Stefanik Ivy Presidentd

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pathetic on the part of the university presidents. It is hard to believe that the words uttered by some of these protesters do not violate the universities' policies WRT intimidation and bullying.
Their responses sounded like they spent too much time consulting with university legal counsel instead of using common sense and truth.

Even those on the left agree:

QThis is so misleading, nobody supports the words “genocide of Jews”, Stefanik ‘s actual question was that Intifada and River to the Sea translates to genocide of Jews and that’s an incorrect interpretation. Stefanik as always is vile and despicable.

Uh, yes they do. It’s called Hamas and it calls for the killing of Jews as part of its
Charter. And this is the group that Israel is trying to protect itself from and that all of the anti-Israel crew are cheering for. Stop the gaslighting.

That poster obviously meant that no one *on their campuses* had been chanting with those words. And don’t start with intifada or river-to-the-sea. The hypo used the words “genocide of Jews” on purpose to make it as outrageous as possible.

Yeah, I’ll start with the facts that from the river to the sea is about annihilating Isreal and is absolutely about eradicating Jews from the region. Something that groups in the region have tried for decades - predating Israel by centuries. Jews are indigenous to that region.

so stop gaslighting. We all know what these anti-Israel chants are about. The dog whistles. We get it. Never thought in million years I’d agree with Elise Stefanik on anything ever. But on this, I do.

The fact you started with is wrong. From the river to the sea does not mean annihilating Israel. It just means the Palestinians want to return to their ancestral homes that were stolen from them.

Do you even know what gaslighting means? Seems like you are really struggling with its definition.

We all know this we all know that. What DO you know other than claiming that anyone speaking up for the humanity of Palestinians is an anti Semite. You know nothing Jon Snow.

Yes. You are gaslighting. River to the sea is about eradicating Israel. Stop deflecting, stop pretending, just stop.

The same people who were silent or even openly joyous at the devastation of 10/7, who couldn’t even bring themselves to express concern or condemn Hamas, who held up swastikas and and called Jews colonizers, who openly delighted in Hamas’ “resistance” and who defend those tearing down hostage posters, want us to think that there’s no anti semitism and river to the sea is just some ordinary tune. We know what it means.

So stop gaslighting and stop defending / denying antisemitism. Those of us who’ve experienced it, know what antisemitism is. Always ridiculous telling people who experience bigotry because of their religion or color that they don’t know what that bigotry is.

YOU are doing just that “ridiculous” thing when you dismiss Palestinians and put words in pro-Palestinian protestors’ mouths.

Because the pro Palestinian folks speak in code and say offensive and anti Semitic things in sneaky ways, to have the effect of deniability while their meaning is clear.

+1

It’s the 21st century equivalent of “those people”.

The bigotry and hatred from many of the hard-core protesters is ridiculously transparent.

What’s pathetic is that many of their well-intentioned “allies” on the left are willing to excuse it.

They’re complicit in grotesque hatred.

Well I guess that means it was 20th century version of “those people” when Netanyahu was saying it - but you’re okay with that. I see.

Who’s excusing Netanyahu?

Above post is an excellent example of the the far left’s dishonesty on this issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pathetic on the part of the university presidents. It is hard to believe that the words uttered by some of these protesters do not violate the universities' policies WRT intimidation and bullying.
Their responses sounded like they spent too much time consulting with university legal counsel instead of using common sense and truth.

Even those on the left agree:

QThis is so misleading, nobody supports the words “genocide of Jews”, Stefanik ‘s actual question was that Intifada and River to the Sea translates to genocide of Jews and that’s an incorrect interpretation. Stefanik as always is vile and despicable.

Uh, yes they do. It’s called Hamas and it calls for the killing of Jews as part of its
Charter. And this is the group that Israel is trying to protect itself from and that all of the anti-Israel crew are cheering for. Stop the gaslighting.

That poster obviously meant that no one *on their campuses* had been chanting with those words. And don’t start with intifada or river-to-the-sea. The hypo used the words “genocide of Jews” on purpose to make it as outrageous as possible.

