DHS Creating "Disinformation Governance Board"

Anonymous
Not sure the person they picked is the best person to lead it but in principle it is an excellent idea to try to better monitor and contain online misinformation. It is not Orwellian to seek to protect ourselves from the onslaught of false information that plagues us and other Western countries. Orwellian would be creating propaganda to steer people towards voting for authoritarian dictators and not to protecting information flows so that people can vote according to more rational preferences.


“Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas testified Wednesday that the Department of Homeland Security is creating a "Disinformation Governance Board" to combat misinformation ahead of the 2022 midterms.

Mayorkas appeared before the House Appropriations Subcommittee to discuss the fiscal 2023 budget for the Department of Homeland Security.

Rep. Lauren Underwood, D-Ill., cited reports on how minority communities are being targeted in misinformation campaigns and asked Mayorkas what DHS will do to address it.”
Anonymous
I guess most commercial ads will be banned now, and campaign claims of incumbent opponents. Putin is winning and our govies don’t even know it.
Anonymous
The amount of foreign misinformation during the last campaign was crazy. I worked for the Senate and we tracked a lot of it. After work, I would get on FB and see people I knew sharing the same misinformation posts I saw at work. It was insane. I ended up closing out most of my social media accounts. This is definitely needed but it needs to be handled by career people not political people.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:All good questions





How about the comments that “The border is being managed effectively.”

That’s disinformation right there. Or will this board police only viewports that go against the official govt position. I don’t think many people feel the border is being managed well at all, but Biden/Myorkas keep saying that all is good there!!!

Bull.
Anonymous
He hits the nail on the head.

Anonymous
Easy rule of thumb: If you think it would be a horrible idea if the other party did it, it is a horrible idea for your party to do it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Easy rule of thumb: If you think it would be a horrible idea if the other party did it, it is a horrible idea for your party to do it.

Probably the most rational point made in this cesspool.
Anonymous
I look forward to the discussion regarding the authorizing statue, the particular people such an entity is being designed for, the staff selection etc. Lots of huge issues that should be explored before this is up and running.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All good questions





How about the comments that “The border is being managed effectively.”

That’s disinformation right there. Or will this board police only viewports that go against the official govt position. I don’t think many people feel the border is being managed well at all, but Biden/Myorkas keep saying that all is good there!!!

Bull.


Exactly. Democrats consider “disinformation” anything that exposes their narrative as a lie. Mayorkas/Biden/Harris are absolutely peddling disinformation with the lie that the border has - in any way - been effectively managed by their administration.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:He hits the nail on the head.



+1,000
What a joke.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


O. M. G.


This is absolutely priceless. Thank you, PP!
Anonymous
this is the problem and it is tearing our country and the world apart



Personally, I don't want to live in the Orwellian distopia envisioned by the far right.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:this is the problem and it is tearing our country and the world apart



Personally, I don't want to live in the Orwellian distopia envisioned by the far right.



The Orwellian dystopia is being created by the Joe Administration.
Anonymous
Didn’t she also previously tweet that Americans have too much freedom as well?
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: