Queen Elizabeth Platinum Jubilee

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have you discussed Louis. Little rebellious and sassy Louis is my favorite royal. What a ham!

That video of him and Kate! With him making faces and covering her mouth.

She’s every mom.

Hmm, no. None of the other royal kids were or are that bad. He kicked his sister, slapped his hand over Kate's face, and was just unruly the whole time. He needed his nanny.

He's four you idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have you discussed Louis. Little rebellious and sassy Louis is my favorite royal. What a ham!

That video of him and Kate! With him making faces and covering her mouth.

She’s every mom.

Hmm, no. None of the other royal kids were or are that bad. He kicked his sister, slapped his hand over Kate's face, and was just unruly the whole time. He needed his nanny.

Agree that he probably would have been more comfortable with Nanny Maria there. But he didn’t seem that bad to me and he’s the cutest of the three of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too bad there were any sightings of Archie and Lilibet.

I bet they didn't even bring them.

They did. They wanted the Queen to meet Lilibet in person. Lilibet turned one and they had a party for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too bad there were any sightings of Archie and Lilibet.

I bet they didn't even bring them.

DP. Lots of reports that Queen met Lillibet. There’s no upside of them showing them though. People tear the Cambridge kids apart but the upside is that their parents get to be King and Queen consort some day. Not the same with non heirs.

[Anonymous]

They walked that back. Sounds like the Queen may not have met the poorly named Netflix baby after all. What a spectacle the Sussexes are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too bad there were any sightings of Archie and Lilibet.

I bet they didn't even bring them.

DP. Lots of reports that Queen met Lillibet. There’s no upside of them showing them though. People tear the Cambridge kids apart but the upside is that their parents get to be King and Queen consort some day. Not the same with non heirs.

+1

No need to feed racist trolls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They walked that back. Sounds like the Queen may not have met the poorly named Netflix baby after all. What a spectacle the Sussexes are.

Didn’t the papers all say that they spent lots of time with the Queen at Windsor?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How can Diana be queen. She’s dead.

And even if Diana had remained alive she would have been divorced from Charles for decades by now. He has been with Camilla for far longer than he was with Diana. Nothing would have prevented him from making her Queen.

That's an understatement! He's been with Camilla since long before Diana, all during Diana, and ever since Diana.

There is a school of thought that thinks Charles could not have married Camilla while Diana was alive. I tend to think that he would have been able to marry Camilla at a later date after an alive Diana had remarried.

Of course he would have married Camilla regardless. It’s not like this is the Victorian era.

[Anonymous]

This event should tell them that they are going to have to behave better if they want to continue to be royal. You cannot trash your relatives in the worse way and expect to go on the balcony. I think everything this week almost communicated that everyone is done. The Queen loves Harry but she is not having the gossipy drama. Hopefully they get it and act better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How can Diana be queen. She’s dead.

And even if Diana had remained alive she would have been divorced from Charles for decades by now. He has been with Camilla for far longer than he was with Diana. Nothing would have prevented him from making her Queen.

That's an understatement! He's been with Camilla since long before Diana, all during Diana, and ever since Diana.

There is a school of thought that thinks Charles could not have married Camilla while Diana was alive. I tend to think that he would have been able to marry Camilla at a later date after an alive Diana had remarried.

Of course he would have married Camilla regardless. It’s not like this is the Victorian era.

He would have married Camilla first if he didn’t have to marry a virgin with the right bloodline.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This event should tell them that they are going to have to behave better if they want to continue to be royal. You cannot trash your relatives in the worse way and expect to go on the balcony. I think everything this week almost communicated that everyone is done. The Queen loves Harry but she is not having the gossipy drama. Hopefully they get it and act better.

I doubt they expected to be on the balcony. How exactly would that work for some non-working royals to be on the balcony but not Andrew? It would just draw attention to him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How can Diana be queen. She’s dead.

And even if Diana had remained alive she would have been divorced from Charles for decades by now. He has been with Camilla for far longer than he was with Diana. Nothing would have prevented him from making her Queen.

That's an understatement! He's been with Camilla since long before Diana, all during Diana, and ever since Diana.

There is a school of thought that thinks Charles could not have married Camilla while Diana was alive. I tend to think that he would have been able to marry Camilla at a later date after an alive Diana had remarried.

Of course he would have married Camilla regardless. It’s not like this is the Victorian era.

He would have married Camilla first if he didn’t have to marry a virgin with the right bloodline.

Except Camilla didn’t want him. She married someone else and then when he started cheating on her she was like “I guess I’ll settle for this goofy looking weirdo.” She only dated Charles to begin with because she got dumped by the man she married.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How can Diana be queen. She’s dead.

And even if Diana had remained alive she would have been divorced from Charles for decades by now. He has been with Camilla for far longer than he was with Diana. Nothing would have prevented him from making her Queen.

That's an understatement! He's been with Camilla since long before Diana, all during Diana, and ever since Diana.

There is a school of thought that thinks Charles could not have married Camilla while Diana was alive. I tend to think that he would have been able to marry Camilla at a later date after an alive Diana had remarried.

Of course he would have married Camilla regardless. It’s not like this is the Victorian era.

He would have married Camilla first if he didn’t have to marry a virgin with the right bloodline.

Except Camilla didn’t want him. She married someone else and then when he started cheating on her she was like “I guess I’ll settle for this goofy looking weirdo.” She only dated Charles to begin with because she got dumped by the man she married.

They both seem very happily married now. That’s all that matters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have you discussed Louis. Little rebellious and sassy Louis is my favorite royal. What a ham!

That video of him and Kate! With him making faces and covering her mouth.

She’s every mom.

Hmm, no. None of the other royal kids were or are that bad. He kicked his sister, slapped his hand over Kate's face, and was just unruly the whole time. He needed his nanny.

He's four you idiot.

Yeah and he'll be 14 soon enough. Hopefully nanny maria is allowed to be firm.

[Anonymous]