Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's weird to me that he did this to clear his name for his kids, yet the second the trial was over he went to London, instead of to spend time with his kids.

None of this was done for his kids.

The worst thing out of this is that my college age DD just told me that she supports JD! She is full of vitriol towards AH and why? Because she gets her news from the YTU, and we have a young woman exposed to opinions of nasty people and all her friends that are young women too are cheering for the abusive narcissist against the rights of women!
She was his supply, and she refused to take it and gave it back. That is her sin, he is abusing her still. Let us remember who started all the trials. Who is smirking like a looney narc. Is she perfect? No. And the world is using the same Othering of women used for centuries, where if we are not docile and take abuse, we are irrational, histrionic, nasty. To this day, haunted houses show tours in the South where the evil 13 year old slave seduced her master and the mistress punished her, and then she was killed for her sins!! To this day many blame an innocent child for being raped.
I worked with one, had to change jobs, he did the same exact thing. I would say, Mike said this, and I had notes, and he would say, in front of all the staff, I never said that, I never did that. Wanted me to write a report about a missing document that I took somewhere... and when I asked to see the dates I was on vacation the whole week! I was lucky to run away, but he is till running a smear campaign against me.

I applaud her for not approaching this case from the standpoint of women's rights!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's weird to me that he did this to clear his name for his kids, yet the second the trial was over he went to London, instead of to spend time with his kids.

None of this was done for his kids.

The worst thing out of this is that my college age DD just told me that she supports JD! She is full of vitriol towards AH and why? Because she gets her news from the YTU, and we have a young woman exposed to opinions of nasty people and all her friends that are young women too are cheering for the abusive narcissist against the rights of women!
She was his supply, and she refused to take it and gave it back. That is her sin, he is abusing her still. Let us remember who started all the trials. Who is smirking like a looney narc. Is she perfect? No. And the world is using the same Othering of women used for centuries, where if we are not docile and take abuse, we are irrational, histrionic, nasty. To this day, haunted houses show tours in the South where the evil 13 year old slave seduced her master and the mistress punished her, and then she was killed for her sins!! To this day many blame an innocent child for being raped.
I worked with one, had to change jobs, he did the same exact thing. I would say, Mike said this, and I had notes, and he would say, in front of all the staff, I never said that, I never did that. Wanted me to write a report about a missing document that I took somewhere... and when I asked to see the dates I was on vacation the whole week! I was lucky to run away, but he is till running a smear campaign against me.

Yesterday a poster was arguing that no one here believes only women get abused. This seems to be what you believe?? Have you heard all the evidence? Good for your daughter to have open eyes and ears!

+1

SO many people here are taking sides without having watched the trial. I listened to the entire thing and whether JD wins or loses based on the technicalities of defamation, I truly believe AH is a liar, an abuser and someone who concocted this entire thing for fame and to take him down. She does not speak for victims of DV. She's awful.

There is a huge possibility that JD loses the case because that only takes one single juror to double down and say no. The win will only come about if there is a unanimous vote for him. I wonder if we'll eventually find out how the vote went (how many jurors for/against). It really doesn't matter much what the jury returns because most of us have already made up our mind as who's the liar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No he shouldn’t win because he didn’t meet the standard of defamation.

+1 he will only win if the three witnesses testifying to her injuries are not believed. This is unlikely.

Apparently the Johnny stans think they were all lying too? Or in their gift for cherry picking, they conveniently ignore.

The witnesses that helped her try to stage dv and fake bruises, called TMZ to be at the courthouse? 4 cops with bodycams, 2 separate calls, did not see any of this. They were trying to blackmail JD so they could all continue living free in the penthouses. I don't believe these witnesses. I am very curious to hear from the jury!

Really, their marriage counselor and her former makeup artist were Depp grifters? Do tell.

[Anonymous]

I've listened to most of the trial and I support AH. Seems clear he did a lot of bad stuff he doesn't remember.

