Harry and Meghan’s Christmas card

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lillibet's hair is not brushed.

As someone with curly hair, I will posit that brushing Lilibet's hair could make it very frizzy. Or it could be that humidity makes her hair freak out a bit.

Or maybe she hates having it brushed. I did when I was her age, and I have a vivid memory of having my hair brushed and squirming around so much trying to get away that my mom whacked me with the brush. It's OK with me if Megan prefers unbrushed hair on a preschooler to that.

But regardless: You are criticizing the hair of a preschooler.

You don't think Meghan, who straightens her curly hair to the point of flatness, wouldn't know how to handle her daughter's curly hair?

I have curly hair (which I wear sometimes straight and sometimes curly and am very good with) and I am still figuring out what to do with my 8 yo DD's hair, which like Lillibet's is also curly but with a looser curl pattern and is very fine and not as thick. It's a really tricky hairstyle because it can't handle the product you'd use on thicker, curlier hair to make it look good curly, but it's also very breakage prone which makes heat styling and relaxing a hard no, especially on a young kid.

My DD's hair looks just like Lillibet's as sometimes. Humidity is especially hard to deal with.

Yes, her hair is fine thin European white person wavy hair, which is very flyaway. It is different from mixed race or darker thicker curly hair or silky mixed race hair.

The products that fine wavy caucasian hair needs is different than what thicker curly mixed race or biracial hair needs.

Yes and would never use chemicals or very many products at all on a small child’s hair. The suggestions to do so are totally crazy!

You're right. None of us should shampoo our children's hair either. Or use soap to wash them. Or serve them food. Or let them breathe air. NO CHEMICALS EVER!!!!

You’re comparing not using relaxers and flatirons on a preschooler to not using soap and eating food?

Get help

+1000. Sometimes it's hard to look at the people who hate, hate, hate Meghan and Harry and wonder exactly how these posters' own lives are deficient.

[Anonymous]

I think the Tina Brown remarks on Harry and Meghan are spot on (she basically said Harry is stupid). These people are sad and now that they have nothing left to say about her one year with the royal family, they spend their time posing for silly pictures for instagram.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s a posed casual photo. Totally fine. My daughter hates when I wash / brush her hair, and so her hair, which I don’t let grow past her shoulders, kind of look like this all the time.

It's posed, but definitely not casual. Meghan is practically wearing a gown. Her daughter has on a dress and shiny dress shoes. It's the equivalent of going for a 5 mile run, coming home, not showering or washing your face , keeping your hair up in the sweaty ponytail, and throwing on a fancy dress to attend a wedding.

DP who just joined this thread here. Worry about your own family instead of hating the Instagram post of a family you've never met, and who you only know through lies spread by the British tabloids. Why this obsessive hate, are you escaping something in your own life?

Maybe just sit this out if you’re getting too worked up about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all look so disheveled and awkward both individually and with each other.

The girl’s hair definitely needs to be brushed and cut.

What up with the weird photoshopping his bald spot with tree leaves?

It is just such a bad Christmas card. So I looked up William’s. It looks classy while Harry’s looks so trashy.

Here is William’s:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9975zk98kyo

That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...

With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.

By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.

But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.

It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.

And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.

Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.

Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.

It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.

I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.

The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?

And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s a posed casual photo. Totally fine. My daughter hates when I wash / brush her hair, and so her hair, which I don’t let grow past her shoulders, kind of look like this all the time.

It's posed, but definitely not casual. Meghan is practically wearing a gown. Her daughter has on a dress and shiny dress shoes. It's the equivalent of going for a 5 mile run, coming home, not showering or washing your face , keeping your hair up in the sweaty ponytail, and throwing on a fancy dress to attend a wedding.

DP who just joined this thread here. Worry about your own family instead of hating the Instagram post of a family you've never met, and who you only know through lies spread by the British tabloids. Why this obsessive hate, are you escaping something in your own life?

Maybe just sit this out if you’re getting too worked up about it.

Um, I'm not the one who's spent 25 pages hating on the Instagram post from a family I've never met.

YOU need to dunk your head in a bucket of cold water.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s a posed casual photo. Totally fine. My daughter hates when I wash / brush her hair, and so her hair, which I don’t let grow past her shoulders, kind of look like this all the time.

It's posed, but definitely not casual. Meghan is practically wearing a gown. Her daughter has on a dress and shiny dress shoes. It's the equivalent of going for a 5 mile run, coming home, not showering or washing your face , keeping your hair up in the sweaty ponytail, and throwing on a fancy dress to attend a wedding.

DP who just joined this thread here. Worry about your own family instead of hating the Instagram post of a family you've never met, and who you only know through lies spread by the British tabloids. Why this obsessive hate, are you escaping something in your own life?

My opinions (mainly negative) of the Sussexes are not formed by the British tabloids, which I do not read or pay attention to. My opinions are formed by the words that come out of their mouths that I hear with my own ears and their own actions that I can see for myself.