Yeah, I’ll start with the facts that from the river to the sea is about annihilating Isreal and is absolutely about eradicating Jews from the region. Something that groups in the region have tried for decades - predating Israel by centuries. Jews are indigenous to that region.

so stop gaslighting. We all know what these anti-Israel chants are about. The dog whistles. We get it. Never thought in million years I’d agree with Elise Stefanik on anything ever. But on this, I do.

The fact you started with is wrong. From the river to the sea does not mean annihilating Israel. It just means the Palestinians want to return to their ancestral homes that were stolen from them.

Do you even know what gaslighting means? Seems like you are really struggling with its definition.

We all know this we all know that. What DO you know other than claiming that anyone speaking up for the humanity of Palestinians is an anti Semite. You know nothing Jon Snow.

Yes. You are gaslighting. River to the sea is about eradicating Israel. Stop deflecting, stop pretending, just stop.

The same people who were silent or even openly joyous at the devastation of 10/7, who couldn’t even bring themselves to express concern or condemn Hamas, who held up swastikas and and called Jews colonizers, who openly delighted in Hamas’ “resistance” and who defend those tearing down hostage posters, want us to think that there’s no anti semitism and river to the sea is just some ordinary tune. We know what it means.

So stop gaslighting and stop defending / denying antisemitism. Those of us who’ve experienced it, know what antisemitism is. Always ridiculous telling people who experience bigotry because of their religion or color that they don’t know what that bigotry is.

YOU are doing just that “ridiculous” thing when you dismiss Palestinians and put words in pro-Palestinian protestors’ mouths.

Because the pro Palestinian folks speak in code and say offensive and anti Semitic things in sneaky ways, to have the effect of deniability while their meaning is clear.

+1

It’s the 21st century equivalent of “those people”.

The bigotry and hatred from many of the hard-core protesters is ridiculously transparent.

What’s pathetic is that many of their well-intentioned “allies” on the left are willing to excuse it.

They’re complicit in grotesque hatred.

Well I guess that means it was 20th century version of “those people” when Netanyahu was saying it - but you’re okay with that. I see.

Who’s excusing Netanyahu?

Above post is an excellent example of the the far left’s dishonesty on this issue.

Dishonesty how? I don’t care whether either side says “from the river to the sea.” I don’t think it’s necessarily a call for genocide period. I’d rather worry about the facts on the ground and not policing slogans. And I’m on the right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pathetic on the part of the university presidents. It is hard to believe that the words uttered by some of these protesters do not violate the universities' policies WRT intimidation and bullying.
Their responses sounded like they spent too much time consulting with university legal counsel instead of using common sense and truth.

Even those on the left agree:

QThis is so misleading, nobody supports the words “genocide of Jews”, Stefanik ‘s actual question was that Intifada and River to the Sea translates to genocide of Jews and that’s an incorrect interpretation. Stefanik as always is vile and despicable.

Uh, yes they do. It’s called Hamas and it calls for the killing of Jews as part of its
Charter. And this is the group that Israel is trying to protect itself from and that all of the anti-Israel crew are cheering for. Stop the gaslighting.

That poster obviously meant that no one *on their campuses* had been chanting with those words. And don’t start with intifada or river-to-the-sea. The hypo used the words “genocide of Jews” on purpose to make it as outrageous as possible.

Yeah, I’ll start with the facts that from the river to the sea is about annihilating Isreal and is absolutely about eradicating Jews from the region. Something that groups in the region have tried for decades - predating Israel by centuries. Jews are indigenous to that region.

so stop gaslighting. We all know what these anti-Israel chants are about. The dog whistles. We get it. Never thought in million years I’d agree with Elise Stefanik on anything ever. But on this, I do.

The fact you started with is wrong. From the river to the sea does not mean annihilating Israel. It just means the Palestinians want to return to their ancestral homes that were stolen from them.

Do you even know what gaslighting means? Seems like you are really struggling with its definition.

We all know this we all know that. What DO you know other than claiming that anyone speaking up for the humanity of Palestinians is an anti Semite. You know nothing Jon Snow.