I don't understand the self-confidence of someone who spent years abusing drugs and alcohol and yet seems to claim with absolute certainty that he would never do _____ [hit a woman/damage property/harm someone/etc.]. There is plenty of evidence that he did this terrible stuff -- punched out walls, completely destroyed property, scared people (especially women) he was being destructive around that he might hurt them, behave in a generally out of control way, even hit people or things accidentally - on top of testimony about more personal and damaging hitting/violence behind closed doors. He just doesn't want to believe he did this stuff, despite evidence to the contrary, because he doesn't want to be that guy. Isn't it pretty to think so? He needs help and some truth tellers around him who aren't on his payroll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's weird to me that he did this to clear his name for his kids, yet the second the trial was over he went to London, instead of to spend time with his kids.

None of this was done for his kids.

The worst thing out of this is that my college age DD just told me that she supports JD! She is full of vitriol towards AH and why? Because she gets her news from the YTU, and we have a young woman exposed to opinions of nasty people and all her friends that are young women too are cheering for the abusive narcissist against the rights of women!
She was his supply, and she refused to take it and gave it back. That is her sin, he is abusing her still. Let us remember who started all the trials. Who is smirking like a looney narc. Is she perfect? No. And the world is using the same Othering of women used for centuries, where if we are not docile and take abuse, we are irrational, histrionic, nasty. To this day, haunted houses show tours in the South where the evil 13 year old slave seduced her master and the mistress punished her, and then she was killed for her sins!! To this day many blame an innocent child for being raped.
I worked with one, had to change jobs, he did the same exact thing. I would say, Mike said this, and I had notes, and he would say, in front of all the staff, I never said that, I never did that. Wanted me to write a report about a missing document that I took somewhere... and when I asked to see the dates I was on vacation the whole week! I was lucky to run away, but he is till running a smear campaign against me.

I applaud her for not approaching this case from the standpoint of women's rights!

LOL! But, you sure are happy to overlook all of his problematic behavior! Woman lied! OMG, what an abuser! JD lies all the time and passes out drunk, poor guy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's weird to me that he did this to clear his name for his kids, yet the second the trial was over he went to London, instead of to spend time with his kids.

None of this was done for his kids.

The worst thing out of this is that my college age DD just told me that she supports JD! She is full of vitriol towards AH and why? Because she gets her news from the YTU, and we have a young woman exposed to opinions of nasty people and all her friends that are young women too are cheering for the abusive narcissist against the rights of women!
She was his supply, and she refused to take it and gave it back. That is her sin, he is abusing her still. Let us remember who started all the trials. Who is smirking like a looney narc. Is she perfect? No. And the world is using the same Othering of women used for centuries, where if we are not docile and take abuse, we are irrational, histrionic, nasty. To this day, haunted houses show tours in the South where the evil 13 year old slave seduced her master and the mistress punished her, and then she was killed for her sins!! To this day many blame an innocent child for being raped.
I worked with one, had to change jobs, he did the same exact thing. I would say, Mike said this, and I had notes, and he would say, in front of all the staff, I never said that, I never did that. Wanted me to write a report about a missing document that I took somewhere... and when I asked to see the dates I was on vacation the whole week! I was lucky to run away, but he is till running a smear campaign against me.

Yesterday a poster was arguing that no one here believes only women get abused. This seems to be what you believe?? Have you heard all the evidence? Good for your daughter to have open eyes and ears!

+1

SO many people here are taking sides without having watched the trial. I listened to the entire thing and whether JD wins or loses based on the technicalities of defamation, I truly believe AH is a liar, an abuser and someone who concocted this entire thing for fame and to take him down. She does not speak for victims of DV. She's awful.

There is a huge possibility that JD loses the case because that only takes one single juror to double down and say no. The win will only come about if there is a unanimous vote for him. I wonder if we'll eventually find out how the vote went (how many jurors for/against). It really doesn't matter much what the jury returns because most of us have already made up our mind as who's the liar.

I thought it was just a majority because it’s a civil case? Isn’t unanimous just for criminal? If it is unanimous I think he’s very very unlike to win. As evidenced by this thread, a bunch of people seeing the same trial are interpreting/believing the witnesses very differently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's weird to me that he did this to clear his name for his kids, yet the second the trial was over he went to London, instead of to spend time with his kids.

