Stefanik Ivy Presidentd

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harvard is not firing their first black president. Even if she needs to contextualize genocide.

But this debacle and support for Hamas is going to have carry on effects. The number of early applicants to Harvard was already down by nearly 20 points this year. It'll be significantly more next year.

Jews don't feel welcome. Asians don't feel welcome. Unless you are a very well to do and privileged wokey wokey white, Harvard is probably not a great place. And the number of applications will reflect that

Somehow I think Harvard will survive and maintain its acceptance rate in the single digits.

They will, but look who is applying and who they accepting. Harvard graduates already have poor reputation in major companies. It will be going downhill in the next 10-15 years and Harvard diploma very soon will be like your online degree.

This would be great for meritocracy and leveling of inequality, but I wouldn't exactly hold my breath that it'll happen.

Harvard was never built on meritocracy - ever! She shouldn't resign. Everyone wants Campus Free Expression until something is said that they don't like.

Gay just requested to make changes to her prior citations ( or omissions of citations) after she was already allowed to do so previously. She is so stupid that she cannot even fix her mistake properly and needs another “opportunity “ to do so. Truly deprived person.

The true scandal is that she only has 11 published academic works to her credit. That wouldn't be enough to become an adjunct at most universities, much less President of ostensibly the leading U.S. university.

You don't know many school administrators do you?

She was a professor before she became an administrator. It still doesn't change the fact that her academic record is pretty pathetic, especially for a university as prestigious as Harvard.

You still don’t get it, do you?! She was not hired for her academic prowess. She was hired because she is a black female with some paltry level of experience.

They don’t care about the plagerism or the weak academic record, or the disastrous performance before the House committee. She is black and she is a woman. That is literally the requirement now for the job of president of Harvard.

Tough to swallow, I know, but once you fully accept this everything else makes sense.

How can you be sure that in the history of Harvard U no mediocre white man was ever hired as president? Do you just assume they were all brilliant scholars with an impecable written record of published work?

No not at all. I’m sure in harvards 300 whatever year history, there have been some duds. The difference is, they would have been fired for this.

What a ridiculous statement. No Harvard president has ever been fired even Larry Summers

And exactly how many past Harvard presidents were hit with 40 charges of plagiarism?

Oooh 40 charges. Do you count by how many people are complaining or by the word?