Help me understand Republican women in their 30s and 40s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You can’t have it both ways Kamala. Either Dems are the party of WOMEN because they will always protect a WOMAN’S right to abort her own child up until the moment of birth- but then they aren’t exactly the party of WOMEN because if your daughter happens to survive her abortion, she’s no longer a WOMAN on the sports field, or if she’d prefer not to share a public bathroom with men.

You are utterly unhinged, like MTG unhinged.

But correct.

Nobody is aborting their child up until the moment of birth. Late-term abortions are tragic cases where a woman intended to have a baby, only to learn it would not be viable. I would recommend you read some of their stories - they are heartbreaking.

Stop lying. There was a story in the Washington Post about a young woman that was actively looking to abort her healthy 34 week old fetus because she decided she couldn't handle being a mother.

Luckily laws prevented that and the health child is now adopted by a family.

So no, not all abortions in the last trimester are tragic, some are elective. And if this woman had her way should have killed a viable fetus just for convenience. Stop lying.

Tired tired tired old talking point.

Data doesn’t lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see how anyone can call them a feminist and vote for Trump. Because a feminist ought to care for all women’s rights, not just their own. We have a terrible maternal death rate, that is exponentially worse for Black women. Women have lost access to safe health care and voting rights.

I also feel sad for the one trans woman we know who is at least 6’2 or 6’3”. She has an amazing family and is a mother of teens and would never hurt anyone. That she has to deal with this level of hate is incredible.

Democrats always think they own feminism. Nope. Look at the number of disrespectful comments here from liberals insisting GOP women are misled or following their husbands.

- Feminist Republican

Sorry. You’re actively supporting the party that wants to erase women’s rights entirely. You are not a feminist.

And you are supporting the party that wants to erase women entirely. You are not a feminist either.

+100. One party wants to take away my right to decide my fate if I get pregnant. The other party wants to erase me entirely so men can steal my identity. Two awful choices, but erasing me in every aspect of life is worse. Dems can get bent.

This is nonsense. Acknowledging trans people isn’t “erasing” women.

It depends. If we are allowed to acknowledge that trans people have a biological sex that is different from the sex they would prefer, that isn't in conflict. If we are required to say, in polite society, that trans women are women, with no distinction at all from biological women, that is an issue for many people. And of course, if it is taken a step further and claimed that suggesting that sex is an immutable characteristic is criminal hate speech, that is a serious step toward the suppression of free speech, science, and religion in favor of state dogma.

The Democratic Party claims none of the bolded. Referring to trans women as women doesn’t mean you can’t acknowledge that they’re trans. It just means you shouldn’t call them men. I’m sure you understand the difference. And there is no Democratic policy in place to “criminalize” speech about sex as a biological characteristic. Some people have a gender that is different from their sex. That’s all.

NP. I will always refer to a man as a man and a woman as a woman. That’s a statement of fact. However the man and woman in question feel about that is between them and
their therapists. You will not force us to lie and then call it kindness.

Men are men because of their sex, not their gender.

IDGAF about your made-up religious concept. Sex is material reality. Whatever a man claims to believe he is in his head is an unverifiable, unfalsifiable, self-serving claim and, as such,
is entitled to zero deference.

That is one opinion on the matter. Not the only one.

Sexual reproduction is not a matter of opinion. Most people who have critical thinking skills believe that biology is real.

Another anonymous DCUM expert on transgenderism has spoken. Lucky us.

I thought people like you believed in science?

I don't believe in getting expert knowledge or guidance about transgenderism from DCUM.

Apparently you don’t believe in evolutionary biology either.

DCUM is not a source for any expert knowledge about anything. It is an anonymous chat forum. Whatever parenting issues you are involved in, go ahead and read anonymous opinions on DCUM if you like, but get some solid, experienced professional advice to use before you make important decisions.

[Anonymous]

Brain dead idiots
Remember that right to vote

Project 2025 author is going to add removal of the 19 th amendment you utterly stupid idiots this is what youbare voting for to lose your right to vote ?

Don’t anyone say it can not happen! Dictatorship look it up idiots

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican woman. The Republican Party speaks to a much broader range of my concerns. The democratic Party has less to offer. I'm interested in lower taxes, lower crime, a secure border, girls being able to have sports on an equal playing field, and things like respect for the American flag and military service. I'm very against terrorism, including Hamas, and I'm in favor of Israel being able to exist. The democrats offer me abortions. Lots of abortions, with greater access to abortions. It's a grim vision for the women of America.

