She picked Tim

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

I admire her integrity for correcting his statements. I’m starting to wonder— maybe he does not even understand the difference? Or he wanted to garner more sympathy? Hard to know, but truly bizarre.

I think he probably figured most Americans even those who haven't dealt with infertility recognize the word IVF far more than can recognize IUI without looking it up. His entire role is relating to average Americans in an easy way

Yes. In addition anyone going through IUI understands that IVF would be the next step and would be fiercely protective of both procedures plus all the other infertility treatments.

Exactly. That’s why I know that poster is a liar, FOS, or a paid troll because they surely have never gone through the infertility cycle and trying to become a parent. So many despicable people opining about other family’s struggles. Karma strike them HARD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So “mind your own damn business” doesn’t meant to Walz what he said https://www.fox9.com/news/minnesota-bans-marijuana-smoking-apartments.amp

How is producing second hand smoke minding your own business? Smoke you weed away from other folks ..problem solved.

What did Walz say? Even if neighbors don’t like what you are doing you mind your own damn business

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

I admire her integrity for correcting his statements. I’m starting to wonder— maybe he does not even understand the difference? Or he wanted to garner more sympathy? Hard to know, but truly bizarre.

I think he probably figured most Americans even those who haven't dealt with infertility recognize the word IVF far more than can recognize IUI without looking it up. His entire role is relating to average Americans in an easy way

Yes. In addition anyone going through IUI understands that IVF would be the next step and would be fiercely protective of both procedures plus all the other infertility treatments.

The handwaving on this issue is really the most impressive I’ve ever seen. 9/10, at least.

Written like someone that knows little about going through infertility. It not a small community and these attacks against Walz for saying IVF and not IUI will never stick. All of these treatments are important threatening one threatens the entire community.

I know quite a bit about infertility, but thanks for assuming.
Of course they won’t stick, at least for the Dems. Their platform of JOY simply won’t allow it!

DP. Funny thing. Nobody believes you. And we all know that you’re lying. No normal person who has gone through fertility treatment is this clueless, classless, or callous when it comes to this personal, family journey.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

I admire her integrity for correcting his statements. I’m starting to wonder— maybe he does not even understand the difference? Or he wanted to garner more sympathy? Hard to know, but truly bizarre.

I think he probably figured most Americans even those who haven't dealt with infertility recognize the word IVF far more than can recognize IUI without looking it up. His entire role is relating to average Americans in an easy way

Yes. In addition anyone going through IUI understands that IVF would be the next step and would be fiercely protective of both procedures plus all the other infertility treatments.

The handwaving on this issue is really the most impressive I’ve ever seen. 9/10, at least.

Written like someone that knows little about going through infertility. It not a small community and these attacks against Walz for saying IVF and not IUI will never stick. All of these treatments are important threatening one threatens the entire community.

I know quite a bit about infertility, but thanks for assuming.
Of course they won’t stick, at least for the Dems. Their platform of JOY simply won’t allow it!

What treatments? Were they successful?

IUI unsuccessful; IVF successful.

wtf does this have to do with Walz?!?

SURE

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So “mind your own damn business” doesn’t meant to Walz what he said https://www.fox9.com/news/minnesota-bans-marijuana-smoking-apartments.amp

How is producing second hand smoke minding your own business? Smoke you weed away from other folks ..problem solved.

What did Walz say? Even if neighbors don’t like what you are doing you mind your own damn business

As long as you don't get close enough to have other people inhale the smoke then do what you want. It is no one else's business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My uncle tells people he lives in Denver..... but actually lives in Littleton. Because no one knows where the hell Littleton is and everyone knows where Denver is.

What a lying jerk.

Is he doing it to score political points and garner sympathy? If not, your story is irrelevant.

Tell us without telling us you’re an idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

I admire her integrity for correcting his statements. I’m starting to wonder— maybe he does not even understand the difference? Or he wanted to garner more sympathy? Hard to know, but truly bizarre.