None of this was done for his kids.

The worst thing out of this is that my college age DD just told me that she supports JD! She is full of vitriol towards AH and why? Because she gets her news from the YTU, and we have a young woman exposed to opinions of nasty people and all her friends that are young women too are cheering for the abusive narcissist against the rights of women!
She was his supply, and she refused to take it and gave it back. That is her sin, he is abusing her still. Let us remember who started all the trials. Who is smirking like a looney narc. Is she perfect? No. And the world is using the same Othering of women used for centuries, where if we are not docile and take abuse, we are irrational, histrionic, nasty. To this day, haunted houses show tours in the South where the evil 13 year old slave seduced her master and the mistress punished her, and then she was killed for her sins!! To this day many blame an innocent child for being raped.
I worked with one, had to change jobs, he did the same exact thing. I would say, Mike said this, and I had notes, and he would say, in front of all the staff, I never said that, I never did that. Wanted me to write a report about a missing document that I took somewhere... and when I asked to see the dates I was on vacation the whole week! I was lucky to run away, but he is till running a smear campaign against me.

It need to be unanimous but because it’s a civil case the evidence doesn’t have to be within a shadow of a doubt like a criminal case.

Yesterday a poster was arguing that no one here believes only women get abused. This seems to be what you believe?? Have you heard all the evidence? Good for your daughter to have open eyes and ears!

+1

SO many people here are taking sides without having watched the trial. I listened to the entire thing and whether JD wins or loses based on the technicalities of defamation, I truly believe AH is a liar, an abuser and someone who concocted this entire thing for fame and to take him down. She does not speak for victims of DV. She's awful.

There is a huge possibility that JD loses the case because that only takes one single juror to double down and say no. The win will only come about if there is a unanimous vote for him. I wonder if we'll eventually find out how the vote went (how many jurors for/against). It really doesn't matter much what the jury returns because most of us have already made up our mind as who's the liar.

I thought it was just a majority because it’s a civil case? Isn’t unanimous just for criminal? If it is unanimous I think he’s very very unlike to win. As evidenced by this thread, a bunch of people seeing the same trial are interpreting/believing the witnesses very differently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's weird to me that he did this to clear his name for his kids, yet the second the trial was over he went to London, instead of to spend time with his kids.

None of this was done for his kids.

The worst thing out of this is that my college age DD just told me that she supports JD! She is full of vitriol towards AH and why? Because she gets her news from the YTU, and we have a young woman exposed to opinions of nasty people and all her friends that are young women too are cheering for the abusive narcissist against the rights of women!
She was his supply, and she refused to take it and gave it back. That is her sin, he is abusing her still. Let us remember who started all the trials. Who is smirking like a looney narc. Is she perfect? No. And the world is using the same Othering of women used for centuries, where if we are not docile and take abuse, we are irrational, histrionic, nasty. To this day, haunted houses show tours in the South where the evil 13 year old slave seduced her master and the mistress punished her, and then she was killed for her sins!! To this day many blame an innocent child for being raped.
I worked with one, had to change jobs, he did the same exact thing. I would say, Mike said this, and I had notes, and he would say, in front of all the staff, I never said that, I never did that. Wanted me to write a report about a missing document that I took somewhere... and when I asked to see the dates I was on vacation the whole week! I was lucky to run away, but he is till running a smear campaign against me.

I applaud her for not approaching this case from the standpoint of women's rights!

LOL! But, you sure are happy to overlook all of his problematic behavior! Woman lied! OMG, what an abuser! JD lies all the time and passes out drunk, poor guy!

Nope, never overlooked his behavior! I just don't believe her narrative of the helpless victim of domestic and sexual violence and she should not be made a spokesperson for the the abused. This case should not be about women's rights

[Anonymous]

HAHA. Just saw the ACLU is demanding JD to pay them $86,253.26 for wasting their time to produce all the records and expenses on Amber's Pledge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's weird to me that he did this to clear his name for his kids, yet the second the trial was over he went to London, instead of to spend time with his kids.

