The lawsuit against Royal Caribbean/toddler death

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember the lawyer had the media repeating that this happened in a children’s PLAY AREA. The lawyer is a lying dirt bag and should be disbarred. That news agencies blindly repeated the lawyer’s claims as fact is despicable.

To be fair, this is the walk area that goes around the pool deck which includes a children's play area. However, where they were, the walkway opens wider for an open space around the bar. They walked away from the pool area passed the bar over to the walkway and window. So, it may be that the grandfather is the one that pushed the children's play area, because they were there before they walked over to the window. But it was a significant distance away from the play area. There's no guarantee that this is just the lawyer pushing that it was a play area. This could have been the grandfather's own words.

If they were a significant distance away, then there is no need to "be fair", is there? This is an entitlement attitude, whether it originally came from the lawyer or grandpa.
LOL at all the posters using this thread to get in their little jabs at IT people. Still bitter about getting blocked from pinterest at work?

The area it happened, as you can clearly see on the videos, is a bar. Literally a bar. Not a children’s area.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember the lawyer had the media repeating that this happened in a children’s PLAY AREA. The lawyer is a lying dirt bag and should be disbarred. That news agencies blindly repeated the lawyer’s claims as fact is despicable.

To be fair, this is the walk area that goes around the pool deck which includes a children's play area. However, where they were, the walkway opens wider for an open space around the bar. They walked away from the pool area passed the bar over to the walkway and window. So, it may be that the grandfather is the one that pushed the children's play area, because they were there before they walked over to the window. But it was a significant distance away from the play area. There's no guarantee that this is just the lawyer pushing that it was a play area. This could have been the grandfather's own words.

If they were a significant distance away, then there is no need to "be fair", is there? This is an entitlement attitude, whether it originally came from the lawyer or grandpa.
LOL at all the posters using this thread to get in their little jabs at IT people. Still bitter about getting blocked from pinterest at work?

More like still skeeved out that I had to enter his dark cave and ask a third time why my wiring had not been fixed only to see that he was viewing porn on his iPad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember the lawyer had the media repeating that this happened in a children’s PLAY AREA. The lawyer is a lying dirt bag and should be disbarred. That news agencies blindly repeated the lawyer’s claims as fact is despicable.

To be fair, this is the walk area that goes around the pool deck which includes a children's play area. However, where they were, the walkway opens wider for an open space around the bar. They walked away from the pool area passed the bar over to the walkway and window. So, it may be that the grandfather is the one that pushed the children's play area, because they were there before they walked over to the window. But it was a significant distance away from the play area. There's no guarantee that this is just the lawyer pushing that it was a play area. This could have been the grandfather's own words.

If they were a significant distance away, then there is no need to "be fair", is there? This is an entitlement attitude, whether it originally came from the lawyer or grandpa.
LOL at all the posters using this thread to get in their little jabs at IT people. Still bitter about getting blocked from pinterest at work?

More like still skeeved out that I had to enter his dark cave and ask a third time why my wiring had not been fixed only to see that he was viewing porn on his iPad.

Ewwww

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember the lawyer had the media repeating that this happened in a children’s PLAY AREA. The lawyer is a lying dirt bag and should be disbarred. That news agencies blindly repeated the lawyer’s claims as fact is despicable.

To be fair, this is the walk area that goes around the pool deck which includes a children's play area. However, where they were, the walkway opens wider for an open space around the bar. They walked away from the pool area passed the bar over to the walkway and window. So, it may be that the grandfather is the one that pushed the children's play area, because they were there before they walked over to the window. But it was a significant distance away from the play area. There's no guarantee that this is just the lawyer pushing that it was a play area. This could have been the grandfather's own words.

If they were a significant distance away, then there is no need to "be fair", is there? This is an entitlement attitude, whether it originally came from the lawyer or grandpa.
LOL at all the posters using this thread to get in their little jabs at IT people. Still bitter about getting blocked from pinterest at work?

The area it happened, as you can clearly see on the videos, is a bar. Literally a bar. Not a children’s area.