Yes. You are gaslighting. River to the sea is about eradicating Israel. Stop deflecting, stop pretending, just stop.

The same people who were silent or even openly joyous at the devastation of 10/7, who couldn’t even bring themselves to express concern or condemn Hamas, who held up swastikas and and called Jews colonizers, who openly delighted in Hamas’ “resistance” and who defend those tearing down hostage posters, want us to think that there’s no anti semitism and river to the sea is just some ordinary tune. We know what it means.

So stop gaslighting and stop defending / denying antisemitism. Those of us who’ve experienced it, know what antisemitism is. Always ridiculous telling people who experience bigotry because of their religion or color that they don’t know what that bigotry is.

YOU are doing just that “ridiculous” thing when you dismiss Palestinians and put words in pro-Palestinian protestors’ mouths.

Because the pro Palestinian folks speak in code and say offensive and anti Semitic things in sneaky ways, to have the effect of deniability while their meaning is clear.

Okay so you’re a mind reader and are de-coding those “sneaky” people! You sound just like anti-Semites talking about the conspiracies of the “clever” Jews.

Or… plenty of protesters are voicing legitimate grievances and dismissing them all as bent on the annihilation of Jews makes you look nuts.

DP.

Plenty of protesters ARE voicing legitimate grievances.

The problem is that they’re allying themselves with people callling for the elimination of Israel, celebrating Hamas, etc.

It’s an exact parallel to Trump voters. You might not be a racist, but look at who’s standing next to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pathetic on the part of the university presidents. It is hard to believe that the words uttered by some of these protesters do not violate the universities' policies WRT intimidation and bullying.
Their responses sounded like they spent too much time consulting with university legal counsel instead of using common sense and truth.

Even those on the left agree:

QThis is so misleading, nobody supports the words “genocide of Jews”, Stefanik ‘s actual question was that Intifada and River to the Sea translates to genocide of Jews and that’s an incorrect interpretation. Stefanik as always is vile and despicable.

Uh, yes they do. It’s called Hamas and it calls for the killing of Jews as part of its
Charter. And this is the group that Israel is trying to protect itself from and that all of the anti-Israel crew are cheering for. Stop the gaslighting.

That poster obviously meant that no one *on their campuses* had been chanting with those words. And don’t start with intifada or river-to-the-sea. The hypo used the words “genocide of Jews” on purpose to make it as outrageous as possible.

Yeah, I’ll start with the facts that from the river to the sea is about annihilating Isreal and is absolutely about eradicating Jews from the region. Something that groups in the region have tried for decades - predating Israel by centuries. Jews are indigenous to that region.

so stop gaslighting. We all know what these anti-Israel chants are about. The dog whistles. We get it. Never thought in million years I’d agree with Elise Stefanik on anything ever. But on this, I do.

The fact you started with is wrong. From the river to the sea does not mean annihilating Israel. It just means the Palestinians want to return to their ancestral homes that were stolen from them.

Do you even know what gaslighting means? Seems like you are really struggling with its definition.

We all know this we all know that. What DO you know other than claiming that anyone speaking up for the humanity of Palestinians is an anti Semite. You know nothing Jon Snow.

Yes. You are gaslighting. River to the sea is about eradicating Israel. Stop deflecting, stop pretending, just stop.

The same people who were silent or even openly joyous at the devastation of 10/7, who couldn’t even bring themselves to express concern or condemn Hamas, who held up swastikas and and called Jews colonizers, who openly delighted in Hamas’ “resistance” and who defend those tearing down hostage posters, want us to think that there’s no anti semitism and river to the sea is just some ordinary tune. We know what it means.

So stop gaslighting and stop defending / denying antisemitism. Those of us who’ve experienced it, know what antisemitism is. Always ridiculous telling people who experience bigotry because of their religion or color that they don’t know what that bigotry is.

YOU are doing just that “ridiculous” thing when you dismiss Palestinians and put words in pro-Palestinian protestors’ mouths.

