Van Lifer couple camping in Utah national park - two weeks later fiancee arrives in FL alone

[Anonymous]

It doesn't matter now but I can't imagine my son leaving and telling me where to find his body...

[Anonymous]

Interesting article. I didn’t realize he left a half written note. An exFBI agent is questioning whether hBrian Laundrie’s death was an assisted suicide. He was right handed, and was shot on the left side of his head.

https://www.wric.com/news/ex-fbi-agent-questions-bothersome-detail-in-brian-laundrie-autopsy/?utm_campaign=socialflow&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&fbclid=IwAR3Olb0IPXlx2S38k0jX6Wv3UuzDdbzhjubSvJ70WTj_ucP4cYa_UtZB6Yo

[Anonymous]

Petito family sues Brian Laundrie's parents, allege they knew Gabby 'had been murdered by their son'



https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/petito-family-sues-brian-laundries-parents-allege-knew-gabby-murdered-rcna19744

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Petito family sues Brian Laundrie's parents, allege they knew Gabby 'had been murdered by their son'



https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/petito-family-sues-brian-laundries-parents-allege-knew-gabby-murdered-rcna19744

His family knew what he did and helped cover it up. I don’t know about the legal basis for the suit, but at the very least it will he annoying for his parents to have to defend themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Petito family sues Brian Laundrie's parents, allege they knew Gabby 'had been murdered by their son'



https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/petito-family-sues-brian-laundries-parents-allege-knew-gabby-murdered-rcna19744

His family knew what he did and helped cover it up. I don’t know about the legal basis for the suit, but at the very least it will he annoying for his parents to have to defend themselves.

+1

They absolutely knew, and did nothing. They should feel it.

[Anonymous]

I feel badly for Gabby's family, and they are correct that the family had a moral obligation, but there is no legal basis for this lawsuit. Except in very limited circumstances (e.g., a grand jury subpoena), you don't have to answer questions or provide information about a crime that a family member may have committed. You can't lie to law enforcement about it, but you are 100 percent within your rights not to speak with them or provide information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel badly for Gabby's family, and they are correct that the family had a moral obligation, but there is no legal basis for this lawsuit. Except in very limited circumstances (e.g., a grand jury subpoena), you don't have to answer questions or provide information about a crime that a family member may have committed. You can't lie to law enforcement about it, but you are 100 percent within your rights not to speak with them or provide information.

There are criminal laws against harboring a fugitive and obstructing federal investigations. And there are plenty of civil laws their actions would fall under

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel badly for Gabby's family, and they are correct that the family had a moral obligation, but there is no legal basis for this lawsuit. Except in very limited circumstances (e.g., a grand jury subpoena), you don't have to answer questions or provide information about a crime that a family member may have committed. You can't lie to law enforcement about it, but you are 100 percent within your rights not to speak with them or provide information.

There are criminal laws against harboring a fugitive and obstructing federal investigations. And there are plenty of civil laws their actions would fall under

+1

Most of us know it is not a crime, but they should still be brought through the process and not get away with it unscathed. They are clearly not parents of the year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel badly for Gabby's family, and they are correct that the family had a moral obligation, but there is no legal basis for this lawsuit. Except in very limited circumstances (e.g., a grand jury subpoena), you don't have to answer questions or provide information about a crime that a family member may have committed. You can't lie to law enforcement about it, but you are 100 percent within your rights not to speak with them or provide information.

There are criminal laws against harboring a fugitive and obstructing federal investigations. And there are plenty of civil laws their actions would fall under

+1

Most of us know it is not a crime, but they should still be brought through the process and not get away with it unscathed. They are clearly not parents of the year.

Newsflash— there are no parents of the year in this whole sad story

[Anonymous]

What a stupid lawsuit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What a stupid lawsuit.

Perhaps, but put yourself in Gabby’s parent’s shoes - perhaps they want the Laundries to feel 1/100 of the pain that they have endured since Sept, perhaps it is how they have learned to grieve each + every day, perhaps they hope to deter another situation like this ever occurring again.

We are not in their shoes ->> if we were than it could be more crystal clear.
🔮📿

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a stupid lawsuit.

Perhaps, but put yourself in Gabby’s parent’s shoes - perhaps they want the Laundries to feel 1/100 of the pain that they have endured since Sept, perhaps it is how they have learned to grieve each + every day, perhaps they hope to deter another situation like this ever occurring again.

We are not in their shoes ->> if we were than it could be more crystal clear.
🔮📿

How is a lawsuit against the Laundries going to deter anything? The Laundries lost a son too, and they have to grapple with him committing a terrible crime. It is enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What a stupid lawsuit.

why is it stupid? If they knew Gaby was dead sands refused to tell, then it’s warranted. If they didn’t know, then it will be dismissed. Send a message to other parents who try to cover up felonies committed by their kids, like the school shooter whose parents were arrested recently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting article. I didn’t realize he left a half written note. An exFBI agent is questioning whether hBrian Laundrie’s death was an assisted suicide. He was right handed, and was shot on the left side of his head.

https://www.wric.com/news/ex-fbi-agent-questions-bothersome-detail-in-brian-laundrie-autopsy/?utm_campaign=socialflow&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&fbclid=IwAR3Olb0IPXlx2S38k0jX6Wv3UuzDdbzhjubSvJ70WTj_ucP4cYa_UtZB6Yo

I believe Brian Laundrie died by his own hand and his one hand only.
No one shot him and even if they did, it certainly would not have made any difference.

No one would blame anyone else for killing a murderer like him.

But I do believe that the detail about him being right-handed, etc. is just a small detail that does not bear questioning.
Who killed Brian does not matter to anyone.

What does is preventing what happened to sweet Gabby Petito to ever happen to another innocent + vulnerable person.

🕊🕊🕊

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a stupid lawsuit.

Perhaps, but put yourself in Gabby’s parent’s shoes - perhaps they want the Laundries to feel 1/100 of the pain that they have endured since Sept, perhaps it is how they have learned to grieve each + every day, perhaps they hope to deter another situation like this ever occurring again.

We are not in their shoes ->> if we were than it could be more crystal clear.
🔮📿

How is a lawsuit against the Laundries going to deter anything? The Laundries lost a son too, and they have to grapple with him committing a terrible crime. It is enough.

Because if the Petito family actually successfully won a court case regarding the Laundrie family deliberately withholding information from them >> then it is possible that in the future, no family will ever get away w/doing this to another grieving family ever again. 😢