Making time for kids? Study says quality trumps quantity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Really? Ok, you go right ahead and think that if it makes you feel more satisfied with your own choice. I assure you, those of us who intend to return to the workforce will absolutely do so. See you there.

NP here- just curious, what field are you and all your friends in? I like the idea of taking off a few years to stay home, but know it would be really difficult to get back into my field after that long of a layoff (STEM field). Sometimes I wish I had picked something where it was easier to jump in and out. Even though you don't know anyone like this, there really are a lot of us who struggle with the decision! I am jealous that it was so easy for you.

It hasn't happened yet. Many of us wouldnt hire someone who'd taken years as a SAHM. Wait and see, my dears.

LOL. Sure. As if you're in any position to hire someone.

Guess again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Right, just get a sub who can do an adequate(?) job with your kid.
Is that your minimum requirement?

At least some of these moms have an adequate sub. What's your excuse? Mediocre mommy? That's what they're getting. Parenting is more than just being there. It's being a decent human being, which you aren't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Really? Ok, you go right ahead and think that if it makes you feel more satisfied with your own choice. I assure you, those of us who intend to return to the workforce will absolutely do so. See you there.

NP here- just curious, what field are you and all your friends in? I like the idea of taking off a few years to stay home, but know it would be really difficult to get back into my field after that long of a layoff (STEM field). Sometimes I wish I had picked something where it was easier to jump in and out. Even though you don't know anyone like this, there really are a lot of us who struggle with the decision! I am jealous that it was so easy for you.

It hasn't happened yet. Many of us wouldnt hire someone who'd taken years as a SAHM. Wait and see, my dears.

I'm not in the STEM field, and I wouldn't hire anyone who had taken a decade off of work. I just wouldn't. Most fields are dynamic, and it's not about just volunteering and networking, it's being in the field and actually working. I might take them on as an intern though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The saddest part about this thread is that some of the SAHMs who are so intent on making WOHM feel bad about themselves have daughters of their own, and will teach these daughters that they cannot both have a fulfilling career and be a good mom. Such a false choice. And when some of these daughters do try to maintain careers they've worked their entire lives for and also have children, these women will do their best make them feel awful about it.

See, I've had exactly the opposite thought. When the daughters of all gheae these WOHMs grow up, they're not even going to consider SAH with their kids because their mothers will have ingrained in them, from Day 1, that successful women simply don't stay home with their kids. Instead, they pay other women (lesser beings, in their books), to do the actual childcare. And that is so sad, that these women will never have the support of their own mothers to raise their kids the way they choose, if that way includes staying home with them.

As a SAHM, I'm planning on supporting my daughter in any way I can, whether she chooses to be a WOHM or a SAHM, or any combination of the two. But I'll absolutely be teaching (and showing) her the value and importance of having a SAHP.

Do you actually know any WOHMs really well? You talk about them as if they are a different species that you haven't studied well. Most of the ones I know don't sit around judging other women for their choices. And they certainly don't fit this fantasy nit-SAHM picture you paint. All I want for my daughter is for her to know that she has choices and one is to SAH and one is to WOH. And I want her to be happy with her choice.

Agree, but I hope that by the time she is planning on having kids, that there will be enough change in govt policy and the workplace so that she won't have to make a hard choice. I am grateful that I work in an environment where I received at tremendous amount of time off, paid, and have a flexible schedule (university professor), so that I have been able to have children AND pursue a fulfilling career. Yes, my husband and I need a nanny--not just me, as he needs childcare so that he can go to work, too--and she is wonderful. But, she does not have a PhD, loves working as a nanny, and is well compensated for her work. We don't consider her a lesser being, and we are so thankful to have had her in our lives for several years now. I think that many professional women feel the way I do. I do wonder sometimes if women who choose to SAH have "given up" without pursuing alternative options, and I wish that they would have petitioned their own businesses before quitting for better options for working families, but I don't look down on the choices they've made.

When it comes to SAHPs, you seem to be missing the point. Parents choose to stay home with their kids because this is how they want to raise them - not because they were somehow out of options. Having a SAHP is the option of choice in families that choose to have one.