Because the pro Palestinian folks speak in code and say offensive and anti Semitic things in sneaky ways, to have the effect of deniability while their meaning is clear.

+1

It’s the 21st century equivalent of “those people”.

The bigotry and hatred from many of the hard-core protesters is ridiculously transparent.

What’s pathetic is that many of their well-intentioned “allies” on the left are willing to excuse it.

They’re complicit in grotesque hatred.

Well I guess that means it was 20th century version of “those people” when Netanyahu was saying it - but you’re okay with that. I see.

Who’s excusing Netanyahu?

Above post is an excellent example of the the far left’s dishonesty on this issue.

Dishonesty how? I don’t care whether either side says “from the river to the sea.” I don’t think it’s necessarily a call for genocide period. I’d rather worry about the facts on the ground and not policing slogans. And I’m on the right.

Lol. Sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pathetic on the part of the university presidents. It is hard to believe that the words uttered by some of these protesters do not violate the universities' policies WRT intimidation and bullying.
Their responses sounded like they spent too much time consulting with university legal counsel instead of using common sense and truth.

Even those on the left agree:

QThis is so misleading, nobody supports the words “genocide of Jews”, Stefanik ‘s actual question was that Intifada and River to the Sea translates to genocide of Jews and that’s an incorrect interpretation. Stefanik as always is vile and despicable.

Uh, yes they do. It’s called Hamas and it calls for the killing of Jews as part of its
Charter. And this is the group that Israel is trying to protect itself from and that all of the anti-Israel crew are cheering for. Stop the gaslighting.

That poster obviously meant that no one *on their campuses* had been chanting with those words. And don’t start with intifada or river-to-the-sea. The hypo used the words “genocide of Jews” on purpose to make it as outrageous as possible.

Yeah, I’ll start with the facts that from the river to the sea is about annihilating Isreal and is absolutely about eradicating Jews from the region. Something that groups in the region have tried for decades - predating Israel by centuries. Jews are indigenous to that region.

so stop gaslighting. We all know what these anti-Israel chants are about. The dog whistles. We get it. Never thought in million years I’d agree with Elise Stefanik on anything ever. But on this, I do.

The fact you started with is wrong. From the river to the sea does not mean annihilating Israel. It just means the Palestinians want to return to their ancestral homes that were stolen from them.

Do you even know what gaslighting means? Seems like you are really struggling with its definition.

We all know this we all know that. What DO you know other than claiming that anyone speaking up for the humanity of Palestinians is an anti Semite. You know nothing Jon Snow.

Yes. You are gaslighting. River to the sea is about eradicating Israel. Stop deflecting, stop pretending, just stop.

The same people who were silent or even openly joyous at the devastation of 10/7, who couldn’t even bring themselves to express concern or condemn Hamas, who held up swastikas and and called Jews colonizers, who openly delighted in Hamas’ “resistance” and who defend those tearing down hostage posters, want us to think that there’s no anti semitism and river to the sea is just some ordinary tune. We know what it means.

So stop gaslighting and stop defending / denying antisemitism. Those of us who’ve experienced it, know what antisemitism is. Always ridiculous telling people who experience bigotry because of their religion or color that they don’t know what that bigotry is.

YOU are doing just that “ridiculous” thing when you dismiss Palestinians and put words in pro-Palestinian protestors’ mouths.

Because the pro Palestinian folks speak in code and say offensive and anti Semitic things in sneaky ways, to have the effect of deniability while their meaning is clear.

Okay so you’re a mind reader and are de-coding those “sneaky” people! You sound just like anti-Semites talking about the conspiracies of the “clever” Jews.

Or… plenty of protesters are voicing legitimate grievances and dismissing them all as bent on the annihilation of Jews makes you look nuts.

DP.

Plenty of protesters ARE voicing legitimate grievances.

The problem is that they’re allying themselves with people callling for the elimination of Israel, celebrating Hamas, etc.

It’s an exact parallel to Trump voters. You might not be a racist, but look at who’s standing next to you.

Hm… so how do you feel about standing next to Stefanik and the MAGA crowd?

