We would like you to dedicate the same care and interest to dissecting Trump's lies. We'll wait. |
Oh I did that long ago. Which is why I’m not voting for him. So can you answer my question? |
A guy omits junior when describing chamber of commerce is on par with a guy who didn’t call the National Guard when the the Capitol was under attack and has you writing in your daughter. It would be funny if our nation’s future wasn’t @ stake. |
DP. Here’s a site for you: www.neverwalz.com |
+1000 |
Lots of people use IVF as a shorthand for all types of ART, mainly b/c there remains more stigma about semen than eggs. |
Well? |
More hand waving |
Don’t you think he should know this if it’s one of his limited talking points? So far, Harris and Walz are the party of frivolity and grandiosity. Everything he says seems to require an edit to pare back claims. |
DP but the “lies” you’re calling him on are not lies and if you held everyone to that standard, not one person is qualified to run. Because normal people don’t go into the weeds on every word in every conversation - some people have social skills. |
I thought Democrats were against “whataboutism”? “The communication intent is often to distract from the content of a topic (red herring). The goal may also be to question the justification for criticism and the legitimacy, integrity, and fairness of the critic, which can take on the character of discrediting the criticism, which may or may not be justified. Common accusations include double standards, and hypocrisy, but it can also be used to relativize criticism of one's own viewpoints or behaviors. (A: "Long-term unemployment often means poverty in Germany." B: "And what about the starving in Africa and Asia?").[5] Related manipulation and propaganda techniques in the sense of rhetorical evasion of the topic are the change of topic and false balance (bothsidesism).[6]” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism So please stop the propaganda and respond directly to the point made by the previous poster! |
PP isn’t guilty of whataboutism. PP was calling them out on their double standards. Don’t use words you don’t understand. |
|
| Walz was fact checked by his own wife. She’s got to be sick of his lies, exaggerated statements, misstatements, etc. |
NP... if you think Walz has told intolerable unacceptable lies and cannot under any circumstance be voted for, then you'd better just uninvolved yourself from politics altogether and stop voting for anyone at all. The best the right wing has been able to come up with is a handful of things that at best could be called minor embellishments, fewer than one can count on one's fingers, over the entire span of 30+ years. Frankly that makes Walz cleaner and more honest than 99% of current sitting politicians out there. |