No, I am not missing the point. You OTOH seem to be ignoring a huge block of well-educated professional women in cities like DC who had to make a hard choice between a career they loved but that required hours or travel incompatible with having a balanced family life once they had children. There are some women out there who gave up their careers because they wanted to SAH, but for many women who went to top colleges, graduate programs, and did well in their early careers, they make the choice with some reluctance. The choice for many is not so starkly black and white as you paint it.

Well, let's see. As one of those well-educated (yes, top college and grad school) women who did very well in my career, I happily chose to SAH once my husband and I had children. It was a choice we were fortunate to have and I am grateful every single day to have this time with our kids. Interestingly, every SAHM I know comes from a similar background (well-educated, prior-professional) and also easily made the choice to stay home - so rather than "ignoring a huge block" of women like myself, I'm actually speaking as one of these women, and I'm surrounded by them every day. My neighborhood and children's schools are full of highly educated SAHMs. At some point, many of us will return to work, but for this time in our children's lives, the choice was indeed simple enough: did we want to continue on the fast-track with our careers and rarely see our children? Or "lean out" in order to "lean in" to our families? While I know some women do find this a difficult decision to make, and often choose to continue working, the SAHMs I know aren't staying home as some sort of "consolation prize" or "last resort." It's a very fortunate situation we find ourselves in and we're absolutely making the most of it.

It seems you equate being highly educated and having a high-level career to be incompatible with enthusiastically choosing to SAH with one's children. Among the women I know, this just isn't the case.

Projecting? I never that SAH was a consolation prize or last resort, only that it is a difficult choice because both options have their plusses and minuses.

BTW, the well-educated women I know seem to be much more aware of how difficult it is to return to the workforce once the kids are in school. You and your cohort seem to be happily ignoring the statistics of the difficulties of on-ramping. All the SAHMs (and my children are now in late elementary school, so several years older than yours) are fully aware of these challenges and made the decision to SAH not as a consolation prize, but after carefully weighing the pros and cons. A good education does enable one to carefully analyze situations, after all.

Hmm. First of all, I'm wondering how you surmised your children are older than mine. My oldest is in middle school, so it seems your analytical skills might need some refining. At any rate, I wouldn't say anyone I know is "happily ignoring" the reality of returning to the workforce; rather that we are enjoying and making the most of the time we have at home with our kids. For some women, perhaps deciding to SAH is a difficult choice. I was simply saying that among women I know, it wasn't.

Well, when you say "At some point, many of us will return to work, but for this time in our children's lives, the choice was indeed simple enough: did we want to continue on the fast-track with our careers and rarely see our children? " it implies that one will not be out of the professional workforce for more than a decade. Because if many of your cohort think that they'll be returning to work after staying at home with the kids until high school or college, those women are simply delusional.

Really? Ok, you go right ahead and think that if it makes you feel more satisfied with your own choice. I assure you, those of us who intend to return to the workforce will absolutely do so. See you there.

We won't be on the same floors, so nope, won't see you there.

Not the PP, but you really do have an inflated view of yourself, don't you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Really? Ok, you go right ahead and think that if it makes you feel more satisfied with your own choice. I assure you, those of us who intend to return to the workforce will absolutely do so. See you there.

NP here- just curious, what field are you and all your friends in? I like the idea of taking off a few years to stay home, but know it would be really difficult to get back into my field after that long of a layoff (STEM field). Sometimes I wish I had picked something where it was easier to jump in and out. Even though you don't know anyone like this, there really are a lot of us who struggle with the decision! I am jealous that it was so easy for you.

It hasn't happened yet. Many of us wouldnt hire someone who'd taken years as a SAHM. Wait and see, my dears.

You mean it hasn't happened yet in whatever firm you work for. And that just speaks volumes about you (if you really are in a position to hire, which is looking ever more doubtful with each of your silly posts) and/or your firm. You have no idea what kind of backgrounds, education, and prior work experience many SAHMs have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The saddest part about this thread is that some of the SAHMs who are so intent on making WOHM feel bad about themselves have daughters of their own, and will teach these daughters that they cannot both have a fulfilling career and be a good mom. Such a false choice. And when some of these daughters do try to maintain careers they've worked their entire lives for and also have children, these women will do their best make them feel awful about it.