Personally, I don’t think you have to endorse everything your “allies” do to work together on a discrete issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pathetic on the part of the university presidents. It is hard to believe that the words uttered by some of these protesters do not violate the universities' policies WRT intimidation and bullying.
Their responses sounded like they spent too much time consulting with university legal counsel instead of using common sense and truth.

Even those on the left agree:

QThis is so misleading, nobody supports the words “genocide of Jews”, Stefanik ‘s actual question was that Intifada and River to the Sea translates to genocide of Jews and that’s an incorrect interpretation. Stefanik as always is vile and despicable.

Uh, yes they do. It’s called Hamas and it calls for the killing of Jews as part of its
Charter. And this is the group that Israel is trying to protect itself from and that all of the anti-Israel crew are cheering for. Stop the gaslighting.

That poster obviously meant that no one *on their campuses* had been chanting with those words. And don’t start with intifada or river-to-the-sea. The hypo used the words “genocide of Jews” on purpose to make it as outrageous as possible.

Yeah, I’ll start with the facts that from the river to the sea is about annihilating Isreal and is absolutely about eradicating Jews from the region. Something that groups in the region have tried for decades - predating Israel by centuries. Jews are indigenous to that region.

so stop gaslighting. We all know what these anti-Israel chants are about. The dog whistles. We get it. Never thought in million years I’d agree with Elise Stefanik on anything ever. But on this, I do.

The fact you started with is wrong. From the river to the sea does not mean annihilating Israel. It just means the Palestinians want to return to their ancestral homes that were stolen from them.

Do you even know what gaslighting means? Seems like you are really struggling with its definition.

We all know this we all know that. What DO you know other than claiming that anyone speaking up for the humanity of Palestinians is an anti Semite. You know nothing Jon Snow.

Yes. You are gaslighting. River to the sea is about eradicating Israel. Stop deflecting, stop pretending, just stop.

The same people who were silent or even openly joyous at the devastation of 10/7, who couldn’t even bring themselves to express concern or condemn Hamas, who held up swastikas and and called Jews colonizers, who openly delighted in Hamas’ “resistance” and who defend those tearing down hostage posters, want us to think that there’s no anti semitism and river to the sea is just some ordinary tune. We know what it means.

So stop gaslighting and stop defending / denying antisemitism. Those of us who’ve experienced it, know what antisemitism is. Always ridiculous telling people who experience bigotry because of their religion or color that they don’t know what that bigotry is.

YOU are doing just that “ridiculous” thing when you dismiss Palestinians and put words in pro-Palestinian protestors’ mouths.

Because the pro Palestinian folks speak in code and say offensive and anti Semitic things in sneaky ways, to have the effect of deniability while their meaning is clear.

+1

It’s the 21st century equivalent of “those people”.

The bigotry and hatred from many of the hard-core protesters is ridiculously transparent.

What’s pathetic is that many of their well-intentioned “allies” on the left are willing to excuse it.

They’re complicit in grotesque hatred.

Well I guess that means it was 20th century version of “those people” when Netanyahu was saying it - but you’re okay with that. I see.

Who’s excusing Netanyahu?

Above post is an excellent example of the the far left’s dishonesty on this issue.

Dishonesty how? I don’t care whether either side says “from the river to the sea.” I don’t think it’s necessarily a call for genocide period. I’d rather worry about the facts on the ground and not policing slogans. And I’m on the right.

Lol. Sure.

Which part is funny? Lame response.

[Anonymous]

From the river to the sea is not a call for genocide. How dare you all impart meaning to a slogan that you didn’t create. From the river to the sea means Palestine should be free of Israeli occupation and allowed to live with dignity where they don’t have to go through checkpoints or beg for access to more food and water. The fact that you are giving it a meaning shows you are relying on racist and islamophobia to show that Palestinians always have a violent intent.