I think he probably figured most Americans even those who haven't dealt with infertility recognize the word IVF far more than can recognize IUI without looking it up. His entire role is relating to average Americans in an easy way

Yes. In addition anyone going through IUI understands that IVF would be the next step and would be fiercely protective of both procedures plus all the other infertility treatments.

The handwaving on this issue is really the most impressive I’ve ever seen. 9/10, at least.

Written like someone that knows little about going through infertility. It not a small community and these attacks against Walz for saying IVF and not IUI will never stick. All of these treatments are important threatening one threatens the entire community.

I know quite a bit about infertility, but thanks for assuming.
Of course they won’t stick, at least for the Dems. Their platform of JOY simply won’t allow it!

What treatments? Were they successful?

IUI unsuccessful; IVF successful.

wtf does this have to do with Walz?!?

The GOP is trying to make a thing about him saying IVF instead of IUI. It is nonsense. One often follows the other is IUI is not successful.

That is so not the point. The point is Republicans are talking about banning IVF, not IUI. He tried to make it look like a possibly soon to be banned procedure enabled him to have a family. Completely untrue.

What exactly is the difference when it comes to GOP policy? What I mean is, what is the point in trying to rationalize what the GOP is trying to do to women’s reproductive health. NOTHING should be up to the govt when it comes to a woman’s health. Not IVF, IUI or anything else.

In what first world country are women bleeding out in parking lots due to the govt? In Ireland, that was enough to change the law. In America, the Republicans think that isn’t enough suffering for women.

I would say that their daughters would have to die before they cared. They don’t care about their wives. She’ll be replaced.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

I admire her integrity for correcting his statements. I’m starting to wonder— maybe he does not even understand the difference? Or he wanted to garner more sympathy? Hard to know, but truly bizarre.

I think he probably figured most Americans even those who haven't dealt with infertility recognize the word IVF far more than can recognize IUI without looking it up. His entire role is relating to average Americans in an easy way

Yes. In addition anyone going through IUI understands that IVF would be the next step and would be fiercely protective of both procedures plus all the other infertility treatments.

The handwaving on this issue is really the most impressive I’ve ever seen. 9/10, at least.

Written like someone that knows little about going through infertility. It not a small community and these attacks against Walz for saying IVF and not IUI will never stick. All of these treatments are important threatening one threatens the entire community.

I know quite a bit about infertility, but thanks for assuming.
Of course they won’t stick, at least for the Dems. Their platform of JOY simply won’t allow it!

DP. Funny thing. Nobody believes you. And we all know that you’re lying. No normal person who has gone through fertility treatment is this clueless, classless, or callous when it comes to this personal, family journey.

It just burns you that someone has a different opinion, doesn’t it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

I admire her integrity for correcting his statements. I’m starting to wonder— maybe he does not even understand the difference? Or he wanted to garner more sympathy? Hard to know, but truly bizarre.

I think he probably figured most Americans even those who haven't dealt with infertility recognize the word IVF far more than can recognize IUI without looking it up. His entire role is relating to average Americans in an easy way

Yes. In addition anyone going through IUI understands that IVF would be the next step and would be fiercely protective of both procedures plus all the other infertility treatments.

The handwaving on this issue is really the most impressive I’ve ever seen. 9/10, at least.

Written like someone that knows little about going through infertility. It not a small community and these attacks against Walz for saying IVF and not IUI will never stick. All of these treatments are important threatening one threatens the entire community.

I know quite a bit about infertility, but thanks for assuming.
Of course they won’t stick, at least for the Dems. Their platform of JOY simply won’t allow it!

DP. Funny thing. Nobody believes you. And we all know that you’re lying. No normal person who has gone through fertility treatment is this clueless, classless, or callous when it comes to this personal, family journey.

If there is no distinction between the two procedures – at least according to you, those of us who understand science get that they are completely different procedures – why did his wife have to come out and make a statement about which procedure she had?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My uncle tells people he lives in Denver..... but actually lives in Littleton. Because no one knows where the hell Littleton is and everyone knows where Denver is.

What a lying jerk.

