Just one. |
Have you ever heard of addition by subtraction.......and we are specifically talking about subtraction of the parent? That is definitely the case here. |
The bolded sentence is the answer to the question. The rest is just window dressing, trying to make FCV look better. And it's also the answer for why those claiming FCV's U17s could beat either BRYC or MCLean's U17s are delusional. Because the 02s that are playing up and committed would sit the game out? Come on man. Don't be such a joke. |
Your child is an outsider with respect to that. Nothing wrong with it. Just not common among her peers. |
DA atlantic conference 05 is a weak conference. |
This is what happens when you just go by TDS instead of actually knowing the players on the different teams and when you don't actually address the question posed. First, the question wasn't about the 2020 classes; it was about the U17 teams. Second, TDS is often wrong and not up-to-date. For example, just on McLean, the AF commit you listed is actually a 2019; another example, the U17s have a player who recently committed to Georgetown. And there are at least 2 2020 commits to Ivies at McLean which TDS doesn't have listed. Your BRYC list, for both U17s and U19s, is similarly incomplete. But in any event, on this past year's teams, there were more D1 commits on both the McLean and BRYC than on FCV and correspondingly, more talent. And it's also because of that dearth of talent moving up at FCV that I stated that BRYC will challenge FCV next year as the best U19 team in the area (McLean only has three players sticking around from the U19 team and although all three are very good, they won't not enough to compete with FCV or BRYC). |
You might be right about that. But what does it say about the 05 ECNL MA if those ECNL teams would comprise the entirety of the bottom of the 05 DA Atlantic conference? Literally the entire bottom. |
This is what happens when you just go by TDS instead of actually knowing the players on the different teams and when you don't actually address the question posed. First, the question wasn't about the 2020 classes; it was about the U17 teams. Second, TDS is often wrong and not up-to-date. For example, just on McLean, the AF commit you listed is actually a 2019; another example, the U17s have a player who recently committed to Georgetown. And there are at least 2 2020 commits to Ivies at McLean which TDS doesn't have listed. Your BRYC list, for both U17s and U19s, is similarly incomplete. But in any event, on this past year's teams, there were more D1 commits on both the McLean and BRYC than on FCV and correspondingly, more talent. And it's also because of that dearth of talent moving up at FCV that I stated that BRYC will challenge FCV next year as the best U19 team in the area (McLean only has three players sticking around from the U19 team and although all three are very good, they won't not enough to compete with FCV or BRYC). Ahhhh. TDS is not up to date for BRYC and McLean but up to date for FCV. Thanks for the clarification Nadir. |
This is what happens when you just go by TDS instead of actually knowing the players on the different teams and when you don't actually address the question posed. First, the question wasn't about the 2020 classes; it was about the U17 teams. Second, TDS is often wrong and not up-to-date. For example, just on McLean, the AF commit you listed is actually a 2019; another example, the U17s have a player who recently committed to Georgetown. And there are at least 2 2020 commits to Ivies at McLean which TDS doesn't have listed. Your BRYC list, for both U17s and U19s, is similarly incomplete. But in any event, on this past year's teams, there were more D1 commits on both the McLean and BRYC than on FCV and correspondingly, more talent. And it's also because of that dearth of talent moving up at FCV that I stated that BRYC will challenge FCV next year as the best U19 team in the area (McLean only has three players sticking around from the U19 team and although all three are very good, they won't not enough to compete with FCV or BRYC). You understand that there are U17s playing up and committed to colleges at FCV? I thought you "actually knew the players". LOL. |
Because the 02s that are playing up and committed would sit the game out? Come on man. Don't be such a joke. You can't be that stupid to be comparing apples to oranges. The question was about teams, not some fantasy mix. And second, because the breakdown was by class year, not birth year, it's not relevant. Are you too stupid to know the difference between a 2020 class year and an '02 birth year. There not the same thing. Almost all of the 2020 FCV commits listed are 2001 birth years and thus can't play on a U17 team. There's only one joke here and that's you. |
They wouldn’t. Would be nice if fcv took a break from beating Long Island and spirit and played a local ecnl team. Keep running Bobby and friends... |
You can't be that stupid to be comparing apples to oranges. The question was about teams, not some fantasy mix. And second, because the breakdown was by class year, not birth year, it's not relevant. Are you too stupid to know the difference between a 2020 class year and an '02 birth year. There not the same thing. Almost all of the 2020 FCV commits listed are 2001 birth years and thus can't play on a U17 team. There's only one joke here and that's you. "Almost all of the 2020 commits listed are 2001 birth years and can't play on a U17 team". There are FIVE are PLAYING UP and 2020 CLASS and are 2002s and thus eligible to play U17. The content from the post that made this clear is below. Stop putting your ignorance on display please. 5 play on the U19s (all playing up): schools Duke, VT, UVA, WF, W&M |
Don’t you mean lucky for bryc? That was quite the trick you pulled. |
Hahahahaha VDA lost to MUSpirit! Literally the next to last team in the division. VDA is too 3 in MA. VDA would be another doormat in DA, just like they were before they left. |
Different player grasshopper |