It’s so tragic that there is an actual genocide taking place where 17,000 civilians have been killed. The Israeli occupied forces can still not say how many Hamas members they have actually killed. They are busy carpet binging the entire place and constraining Palestinians in an extremely small piece of land. Does this remind you of something? A lot akin to concentration camps! There are actual children being mercilessly killed and all you imbeciles are clutching your pearls and screaming students protesting for Palestinian rights are anti Semitic. You all make me sick. It’s true when they say the Zionists really have this misconception that they are superior than other races. That is why they show no regard to other ethnicities and show no remorse in bombing them. They are truly vile people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:From the river to the sea is not a call for genocide. How dare you all impart meaning to a slogan that you didn’t create. From the river to the sea means Palestine should be free of Israeli occupation and allowed to live with dignity where they don’t have to go through checkpoints or beg for access to more food and water. The fact that you are giving it a meaning shows you are relying on racist and islamophobia to show that Palestinians always have a violent intent.

It’s so tragic that there is an actual genocide taking place where 17,000 civilians have been killed. The Israeli occupied forces can still not say how many Hamas members they have actually killed. They are busy carpet binging the entire place and constraining Palestinians in an extremely small piece of land. Does this remind you of something? A lot akin to concentration camps! There are actual children being mercilessly killed and all you imbeciles are clutching your pearls and screaming students protesting for Palestinian rights are anti Semitic. You all make me sick. It’s true when they say the Zionists really have this misconception that they are superior than other races. That is why they show no regard to other ethnicities and show no remorse in bombing them. They are truly vile people.

Thank you for explaining that River to sea slogan.
Now, if Bob misgenders Sam on campus and Sam's feelings are hurt, would you also explain to Sam that Bob didn't mean it that way and
Sam is wrong to be offended and to complain?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the river to the sea is not a call for genocide. How dare you all impart meaning to a slogan that you didn’t create. From the river to the sea means Palestine should be free of Israeli occupation and allowed to live with dignity where they don’t have to go through checkpoints or beg for access to more food and water. The fact that you are giving it a meaning shows you are relying on racist and islamophobia to show that Palestinians always have a violent intent.

It’s so tragic that there is an actual genocide taking place where 17,000 civilians have been killed. The Israeli occupied forces can still not say how many Hamas members they have actually killed. They are busy carpet binging the entire place and constraining Palestinians in an extremely small piece of land. Does this remind you of something? A lot akin to concentration camps! There are actual children being mercilessly killed and all you imbeciles are clutching your pearls and screaming students protesting for Palestinian rights are anti Semitic. You all make me sick. It’s true when they say the Zionists really have this misconception that they are superior than other races. That is why they show no regard to other ethnicities and show no remorse in bombing them. They are truly vile people.

Thank you for explaining that River to sea slogan.
Now, if Bob misgenders Sam on campus and Sam's feelings are hurt, would you also explain to Sam that Bob didn't mean it that way and
Sam is wrong to be offended and to complain?

And maybe that incident was Sam's fault in the first place?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the river to the sea is not a call for genocide. How dare you all impart meaning to a slogan that you didn’t create. From the river to the sea means Palestine should be free of Israeli occupation and allowed to live with dignity where they don’t have to go through checkpoints or beg for access to more food and water. The fact that you are giving it a meaning shows you are relying on racist and islamophobia to show that Palestinians always have a violent intent.

It’s so tragic that there is an actual genocide taking place where 17,000 civilians have been killed. The Israeli occupied forces can still not say how many Hamas members they have actually killed. They are busy carpet binging the entire place and constraining Palestinians in an extremely small piece of land. Does this remind you of something? A lot akin to concentration camps! There are actual children being mercilessly killed and all you imbeciles are clutching your pearls and screaming students protesting for Palestinian rights are anti Semitic. You all make me sick. It’s true when they say the Zionists really have this misconception that they are superior than other races. That is why they show no regard to other ethnicities and show no remorse in bombing them. They are truly vile people.

Thank you for explaining that River to sea slogan.
Now, if Bob misgenders Sam on campus and Sam's feelings are hurt, would you also explain to Sam that Bob didn't mean it that way and
Sam is wrong to be offended and to complain?