Well said. This sums it up for me too. Democrats thinking that all I care about is abortion is insulting. Especially when they actively deny my existence as a woman in so many other cases.

+1

Though I suppose it makes sense. If the Democrats want to reduce women to a series of body parts, perhaps they only care about uteruses. In this, the Democrats are at least consistent. So women who are fine being referred to as uterus-havers or front holes can vote for the party that sees them that way.

Andrea said it best “to conservative men, women are private property. To liberal men, women are public property”

I’ll take my chances with the husband of my choosing over the state.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

NP. I’m the black woman who posted about my abortion and your comment is what it comes down to. There’s a lot more to consider than abortion. I’m so disgusted by Democrats’ positions on so many other issues that I won’t vote for Biden this election. It’s a measure of how far this country has fallen that we have to choose between a party that would allow adult male crossdressers, a disproportionate number of whom are sex offenders, into girls’ bathrooms versus a party that would force a raped girl to carry the crossdressing degenerate’s child to term.

Good grief woman. None of this is happening. You're being manipulated and they're using your bigotry to do it. One day the fascists will come to round up people that look like you and me, and you'll have empowered them because you were afraid of imaginary cross-dressing rapists. Get it together! There are real and present dangers, and I promise you trans people are not the danger you should fear.

BW Hold on. You mean the old man in a miniskirt and 4” clear stiletto heels who I encountered in the women’s bathroom at the YMCA three weeks ago wasn’t actually there? Or the at least 6’4 man with long hair who entered the women’s bathroom at the AMC movie theater while I was alone there three months ago also didn’t exist?

Wow, either Republicans have perfected a mind control ray that makes women see cross-dressing men in the bathroom or Democrats like you are lying, gaslighting, hateful pieces of sh!t who endanger women with this disgusting social agenda and then attack us when we speak plainly on what is happening.

While you figure that puzzle out, I’ll be voting Republican for the first time because of fools like you.

NP I never call troll until now. You shared your tragic abortion story a few pages back. Received shared sorrow and attention. You posted again and now. Let’s assume you’re a real person who had an abortion to save your life. The one who said, if it weren’t for the “pill” you would have used a “hanger to rip your daughter” out in order to live for your two kids. In your 2nd post, you said something like, “yeh I did it for my kids, but mostly did it for myself bc I had the right to live.” Ok, not mutually exclusive. Now here you are identifying yourself as a new poster, which you are not. Then going off on the “good grief” poster who responds rationally to you as a black woman herself.

You go from being calm, articulate, and measured in your 1st post to garner empathy and attention. Now you’re a raging Republican voter for the 1st time bc of fools like her? saying democrats are [i]hateful pieces of sh!t bc you allegedly encountered not 1, but 2 cross dressed men, one being old, and the other being 6’4” GUURRRL you’re trolling hard. Welcome to DCUM newbie where you will be called out for bullsh!t. I’m gonna guess you’re not voting for anyone. Probably a dude.

The only dudes on this thread are the ones who want to be women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You can’t have it both ways Kamala. Either Dems are the party of WOMEN because they will always protect a WOMAN’S right to abort her own child up until the moment of birth- but then they aren’t exactly the party of WOMEN because if your daughter happens to survive her abortion, she’s no longer a WOMAN on the sports field, or if she’d prefer not to share a public bathroom with men.

You are utterly unhinged, like MTG unhinged.

But correct.

Nobody is aborting their child up until the moment of birth. Late-term abortions are tragic cases where a woman intended to have a baby, only to learn it would not be viable. I would recommend you read some of their stories - they are heartbreaking.

Stop lying. There was a story in the Washington Post about a young woman that was actively looking to abort her healthy 34 week old fetus because she decided she couldn't handle being a mother.

Luckily laws prevented that and the health child is now adopted by a family.

So no, not all abortions in the last trimester are tragic, some are elective. And if this woman had her way should have killed a viable fetus just for convenience. Stop lying.

Tired tired tired old talking point.

Data doesn’t lie.

Agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican woman. The Republican Party speaks to a much broader range of my concerns. The democratic Party has less to offer. I'm interested in lower taxes, lower crime, a secure border, girls being able to have sports on an equal playing field, and things like respect for the American flag and military service. I'm very against terrorism, including Hamas, and I'm in favor of Israel being able to exist. The democrats offer me abortions. Lots of abortions, with greater access to abortions. It's a grim vision for the women of America.

Well said. This sums it up for me too. Democrats thinking that all I care about is abortion is insulting. Especially when they actively deny my existence as a woman in so many other cases.