This reminds me of when people accuse Trump 'haters' of being brainwashed by the media. We don't nee the media to hear what he is saying on TV or read what he is tweeting. It's right in front of us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s a posed casual photo. Totally fine. My daughter hates when I wash / brush her hair, and so her hair, which I don’t let grow past her shoulders, kind of look like this all the time.

It's posed, but definitely not casual. Meghan is practically wearing a gown. Her daughter has on a dress and shiny dress shoes. It's the equivalent of going for a 5 mile run, coming home, not showering or washing your face , keeping your hair up in the sweaty ponytail, and throwing on a fancy dress to attend a wedding.

DP who just joined this thread here. Worry about your own family instead of hating the Instagram post of a family you've never met, and who you only know through lies spread by the British tabloids. Why this obsessive hate, are you escaping something in your own life?

My opinions (mainly negative) of the Sussexes are not formed by the British tabloids, which I do not read or pay attention to. My opinions are formed by the words that come out of their mouths that I hear with my own ears and their own actions that I can see for myself.

This reminds me of when people accuse Trump 'haters' of being brainwashed by the media. We don't nee the media to hear what he is saying on TV or read what he is tweeting. It's right in front of us.

You can dislike Meghan's TV show (I'm actually not wild about it) without spending 26 pages hating her Insta post on a mom's website. Most of us just, you know, change the channel. C'mon, dish: what's really wrong with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s a posed casual photo. Totally fine. My daughter hates when I wash / brush her hair, and so her hair, which I don’t let grow past her shoulders, kind of look like this all the time.

It's posed, but definitely not casual. Meghan is practically wearing a gown. Her daughter has on a dress and shiny dress shoes. It's the equivalent of going for a 5 mile run, coming home, not showering or washing your face , keeping your hair up in the sweaty ponytail, and throwing on a fancy dress to attend a wedding.

DP who just joined this thread here. Worry about your own family instead of hating the Instagram post of a family you've never met, and who you only know through lies spread by the British tabloids. Why this obsessive hate, are you escaping something in your own life?

My opinions (mainly negative) of the Sussexes are not formed by the British tabloids, which I do not read or pay attention to. My opinions are formed by the words that come out of their mouths that I hear with my own ears and their own actions that I can see for myself.

This reminds me of when people accuse Trump 'haters' of being brainwashed by the media. We don't nee the media to hear what he is saying on TV or read what he is tweeting. It's right in front of us.

Sure, Jan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all look so disheveled and awkward both individually and with each other.

The girl’s hair definitely needs to be brushed and cut.

What up with the weird photoshopping his bald spot with tree leaves?

It is just such a bad Christmas card. So I looked up William’s. It looks classy while Harry’s looks so trashy.

Here is William’s:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9975zk98kyo

That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...

With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.

By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.

But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.

It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.

And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.

Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.

Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.

It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.

I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.

The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?

And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.

It sounds like this is very important to you.

It was reported in the daily beast that he dropped his demand they apologize to his wife.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all look so disheveled and awkward both individually and with each other.

The girl’s hair definitely needs to be brushed and cut.

What up with the weird photoshopping his bald spot with tree leaves?

It is just such a bad Christmas card. So I looked up William’s. It looks classy while Harry’s looks so trashy.

Here is William’s:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9975zk98kyo

That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...

With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.

By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.

But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.

It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.

And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.

Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.

Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.

It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.

I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.

The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?

And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.

It sounds like this is very important to you.

It was reported in the daily beast that he dropped his demand they apologize to his wife.

LOL! "The Royalist" Tom Sykes, who's monetizing Sussex hate based on rumours and innuendo. If I had a dime for every time Sykes lied, exaggerated, or omitted key facts, I'd be rich(er). You need to read more widely, honey.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all look so disheveled and awkward both individually and with each other.

The girl’s hair definitely needs to be brushed and cut.

What up with the weird photoshopping his bald spot with tree leaves?

It is just such a bad Christmas card. So I looked up William’s. It looks classy while Harry’s looks so trashy.

Here is William’s:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9975zk98kyo

That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...

With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.

By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.

But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.

It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.

And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.

Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.

Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.

It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.

I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.

The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?

And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.

It sounds like this is very important to you.

It was reported in the daily beast that he dropped his demand they apologize to his wife.

LOL! "The Royalist" Tom Sykes, who's monetizing Sussex hate based on rumours and innuendo. If I had a dime for every time Sykes lied, exaggerated, or omitted key facts, I'd be rich(er). You need to read more widely, honey.

For sure, what's said on Oprah's show is more believable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all look so disheveled and awkward both individually and with each other.

The girl’s hair definitely needs to be brushed and cut.

What up with the weird photoshopping his bald spot with tree leaves?

It is just such a bad Christmas card. So I looked up William’s. It looks classy while Harry’s looks so trashy.

Here is William’s:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9975zk98kyo

That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...

With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.

By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.

But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.

It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.

And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.

Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.

Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.

It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.

I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.

The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?

And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.

It sounds like this is very important to you.

