It looks like very thick underbrush. Imagine that, but submerged. Not easy to search or see objects under muddy water, mixed in with plants and other debris. |
| This looks so staged. They either knew where he was or planted those items to make it look like he was there--do we know for sure the remains found are human? |
No it's not. They have all the answers they need. They know how she died and who did it. If Brian is actually dead, they can rest knowing he won't do it to someone else's daughter. That is true closure. |
|
Maybe since the parents said they and BL had frequented that area of the reserve before, they knew from prior experience that their were old human remains there and so they planted Brian’s sketch book there to make it look like he was there and that the body is him
Lol BL’s “ drawings” are basically pre- adolescent garbage and of no value ( not like he put a computer or camera in the wet bag like most people ) A dry bag for a doodle pad ??? Lol . Most likely this was the parents trying to preserve the concocted “ evidence “ that their son died in the preserve so that LE will stop looking for him Also only possible reason I can think of for these parents to be going about mowing their lawn and tending their garden as if their son weren’t rotting in a swamp a few miles away - cause he wasn’t |
Laundrie family PR working overtime in this thread. No one but you sympathizes with these trash losers. |
+1 |
GMAFB. |
It’s not about sympathy, it’s about recognizing that you and I don’t know what is actually happening behind the media sensationalism (and a not-small amount of misinformation). Critical thinking vs mindless consumption of whatever you’ve stumbled across on the internet. |
This. Thank god these posters aren’t working in the case. What a bunch of presumptuous idiots. |
|
Dog sure went quiet.
Remember all the people saying the FBI was getting nowhere and Dog had all the answers? |
|
It's horrifying what mob mentality can do, even to the educated, intelligent, decent people on DCUM. Just leave these parents alone. They're not monsters. They didn't raise a monster. Their son is accused of killing a woman, and that's not their fault. It's the son's fault. Stop spreading rumors and nasty assumptions about people you don't know. |
He's spoken about it: https://www.newsweek.com/dog-bounty-hunter-questions-brian-laundrie-parents-actions-remains-found-1641132 |
|
Re: The coincidence that Brian Laundrie’s possible remains alongside his belongings were discovered on the same day that his parents appeared at the reserve….
It has been noted that the reserve had been closed for an entire month & had just recently re-opened when Brian’s parents visited it. So what likely occurred is that Brian actually did in fact go hiking in the area where his parents told authorities he went. Then due to the high water level in the area - searchers did not find his body while embarking on the multi-million search this past month. After the reserve re-opened > it makes complete sense that Brian’s folks would return to the area where they believed their son to be at + since the water level had receded, Brian’s stuff and possibly his remains were discovered. Which would mean that his parents as well as his older sister Cassie were telling the truth that they did not know Brian’s whereabouts nor had spoken directly with him. However due to the parents electing to remain silent throughout this entire ordeal, they will always be publicly vilified which is only of their own doing. |
|
What's so unusual about that? They spent a lot of time there, dad probably knew where Brian liked to veer off the path to go look at other things. No surprise. |
Well, they DID raise a monster. Whether it’s their fault or not who knows. But if they had been less shady and obstructive from the beginning, people would be more inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt now. They went on a freaking camping vacation while their beloved DIL was missing. They refused to answer calls or texts from her frantic parents, who for a time thought Brian was missing too. These facts are not in dispute. |