2022 US News Best National Universities

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Undergraduate:
Harvard Stanford MIT
Yale Princeton Columbia Caltech
Penn Chicago
Dartmouth Brown Duke Northwestern
Cornell JHU Berkeley

Overall:
Harvard Stanford
MIT Columbia Berkeley
Yale Princeton Caltech
Penn Chicago
Duke Northwestern JHU Cornell

We are tiers or whatever but Berkeley and Cornell for undergrad (or otherwise) are not and never been on JHU's level.


Columbia belongs with Penn and Chicago


Undergraduate:
Harvard Yale Princeton Stanford MIT
Columbia
Penn Chicago
Duke
Caltech
Dartmouth Brown Northwestern
Cornell JHU Berkeley

Overall:
Harvard Stanford Yale
MIT Princeton
Columbia Berkeley
Penn Chicago
Duke Northwestern
Caltech JHU Cornell Brown






Undergraduate:
Harvard Yale Princeton Stanford MIT
Columbia
Penn Chicago
Duke
Caltech
Dartmouth Brown Northwestern
Cornell JHU Berkeley

Overall:
Harvard Stanford
Yale MIT
Columbia Princeton Berkeley
Penn Chicago
Duke Northwestern
Caltech JHU Cornell Brown

H/S for all-roundedness. Yale and MIT for top-notch programs in either the arts or sciences, plus graduate schools.

Princeton does not have professional schools except Woodrow Wilson (PSIA). You also made it seem as if Columbia's law school, business school, and medical schools don't matter. Columbia also has top-notch journalism, architecture, and performing arts programs.


I thought we had a consensus on this? https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/450/976040.page

Undergraduate:

Harvard Stanford MIT Yale Princeton
Columbia Caltech
Penn Chicago
Duke Northwestern
Dartmouth Brown
Cornell JHU
Berkeley

Overall:

Harvard
Stanford MIT Yale
Columbia Princeton
Penn Chicago
Berkeley
Duke Northwestern


Way to sneak in Berkeley lol.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s cute that Columbia, which is overwhelmingly a graduate/professional university, has ascended to the near top at USNWR. It is a superlative school for sure, but definitely has benefited by playing into the criteria used by that ranking system.


No idea what this means since everyone knows that Columbia has a very strong undergraduate presence


A very strong undergraduate presence with 1/3 of its undergraduates not matriculated as 18 year olds out of high school? Columbia’s stats are skewed by ignoring a huge minority of students who came through the back door. Those same students in the College of General Studies take classes alongside Columbia College students, so it’s not like they have an entirely separate curriculum. I highly doubt than any other of the top ten undergraduate schools have that high a percentage of alternative students.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I find it fascinating there are so many Columbia haters on this board. Either that or some weird HYP fanatics.


Columbia has been rising over the years. It overtook Harvard, Yale, MIT, and Stanford. People know where it’s headed.

When you are the President of the USA, you are gonna be attacked. It comes with the territory. When was the last time someone attacked some obscure undersecretary of some obscure government agency? You go after the #1 guy (or gal). You go after the soon-to-be #1 guy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s cute that Columbia, which is overwhelmingly a graduate/professional university, has ascended to the near top at USNWR. It is a superlative school for sure, but definitely has benefited by playing into the criteria used by that ranking system.


No idea what this means since everyone knows that Columbia has a very strong undergraduate presence


A very strong undergraduate presence with 1/3 of its undergraduates not matriculated as 18 year olds out of high school? Columbia’s stats are skewed by ignoring a huge minority of students who came through the back door. Those same students in the College of General Studies take classes alongside Columbia College students, so it’s not like they have an entirely separate curriculum. I highly doubt than any other of the top ten undergraduate schools have that high a percentage of alternative students.


Why blame a school dare to serve disadvantaged students since long time ago while other elite schools only catered to upper-class WASP descendants, with only tinny programs for veterans to claim their social justice.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s cute that Columbia, which is overwhelmingly a graduate/professional university, has ascended to the near top at USNWR. It is a superlative school for sure, but definitely has benefited by playing into the criteria used by that ranking system.


No idea what this means since everyone knows that Columbia has a very strong undergraduate presence


A very strong undergraduate presence with 1/3 of its undergraduates not matriculated as 18 year olds out of high school? Columbia’s stats are skewed by ignoring a huge minority of students who came through the back door. Those same students in the College of General Studies take classes alongside Columbia College students, so it’s not like they have an entirely separate curriculum. I highly doubt than any other of the top ten undergraduate schools have that high a percentage of alternative students.


