: why aren’t Brits furious?

Fine. Let him go. But kick him out of Frogmore or make him reimburse them for renovations and start paying rent.

[Anonymous]

“Aides complain about being stabbed in the back.” Taken from Sun article today on their surprise announcement to the press.

Good job, Harkles! You suck. Hope the Queen strips you of your titles and every royal perk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So how do they plan to become ‘financially independent’? Instagram influencers? Can you imagine MM hawking a fab fit fun box LMAO

He has $45M already and he’ll inherit money from Charles. He really doesn’t need money.

He’ll curry favor with Hollywood celebs and global rich people (free house stays, vacations, gifts, etc.).

They’ll ramp up their foundation and perhaps draw a salary.

Maybe they’ll serve on boards for a salary?

Again: they’ll make money the way Andrew did by selling access to the royals. I hope the Queen makes a public statement making clear Harry no longer has access to the royals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Im reminded of all of the stories that the queen never forgave her uncle for abdicating. Obviously Harry is nowhere near first in line, so it isn’t the same sort of abdication, but I would love to know if this is viewed (by the queen) as a similar shirking of responsibility.

The Queen’s anger at her uncle wasn’t general disdain for irresponsibility but because the abdication made her father king. It was a huge burden for a man not suited for that role and she felt the stress of it shortened his life. It is not analogous to Harry’s actions in any way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good for them. I'm glad they feel secure enough to establish their own lives for themselves rather than being bound to outdated norms. If nothing else, given the open racism of the British press, I think it would be good for Archie to be shielded from it a bit more as he grows up.

Harry is a prince. He's outdated. And he wants to have it both ways.

They keep saying how close the brothers are. Even if they're not as close as they were before, I didn't expect this behavior from Harry.

I guess you (and the rest of the Royal family) didn’t listen to him in South Africa.

He’s endured three years of Meghan being abused DAILY by the British starting with this first piece in 2016.



The Firm has had a good six months to come up with a solution since South Africa and done nothing.

So Harry is.

Is there any other article to fit your narrative????

Did you see Prince Charles walk Meghan down he aisle at her wedding? And the Queen take Meghan on one of her first royal engagements? And see photos of the Queen and Prince Phillip Meeting Archie? And the Queen saying in her Christmas speech how wonderful it was to have Archie born?

Your selective choice of media to fit your narrative is appalling. The Royal Family has bent over backwards to welcome Meghan. Meghan not a victim.

None of that is some extraordinary welcome. It’s the very least they could have done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Suck it, haters! Enjoy your sad little tabloid bits about Charles’ sausage fingers and George’s new long pants.

Relative freedom FTW.

DCUM readers —- see what Meghan’s vile stans are like?!!!! They make fun of Prince George’s clothes from his Christmas photo shoot with the Queen. And make fun of Prince Charles’s swollen fingers, obviously due to some unannounced medical condition.

MM attracts the most vicious fans. They are all over Twitter, some even hoping for the death of William and his children so Meghan and Harry will take the throne. They are disgusting followers.

Harry brought all of MM’s unhinged followers into the royal family. That’s what pisses me off. The way her stans attack Kate is despicable. If I were William, I’d never want to be near him again.

Yes, I do. Are you a MM stan? The level of hate from the MM followers towards Kate and her children is unpardonable.

LOL, do you hear yourself?

There were people on the thread about their Christmas card saying Archie was cross eyed and that he was much less cute than George. It’s more a terrible loser thing than it is a MM Stan thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Suck it, haters! Enjoy your sad little tabloid bits about Charles’ sausage fingers and George’s new long pants.

Relative freedom FTW.

DCUM readers —- see what Meghan’s vile stans are like?!!!! They make fun of Prince George’s clothes from his Christmas photo shoot with the Queen. And make fun of Prince Charles’s swollen fingers, obviously due to some unannounced medical condition.

MM attracts the most vicious fans. They are all over Twitter, some even hoping for the death of William and his children so Meghan and Harry will take the throne. They are disgusting followers.

You’re an idiot if you can’t see that that was a comment on the kind of material that the tabloids publish. Truly an idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good on them. It seemed like Harry loved being in the army, sleeping on a campbed and being treated as one of the lads. Hollywood celebrities choose a lifestyle in the public eye. These royals are born into it and don't have a choice of career or a voice regarding their status as involuntary celebrities.

What?

Harry and Meghan are desperate to be celebrities. They don’t like the hassle of Royal duties. They don’t want to work, they just want to play.

I bet Meghan wants to be dressed by designers. And I bet she wants to be able to flaunt their wealth. They hated having to exercise restraint.

They won’t get less media attention. They’re counting on getting more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Aides complain about being stabbed in the back.” Taken from Sun article today on their surprise announcement to the press.

Good job, Harkles! You suck. Hope the Queen strips you of your titles and every royal perk.

The Sun.

THE SUN. Smh.

[Anonymous]

What exactly will the Harkles bring to the table? If they cannot offer an audience with the Queen, Prince Charles or Prince William, or say a private tour of Buckingham Palace, what do they offer? I don’t understand their draw.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Aides complain about being stabbed in the back.” Taken from Sun article today on their surprise announcement to the press.

Good job, Harkles! You suck. Hope the Queen strips you of your titles and every royal perk.

The Sun.

THE SUN. Smh.

And the BBC.