80% of women swipe on just 20% of men on dating apps

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Before pregnancy, married or dating, both are equally responsible for their own expenses.

Nope - men abuse platforms using women for free hookups and ONSs under a premise of relationship.
I don’t share expenses until exclusivity is discussed and agreed upon. Dates don’t need to be crazily expensive.
Women are still making less money and are spending higher proportion of their income on the looks. It’s more expensive to be a woman in dating and she takes more risks - infections, apps abuse, sexual harassment, lying etc.

How many relationships have you been in that work like this? Like he’ll pay for everything until you agree to be exclusive and then you give sex and pay half of everything? Of all the things that didn’t happen, this didn’t happen the most.

No I don’t pay half after sex. It’s after we are exclusive and not seeing others usually 3-6
Months and I always contributed towards travels

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both parties should go dutch with any and all expenses so they are on equal footing to evaluate if they want to go steady and explore intimacy and other aspects of the relationship.

Nope, women spend more on looks. He can go date other women but my man pays for the dates before exclusivity.

How’s that working for you?

the most meaningful relationships started that way for me

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both parties should go dutch with any and all expenses so they are on equal footing to evaluate if they want to go steady and explore intimacy and other aspects of the relationship.

Nope, women spend more on looks. He can go date other women but my man pays for the dates before exclusivity.

Nobody else is responsible for women wanting to spend on looks so they can score higher. That's an investment they decide to make.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Before pregnancy, married or dating, both are equally responsible for their own expenses.

Nope - men abuse platforms using women for free hookups and ONSs under a premise of relationship.
I don’t share expenses until exclusivity is discussed and agreed upon. Dates don’t need to be crazily expensive.
Women are still making less money and are spending higher proportion of their income on the looks. It’s more expensive to be a woman in dating and she takes more risks - infections, apps abuse, sexual harassment, lying etc.

Then women should go back to arranged marriages and guard their virginity for their preferable time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both parties should go dutch with any and all expenses so they are on equal footing to evaluate if they want to go steady and explore intimacy and other aspects of the relationship.

Nope, women spend more on looks. He can go date other women but my man pays for the dates before exclusivity.

Nobody else is responsible for women wanting to spend on looks so they can score higher. That's an investment they decide to make.

Sure, but the woman who invests in looks also doesn’t owe men dates or sex. I totally get that some men want to split and then can date other women . I’m in no shortage of interesting men asking me out and planning dates. Always could find someone if I became single

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Before pregnancy, married or dating, both are equally responsible for their own expenses.

Nope - men abuse platforms using women for free hookups and ONSs under a premise of relationship.
I don’t share expenses until exclusivity is discussed and agreed upon. Dates don’t need to be crazily expensive.
Women are still making less money and are spending higher proportion of their income on the looks. It’s more expensive to be a woman in dating and she takes more risks - infections, apps abuse, sexual harassment, lying etc.

Then women should go back to arranged marriages and guard their virginity for their preferable time.

Marriages are arranged they are contracts already just in different ways now. And you should get over your Madonna- Ho complex

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both parties should go dutch with any and all expenses so they are on equal footing to evaluate if they want to go steady and explore intimacy and other aspects of the relationship.

Nope, women spend more on looks. He can go date other women but my man pays for the dates before exclusivity.

How’s that working for you?

the most meaningful relationships started that way for me

Why aren't any ending of those most meaningful or not meaningful relationships ending in marriage?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both parties should go dutch with any and all expenses so they are on equal footing to evaluate if they want to go steady and explore intimacy and other aspects of the relationship.

Nope, women spend more on looks. He can go date other women but my man pays for the dates before exclusivity.

How’s that working for you?

the most meaningful relationships started that way for me

Why aren't any ending of those most meaningful or not meaningful relationships ending in marriage?

Are you really that stupid not to know that not all relationships end in marriage ? At least these were not ONSs

[Anonymous]

Women aren't going to achieve equality until they kept demanding men to pay for the dates and the courtship.

[Anonymous]

I for one celebrate hos. Please don’t change.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both parties should go dutch with any and all expenses so they are on equal footing to evaluate if they want to go steady and explore intimacy and other aspects of the relationship.

Nope, women spend more on looks. He can go date other women but my man pays for the dates before exclusivity.

How’s that working for you?

the most meaningful relationships started that way for me

Why aren't any ending of those most meaningful or not meaningful relationships ending in marriage?

Are you really that stupid not to know that not all relationships end in marriage ? At least these were not ONSs

No but anyone having so many most meaningful relationships is unlikely to be single forever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Women aren't going to achieve equality until they kept demanding men to pay for the dates and the courtship.

Then men should really stop bothering with women looks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both parties should go dutch with any and all expenses so they are on equal footing to evaluate if they want to go steady and explore intimacy and other aspects of the relationship.

Nope, women spend more on looks. He can go date other women but my man pays for the dates before exclusivity.

Nobody else is responsible for women wanting to spend on looks so they can score higher. That's an investment they decide to make.

Sure, but the woman who invests in looks also doesn’t owe men dates or sex. I totally get that some men want to split and then can date other women . I’m in no shortage of interesting men asking me out and planning dates. Always could find someone if I became single

So are you interested in having a relationship with these men or are you just using them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both parties should go dutch with any and all expenses so they are on equal footing to evaluate if they want to go steady and explore intimacy and other aspects of the relationship.

Nope, women spend more on looks. He can go date other women but my man pays for the dates before exclusivity.

How’s that working for you?

the most meaningful relationships started that way for me

Why aren't any ending of those most meaningful or not meaningful relationships ending in marriage?

Are you really that stupid not to know that not all relationships end in marriage ? At least these were not ONSs

No but anyone having so many most meaningful relationships is unlikely to be single forever.

I was married for over 10 years and was never single in my life for longer than three months so I’m fine thank you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both parties should go dutch with any and all expenses so they are on equal footing to evaluate if they want to go steady and explore intimacy and other aspects of the relationship.

Nope, women spend more on looks. He can go date other women but my man pays for the dates before exclusivity.

Nobody else is responsible for women wanting to spend on looks so they can score higher. That's an investment they decide to make.

Sure, but the woman who invests in looks also doesn’t owe men dates or sex. I totally get that some men want to split and then can date other women . I’m in no shortage of interesting men asking me out and planning dates. Always could find someone if I became single

So are you interested in having a relationship with these men or are you just using them?

Most men don’t make it to second date first date is a coffee intro. Yes only a man I’m truly interested in can take me out for dinner.. I don’t have much time for dating.