Why blame a school dare to serve disadvantaged students since long time ago while other elite schools only catered to upper-class WASP descendants, with only tinny programs for veterans to claim their social justice.


Also, Columbia was the only ivy that didn’t discriminate against the Jewish students in 1920s, 1930s. A lot of hatred from the WASPs come from this fact. Even Donald Trump said Columbia is a “liberal, disgraceful institution.”
Anonymous
Why are Wf and Uf above boston college? where is BC?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Undergraduate:
Harvard Stanford MIT
Yale Princeton Columbia Caltech
Penn Chicago
Dartmouth Brown Duke Northwestern
Cornell JHU Berkeley

Overall:
Harvard Stanford
MIT Columbia Berkeley
Yale Princeton Caltech
Penn Chicago
Duke Northwestern JHU Cornell

We are tiers or whatever but Berkeley and Cornell for undergrad (or otherwise) are not and never been on JHU's level.


Columbia belongs with Penn and Chicago


Undergraduate:
Harvard Yale Princeton Stanford MIT
Columbia
Penn Chicago
Duke
Caltech
Dartmouth Brown Northwestern
Cornell JHU Berkeley

Overall:
Harvard Stanford Yale
MIT Princeton
Columbia Berkeley
Penn Chicago
Duke Northwestern
Caltech JHU Cornell Brown






Undergraduate:
Harvard Yale Princeton Stanford MIT
Columbia
Penn Chicago
Duke
Caltech
Dartmouth Brown Northwestern
Cornell JHU Berkeley

Overall:
Harvard Stanford
Yale MIT
Columbia Princeton Berkeley
Penn Chicago
Duke Northwestern
Caltech JHU Cornell Brown

H/S for all-roundedness. Yale and MIT for top-notch programs in either the arts or sciences, plus graduate schools.

Princeton does not have professional schools except Woodrow Wilson (PSIA). You also made it seem as if Columbia's law school, business school, and medical schools don't matter. Columbia also has top-notch journalism, architecture, and performing arts programs.


I thought we had a consensus on this? https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/450/976040.page

Undergraduate:

Harvard Stanford MIT Yale Princeton
Columbia Caltech
Penn Chicago
Duke Northwestern
Dartmouth Brown
Cornell JHU
Berkeley

Overall:

Harvard
Stanford MIT Yale
Columbia Princeton
Penn Chicago
Berkeley
Duke Northwestern


+1, this is the most accurate. No need for everyone to keep arguing and nitpicking.


+1, as of Sep.15, 2021, this is about as accurate as it stands.


How can something 100% arbitrary, presented without data or analysis, without any context, and entirely functionally meaningless be accurate in any way?

It's opinion. And you know what they say about opinions.


People who are shocked by the rise of Columbia seem to be shocked bc Columbia is not part of HYPSM. It’s kind of like saying Brazil soccer is perennially ranked #1 in the FIFA ranking, so they can’t imagine the possibility of Colombia soccer winning the next World Cup. The World Cup winner is not based on an arbitrary ranking. You have to have a live, physical competition to determine the winner. It’s the same with the NFL championship, the NBA championship, or the MLB World Series Championship. No one’s ever settled this year’s championship based on how the teams ranked last year. Yet, people coming on here are “shocked” that a school that is not even part of the arbitrary HYPSM is at the top of the charts.


They used to argue whether Stanford should be included in the HYP acronym in the 2000s when the internet just started, and Silicon Valley was in its infancy... Rankings and prestige are all relative.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s cute that Columbia, which is overwhelmingly a graduate/professional university, has ascended to the near top at USNWR. It is a superlative school for sure, but definitely has benefited by playing into the criteria used by that ranking system.


No idea what this means since everyone knows that Columbia has a very strong undergraduate presence


A very strong undergraduate presence with 1/3 of its undergraduates not matriculated as 18 year olds out of high school? Columbia’s stats are skewed by ignoring a huge minority of students who came through the back door. Those same students in the College of General Studies take classes alongside Columbia College students, so it’s not like they have an entirely separate curriculum. I highly doubt than any other of the top ten undergraduate schools have that high a percentage of alternative students.


Harvard has about 1,000 students enrolled in its extension school. Penn has a college of liberal studies, but they decline to publish the # of students. Just fyi, most of the students enrolled in GS are actually veterans (and it was set up precisely for this reason) who spilled blood for this country to protect your pathetic, lazy asses so that you can disparage them anonymously on this forum. Say that in front their faces, I dare you.
Anonymous
Because Stanford hasn't been a prestigious, hard to gain entry school for a century.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s cute that Columbia, which is overwhelmingly a graduate/professional university, has ascended to the near top at USNWR. It is a superlative school for sure, but definitely has benefited by playing into the criteria used by that ranking system.


