Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
I don’t much care what people put in private texts unless he actually murdered her. I wouldn’t want anyone going through my personal texts in the midst of an abusive relationship. Who know what I would say or have said about people who have betrayed or harmed me. |
Then you probably shouldn’t get on the stand and claim you never spoke in violent language about a woman when your texts are flooded with such language. |
|
Believe women? No.
Listen to women. Listen to men. Listen to people. |
She’s right and I’m heartbroken for her. Depp was abusive and she had every right to write her op Ed and share her experience with an abuser. That she is imperfect as a victim doesn’t negate his abuse. It also doesn’t mean she defamed him. Sad day for women but this is the direction our country is headed in so not a total surprise. Soon you’ll be able to beat and terrify women with impunity. |
I see them all too well, actually. I know he's terrible. But the jury decision is still legitimate, based on the facts presented. They were not making a moral judgement on his character. They were making a technical judgement on defamation. This is how the law works, PP. Sometimes the terrible person wins because the facts presented are in his favor. Heard did not present a strong argument, at all. And she's a terrible person, too, BTW. Just younger and prettier. |
This case was about defamation so… |
+1 |
Of course, vile monsters like Coulter are latching on to it. |
+1000 |
He lied about more than that. He accused Rottenborn of altering his email just to frame him. He blatantly lied about never hitting a woman, but he doesn’t consider Heard a woman. To him, she’s a c*unt, flappy fish etc. How do you know she lied about the rape? You must know that many victims do not get a rape kit done. Many times they scrub themselves raw to get the scum off their bodies. Many don’t report for fear of the same retaliation Heard received. How does the jury know she lied. They don’t! You don’t! I don’t! Do most victims record or take pics while they’re being abused? To make a unanimous decision in Depp’s favor should really make you worry if you’re a woman. If you’re a man, you should worry for your daughters. I realize the term beyond a reasonable doubt doesn’t apply to a civil defamation case, but they unanimously decided she lied over semantics between donate and pledge. There was no expiration date. She said these things: it was her intention to donate 7m, she pledged 7m and she intended to keep that promise. Then Depp filed the suit costing her many millions. This is unreasonable? This entire trial was about the gotcha moments. Depp cleverly lied when he said he didn’t write checks or donate because his name attached to a charity event was more impactful. You believe this? He pissed his money away. He had none to donate because the guy was burning through 20 million a month and essentially demanded his talent agency give him 30 million because he’s Johnny Depp. Depp’s single email beginning with “global annihilation” was transparent, but excused. Judge A’s voice was obviously shaken when she dismissed the jury. I think her mind was blown. |
| They are both mentally health challenged. Wish they could have had a verdict to prevent both from marrying other people ever again. |
True that both of them are probably not innocent. |
It's because it's true. I will never understand middle-aged white women. The Karen effect turned into the Youngkin-effect turned into Johnny stans. It's the same people and we know it. |
+2 but I’m surprised. |
KAREN KAREN KAREN KAREN |