None of this was done for his kids.

The worst thing out of this is that my college age DD just told me that she supports JD! She is full of vitriol towards AH and why? Because she gets her news from the YTU, and we have a young woman exposed to opinions of nasty people and all her friends that are young women too are cheering for the abusive narcissist against the rights of women!
She was his supply, and she refused to take it and gave it back. That is her sin, he is abusing her still. Let us remember who started all the trials. Who is smirking like a looney narc. Is she perfect? No. And the world is using the same Othering of women used for centuries, where if we are not docile and take abuse, we are irrational, histrionic, nasty. To this day, haunted houses show tours in the South where the evil 13 year old slave seduced her master and the mistress punished her, and then she was killed for her sins!! To this day many blame an innocent child for being raped.
I worked with one, had to change jobs, he did the same exact thing. I would say, Mike said this, and I had notes, and he would say, in front of all the staff, I never said that, I never did that. Wanted me to write a report about a missing document that I took somewhere... and when I asked to see the dates I was on vacation the whole week! I was lucky to run away, but he is till running a smear campaign against me.

It depends on the state. This trial requires a unanimous opinion. In my opinion, Johnny Depp is unlikely to win. Amber heard is also unlikely to win.
Yesterday a poster was arguing that no one here believes only women get abused. This seems to be what you believe?? Have you heard all the evidence? Good for your daughter to have open eyes and ears!

+1

SO many people here are taking sides without having watched the trial. I listened to the entire thing and whether JD wins or loses based on the technicalities of defamation, I truly believe AH is a liar, an abuser and someone who concocted this entire thing for fame and to take him down. She does not speak for victims of DV. She's awful.

There is a huge possibility that JD loses the case because that only takes one single juror to double down and say no. The win will only come about if there is a unanimous vote for him. I wonder if we'll eventually find out how the vote went (how many jurors for/against). It really doesn't matter much what the jury returns because most of us have already made up our mind as who's the liar.

I thought it was just a majority because it’s a civil case? Isn’t unanimous just for criminal? If it is unanimous I think he’s very very unlike to win. As evidenced by this thread, a bunch of people seeing the same trial are interpreting/believing the witnesses very differently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's weird to me that he did this to clear his name for his kids, yet the second the trial was over he went to London, instead of to spend time with his kids.

None of this was done for his kids.

The worst thing out of this is that my college age DD just told me that she supports JD! She is full of vitriol towards AH and why? Because she gets her news from the YTU, and we have a young woman exposed to opinions of nasty people and all her friends that are young women too are cheering for the abusive narcissist against the rights of women!
She was his supply, and she refused to take it and gave it back. That is her sin, he is abusing her still. Let us remember who started all the trials. Who is smirking like a looney narc. Is she perfect? No. And the world is using the same Othering of women used for centuries, where if we are not docile and take abuse, we are irrational, histrionic, nasty. To this day, haunted houses show tours in the South where the evil 13 year old slave seduced her master and the mistress punished her, and then she was killed for her sins!! To this day many blame an innocent child for being raped.
I worked with one, had to change jobs, he did the same exact thing. I would say, Mike said this, and I had notes, and he would say, in front of all the staff, I never said that, I never did that. Wanted me to write a report about a missing document that I took somewhere... and when I asked to see the dates I was on vacation the whole week! I was lucky to run away, but he is till running a smear campaign against me.

It depends on the state. This trial requires a unanimous opinion. In my opinion, Johnny Depp is unlikely to win. Amber heard is also unlikely to win.
Yesterday a poster was arguing that no one here believes only women get abused. This seems to be what you believe?? Have you heard all the evidence? Good for your daughter to have open eyes and ears!

+1

SO many people here are taking sides without having watched the trial. I listened to the entire thing and whether JD wins or loses based on the technicalities of defamation, I truly believe AH is a liar, an abuser and someone who concocted this entire thing for fame and to take him down. She does not speak for victims of DV. She's awful.

