I think they do care. This is a battle for the US more than it is a battle for Gaza or Israel/Palestine |
It's quite encouraging to read the posts from seemingly MANY informed, realistic posters who are opposed to Israel's brutal subjugation and genocide - the same posters who the Zionist bullies (bully?) try to castigate as "one pro-Hamas terrorist" whenever the spotlight gets a bit too uncomfortable. Jeff must chuckle to himself when he reads those comments, too. Threats of linguistic pattern analysis, bread crumbing federal agents into career-ending investigations of citizens exercising the same free speech our founders fought for, spittle frothing from their mouths as they rage against the persistence of this thread. But mostly what they do is serve up that word salad, obsessed day after day with what others have to say about Israel's atrocities. |
Yikes! This is a lot of MAGA-like projection, but not surprising given the anti-Israel faction is its complimentary opposite: the irrational far-left. |
If Israel would pause, take stock of what the future holds, discontinue their pattern of repeatedly provoking all of their neighbors, and work toward a reasonable solution to resolve the conflict of the last 80 or whatever years, I think I'd be quite happy to count myself as an Israel supporter. But as it stands - yeah, no. Not even close. That doesn't mean I want to see Israel "wiped off the map", but who cares about that hyperbole anyway? That's about as realistic of an idea as the idea that the Cayman Islands will be the lone global superpower in the 21st century. That we allow you to cry about it like it's a realistic possibility speaks a lot to how much idiocy we entertain in this matter. This shit is so one-sided and no amount of U.S. blocking and tackling (or designating as a terrorist anyone who dares to stand up to Israel after getting punched in the face by Israel repeatedly) will change my mind until I see wave after wave of change in the Middle East. It's long overdue. |
It isn’t one-sided. You are incredibly naive. |
I'm naive? That's rich. Truly. It is one-sided. OF COURSE someone like you, who LOVES the prevailing one-sided imbalance, will take the stance that it's not one-sided ... why would you? In reality, it's probably something like 73 - 80% Israel to blame, 10% topper for U.S. meddling under the guise of "facilitating peace", and 10 - 17% Palestinians to blame. To be honest, I'm surprised you're not trying to argue, as some have done here, that the one-sided imbalance favors the Palestinians at the same level. That's certifiable. But even to suggest that EVERYONE outside the U.S. has it all wrong, and only the U.S. and Israel have it all right ... don't you get how the naive one is the person looking at you in the mirror? |
On the contrary, this amuses me to no end. Please carry on. |
Really? Tunnels are nonexistent was a gem from today. Iran as a force for peace was Friday’s talking point. Palestinians want a two state solution (notwithstanding all polling to the contrary) was Sunday’s bon mot, IIRC. And let’s not forget everyone’s favorite: bin Laden was just misunderstood. If you have a strong stomach, look ‘em up yourself. Suffice it to say, no mystery why the protests in Chicago have been a complete bust. The far left is setting an absurd narrative and no one reasonable wants to be associated with their nonsense. |
Not too amused to have a tantrum every day over the existence of the thread. The lady doth protest too much, methinks. |
<gasp> you're talking notes on what's being said by whom, and when? Yikes. Get a hobby. Your doxxing dreams are just that ... dreams. |
Tantrum? You’ve got the wrong guy. |
Notes? No. Doxxing? No. Reading and retaining? Most assuredly. Rather the point of dialogue, wouldn’t you say? |
I think you are taking liberties with paraphrasing here. Iran doesn’t want war with the US nor does the U.S. want war in Iran does not mean It is a force for peace. It just means it is war averse. The US is fatigued by all the Middle East wars and vice versa. Apparently, Israel isnt satisfied yet. If you don’t have any skin in the game, of course war is great. They won’t pay the price in human life for it so why would they care? |
Putin has more to do with 10/7 than Iran but Israel would never fight a giant country like Russia. All the weapons used on 10/7 came from Wagner group in Sudan |
|
There were clearly sudanese or other African paid Russian Wagner group mercenaries doing acts on 10/7. Some of those stories are scrubbed but for sure the US and Israel are aware.
If Israel were truthful they would point the finger at Putin first as he had more to do with 10/7 than Iran. He was losing territory last year but now the pentagon has run out of enough shells for Ukraines army last month so Putin and Russia were able to regain territory. He made the gamble and he was right that an Israeli war would drain the pentagon for a bit-long enough for him to regain the advantage on the ground |