Sam sounds a lot like you Zionists with your feelings getting hurt and imparting nonsensical meaning to some phrase when there was no such intention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the river to the sea is not a call for genocide. How dare you all impart meaning to a slogan that you didn’t create. From the river to the sea means Palestine should be free of Israeli occupation and allowed to live with dignity where they don’t have to go through checkpoints or beg for access to more food and water. The fact that you are giving it a meaning shows you are relying on racist and islamophobia to show that Palestinians always have a violent intent.

It’s so tragic that there is an actual genocide taking place where 17,000 civilians have been killed. The Israeli occupied forces can still not say how many Hamas members they have actually killed. They are busy carpet binging the entire place and constraining Palestinians in an extremely small piece of land. Does this remind you of something? A lot akin to concentration camps! There are actual children being mercilessly killed and all you imbeciles are clutching your pearls and screaming students protesting for Palestinian rights are anti Semitic. You all make me sick. It’s true when they say the Zionists really have this misconception that they are superior than other races. That is why they show no regard to other ethnicities and show no remorse in bombing them. They are truly vile people.

Thank you for explaining that River to sea slogan.
Now, if Bob misgenders Sam on campus and Sam's feelings are hurt, would you also explain to Sam that Bob didn't mean it that way and
Sam is wrong to be offended and to complain?

Sam sounds a lot like you Zionists with your feelings getting hurt and imparting nonsensical meaning to some phrase when there was no such intention.

QED

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jewish America needs to get control of these places and end the Jew quotas. Revenge is a dish….

There are no Jew quotas. Penn’s Jewish population has declined in recent years — but so has its white population. When I was an undergrad there, the school was about 30 or 40 percent Jewish, but it was also much whiter than it is now. It’s not an antisemitic conspiracy that has led to a decline in Jewish enrollment, it’s just math (if most Jewish students are white, and white students make up a declining share of the student body, the share of Jewish students will also decline).

White Schmite Jews are being excluded and you know it. Basically, merit based schools will be Asians and Jews. Period.

Penn is still something like 15 to 20 percent Jewish, which in case you haven’t noticed, is a much larger share than we make up in the population overall. As for your other claim, there are far more “qualified” students applying for elite schools than there are available spots. So everyone who gets in is getting in on merit, with the possible exception of legacy admits who get in on their parents’ and grandparents’ merit. (I’m mostly kidding, as a legacy admission myself.) But if you think having no diversity at all is a good way to run a university, you’re wrong.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pathetic on the part of the university presidents. It is hard to believe that the words uttered by some of these protesters do not violate the universities' policies WRT intimidation and bullying.
Their responses sounded like they spent too much time consulting with university legal counsel instead of using common sense and truth.

Even those on the left agree:

[twitter]https://twitter.com/tribelaw/status/1732419593225044246[/twitter][/quote]

[b]QThis is so misleading, nobody supports the words “genocide of Jews”,[/b] Stefanik ‘s actual question was that Intifada and River to the Sea translates to genocide of Jews and that’s an incorrect interpretation. Stefanik as always is vile and despicable.[/quote]

Uh, yes they do. It’s called Hamas and it calls for the killing of Jews as part of its
Charter. And this is the group that Israel is trying to protect itself from and that all of the anti-Israel crew are cheering for. Stop the gaslighting.
[/quote]

That poster obviously meant that no one *on their campuses* had been chanting with those words. And don’t start with intifada or river-to-the-sea. The hypo used the words “genocide of Jews” on purpose to make it as outrageous as possible.[/quote]

Yeah, I’ll start with the facts that from the river to the sea is about annihilating Isreal and is absolutely about eradicating Jews from the region. Something that groups in the region have tried for decades - predating Israel by centuries. Jews are indigenous to that region.

so stop gaslighting. We all know what these anti-Israel chants are about. The dog whistles. We get it. Never thought in million years I’d agree with Elise Stefanik on anything ever. But on this, I do. [/quote]

The fact you started with is wrong. From the river to the sea does not mean annihilating Israel. It just means the Palestinians want to return to their ancestral homes that were stolen from them.