And throughout the video I didn’t see a single other child. Not one.
The escalators are near the play area at Tysons mall, so maybe that’s a play area too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember the lawyer had the media repeating that this happened in a children’s PLAY AREA. The lawyer is a lying dirt bag and should be disbarred. That news agencies blindly repeated the lawyer’s claims as fact is despicable.

To be fair, this is the walk area that goes around the pool deck which includes a children's play area. However, where they were, the walkway opens wider for an open space around the bar. They walked away from the pool area passed the bar over to the walkway and window. So, it may be that the grandfather is the one that pushed the children's play area, because they were there before they walked over to the window. But it was a significant distance away from the play area. There's no guarantee that this is just the lawyer pushing that it was a play area. This could have been the grandfather's own words.

If they were a significant distance away, then there is no need to "be fair", is there? This is an entitlement attitude, whether it originally came from the lawyer or grandpa.
LOL at all the posters using this thread to get in their little jabs at IT people. Still bitter about getting blocked from pinterest at work?

The area it happened, as you can clearly see on the videos, is a bar. Literally a bar. Not a children’s area.

And throughout the video I didn’t see a single other child. Not one.
The escalators are near the play area at Tysons mall, so maybe that’s a play area too?

There’s no play area on that ship. There are pools on that deck, and there is a walkway between the pools, bars, etc. and a seating area with tables and chairs near the windows.

I was on that ship the week before the accident (got off that ship that morning), and we looked out those windows many times.

Again: no children’s play area on that ship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember the lawyer had the media repeating that this happened in a children’s PLAY AREA. The lawyer is a lying dirt bag and should be disbarred. That news agencies blindly repeated the lawyer’s claims as fact is despicable.

To be fair, this is the walk area that goes around the pool deck which includes a children's play area. However, where they were, the walkway opens wider for an open space around the bar. They walked away from the pool area passed the bar over to the walkway and window. So, it may be that the grandfather is the one that pushed the children's play area, because they were there before they walked over to the window. But it was a significant distance away from the play area. There's no guarantee that this is just the lawyer pushing that it was a play area. This could have been the grandfather's own words.

If they were a significant distance away, then there is no need to "be fair", is there? This is an entitlement attitude, whether it originally came from the lawyer or grandpa.
LOL at all the posters using this thread to get in their little jabs at IT people. Still bitter about getting blocked from pinterest at work?

The area it happened, as you can clearly see on the videos, is a bar. Literally a bar. Not a children’s area.

And throughout the video I didn’t see a single other child. Not one.
The escalators are near the play area at Tysons mall, so maybe that’s a play area too?

There’s no play area on that ship. There are pools on that deck, and there is a walkway between the pools, bars, etc. and a seating area with tables and chairs near the windows.

I was on that ship the week before the accident (got off that ship that morning), and we looked out those windows many times.

Again: no children’s play area on that ship.

I’m irrationally annoyed at the sheeple who insist “to be fair” and then defend the dirty rotten lying —insert lawyer or grandpa or combination of both. They’re liars. It’s not a play area. They said it was. And then the media repeated it as if it were a fact!
It’s not a child’s play area.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember the lawyer had the media repeating that this happened in a children’s PLAY AREA. The lawyer is a lying dirt bag and should be disbarred. That news agencies blindly repeated the lawyer’s claims as fact is despicable.

To be fair, this is the walk area that goes around the pool deck which includes a children's play area. However, where they were, the walkway opens wider for an open space around the bar. They walked away from the pool area passed the bar over to the walkway and window. So, it may be that the grandfather is the one that pushed the children's play area, because they were there before they walked over to the window. But it was a significant distance away from the play area. There's no guarantee that this is just the lawyer pushing that it was a play area. This could have been the grandfather's own words.

If they were a significant distance away, then there is no need to "be fair", is there? This is an entitlement attitude, whether it originally came from the lawyer or grandpa.
LOL at all the posters using this thread to get in their little jabs at IT people. Still bitter about getting blocked from pinterest at work?

The area it happened, as you can clearly see on the videos, is a bar. Literally a bar. Not a children’s area.

And throughout the video I didn’t see a single other child. Not one.
The escalators are near the play area at Tysons mall, so maybe that’s a play area too?