See, I've had exactly the opposite thought. When the daughters of all gheae these WOHMs grow up, they're not even going to consider SAH with their kids because their mothers will have ingrained in them, from Day 1, that successful women simply don't stay home with their kids. Instead, they pay other women (lesser beings, in their books), to do the actual childcare. And that is so sad, that these women will never have the support of their own mothers to raise their kids the way they choose, if that way includes staying home with them.

As a SAHM, I'm planning on supporting my daughter in any way I can, whether she chooses to be a WOHM or a SAHM, or any combination of the two. But I'll absolutely be teaching (and showing) her the value and importance of having a SAHP.

Do you actually know any WOHMs really well? You talk about them as if they are a different species that you haven't studied well. Most of the ones I know don't sit around judging other women for their choices. And they certainly don't fit this fantasy nit-SAHM picture you paint. All I want for my daughter is for her to know that she has choices and one is to SAH and one is to WOH. And I want her to be happy with her choice.

Agree, but I hope that by the time she is planning on having kids, that there will be enough change in govt policy and the workplace so that she won't have to make a hard choice. I am grateful that I work in an environment where I received at tremendous amount of time off, paid, and have a flexible schedule (university professor), so that I have been able to have children AND pursue a fulfilling career. Yes, my husband and I need a nanny--not just me, as he needs childcare so that he can go to work, too--and she is wonderful. But, she does not have a PhD, loves working as a nanny, and is well compensated for her work. We don't consider her a lesser being, and we are so thankful to have had her in our lives for several years now. I think that many professional women feel the way I do. I do wonder sometimes if women who choose to SAH have "given up" without pursuing alternative options, and I wish that they would have petitioned their own businesses before quitting for better options for working families, but I don't look down on the choices they've made.

When it comes to SAHPs, you seem to be missing the point. Parents choose to stay home with their kids because this is how they want to raise them - not because they were somehow out of options. Having a SAHP is the option of choice in families that choose to have one.

No, I am not missing the point. You OTOH seem to be ignoring a huge block of well-educated professional women in cities like DC who had to make a hard choice between a career they loved but that required hours or travel incompatible with having a balanced family life once they had children. There are some women out there who gave up their careers because they wanted to SAH, but for many women who went to top colleges, graduate programs, and did well in their early careers, they make the choice with some reluctance. The choice for many is not so starkly black and white as you paint it.

Well, let's see. As one of those well-educated (yes, top college and grad school) women who did very well in my career, I happily chose to SAH once my husband and I had children. It was a choice we were fortunate to have and I am grateful every single day to have this time with our kids. Interestingly, every SAHM I know comes from a similar background (well-educated, prior-professional) and also easily made the choice to stay home - so rather than "ignoring a huge block" of women like myself, I'm actually speaking as one of these women, and I'm surrounded by them every day. My neighborhood and children's schools are full of highly educated SAHMs. At some point, many of us will return to work, but for this time in our children's lives, the choice was indeed simple enough: did we want to continue on the fast-track with our careers and rarely see our children? Or "lean out" in order to "lean in" to our families? While I know some women do find this a difficult decision to make, and often choose to continue working, the SAHMs I know aren't staying home as some sort of "consolation prize" or "last resort." It's a very fortunate situation we find ourselves in and we're absolutely making the most of it.

It seems you equate being highly educated and having a high-level career to be incompatible with enthusiastically choosing to SAH with one's children. Among the women I know, this just isn't the case.

Projecting? I never that SAH was a consolation prize or last resort, only that it is a difficult choice because both options have their plusses and minuses.

BTW, the well-educated women I know seem to be much more aware of how difficult it is to return to the workforce once the kids are in school. You and your cohort seem to be happily ignoring the statistics of the difficulties of on-ramping. All the SAHMs (and my children are now in late elementary school, so several years older than yours) are fully aware of these challenges and made the decision to SAH not as a consolation prize, but after carefully weighing the pros and cons. A good education does enable one to carefully analyze situations, after all.

Hmm. First of all, I'm wondering how you surmised your children are older than mine. My oldest is in middle school, so it seems your analytical skills might need some refining. At any rate, I wouldn't say anyone I know is "happily ignoring" the reality of returning to the workforce; rather that we are enjoying and making the most of the time we have at home with our kids. For some women, perhaps deciding to SAH is a difficult choice. I was simply saying that among women I know, it wasn't.

Well, when you say "At some point, many of us will return to work, but for this time in our children's lives, the choice was indeed simple enough: did we want to continue on the fast-track with our careers and rarely see our children? " it implies that one will not be out of the professional workforce for more than a decade. Because if many of your cohort think that they'll be returning to work after staying at home with the kids until high school or college, those women are simply delusional.

Really? Ok, you go right ahead and think that if it makes you feel more satisfied with your own choice. I assure you, those of us who intend to return to the workforce will absolutely do so. See you there.

We won't be on the same floors, so nope, won't see you there.

Not the PP, but you really do have an inflated view of yourself, don't you?

Seriously? You think someone out of the workforce for a decade+ would be on the same playing field as someone who never left the workforce?? That's not an inflated sense of self, that's reality darling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The saddest part about this thread is that some of the SAHMs who are so intent on making WOHM feel bad about themselves have daughters of their own, and will teach these daughters that they cannot both have a fulfilling career and be a good mom. Such a false choice. And when some of these daughters do try to maintain careers they've worked their entire lives for and also have children, these women will do their best make them feel awful about it.

See, I've had exactly the opposite thought. When the daughters of all gheae these WOHMs grow up, they're not even going to consider SAH with their kids because their mothers will have ingrained in them, from Day 1, that successful women simply don't stay home with their kids. Instead, they pay other women (lesser beings, in their books), to do the actual childcare. And that is so sad, that these women will never have the support of their own mothers to raise their kids the way they choose, if that way includes staying home with them.

As a SAHM, I'm planning on supporting my daughter in any way I can, whether she chooses to be a WOHM or a SAHM, or any combination of the two. But I'll absolutely be teaching (and showing) her the value and importance of having a SAHP.

Do you actually know any WOHMs really well? You talk about them as if they are a different species that you haven't studied well. Most of the ones I know don't sit around judging other women for their choices. And they certainly don't fit this fantasy nit-SAHM picture you paint. All I want for my daughter is for her to know that she has choices and one is to SAH and one is to WOH. And I want her to be happy with her choice.

Agree, but I hope that by the time she is planning on having kids, that there will be enough change in govt policy and the workplace so that she won't have to make a hard choice. I am grateful that I work in an environment where I received at tremendous amount of time off, paid, and have a flexible schedule (university professor), so that I have been able to have children AND pursue a fulfilling career. Yes, my husband and I need a nanny--not just me, as he needs childcare so that he can go to work, too--and she is wonderful. But, she does not have a PhD, loves working as a nanny, and is well compensated for her work. We don't consider her a lesser being, and we are so thankful to have had her in our lives for several years now. I think that many professional women feel the way I do. I do wonder sometimes if women who choose to SAH have "given up" without pursuing alternative options, and I wish that they would have petitioned their own businesses before quitting for better options for working families, but I don't look down on the choices they've made.

When it comes to SAHPs, you seem to be missing the point. Parents choose to stay home with their kids because this is how they want to raise them - not because they were somehow out of options. Having a SAHP is the option of choice in families that choose to have one.

No, I am not missing the point. You OTOH seem to be ignoring a huge block of well-educated professional women in cities like DC who had to make a hard choice between a career they loved but that required hours or travel incompatible with having a balanced family life once they had children. There are some women out there who gave up their careers because they wanted to SAH, but for many women who went to top colleges, graduate programs, and did well in their early careers, they make the choice with some reluctance. The choice for many is not so starkly black and white as you paint it.

Well, let's see. As one of those well-educated (yes, top college and grad school) women who did very well in my career, I happily chose to SAH once my husband and I had children. It was a choice we were fortunate to have and I am grateful every single day to have this time with our kids. Interestingly, every SAHM I know comes from a similar background (well-educated, prior-professional) and also easily made the choice to stay home - so rather than "ignoring a huge block" of women like myself, I'm actually speaking as one of these women, and I'm surrounded by them every day. My neighborhood and children's schools are full of highly educated SAHMs. At some point, many of us will return to work, but for this time in our children's lives, the choice was indeed simple enough: did we want to continue on the fast-track with our careers and rarely see our children? Or "lean out" in order to "lean in" to our families? While I know some women do find this a difficult decision to make, and often choose to continue working, the SAHMs I know aren't staying home as some sort of "consolation prize" or "last resort." It's a very fortunate situation we find ourselves in and we're absolutely making the most of it.