Is he doing it to score political points and garner sympathy? If not, your story is irrelevant.

Tell us without telling us you’re an idiot.

What a zinger! And so original. Never heard that one before.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My uncle tells people he lives in Denver..... but actually lives in Littleton. Because no one knows where the hell Littleton is and everyone knows where Denver is.

What a lying jerk.

Is he doing it to score political points and garner sympathy? If not, your story is irrelevant.

Tell us without telling us you’re an idiot.

What a zinger! And so original. Never heard that one before.

You just proved the point. Now you have heard it, but I have a sneaking feeling it was not the first time you’ve been told this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My uncle tells people he lives in Denver..... but actually lives in Littleton. Because no one knows where the hell Littleton is and everyone knows where Denver is.

What a lying jerk.

Is he doing it to score political points and garner sympathy? If not, your story is irrelevant.

Tell us without telling us you’re an idiot.

What a zinger! And so original. Never heard that one before.

You just proved the point. Now you have heard it, but I have a sneaking feeling it was not the first time you’ve been told this.

I was being sarcastic you dolt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

I admire her integrity for correcting his statements. I’m starting to wonder— maybe he does not even understand the difference? Or he wanted to garner more sympathy? Hard to know, but truly bizarre.

I think he probably figured most Americans even those who haven't dealt with infertility recognize the word IVF far more than can recognize IUI without looking it up. His entire role is relating to average Americans in an easy way

Yes. In addition anyone going through IUI understands that IVF would be the next step and would be fiercely protective of both procedures plus all the other infertility treatments.

The handwaving on this issue is really the most impressive I’ve ever seen. 9/10, at least.

Written like someone that knows little about going through infertility. It not a small community and these attacks against Walz for saying IVF and not IUI will never stick. All of these treatments are important threatening one threatens the entire community.

I know quite a bit about infertility, but thanks for assuming.
Of course they won’t stick, at least for the Dems. Their platform of JOY simply won’t allow it!

DP. Funny thing. Nobody believes you. And we all know that you’re lying. No normal person who has gone through fertility treatment is this clueless, classless, or callous when it comes to this personal, family journey.

It just burns you that someone has a different opinion, doesn’t it?

Not at all I just despise liars and trolls

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My uncle tells people he lives in Denver..... but actually lives in Littleton. Because no one knows where the hell Littleton is and everyone knows where Denver is.

What a lying jerk.

Is he doing it to score political points and garner sympathy? If not, your story is irrelevant.

Tell us without telling us you’re an idiot.

What a zinger! And so original. Never heard that one before.

You just proved the point. Now you have heard it, but I have a sneaking feeling it was not the first time you’ve been told this.

I was being sarcastic you dolt.

Oh really. You seemed right on point, idiotic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

I admire her integrity for correcting his statements. I’m starting to wonder— maybe he does not even understand the difference? Or he wanted to garner more sympathy? Hard to know, but truly bizarre.

I think he probably figured most Americans even those who haven't dealt with infertility recognize the word IVF far more than can recognize IUI without looking it up. His entire role is relating to average Americans in an easy way

Yes. In addition anyone going through IUI understands that IVF would be the next step and would be fiercely protective of both procedures plus all the other infertility treatments.

The handwaving on this issue is really the most impressive I’ve ever seen. 9/10, at least.

Written like someone that knows little about going through infertility. It not a small community and these attacks against Walz for saying IVF and not IUI will never stick. All of these treatments are important threatening one threatens the entire community.

I know quite a bit about infertility, but thanks for assuming.
Of course they won’t stick, at least for the Dems. Their platform of JOY simply won’t allow it!

DP. Funny thing. Nobody believes you. And we all know that you’re lying. No normal person who has gone through fertility treatment is this clueless, classless, or callous when it comes to this personal, family journey.

If there is no distinction between the two procedures – at least according to you, those of us who understand science get that they are completely different procedures – why did his wife have to come out and make a statement about which procedure she had?

Do you not realize that fertility treatment is a progression and that IVF has become the colloquial catch-all for the long, draining process.