Do you even know what gaslighting means? Seems like you are really struggling with its definition.

We all know this we all know that. What DO you know other than claiming that anyone speaking up for the humanity of Palestinians is an anti Semite. You know nothing Jon Snow. [/quote]

Yes. You are gaslighting. River to the sea is about eradicating Israel. Stop deflecting, stop pretending, just stop.

The same people who were silent or even openly joyous at the devastation of 10/7, who couldn’t even bring themselves to express concern or condemn Hamas, who held up swastikas and and called Jews colonizers, who openly delighted in Hamas’ “resistance” and who defend those tearing down hostage posters, want us to think that there’s no anti semitism and river to the sea is just some ordinary tune. We know what it means.

So stop gaslighting and stop defending / denying antisemitism. Those of us who’ve experienced it, know what antisemitism is. [b]Always ridiculous telling people who experience bigotry because of their religion or color that they don’t know what that bigotry is.[/b] [/quote]

YOU are doing just that “ridiculous” thing when you dismiss Palestinians and put words in pro-Palestinian protestors’ mouths.[/quote]

Because the pro Palestinian folks speak in code and say offensive and anti Semitic things in sneaky ways, to have the effect of deniability while their meaning is clear.

[/quote]

Okay so you’re a mind reader and are de-coding those “sneaky” people! You sound just like anti-Semites talking about the conspiracies of the “clever” Jews.

Or… plenty of protesters are voicing legitimate grievances and dismissing them all as bent on the annihilation of Jews makes you look nuts.[/quote]

DP.

Plenty of protesters ARE voicing legitimate grievances.

The problem is that they’re allying themselves with people callling for the elimination of Israel, celebrating Hamas, etc.

It’s an exact parallel to Trump voters. You might not be a racist, but look at who’s standing next to you.

[/quote]

Hm… so how do you feel about standing next to Stefanik and the MAGA crowd?

Personally, I don’t think you have to endorse everything your “allies” do to work together on a discrete issue.[/quote]

That’s exactly how millions of Trump supporters justified their votes.

And FWIW, I’m not standing next to anyone, except fellow moderates who deplore the extremism, bigotry and hate from these protesters (and many posters here).

I’m not protesting in the streets in support of the IDF. Haven’t terrorized any Palestinians or called for their ethnic cleansing. Not gonna tear down posters.

In short, I’m going to behave with humanity and respect.

But you do you. Just don’t be so surprised when most Americans are repelled by your behavior. You’ve made your own bed.

[Anonymous]

It is amazing that a person who never showed throughout her career any antisemitism was attacked and removed based on these false accusations. She should have made the university fire her. She could have sued and exposed these people.

We all know the people behind these attacks have an agenda. One is to increase Jewish attendance percentages at these schools. Right now UPenn has 16% self identified jewish students which is down from a few decades ago when it was 1/3. One of the donors said he would like to see UPenn have at a minimum 30% Jewish students.

I guess who every the new president is will have to be a pro israel, anti Palestinian and Jewish. They will also have to agree to have 30% jewish students body. I bet there will be something about forcing out muslims and Palestinians with support for the settlers.

I would hate to be a Palestinian or Muslim at any of these universities. These people will target them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is amazing that a person who never showed throughout her career any antisemitism was attacked and removed based on these false accusations. She should have made the university fire her. She could have sued and exposed these people.

We all know the people behind these attacks have an agenda. One is to increase Jewish attendance percentages at these schools. Right now UPenn has 16% self identified jewish students which is down from a few decades ago when it was 1/3. One of the donors said he would like to see UPenn have at a minimum 30% Jewish students.

I guess who every the new president is will have to be a pro israel, anti Palestinian and Jewish. They will also have to agree to have 30% jewish students body. I bet there will be something about forcing out muslims and Palestinians with support for the settlers.

I would hate to be a Palestinian or Muslim at any of these universities. These people will target them.

Secret Jewish agenda. Calls for genocide ok.

But no anti-Semitism to see here.

Gotcha.