Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Agreed. This is the enhanced video shown on WBRC Fox6 News, and I only see her: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDmIOwbnDlY |
https://www.reddit.com/comments/15060pi?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=2&utm_term=4 |
That's just someone playing around with editing images on the web, and they don't even profess otherwise. Check out the professionally enhanced video released on the news here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDmIOwbnDlY No second person. No other car. |
Thank God she’s alive and ok. |
I think I'll pass on her being my nurse.
|
What happens to the $$$ from the GFM? She was driving a Mercedes at 25 while working at a spa. Maybe she has champagne tastes? |
Scams for GFM $$$, if that is what it turns out to be, is not a mental health issue. |
The family specifically requested not to have a GFM. They asked people to donate to CrimeStoppers instead. |
If this is the case, there goes her career in nursing. How are they coming up with this stuff? Why would she need to deceive her family like that, just to go to a party? There are easier lies - this would be deranged, |
Be sure you figure it out, you online detective with no critical thinking skills.
|
Couldn’t she be arrested for that? |
|
She is home with her family. That is great news. I’m personally going to hold off on drawing any conclusions until we know more.
I’m also going to guess the police department knows there is no immediate risk to the community or suspect at large or else they wouldn’t be holding off on an interview. If it turns out this was some sort of hoax for attention or fundraising then that will be dealt with. If it was a mental health issue or just a 20-something snapping under the pressure of career and religious family, then I hope that will be handled somewhat privately (obviously she is now Google-able so she’ll never totally get her anonymity back). I wish the best for this family as this gets sorted out. Any potential consequences will eventually come if needed. |
Seriously. Unhinged whackjob. |
At the discretion of the officials involved, yes, with decisions made in the full context of the situation. And no, those decisions about whether or not to prosecute do not have to be explained to the general public. |
This doesn’t seem likely. How would someone follow her from a food spot, know in advance which direction she’s going, get way ahead of her on an interstate (overpass?), then use a child to lure her? All within 10-15 minutes of leaving the food place? Doesn’t sound plausible to me. |