No one is threatening a free press. That is your imagination. Wait that’s not true. The previous president did threaten a free press. And I believe has escalated those threats in his current campaign for a second administration. But this current administration has done no such thing. Asians being beat up wasn’t imaginary. That happened, and was the result of disinformation and hate speech. Yes the federal government has an obligation to protect all of their citizens, even the Asian ones. |
“Brought to you by Pfizer” |
Trying to be snarky and doubling down on your dumb covid conspiracy theories doesn't make you any smarter or any more correct. |
And yet having these opinions is legal in the US. Or at least it used to be before Biden, which is what this topic is about. Start a different thread if you want to discuss a different topic. |
DP. As soon as Biden took office, social media started censoring - on behest and at times coerced - anything that related to a lab leak. It has been documented and these violations of our 1A rights are now making their way through the courts. That censorship did not happen under Trump. He spoke the truth about the virus originating in China (no one disputes this) but never stopped open dialogue that it came from a wet market. That is what the PP is saying |
Not covered when the lies can be shown to cause damage. You aren't allowed to make false claims about products, you aren't allowed to falsely hold yourself out to be a physician, engineer, attorney, you aren't allowed to threaten to kill or harm someone or their property and so on. 1A is not absolute and the courts and lawmakers have NEVER considered 1A to cover harmful and destructive lies. |
conspiracy theories are protected by the first amendment, babe. |
I’m not sure if its even worth responding to you since you don’t even want to engage at all with what the Constitution requires. |
Not when they harm people. And why is it SO DAMN IMPORTANT for you people to constantly, willfully spread vicious, harmful and destructive lies? Why do you insist on being so vile and destructive? |
the extent to which “lies” can be legally prohibited is very, very narrow and absolutely would NOT extend to the highly attenuated claim that discussion of the lab leak theory led to attacks on Asians. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12180#:~:text=The%20Supreme%20Court%20has%20said,without%20violating%20the%20First%20Amendment. But what amazes me about people like you is how you cannot see that allowing “lies” or “harmful speech” to be banned whenever the government want is absolutely going to impact your pet causes. See: Desantis. |
Try telling that to the J6 dopes locked up in prison over lies and conspiracy theories, babe. |
What "liberal lies" would DeSantis suppress? |
Please, post the First Amendment jurisprudence that allows conspiracy theories to be banned because they “harm people.” And it’s important because we do not want the government deciding what is a lie and what is “misinformation.” There is zero legal distinction between Desantis claiming drag queens are “harmful” and you claiming that questions about vaccine effectiveness are “harmful.” |
You’re not familiar with his attempts to ban trans healthcare, books, etc? The movement to ban transgender care for teens is absolutely based on the argument that gender affirming care is a “lie” and “harmful.” |
god you are an absolute moron. the J6 defendents were jailed for their actions (invading the capitol) not for posting “the election was stolen” on FB. |