Kevin Costner divorce

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

How is he being vindictive and immature? They signed a contract that laid out the terms if the marriage ended. The wife filed for divorce so the contract now goes into effect.

Public policy doesn't allow for contracts with unconscionable terms.

Whelp yesterday’s ruling validated that this isn’t a contract with unconscionable terms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

How is he being vindictive and immature? They signed a contract that laid out the terms if the marriage ended. The wife filed for divorce so the contract now goes into effect.

The contract was signed many decades - and a bunch of kids - ago. A lifetime ago, basically. It seems petty, mean, and weird for him to be stingy like this - and yes, it looks very stingy - toward the mother of his children, who spent decades with him. Who shared a life with him!

You seem to believe your position is very popular but I don't actually see anyone else on this thread sharing it, which maybe says it's not so popular. No she doesn't have to come out with $200 million - but $1 million? Our house is worth almost that and we live in a ranch that needs work, on a busy street, in a mid-tier city.

It just seems mean, small, and petty. Regardless of the prenup - which I am guessing will be adjusted by the court, if they don't settle - she should at least be able to buy a decent house where she and the kids can live. And to maintain the house. You know, to live a life that is fairly comparable to the one she had when she was married to this cheater for a few decades.

18 years ago is not a lifetime ago. 18 years goes by quick. Please stop acting like she's being treated cruelly and put out on skid row. She's going to be a multi-millionaire with six figures a month in child support WHILE HE PAY FOR ALL OF THE KIDS' EXPENSES. Sorry she can't peel off $50 million bucks from the ex. Boo hoo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Kevin’s PR camp has found this thread.

Ha ha yep!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Kevin’s PR camp has found this thread.

Ha ha yep!

Yeah he looks like a d no matter how you slice it. He's a famous philanderer so even if he was cheating it seems wrong to me. I think its also a huge streisand effect here, he's digging in principal and will look bad. Giving her 10M instead of 1 will not make a lick of difference in his life but it would stop all the gossip dead in its tracks. If he cared about his kids he'd have done that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Kevin’s PR camp has found this thread.

My thoughts exactly - starting much earlier in the thread. Someone seems far too vested in the outcome of this case with views that don't align with other posters and are very hateful toward stay at home moms.

[Anonymous]

Too many gold digger wanna be in this thread or just one giant one replying to every posts.

[Anonymous]

I’m sure he’s aware the terms aren’t fair and the prenup may be unenforceable, but $1m is the starting point of the negotiation. The experts may be reading too much in the judge’s decision to order her to vacate the marital home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Kevin’s PR camp has found this thread.

Ha ha yep!

Yeah he looks like a d no matter how you slice it. He's a famous philanderer so even if he was cheating it seems wrong to me. I think its also a huge streisand effect here, he's digging in principal and will look bad. Giving her 10M instead of 1 will not make a lick of difference in his life but it would stop all the gossip dead in its tracks. If he cared about his kids he'd have done that.

Agree with this. He looks like a complete jerk. On the other hand she is asking for a ridiculous amount of monthly support. Hopefully they come to an agreeable amount.

I find it sad how this marriage has dissolved and the fighting over money... ??Wtf happened??!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Too many gold digger wanna be in this thread or just one giant one replying to every posts.

Ok bitter man, go away so the rest of us can discuss with nuance

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Kevin’s PR camp has found this thread.

Ha ha yep!

Yeah he looks like a d no matter how you slice it. He's a famous philanderer so even if he was cheating it seems wrong to me. I think its also a huge streisand effect here, he's digging in principal and will look bad. Giving her 10M instead of 1 will not make a lick of difference in his life but it would stop all the gossip dead in its tracks. If he cared about his kids he'd have done that.

Agree with this. He looks like a complete jerk. On the other hand she is asking for a ridiculous amount of monthly support. Hopefully they come to an agreeable amount.

I find it sad how this marriage has dissolved and the fighting over money... ??Wtf happened??!

I mean, obvs the same thing that happened with the first marriage.

I wonder what the first ex wife is thinking right now. On one hand she must empathize a lot with CB, knowing what it was like to be married to KC. On the other she doesnt want her kids' inheritance frittered away on a massive divorce settlement and legal fight.

[Anonymous]

God he is is awful. His poor kids. They are old enough to wonder why dad is throwing out mom. She is leaving him exhausted. When your spouse is gone all the time you are exhausted and lonely even with help.
The only benefit is he will be forced to parent but on second thought maybe that isn’t good. He is basically making a public statement that a wife is basically nothing -all those year s together and she earned less than most people. The taking care of kids expanses has nothing to do with what are your own dreams. I will never watch his stuff again. She has been so dignified through this-no dripping embarrassing tidbits. I am sure she can spill a lot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

In what way? Is marriage supposed to make women rich? What is she giving to him after 18 years of marriage? What does he get out of it? So far it seems she gained a great deal more than he has.

She likely did all the work raising his kids. And don't give me 'she wanted them, not him.' He's got seven. You don't get to seven kids without wanting it. I bet you he will have another with a fourth baby mama when this is over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

How is he being vindictive and immature? They signed a contract that laid out the terms if the marriage ended. The wife filed for divorce so the contract now goes into effect.

The contract was signed many decades - and a bunch of kids - ago. A lifetime ago, basically. It seems petty, mean, and weird for him to be stingy like this - and yes, it looks very stingy - toward the mother of his children, who spent decades with him. Who shared a life with him!

You seem to believe your position is very popular but I don't actually see anyone else on this thread sharing it, which maybe says it's not so popular. No she doesn't have to come out with $200 million - but $1 million? Our house is worth almost that and we live in a ranch that needs work, on a busy street, in a mid-tier city.

It just seems mean, small, and petty. Regardless of the prenup - which I am guessing will be adjusted by the court, if they don't settle - she should at least be able to buy a decent house where she and the kids can live. And to maintain the house. You know, to live a life that is fairly comparable to the one she had when she was married to this cheater for a few decades.

I’m not the PP and you must be reading and entirely different thread than I am. I see plenty of posts that don’t see an issue with him.

Your posts are voluminous and distinctive, though. But no matter how often you spam this thread, you can’t make everyone believe your fantasy world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Kevin’s PR camp has found this thread.

Are you insane.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

How is he being vindictive and immature? They signed a contract that laid out the terms if the marriage ended. The wife filed for divorce so the contract now goes into effect.

The contract was signed many decades - and a bunch of kids - ago. A lifetime ago, basically. It seems petty, mean, and weird for him to be stingy like this - and yes, it looks very stingy - toward the mother of his children, who spent decades with him. Who shared a life with him!

You seem to believe your position is very popular but I don't actually see anyone else on this thread sharing it, which maybe says it's not so popular. No she doesn't have to come out with $200 million - but $1 million? Our house is worth almost that and we live in a ranch that needs work, on a busy street, in a mid-tier city.

It just seems mean, small, and petty. Regardless of the prenup - which I am guessing will be adjusted by the court, if they don't settle - she should at least be able to buy a decent house where she and the kids can live. And to maintain the house. You know, to live a life that is fairly comparable to the one she had when she was married to this cheater for a few decades.

I’m not the PP and you must be reading and entirely different thread than I am. I see plenty of posts that don’t see an issue with him.

Your posts are voluminous and distinctive, though. But no matter how often you spam this thread, you can’t make everyone believe your fantasy world.

DP I see both but I think the disapproves have the edge. I think how you look at this depends on whether or not you have an ex you hate. In my case it comes from having parents who hate each other and had a horrendous divorce. Neither is acting particularly well IMO but fair or not he has the ability to end it and he's not. And his kids will suffer as a result.