There’s no play area on that ship. There are pools on that deck, and there is a walkway between the pools, bars, etc. and a seating area with tables and chairs near the windows.

I was on that ship the week before the accident (got off that ship that morning), and we looked out those windows many times.

Again: no children’s play area on that ship.

I’m irrationally annoyed at the sheeple who insist “to be fair” and then defend the dirty rotten lying —insert lawyer or grandpa or combination of both. They’re liars. It’s not a play area. They said it was. And then the media repeated it as if it were a fact!
It’s not a child’s play area.

And even if it were, she didn’t trip and fall out the window. She was lifted and dropped. Big difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember the lawyer had the media repeating that this happened in a children’s PLAY AREA. The lawyer is a lying dirt bag and should be disbarred. That news agencies blindly repeated the lawyer’s claims as fact is despicable.

To be fair, this is the walk area that goes around the pool deck which includes a children's play area. However, where they were, the walkway opens wider for an open space around the bar. They walked away from the pool area passed the bar over to the walkway and window. So, it may be that the grandfather is the one that pushed the children's play area, because they were there before they walked over to the window. But it was a significant distance away from the play area. There's no guarantee that this is just the lawyer pushing that it was a play area. This could have been the grandfather's own words.

If they were a significant distance away, then there is no need to "be fair", is there? This is an entitlement attitude, whether it originally came from the lawyer or grandpa.
LOL at all the posters using this thread to get in their little jabs at IT people. Still bitter about getting blocked from pinterest at work?

The area it happened, as you can clearly see on the videos, is a bar. Literally a bar. Not a children’s area.

And throughout the video I didn’t see a single other child. Not one.
The escalators are near the play area at Tysons mall, so maybe that’s a play area too?

There’s no play area on that ship. There are pools on that deck, and there is a walkway between the pools, bars, etc. and a seating area with tables and chairs near the windows.

I was on that ship the week before the accident (got off that ship that morning), and we looked out those windows many times.

Again: no children’s play area on that ship.

I’m irrationally annoyed at the sheeple who insist “to be fair” and then defend the dirty rotten lying —insert lawyer or grandpa or combination of both. They’re liars. It’s not a play area. They said it was. And then the media repeated it as if it were a fact!
It’s not a child’s play area.

And even if it were, she didn’t trip and fall out the window. She was lifted and dropped. Big difference.

I'm the "to be fair" PP. I am fully blaming the grandfather, mother and father for negligence and this entire horrifically distasteful lawsuit. It is disgusting to be trying to profit off of your child's death, especially when it was caused by your family's negligence.

My comment was for those people who are trying to blame the ambulance chaser for this senseless BS. The former prosecutor, the current LEO and the negligent grandfather are smart enough and experienced enough to know exactly what they are doing here. They found a lawyer who would do what they wanted. I disbelieve the narrative that there was an ambulance chaser who jumped at them and forced this story and case on them and is leading them like sheep in this lawsuit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember the lawyer had the media repeating that this happened in a children’s PLAY AREA. The lawyer is a lying dirt bag and should be disbarred. That news agencies blindly repeated the lawyer’s claims as fact is despicable.

To be fair, this is the walk area that goes around the pool deck which includes a children's play area. However, where they were, the walkway opens wider for an open space around the bar. They walked away from the pool area passed the bar over to the walkway and window. So, it may be that the grandfather is the one that pushed the children's play area, because they were there before they walked over to the window. But it was a significant distance away from the play area. There's no guarantee that this is just the lawyer pushing that it was a play area. This could have been the grandfather's own words.

If they were a significant distance away, then there is no need to "be fair", is there? This is an entitlement attitude, whether it originally came from the lawyer or grandpa.
LOL at all the posters using this thread to get in their little jabs at IT people. Still bitter about getting blocked from pinterest at work?

The area it happened, as you can clearly see on the videos, is a bar. Literally a bar. Not a children’s area.

And throughout the video I didn’t see a single other child. Not one.
The escalators are near the play area at Tysons mall, so maybe that’s a play area too?