No idea what this means since everyone knows that Columbia has a very strong undergraduate presence


A very strong undergraduate presence with 1/3 of its undergraduates not matriculated as 18 year olds out of high school? Columbia’s stats are skewed by ignoring a huge minority of students who came through the back door. Those same students in the College of General Studies take classes alongside Columbia College students, so it’s not like they have an entirely separate curriculum. I highly doubt than any other of the top ten undergraduate schools have that high a percentage of alternative students.


No, it has not diminished the Columbia brand name in the slightest. It does make Columbia a very respectable institution nonetheless for accepting all those veterans, as PP suggested. I looked up the stats and 21% of GS are actually veterans, not your random high-school dropouts. And GS students are admitted through a rigorous selection process like regular college students, unlike Harvard Extension School.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s cute that Columbia, which is overwhelmingly a graduate/professional university, has ascended to the near top at USNWR. It is a superlative school for sure, but definitely has benefited by playing into the criteria used by that ranking system.


No idea what this means since everyone knows that Columbia has a very strong undergraduate presence


A very strong undergraduate presence with 1/3 of its undergraduates not matriculated as 18 year olds out of high school? Columbia’s stats are skewed by ignoring a huge minority of students who came through the back door. Those same students in the College of General Studies take classes alongside Columbia College students, so it’s not like they have an entirely separate curriculum. I highly doubt than any other of the top ten undergraduate schools have that high a percentage of alternative students.


Why blame a school dare to serve disadvantaged students since long time ago while other elite schools only catered to upper-class WASP descendants, with only tinny programs for veterans to claim their social justice.


And one that have produced tons of Nobel prize laureates, billionaires, a US President, dozens of cabinet members, National Humanities Medal, National Medal of Sciences, Academy Awards, Pulitzer Prize recipients, you name it, despite not having as strong an upper-class WASP aura as HYP. Also the school has become a lot WASPier and preppier in the 2000s than the 1920s. I remember that a few of the Whitneys, du Ponts, and Rockefellers went there for undergrad in the 2000s. Also a few Pritzkers, Sacklers, the Ziff brothers and the Sulzbergers who own the New York Times. Plenty of international wealth too. Definitely a top school for the upper-class, but also a lot more socioeconomically diverse than other ivies.
Anonymous
Are the extension students at Harvard taking classes alongside Harvard College students? It’s doubtful many are since 70% of the courses are given online. I think it’s wonderful that Columbia allows 1/3 of its undergraduates to be non traditional students and in classrooms with those brilliant 18 year olds. USNWR rewards them for this as well, by not reporting the huge percentage of students entering without the stellar grades and scores.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Are the extension students at Harvard taking classes alongside Harvard College students? It’s doubtful many are since 70% of the courses are given online. I think it’s wonderful that Columbia allows 1/3 of its undergraduates to be non traditional students and in classrooms with those brilliant 18 year olds. USNWR rewards them for this as well, by not reporting the huge percentage of students entering without the stellar grades and scores.


Yes, they are. HES students can sit in for the same in-person classes as Harvard College students, as well as online classes. About 1,000 sit in for a ALB degree. Harvard does not report this data, neither does Penn, which awards bachelor degrees to nontraditional students through the School of Liberal and Professional Studies.
Anonymous
I'm guessing the poster waxing so eloquent about Columbia is the same poster who has fetishized the fraternities there (like St. A's) and at other Ivies It's a bit much (and I say this as someone with a Columbia degree).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are the extension students at Harvard taking classes alongside Harvard College students? It’s doubtful many are since 70% of the courses are given online. I think it’s wonderful that Columbia allows 1/3 of its undergraduates to be non traditional students and in classrooms with those brilliant 18 year olds. USNWR rewards them for this as well, by not reporting the huge percentage of students entering without the stellar grades and scores.


Yes, they are. HES students can sit in for the same in-person classes as Harvard College students, as well as online classes. About 1,000 sit in for a ALB degree. Harvard does not report this data, neither does Penn, which awards bachelor degrees to nontraditional students through the School of Liberal and Professional Studies.


I’m sure that the vast majority are taking mostly online classes however. Be it as it may, Columbia brings it to a whole new level. 1/3 of its undergraduates in the SGS!
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: