Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Canada doing what the UK should have done all along - protecting the newest royal. I still couldn't believe all the UK media not only reached out to Thomas Markle to bash her but flew her family out for live interviews to do the same in the lead up to the wedding. No shame.

A Vancouver Island charter operator says he turned down a recent booking when he realized the clients were paparazzi looking for photos of Harry and Meghan’s seaside residence.

https://globalnews.ca/news/6412281/bc-charter-turns-down-paparazzi-harry-meghan/

Which billionaire owns that residence where they stayed?

His name is Frank Giustra and ::SURPRISE:: he's a major contributor to the Clinton Foundation.

Umm no. Once again the media jumped the gun.

“I was disappointed to read this morning’s error-filled article about me in ?@nypost
?
I do not own a home in, or near, Victoria, BC.

I have never been contacted by a member of the British Royal family, by the Duke and Duchess

https://twitter.com/Frank_Giustra/status/1216504812516233216

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Canada doing what the UK should have done all along - protecting the newest royal. I still couldn't believe all the UK media not only reached out to Thomas Markle to bash her but flew her family out for live interviews to do the same in the lead up to the wedding. No shame.

A Vancouver Island charter operator says he turned down a recent booking when he realized the clients were paparazzi looking for photos of Harry and Meghan’s seaside residence.

https://globalnews.ca/news/6412281/bc-charter-turns-down-paparazzi-harry-meghan/

Which billionaire owns that residence where they stayed?

His name is Frank Giustra and ::SURPRISE:: he's a major contributor to the Clinton Foundation.

What?!?!?!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Canada doing what the UK should have done all along - protecting the newest royal. I still couldn't believe all the UK media not only reached out to Thomas Markle to bash her but flew her family out for live interviews to do the same in the lead up to the wedding. No shame.

A Vancouver Island charter operator says he turned down a recent booking when he realized the clients were paparazzi looking for photos of Harry and Meghan’s seaside residence.

https://globalnews.ca/news/6412281/bc-charter-turns-down-paparazzi-harry-meghan/

Which billionaire owns that residence where they stayed?

His name is Frank Giustra and ::SURPRISE:: he's a major contributor to the Clinton Foundation.

Umm no. Once again the media jumped the gun.

“I was disappointed to read this morning’s error-filled article about me in ?@nypost
?
I do not own a home in, or near, Victoria, BC.

I have never been contacted by a member of the British Royal family, by the Duke and Duchess

https://twitter.com/Frank_Giustra/status/1216504812516233216

This is why the Daily Fail fails and they'll never be able to harass Meghan in Canada like they used to in the UK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[quote=Anonymous
Harry also got miliions from the Queen Mother who left him more than William.

And you know this how???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Canada doing what the UK should have done all along - protecting the newest royal. I still couldn't believe all the UK media not only reached out to Thomas Markle to bash her but flew her family out for live interviews to do the same in the lead up to the wedding. No shame.

A Vancouver Island charter operator says he turned down a recent booking when he realized the clients were paparazzi looking for photos of Harry and Meghan’s seaside residence.

https://globalnews.ca/news/6412281/bc-charter-turns-down-paparazzi-harry-meghan/

Which billionaire owns that residence where they stayed?

His name is Frank Giustra and ::SURPRISE:: he's a major contributor to the Clinton Foundation.

Umm no. Once again the media jumped the gun.

“I was disappointed to read this morning’s error-filled article about me in ?@nypost
?
I do not own a home in, or near, Victoria, BC.

I have never been contacted by a member of the British Royal family, by the Duke and Duchess

https://twitter.com/Frank_Giustra/status/1216504812516233216

Perhaps he’s lying. If not, well who then owns the place??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[quote=Anonymous
Harry also got miliions from the Queen Mother who left him more than William.

And you know this how???

Common knowledge in the U.K., sweetie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Happy for them. I would not be surprised if they have another baby in the next two years.

I bet no more babies. She got her security baby.

+1. One is all she needs to secure future funding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, custody of a "grown ass man" is possible. The Queen has the authority to tell the people in the line of succession where to live and who to marry and whether they can work and whether they can travel. The Crown doesn't even allow Charles and William to ride in the same car, because of the possibility of car accidents.

Uh, isn't that what Harry just showed? She can ask or command but she's not all powerful. They only obey because they want to. When they don't, they don't.

No, it's not. Harry had to have a meeting on Monday to get his grandmother's permission to live in Canada. If she said "no," they would legally be expected to obey her order.

If she had said No and he had left anyway, she wouldn't call the police and have him arrested. Get real.

They wanted them out, got them out, and made it look like it was their idea. You don’t get to stay in power for 1000 years by playing LA league PR.

[Anonymous]

She doesn’t seem like she even wanted one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, custody of a "grown ass man" is possible. The Queen has the authority to tell the people in the line of succession where to live and who to marry and whether they can work and whether they can travel. The Crown doesn't even allow Charles and William to ride in the same car, because of the possibility of car accidents.

Uh, isn't that what Harry just showed? She can ask or command but she's not all powerful. They only obey because they want to. When they don't, they don't.

No, it's not. Harry had to have a meeting on Monday to get his grandmother's permission to live in Canada. If she said "no," they would legally be expected to obey her order.

If she had said No and he had left anyway, she wouldn't call the police and have him arrested. Get real.

They wanted them out, got them out, and made it look like it was their idea. You don’t get to stay in power for 1000 years by playing LA league PR.

lol yeah an announcement on the Sussex social media and website right after what was supposedly a 'cooling off' six-week vacation really screams "Buckingham Palace PR"

Even better - dragging the Prince of Wales, heir presumptive, and the Queen into a 2.5 hour meeting IN PERSON when the only time those three people are even in the same palace together is during Christmas and on the Queen's birthday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, custody of a "grown ass man" is possible. The Queen has the authority to tell the people in the line of succession where to live and who to marry and whether they can work and whether they can travel. The Crown doesn't even allow Charles and William to ride in the same car, because of the possibility of car accidents.

Uh, isn't that what Harry just showed? She can ask or command but she's not all powerful. They only obey because they want to. When they don't, they don't.

No, it's not. Harry had to have a meeting on Monday to get his grandmother's permission to live in Canada. If she said "no," they would legally be expected to obey her order.

If she had said No and he had left anyway, she wouldn't call the police and have him arrested. Get real.

They wanted them out, got them out, and made it look like it was their idea. You don’t get to stay in power for 1000 years by playing LA league PR.

Interesting theory.

[Anonymous]

The press are brutal to her

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1322042/Wedding-time-Kate-Middleton-grew-.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1263209/Is-Prince-Charles-blame-Williams-reluctance-marry-Waity-Katie.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1051669/Katie-just-waiting-Middleton-works-parents-mundane-office-job.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1084113/Waity-Katie-wobble-Prince-William-commits-seven-years-RAF.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1264718/Does-Waity-Katie-know-dont.html
https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/kate-middleton-nickname-waity-katie.html/
They arent headlines but they do show that Kste wasnt the darling of the press that she is seen as today

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Canada doing what the UK should have done all along - protecting the newest royal. I still couldn't believe all the UK media not only reached out to Thomas Markle to bash her but flew her family out for live interviews to do the same in the lead up to the wedding. No shame.

A Vancouver Island charter operator says he turned down a recent booking when he realized the clients were paparazzi looking for photos of Harry and Meghan’s seaside residence.

https://globalnews.ca/news/6412281/bc-charter-turns-down-paparazzi-harry-meghan/

Which billionaire owns that residence where they stayed?

His name is Frank Giustra and ::SURPRISE:: he's a major contributor to the Clinton Foundation.

Umm no. Once again the media jumped the gun.

“I was disappointed to read this morning’s error-filled article about me in ?@nypost
?
I do not own a home in, or near, Victoria, BC.

I have never been contacted by a member of the British Royal family, by the Duke and Duchess

https://twitter.com/Frank_Giustra/status/1216504812516233216

Perhaps he’s lying. If not, well who then owns the place??

Crickets. He’s probably lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like I said - she's free and happy. Enjoy being bitter haters.

Where’s her baby?

Not with her.

Did she lose him? Abandon him? Or just extend his visit with whoever he's with now?

You sound like a lunatic. Troll.

The truth does hurt. Your super Meg is a horrible person.

Really? Are the parent-from-my-computer women of DCUM actually criticizing a woman for leaving her baby at home in the middle of a snowy day so she could--wait for it--do errands around town? You hassle Kate for not wanting to do anything other than be home with her kids. You hassle Meghan for venturing into a drugstore parking lot. So much sniping, all the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[quote=Anonymous
Harry also got miliions from the Queen Mother who left him more than William.

And you know this how???

Common knowledge in the U.K., sweetie.

It was widely reported in the newspapers.