There’s no play area on that ship. There are pools on that deck, and there is a walkway between the pools, bars, etc. and a seating area with tables and chairs near the windows.

I was on that ship the week before the accident (got off that ship that morning), and we looked out those windows many times.

Again: no children’s play area on that ship.

I’m irrationally annoyed at the sheeple who insist “to be fair” and then defend the dirty rotten lying —insert lawyer or grandpa or combination of both. They’re liars. It’s not a play area. They said it was. And then the media repeated it as if it were a fact!
It’s not a child’s play area.

And even if it were, she didn’t trip and fall out the window. She was lifted and dropped. Big difference.

I'm the "to be fair" PP. I am fully blaming the grandfather, mother and father for negligence and this entire horrifically distasteful lawsuit. It is disgusting to be trying to profit off of your child's death, especially when it was caused by your family's negligence.

My comment was for those people who are trying to blame the ambulance chaser for this senseless BS. The former prosecutor, the current LEO and the negligent grandfather are smart enough and experienced enough to know exactly what they are doing here. They found a lawyer who would do what they wanted. I disbelieve the narrative that there was an ambulance chaser who jumped at them and forced this story and case on them and is leading them like sheep in this lawsuit.

Most of us agree with you. The issue is that the family can at least hide behind an emotional, "we are grief stricken and have no idea what we are/were doing". The lawyer, OTOH, is supposed to be a professional who operates within a code of ethics.

I know that most lawyers are scummy, but aren't people like defense lawyers supposed to say to their clients, "if you did it, I don't want you to tell me, because then I can't argue a lie in court"? I just find it so unbelievably disgusting that this lawyer has seen VIDEO of the incident and has probably been on the exact ship to check it out and he's still peddling these 100% lies. It's like a criminal defense lawyer seeing full footage of a murder and then arguing in court that it didn't happen. It's absolutely and undeniably unethical, at best, probably criminal (perjury is a crime for everyone else and it should be for lawyers too!), and should be cause for disbarment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not rocket science.

This man (Anello), had limited experience with toddlers and children in general.

Men tend to take more risks with kids. He thought he was being cool by giving the child a thrill. He thought he could hold on to her. He put her weight away from his center of gravity. He's not very strong (obviously, he sit in front of a computer everyday, he's over weight). He lost his grip.

There's nothing wrong with his mental functioning. He's not senile or ADHD.

As we were talking about this, my DH (who is 59) said that there is a story in his family where his dad almost dropped him off a boat when he was a baby! His dad would have been around 22 yrs old at the time when he dangled DH (a baby at the time) off a boat. This was just a little personal boat, but still.... men think they are being "fun" and "cool" by interacting with babies/kids in a "thrilling" way. They don't understand how babies move, and they don't take into account the real risk. Fortunately for DH, he didn't fall.

Anello screwed up big time. He should plead guilty, take the probation, the parents should take RC's "condolence" gift, and they all need to move on. Pretending that they are only out to save the next kid from a dangerous ship is ridiculous.

I am a man but none of that seems cool or thrilling. The sidewalks around here are thrilling enough with small children.

The Grandpa was allowing Chloe to get too far away from him in that crowded area, she could have easily been knocked hard to the ground by an adult not paying attention to knee level. That was the type of risk that Grandpas sometimes take that parents wouldn't. Holding her out an 11th story window goes beyond anything that a normal adult would do.

I thought the same thing! Nevermind lifting her into an open window on the 11th floor, I never would have let my 18 month old that far from me in a crowded area. In fact I probably wouldn't have let her walk at all until we got somewhere a little less congested.

He also squatted down into an awkward position where he couldn't have responded and gone to her quickly if he had tried. That short video tape said a lot about Grandpa's supervision of Chloe. The parents had no clue that he was so careless with her? Really?

I wonder if she had been in the pool and her swimsuit was slippery for him to get a good grade and he lost his grip. It looked like One article on the video
Mentioned her in a white sun hat or swimsuit, I can’t recall which.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not rocket science.

This man (Anello), had limited experience with toddlers and children in general.