It seems you equate being highly educated and having a high-level career to be incompatible with enthusiastically choosing to SAH with one's children. Among the women I know, this just isn't the case.

+1 Well said!

[Anonymous]

For me, I know I am going to have a reallllly hard time getting back in the workforce, I work part time now. Once youngest is in school I will start the dreaded hunt. But while I do feel bad abt what I am missing out in terms of money and prestige and where my friends have reached, I know I will regret it more if I miss out on the day to day of my kids. 10 hours in a day is a long time to a toddler and I want to be there )

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Really? Ok, you go right ahead and think that if it makes you feel more satisfied with your own choice. I assure you, those of us who intend to return to the workforce will absolutely do so. See you there.

NP here- just curious, what field are you and all your friends in? I like the idea of taking off a few years to stay home, but know it would be really difficult to get back into my field after that long of a layoff (STEM field). Sometimes I wish I had picked something where it was easier to jump in and out. Even though you don't know anyone like this, there really are a lot of us who struggle with the decision! I am jealous that it was so easy for you.

It hasn't happened yet. Many of us wouldnt hire someone who'd taken years as a SAHM. Wait and see, my dears.

You mean it hasn't happened yet in whatever firm you work for. And that just speaks volumes about you (if you really are in a position to hire, which is looking ever more doubtful with each of your silly posts) and/or your firm. You have no idea what kind of backgrounds, education, and prior work experience many SAHMs have.

I posted once in this thread and others agreeing have chimed in. I hire regularly and wouldnt hire someone who's taken more than a year or two as a SAHM. Nor, based on responses here, would others. Believe what you wish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Really? Ok, you go right ahead and think that if it makes you feel more satisfied with your own choice. I assure you, those of us who intend to return to the workforce will absolutely do so. See you there.

NP here- just curious, what field are you and all your friends in? I like the idea of taking off a few years to stay home, but know it would be really difficult to get back into my field after that long of a layoff (STEM field). Sometimes I wish I had picked something where it was easier to jump in and out. Even though you don't know anyone like this, there really are a lot of us who struggle with the decision! I am jealous that it was so easy for you.

It hasn't happened yet. Many of us wouldnt hire someone who'd taken years as a SAHM. Wait and see, my dears.

You mean it hasn't happened yet in whatever firm you work for. And that just speaks volumes about you (if you really are in a position to hire, which is looking ever more doubtful with each of your silly posts) and/or your firm. You have no idea what kind of backgrounds, education, and prior work experience many SAHMs have.

I posted once in this thread and others agreeing have chimed in. I hire regularly and wouldnt hire someone who's taken more than a year or two as a SAHM. Nor, based on responses here, would others. Believe what you wish.

We do get your point and priorities. Working and job experience are at the top of your list. Go for it!

[Anonymous]

We have someone in our workplace who was a SAHM for 10 years before joining us.

She answers the phones and makes copies. She's been with us for two years and I don't really see her career going any further unless she makes a real effort to catch up with technology. She can barely use Outlook. Would have being in the workforce for the past decade made her smarter? Maybe not, but at least she'd be more experienced.

In short, if you stay at home for a long time, you're going to have to go out of your way to get current. And that will take more than a week or two. Make sure you bake that into your plans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Really? Ok, you go right ahead and think that if it makes you feel more satisfied with your own choice. I assure you, those of us who intend to return to the workforce will absolutely do so. See you there.

NP here- just curious, what field are you and all your friends in? I like the idea of taking off a few years to stay home, but know it would be really difficult to get back into my field after that long of a layoff (STEM field). Sometimes I wish I had picked something where it was easier to jump in and out. Even though you don't know anyone like this, there really are a lot of us who struggle with the decision! I am jealous that it was so easy for you.

It hasn't happened yet. Many of us wouldnt hire someone who'd taken years as a SAHM. Wait and see, my dears.

You mean it hasn't happened yet in whatever firm you work for. And that just speaks volumes about you (if you really are in a position to hire, which is looking ever more doubtful with each of your silly posts) and/or your firm. You have no idea what kind of backgrounds, education, and prior work experience many SAHMs have.

I posted once in this thread and others agreeing have chimed in. I hire regularly and wouldnt hire someone who's taken more than a year or two as a SAHM. Nor, based on responses here, would others. Believe what you wish.