It was reported in the daily beast that he dropped his demand they apologize to his wife.

LOL! "The Royalist" Tom Sykes, who's monetizing Sussex hate based on rumours and innuendo. If I had a dime for every time Sykes lied, exaggerated, or omitted key facts, I'd be rich(er). You need to read more widely, honey.

I like tom Sykes style of writing but I agree, he doesn’t have the caliber of someone like Tina brown (a legit journalist who worked at the New Yorker) who has also trashed Harry as a fool and has said he regrets what he did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all look so disheveled and awkward both individually and with each other.

The girl’s hair definitely needs to be brushed and cut.

What up with the weird photoshopping his bald spot with tree leaves?

It is just such a bad Christmas card. So I looked up William’s. It looks classy while Harry’s looks so trashy.

Here is William’s:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9975zk98kyo

That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...

With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.

By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.

But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.

It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.

And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.

Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.

Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.

It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.

I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.

The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?

And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.

It sounds like this is very important to you.

It was reported in the daily beast that he dropped his demand they apologize to his wife.

LOL! "The Royalist" Tom Sykes, who's monetizing Sussex hate based on rumours and innuendo. If I had a dime for every time Sykes lied, exaggerated, or omitted key facts, I'd be rich(er). You need to read more widely, honey.

Rumours? What’s your agenda here?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all look so disheveled and awkward both individually and with each other.

The girl’s hair definitely needs to be brushed and cut.

What up with the weird photoshopping his bald spot with tree leaves?

It is just such a bad Christmas card. So I looked up William’s. It looks classy while Harry’s looks so trashy.

Here is William’s:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9975zk98kyo

That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...

With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.

By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.

But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.

It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.

And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.

Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.

Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.

It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.

I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.

The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?

And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.

It sounds like this is very important to you.

It was reported in the daily beast that he dropped his demand they apologize to his wife.

So you concede... nobody's Instagram post becomes their Christmas card because "the media says so."

LOL

Tom Sykes of the Daily Beast is a big player in the media industrial hate machine against the Sussexes. Sykes went to Eton with William, and there's speculation he's paid by KP, which has been proven to bully rota journalists and to use paid bots (Sykes was kicked out of the rota last summer, but he's still useful). There's also speculation that Sykes is angling for a journalistic seat deep inside future King William's court, so he's playing to William's more incandescent tendencies toward his brother.

Toying with haters like you is fun. I wouldn't say it's important to me, or even that I'm a huge fan of Meghan or her show. I just think haters like you, who spend their time on biased hate channels, are disgusting. So I'm here to blow up your little hate thread, and to have fun doing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lillibet's hair is not brushed.

As someone with curly hair, I will posit that brushing Lilibet's hair could make it very frizzy. Or it could be that humidity makes her hair freak out a bit.

Or maybe she hates having it brushed. I did when I was her age, and I have a vivid memory of having my hair brushed and squirming around so much trying to get away that my mom whacked me with the brush. It's OK with me if Megan prefers unbrushed hair on a preschooler to that.

But regardless: You are criticizing the hair of a preschooler.

You don't think Meghan, who straightens her curly hair to the point of flatness, wouldn't know how to handle her daughter's curly hair?

I have curly hair (which I wear sometimes straight and sometimes curly and am very good with) and I am still figuring out what to do with my 8 yo DD's hair, which like Lillibet's is also curly but with a looser curl pattern and is very fine and not as thick. It's a really tricky hairstyle because it can't handle the product you'd use on thicker, curlier hair to make it look good curly, but it's also very breakage prone which makes heat styling and relaxing a hard no, especially on a young kid.

My DD's hair looks just like Lillibet's as sometimes. Humidity is especially hard to deal with.

Yes, her hair is fine thin European white person wavy hair, which is very flyaway. It is different from mixed race or darker thicker curly hair or silky mixed race hair.

The products that fine wavy caucasian hair needs is different than what thicker curly mixed race or biracial hair needs.

Yes and would never use chemicals or very many products at all on a small child’s hair. The suggestions to do so are totally crazy!

You're right. None of us should shampoo our children's hair either. Or use soap to wash them. Or serve them food. Or let them breathe air. NO CHEMICALS EVER!!!!

You’re comparing not using relaxers and flatirons on a preschooler to not using soap and eating food?

Get help

Nobody brought up relaxers and flatirons except you.

You were the one freaking out that the previous commenter said they wouldn’t use chemical relaxers on a young child’s hair. You compared that to not using soap and shampoo.

The flatiron, I admit I added because even if a kid gets a chemical relaxer, they would still need a flatiron or curling iron to make their hair straight. All of this would take hours of work with a hairstylist and it would be a horrible parenting choice.

It’s disgusting that you compare a mixed child wearing her natural hair with not being clean.

OH PLEASE. That is absolutely not what I was doing and you know it. You are just a nasty human being who is exaggerating and flat out making things up to try to twist what I said. You know I was being facetious comparing hair gel to shampoo but here you are accusing me of being racist. You are just out of control!!!