Men tend to take more risks with kids. He thought he was being cool by giving the child a thrill. He thought he could hold on to her. He put her weight away from his center of gravity. He's not very strong (obviously, he sit in front of a computer everyday, he's over weight). He lost his grip.

There's nothing wrong with his mental functioning. He's not senile or ADHD.

As we were talking about this, my DH (who is 59) said that there is a story in his family where his dad almost dropped him off a boat when he was a baby! His dad would have been around 22 yrs old at the time when he dangled DH (a baby at the time) off a boat. This was just a little personal boat, but still.... men think they are being "fun" and "cool" by interacting with babies/kids in a "thrilling" way. They don't understand how babies move, and they don't take into account the real risk. Fortunately for DH, he didn't fall.

Anello screwed up big time. He should plead guilty, take the probation, the parents should take RC's "condolence" gift, and they all need to move on. Pretending that they are only out to save the next kid from a dangerous ship is ridiculous.

I am a man but none of that seems cool or thrilling. The sidewalks around here are thrilling enough with small children.

The Grandpa was allowing Chloe to get too far away from him in that crowded area, she could have easily been knocked hard to the ground by an adult not paying attention to knee level. That was the type of risk that Grandpas sometimes take that parents wouldn't. Holding her out an 11th story window goes beyond anything that a normal adult would do.

I thought the same thing! Nevermind lifting her into an open window on the 11th floor, I never would have let my 18 month old that far from me in a crowded area. In fact I probably wouldn't have let her walk at all until we got somewhere a little less congested.

He also squatted down into an awkward position where he couldn't have responded and gone to her quickly if he had tried. That short video tape said a lot about Grandpa's supervision of Chloe. The parents had no clue that he was so careless with her? Really?

I wonder if she had been in the pool and her swimsuit was slippery for him to get a good grade and he lost his grip. It looked like One article on the video
Mentioned her in a white sun hat or swimsuit, I can’t recall which.

even MORE of a reason why he's a complete idiot and solely the one to blame for her death.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember the lawyer had the media repeating that this happened in a children’s PLAY AREA. The lawyer is a lying dirt bag and should be disbarred. That news agencies blindly repeated the lawyer’s claims as fact is despicable.

To be fair, this is the walk area that goes around the pool deck which includes a children's play area. However, where they were, the walkway opens wider for an open space around the bar. They walked away from the pool area passed the bar over to the walkway and window. So, it may be that the grandfather is the one that pushed the children's play area, because they were there before they walked over to the window. But it was a significant distance away from the play area. There's no guarantee that this is just the lawyer pushing that it was a play area. This could have been the grandfather's own words.

If they were a significant distance away, then there is no need to "be fair", is there? This is an entitlement attitude, whether it originally came from the lawyer or grandpa.
LOL at all the posters using this thread to get in their little jabs at IT people. Still bitter about getting blocked from pinterest at work?

The area it happened, as you can clearly see on the videos, is a bar. Literally a bar. Not a children’s area.

And throughout the video I didn’t see a single other child. Not one.
The escalators are near the play area at Tysons mall, so maybe that’s a play area too?

There’s no play area on that ship. There are pools on that deck, and there is a walkway between the pools, bars, etc. and a seating area with tables and chairs near the windows.

I was on that ship the week before the accident (got off that ship that morning), and we looked out those windows many times.

Again: no children’s play area on that ship.

I’m irrationally annoyed at the sheeple who insist “to be fair” and then defend the dirty rotten lying —insert lawyer or grandpa or combination of both. They’re liars. It’s not a play area. They said it was. And then the media repeated it as if it were a fact!
It’s not a child’s play area.

And even if it were, she didn’t trip and fall out the window. She was lifted and dropped. Big difference.

I'm the "to be fair" PP. I am fully blaming the grandfather, mother and father for negligence and this entire horrifically distasteful lawsuit. It is disgusting to be trying to profit off of your child's death, especially when it was caused by your family's negligence.

My comment was for those people who are trying to blame the ambulance chaser for this senseless BS. The former prosecutor, the current LEO and the negligent grandfather are smart enough and experienced enough to know exactly what they are doing here. They found a lawyer who would do what they wanted. I disbelieve the narrative that there was an ambulance chaser who jumped at them and forced this story and case on them and is leading them like sheep in this lawsuit.

