Nest level lacrosse: girls

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Skywalkers, Stars, Integrity are all not showing up for 2027 NGLL, seems odd.

Add Renegades to that list as well. Looks like Skywalkers is registered for 26 and 28s but thats it. Really hard to believe those other bigger clubs are not registered. Sounds like some real incompetence at those clubs.

Is it incompetence at the clubs or Robinson Sports?

Are you implying Robinson sports is not keeping the team registration list up to date? Looks to me that a few clubs are being mismanaged.

No need to imply. They are not competent. Case in point they registered Coppermine 2029 Black in 2028 A and later had to fix it. It’s not a leap of imagination to wonder if teams have registered and they just cannot be bothered to update the information.

Why should they feel compelled to update the information in real time? For onlookers like us? As long as it's all in and correct once registration is closed, seems like they've done their job.

Not to mention they have until March to get it all worked out.

Equally so, it seems a stretch to suggest that just because a club does not show up as registered that somehow they are poorly run. People need to chill out.

Well, seems like most of your teams are in now. Next Level 2028 registered for A and NL 2027 registered for B as of now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Skywalkers, Stars, Integrity are all not showing up for 2027 NGLL, seems odd.

Add Renegades to that list as well. Looks like Skywalkers is registered for 26 and 28s but thats it. Really hard to believe those other bigger clubs are not registered. Sounds like some real incompetence at those clubs.

Is it incompetence at the clubs or Robinson Sports?

Are you implying Robinson sports is not keeping the team registration list up to date? Looks to me that a few clubs are being mismanaged.

No need to imply. They are not competent. Case in point they registered Coppermine 2029 Black in 2028 A and later had to fix it. It’s not a leap of imagination to wonder if teams have registered and they just cannot be bothered to update the information.

Why should they feel compelled to update the information in real time? For onlookers like us? As long as it's all in and correct once registration is closed, seems like they've done their job.

Not to mention they have until March to get it all worked out.

Equally so, it seems a stretch to suggest that just because a club does not show up as registered that somehow they are poorly run. People need to chill out.

Well, seems like most of your teams are in now. Next Level 2028 registered for A and NL 2027 registered for B as of now.

Out of the teams registered so far, they should win 4, lose 5 and play 2 close.

[Anonymous]

Team to watch is the NL 2029s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Skywalkers, Stars, Integrity are all not showing up for 2027 NGLL, seems odd.

Add Renegades to that list as well. Looks like Skywalkers is registered for 26 and 28s but thats it. Really hard to believe those other bigger clubs are not registered. Sounds like some real incompetence at those clubs.

Is it incompetence at the clubs or Robinson Sports?

Are you implying Robinson sports is not keeping the team registration list up to date? Looks to me that a few clubs are being mismanaged.

No need to imply. They are not competent. Case in point they registered Coppermine 2029 Black in 2028 A and later had to fix it. It’s not a leap of imagination to wonder if teams have registered and they just cannot be bothered to update the information.

Why should they feel compelled to update the information in real time? For onlookers like us? As long as it's all in and correct once registration is closed, seems like they've done their job.

Not to mention they have until March to get it all worked out.

Equally so, it seems a stretch to suggest that just because a club does not show up as registered that somehow they are poorly run. People need to chill out.

Well, seems like most of your teams are in now. Next Level 2028 registered for A and NL 2027 registered for B as of now.

Out of the teams registered so far, they should win 4, lose 5 and play 2 close.

28s or 27s? For the 28s in A, 7 for sure losses, 2 close games and probably 2 wins. There aren't many teams in A they are better than.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Team to watch is the NL 2029s.

Are they in A or B? How did they do this fall in tourneys?

[Anonymous]

What does NGLL have for 2026s yet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Team to watch is the NL 2029s.

Are they in A or B? How did they do this fall in tourneys?

How did NL 29 do against M& D black and Heros Green?

[Anonymous]

I think the 29s would be well served by playing in a divison. They won’t be leading the pack but I bet their game grows tremendously during the season and they develop into an even stronger team by next year. they’ve needed to be challenged and this will do it. No one is expecting them to dominate, but they will be able to compete — and most importantly — grow their game both individually and as a team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the 29s would be well served by playing in a divison. They won’t be leading the pack but I bet their game grows tremendously during the season and they develop into an even stronger team by next year. they’ve needed to be challenged and this will do it. No one is expecting them to dominate, but they will be able to compete — and most importantly — grow their game both individually and as a team.

NL 29s will be middle of the pack in As. They won't beat MD Black, Heros or Coppermine, but should be favored against the rest of A except for Pride which will likely be a toss up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the 29s would be well served by playing in a divison. They won’t be leading the pack but I bet their game grows tremendously during the season and they develop into an even stronger team by next year. they’ve needed to be challenged and this will do it. No one is expecting them to dominate, but they will be able to compete — and most importantly — grow their game both individually and as a team.

NL 29s will be middle of the pack in As. They won't beat MD Black, Heros or Coppermine, but should be favored against the rest of A except for Pride which will likely be a toss up.

MDU won the Lax for Cure tournament and was in NGLL Semi-finals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the 29s would be well served by playing in a divison. They won’t be leading the pack but I bet their game grows tremendously during the season and they develop into an even stronger team by next year. they’ve needed to be challenged and this will do it. No one is expecting them to dominate, but they will be able to compete — and most importantly — grow their game both individually and as a team.

NL 29s will be middle of the pack in As. They won't beat MD Black, Heros or Coppermine, but should be favored against the rest of A except for Pride which will likely be a toss up.

You sure do write with great authority on 6th grade girls lacrosse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the 29s would be well served by playing in a divison. They won’t be leading the pack but I bet their game grows tremendously during the season and they develop into an even stronger team by next year. they’ve needed to be challenged and this will do it. No one is expecting them to dominate, but they will be able to compete — and most importantly — grow their game both individually and as a team.

NL 29s will be middle of the pack in As. They won't beat MD Black, Heros or Coppermine, but should be favored against the rest of A except for Pride which will likely be a toss up.

What about BLC and MCE?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the 29s would be well served by playing in a divison. They won’t be leading the pack but I bet their game grows tremendously during the season and they develop into an even stronger team by next year. they’ve needed to be challenged and this will do it. No one is expecting them to dominate, but they will be able to compete — and most importantly — grow their game both individually and as a team.

NL 29s will be middle of the pack in As. They won't beat MD Black, Heros or Coppermine, but should be favored against the rest of A except for Pride which will likely be a toss up.

You sure do write with great authority on 6th grade girls lacrosse.

Actually, it’s fifth grade.

[Anonymous]

Even more pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the 29s would be well served by playing in a divison. They won’t be leading the pack but I bet their game grows tremendously during the season and they develop into an even stronger team by next year. they’ve needed to be challenged and this will do it. No one is expecting them to dominate, but they will be able to compete — and most importantly — grow their game both individually and as a team.

NL 29s will be middle of the pack in As. They won't beat MD Black, Heros or Coppermine, but should be favored against the rest of A except for Pride which will likely be a toss up.

You sure do write with great authority on 6th grade girls lacrosse.

Why are you on a social media site that discusses it if you think its pathetic? There's a troll missing from under a bridge.