There is a huge possibility that JD loses the case because that only takes one single juror to double down and say no. The win will only come about if there is a unanimous vote for him. I wonder if we'll eventually find out how the vote went (how many jurors for/against). It really doesn't matter much what the jury returns because most of us have already made up our mind as who's the liar.

I thought it was just a majority because it’s a civil case? Isn’t unanimous just for criminal? If it is unanimous I think he’s very very unlike to win. As evidenced by this thread, a bunch of people seeing the same trial are interpreting/believing the witnesses very differently.

It depends on the state. This trial requires a unanimous opinion. In my opinion, Johnny Depp is unlikely to win. Amber heard is also unlikely to win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:HAHA. Just saw the ACLU is demanding JD to pay them $86,253.26 for wasting their time to produce all the records and expenses on Amber's Pledge.

This seems reasonable. They used their time and resources to find documentations intead of doing their usual job.

[Anonymous]

Does anyone know the court’s specific reasoning for cutting off JD’s damages at November 2, 2020? I know that’s the date of the verdict in Depp’s UK litigation, but have not found explanation of the court’s grounds for cutting off potential damages at that point (assuming it is in fact related to the UK verdict).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's weird to me that he did this to clear his name for his kids, yet the second the trial was over he went to London, instead of to spend time with his kids.

None of this was done for his kids.

The worst thing out of this is that my college age DD just told me that she supports JD! She is full of vitriol towards AH and why? Because she gets her news from the YTU, and we have a young woman exposed to opinions of nasty people and all her friends that are young women too are cheering for the abusive narcissist against the rights of women!
She was his supply, and she refused to take it and gave it back. That is her sin, he is abusing her still. Let us remember who started all the trials. Who is smirking like a looney narc. Is she perfect? No. And the world is using the same Othering of women used for centuries, where if we are not docile and take abuse, we are irrational, histrionic, nasty. To this day, haunted houses show tours in the South where the evil 13 year old slave seduced her master and the mistress punished her, and then she was killed for her sins!! To this day many blame an innocent child for being raped.
I worked with one, had to change jobs, he did the same exact thing. I would say, Mike said this, and I had notes, and he would say, in front of all the staff, I never said that, I never did that. Wanted me to write a report about a missing document that I took somewhere... and when I asked to see the dates I was on vacation the whole week! I was lucky to run away, but he is till running a smear campaign against me.

It depends on the state. This trial requires a unanimous opinion. In my opinion, Johnny Depp is unlikely to win. Amber heard is also unlikely to win.
Yesterday a poster was arguing that no one here believes only women get abused. This seems to be what you believe?? Have you heard all the evidence? Good for your daughter to have open eyes and ears!

+1

SO many people here are taking sides without having watched the trial. I listened to the entire thing and whether JD wins or loses based on the technicalities of defamation, I truly believe AH is a liar, an abuser and someone who concocted this entire thing for fame and to take him down. She does not speak for victims of DV. She's awful.

There is a huge possibility that JD loses the case because that only takes one single juror to double down and say no. The win will only come about if there is a unanimous vote for him. I wonder if we'll eventually find out how the vote went (how many jurors for/against). It really doesn't matter much what the jury returns because most of us have already made up our mind as who's the liar.

I thought it was just a majority because it’s a civil case? Isn’t unanimous just for criminal? If it is unanimous I think he’s very very unlike to win. As evidenced by this thread, a bunch of people seeing the same trial are interpreting/believing the witnesses very differently.

It depends on the state. This trial requires a unanimous opinion. In my opinion, Johnny Depp is unlikely to win. Amber heard is also unlikely to win.

They are both losers and I hope they STFU after this trial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HAHA. Just saw the ACLU is demanding JD to pay them $86,253.26 for wasting their time to produce all the records and expenses on Amber's Pledge.

This seems reasonable. They used their time and resources to find documentations intead of doing their usual job.

This is normal. The law allows for reasonable copying and related expenses to respond to a subpoena duces tecum. This isn’t a ha ha thing. It is what it is. Do you not think she paid up the wazoo for the evidence (inc. testimony) reviewed?