Washington-Loving

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The best and clearest statement would have been to name the school Washington-Lincoln.

Just rename It Arlington Central. Hindsight is always 20-20, or seems to be, and it'll be about 5 years before Washington gets stripped from the name too, and cost even more in the process. This whole thing is dumb, and nothing to be proud of.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Why so extreme of a reaction to it? "Profoundly stupid"? Don't people have more important things to get upset about?

Why have such a negative reaction to the name of a school that has been there since 1925? Sure, one of the namessakes may not have been the best choice, but the school seems to be doing okay-even with the name.
Why spend all this money and come up with a name that appears to be a poor choice to most people--just in the name of "progress?"

Let’s just bring slavery back. Legalize the rape, murder, pedofilia, and mistreatment of people based on color just as the Washington and Lee did?

You’d really like that wouldn’t you?

NO! But, it sounds like you also wish to get rid of Washington.

Of course, slavery is unacceptable and all those other things you mention. But, you really think we should get rid of Washington? Here is a little tidbit: lots of awful things have happened in the past. Good people have done terrible things. But, Washington is not honored for being a slave owner. He is honored for helping to create a country of liberty and freedom. Slavery was a horrible thing--but our government (which Washington helped found) enabled us to get rid of slavery.

If you cannot understand that, then perhaps you should find a place to live that has never done anything wrong in the past. Please advise this forum of which country that might be.

No let’s find some individuals who are not well known for doing so much evil.
How much liberty and freedom did the the slaves George Washington had have? Robert E Lee was no worse a human being than George Washington. He may have been more of an intellectual. But his lifestyle proves he was just as barbaric.

Not sure why anyone keeps arguing against either Washington or Loving. This is going to be another typical "Arlington Way' maneuver/ploy/ruse in which the SB pretends to be interested in the public's input, including those on the renaming committee, but all along has the name they want selected and will adopt, unfortunately for those who don't prefer Washington or Loving. Then they pretend they listened to all of us and pat themselves on the back for their virtue signaling.

The problem is replacing one patently political name (Lee, which dates from the 20s, and a product of that time, not the 1860s) with another (loving, a product of our times, not the 1960s.) that's why this is dumb. It's a nakedly political gesture for public education, which should be as apolitical as possible. This isn't about the livings, their relationship, or whatever. They didn't choose the name.

[Anonymous]

It’s virtue signaling to mask the de facto segregation that defines both the county and APS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The best and clearest statement would have been to name the school Washington-Lincoln.

Best and clearest statement about what?

[Anonymous]

Cherrydale High school!

[Anonymous]

Question:

Is Justice a better high school than Stuart? Any information on this. Have things improved with the kids?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Question:

Is Justice a better high school than Stuart? Any information on this. Have things improved with the kids?

Well I’m sure the kids feel better knowing there school isn’t named after a white supremacist

[Anonymous]

Arlington Central or Cherrydale.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Question:

Is Justice a better high school than Stuart? Any information on this. Have things improved with the kids?

I think the new name has been positive. It showed that the School Board cared enough about the school to listen to those who found the Stuart name offensive and spend money on new signs, uniforms, etc. Many students participated in the renaming ceremony in the fall, which the Lieutenant Governor (Justin Fairfax) and other elected officials attended. The football team had a winning season wearing their new uniforms. They are getting a kick now out of the fact that Merriam-Webster just announced that "Justice" was the "word of the year."

https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/word-of-the-year-2018-justice/justice

Time will tell whether more teachers will want to work at a school that isn't named after a Confederate, or whether more parents will want to send their kids there, or whether the SOL scores will improve.

[Anonymous]

I sill like Bezos High

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I sill like Bezos High

If he'll pay for special needs education, let's do it!

[Anonymous]

These people — the Lovings — have ZERO connection to Arlington. You either have to be a prominent national figure (MLK, a President etc) or have something to do with Arlington. Otherwise, there is no veil to this progressive feel good we are woke renaming.

Let’s just go with Liberty and take the second “for all” part of the Pledge of Allegiance. Or don’t change it at all. This whole thing is a waste of time and money. The SB certainly would benefit from spending time on other things.

[Anonymous]

I wonder if they ever reached out to the family. I wouldn’t be surprised, based on the articles about divisions between their kids, if they aren’t keen on the idea. I’m sure the SB would come up with some fake reason why they didn’t chose the name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I sill like Bezos High

If he’d pay for it, sure. Still not clear to me why they didn’t extract a promise to fully fund another school from that weird company.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s virtue signaling to mask the de facto segregation that defines both the county and APS.

Not sure the two are related, but you’re not wrong about the de facto segregation. It’s kind of repulsive.