We do get your point and priorities. Working and job experience are at the top of your list. Go for it!

Geez, get over yourself would you? For many, many of us, we have a high priority to help take care if our families. We could simply struggle long term without a second income, and cannot afford to be nonchalant about me taking several years off and hope that I can match, or come close to matching, my previous earning power when I want to re-enter the workforce. We'd like to be able to provide our kids the equivalent of in-state college tuition, prepare for retirement, and not haggle over every single purchase (I had a SAHM and my parents argued about money all the time- you think that isn't harmful to kids?). Some families can do all those things in one income, some can't. And some could but want to maintain dual careers anyway. Why don't you just mind your own business and take care of your own family? Not sure why some posters on here are so obsessed with the choices and needs of others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Really? Ok, you go right ahead and think that if it makes you feel more satisfied with your own choice. I assure you, those of us who intend to return to the workforce will absolutely do so. See you there.

NP here- just curious, what field are you and all your friends in? I like the idea of taking off a few years to stay home, but know it would be really difficult to get back into my field after that long of a layoff (STEM field). Sometimes I wish I had picked something where it was easier to jump in and out. Even though you don't know anyone like this, there really are a lot of us who struggle with the decision! I am jealous that it was so easy for you.

It hasn't happened yet. Many of us wouldnt hire someone who'd taken years as a SAHM. Wait and see, my dears.

You mean it hasn't happened yet in whatever firm you work for. And that just speaks volumes about you (if you really are in a position to hire, which is looking ever more doubtful with each of your silly posts) and/or your firm. You have no idea what kind of backgrounds, education, and prior work experience many SAHMs have.

I posted once in this thread and others agreeing have chimed in. I hire regularly and wouldnt hire someone who's taken more than a year or two as a SAHM. Nor, based on responses here, would others. Believe what you wish.

+1 research the studies on on-ramping. They universally show how difficult it is when women take *an average* of 2 years off. The job search takes longer, and they get paid less than they anticipated. Logically, one can assume that women who take 10 years + off are going to have an extremely hard time getting back into the field. That is simply reality. I know of no professional field where anyone can jump back in anywhere close to where they had been after taking more than a couple of years off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Really? Ok, you go right ahead and think that if it makes you feel more satisfied with your own choice. I assure you, those of us who intend to return to the workforce will absolutely do so. See you there.

NP here- just curious, what field are you and all your friends in? I like the idea of taking off a few years to stay home, but know it would be really difficult to get back into my field after that long of a layoff (STEM field). Sometimes I wish I had picked something where it was easier to jump in and out. Even though you don't know anyone like this, there really are a lot of us who struggle with the decision! I am jealous that it was so easy for you.

It hasn't happened yet. Many of us wouldnt hire someone who'd taken years as a SAHM. Wait and see, my dears.

You mean it hasn't happened yet in whatever firm you work for. And that just speaks volumes about you (if you really are in a position to hire, which is looking ever more doubtful with each of your silly posts) and/or your firm. You have no idea what kind of backgrounds, education, and prior work experience many SAHMs have.

I posted once in this thread and others agreeing have chimed in. I hire regularly and wouldnt hire someone who's taken more than a year or two as a SAHM. Nor, based on responses here, would others. Believe what you wish.

We do get your point and priorities. Working and job experience are at the top of your list. Go for it!

Geez, get over yourself would you? For many, many of us, we have a high priority to help take care if our families. We could simply struggle long term without a second income, and cannot afford to be nonchalant about me taking several years off and hope that I can match, or come close to matching, my previous earning power when I want to re-enter the workforce. We'd like to be able to provide our kids the equivalent of in-state college tuition, prepare for retirement, and not haggle over every single purchase (I had a SAHM and my parents argued about money all the time- you think that isn't harmful to kids?). Some families can do all those things in one income, some can't. And some could but want to maintain dual careers anyway. Why don't you just mind your own business and take care of your own family? Not sure why some posters on here are so obsessed with the choices and needs of others.

To clarify that was a different poster (though I wholeheartedly agree - ha!)

First thy claim they'll waltz back into the workforce where they left off, then hop on the high horse about how their priorities are in line (while they spend hubby's money at Starbucks). Sigh.

[Anonymous]

Some of you WOHMs are catty witches with poor reading comprehension.