Most of us agree with you. The issue is that the family can at least hide behind an emotional, "we are grief stricken and have no idea what we are/were doing". The lawyer, OTOH, is supposed to be a professional who operates within a code of ethics.

I know that most lawyers are scummy, but aren't people like defense lawyers supposed to say to their clients, "if you did it, I don't want you to tell me, because then I can't argue a lie in court"? I just find it so unbelievably disgusting that this lawyer has seen VIDEO of the incident and has probably been on the exact ship to check it out and he's still peddling these 100% lies. It's like a criminal defense lawyer seeing full footage of a murder and then arguing in court that it didn't happen. It's absolutely and undeniably unethical, at best, probably criminal (perjury is a crime for everyone else and it should be for lawyers too!), and should be cause for disbarment.

That is exactly what a lawyer is supposed to do. They have to mount a vigorous defense in support of their client. To not do that is what could subject them to disbarment. And yes, defense attorneys frequently know their clients committed the crime. But that’s not ultimately what they are arguing against, they are fighting to prove the government cannot prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that their client committed the crime.

Attorneys are also not asked in court as to whether or not their client is guilty or if their client committed the crime. What you believe is “undeniably unethical, at best probably criminal” is not at all how the judicial system works. They are not committing ethics violations nor are they committing perjury by providing a defense for the client. The only way they’d be committing an ethics violation or committing perjury would be if they’ve been told their client is guilty and they are asked if their client is guilty and the lawyer says no. But again, that isn’t how our justice system works. The defense attorney isn’t the one on trial and doesn’t testify.

This article does a good job of explaining what defense attorneys do: https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/representing-client-whom-the-lawyer-thinks-is-guilty.html

[Anonymous]

Who sends a 1 year old dressed in a bathing suit to play in a pool area with a fully dressed grandfather?

Had Chloe been going into the water alone? What on earth?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember the lawyer had the media repeating that this happened in a children’s PLAY AREA. The lawyer is a lying dirt bag and should be disbarred. That news agencies blindly repeated the lawyer’s claims as fact is despicable.

To be fair, this is the walk area that goes around the pool deck which includes a children's play area. However, where they were, the walkway opens wider for an open space around the bar. They walked away from the pool area passed the bar over to the walkway and window. So, it may be that the grandfather is the one that pushed the children's play area, because they were there before they walked over to the window. But it was a significant distance away from the play area. There's no guarantee that this is just the lawyer pushing that it was a play area. This could have been the grandfather's own words.

If they were a significant distance away, then there is no need to "be fair", is there? This is an entitlement attitude, whether it originally came from the lawyer or grandpa.
LOL at all the posters using this thread to get in their little jabs at IT people. Still bitter about getting blocked from pinterest at work?

The area it happened, as you can clearly see on the videos, is a bar. Literally a bar. Not a children’s area.

And throughout the video I didn’t see a single other child. Not one.
The escalators are near the play area at Tysons mall, so maybe that’s a play area too?

There’s no play area on that ship. There are pools on that deck, and there is a walkway between the pools, bars, etc. and a seating area with tables and chairs near the windows.

I was on that ship the week before the accident (got off that ship that morning), and we looked out those windows many times.

Again: no children’s play area on that ship.

I’m irrationally annoyed at the sheeple who insist “to be fair” and then defend the dirty rotten lying —insert lawyer or grandpa or combination of both. They’re liars. It’s not a play area. They said it was. And then the media repeated it as if it were a fact!
It’s not a child’s play area.

On that area of the deck there aren't sharply defined areas. I wouldn't call it a bar but I wouldn't call it a children's play area. It's a general recreation area.

There is an actual children's play area with specific staff to entertain children. It's called adventure ocean.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who sends a 1 year old dressed in a bathing suit to play in a pool area with a fully dressed grandfather?

Had Chloe been going into the water alone? What on earth?

RCI has life guards. They are certainly more capable swimmers unless Gramps is a former Olympic hopeful.