+1

Though I suppose it makes sense. If the Democrats want to reduce women to a series of body parts, perhaps they only care about uteruses. In this, the Democrats are at least consistent. So women who are fine being referred to as uterus-havers or front holes can vote for the party that sees them that way.

Andrea said it best “to conservative men, women are private property. To liberal men, women are public property”

I’ll take my chances with the husband of my choosing over the state.

Yes, I never understood what that quote really meant until the last five years or so. And now I really, really get it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You can’t have it both ways Kamala. Either Dems are the party of WOMEN because they will always protect a WOMAN’S right to abort her own child up until the moment of birth- but then they aren’t exactly the party of WOMEN because if your daughter happens to survive her abortion, she’s no longer a WOMAN on the sports field, or if she’d prefer not to share a public bathroom with men.

You are utterly unhinged, like MTG unhinged.

But correct.

Nobody is aborting their child up until the moment of birth. Late-term abortions are tragic cases where a woman intended to have a baby, only to learn it would not be viable. I would recommend you read some of their stories - they are heartbreaking.

Stop lying. There was a story in the Washington Post about a young woman that was actively looking to abort her healthy 34 week old fetus because she decided she couldn't handle being a mother.

Luckily laws prevented that and the health child is now adopted by a family.

So no, not all abortions in the last trimester are tragic, some are elective. And if this woman had her way should have killed a viable fetus just for convenience. Stop lying.

I read that article too. What you didn't mention is that she lived in Texas, and was measured at 6 weeks and 4 days pregnant. She then traveled to Oklahoma to attempt a medication abortion, which failed. She purchased some pills from India, which also failed. You make it sound like she suddenly, at week 34, decided to terminate her pregnancy. That is not remotely true - she just had the misfortune of living in Texas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican woman. The Republican Party speaks to a much broader range of my concerns. The democratic Party has less to offer. I'm interested in lower taxes, lower crime, a secure border, girls being able to have sports on an equal playing field, and things like respect for the American flag and military service. I'm very against terrorism, including Hamas, and I'm in favor of Israel being able to exist. The democrats offer me abortions. Lots of abortions, with greater access to abortions. It's a grim vision for the women of America.

Well said. This sums it up for me too. Democrats thinking that all I care about is abortion is insulting. Especially when they actively deny my existence as a woman in so many other cases.

+1

Though I suppose it makes sense. If the Democrats want to reduce women to a series of body parts, perhaps they only care about uteruses. In this, the Democrats are at least consistent. So women who are fine being referred to as uterus-havers or front holes can vote for the party that sees them that way.

Andrea said it best “to conservative men, women are private property. To liberal men, women are public property”

I’ll take my chances with the husband of my choosing over the state.

Conservative, liberal and anything in between....our daughters have the right to make their own reproductive decisions and deserve the protections of roe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You can’t have it both ways Kamala. Either Dems are the party of WOMEN because they will always protect a WOMAN’S right to abort her own child up until the moment of birth- but then they aren’t exactly the party of WOMEN because if your daughter happens to survive her abortion, she’s no longer a WOMAN on the sports field, or if she’d prefer not to share a public bathroom with men.

You are utterly unhinged, like MTG unhinged.

But correct.

Nobody is aborting their child up until the moment of birth. Late-term abortions are tragic cases where a woman intended to have a baby, only to learn it would not be viable. I would recommend you read some of their stories - they are heartbreaking.

Stop lying. There was a story in the Washington Post about a young woman that was actively looking to abort her healthy 34 week old fetus because she decided she couldn't handle being a mother.

Luckily laws prevented that and the health child is now adopted by a family.

So no, not all abortions in the last trimester are tragic, some are elective. And if this woman had her way should have killed a viable fetus just for convenience. Stop lying.

I read that article too. What you didn't mention is that she lived in Texas, and was measured at 6 weeks and 4 days pregnant. She then traveled to Oklahoma to attempt a medication abortion, which failed. She purchased some pills from India, which also failed. You make it sound like she suddenly, at week 34, decided to terminate her pregnancy. That is not remotely true - she just had the misfortune of living in Texas.

My my my. There is a lot to this story and most of it should probably be no one's business but the patient and doctors. Can we have the link please?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You can’t have it both ways Kamala. Either Dems are the party of WOMEN because they will always protect a WOMAN’S right to abort her own child up until the moment of birth- but then they aren’t exactly the party of WOMEN because if your daughter happens to survive her abortion, she’s no longer a WOMAN on the sports field, or if she’d prefer not to share a public bathroom with men.

You are utterly unhinged, like MTG unhinged.

But correct.

Nobody is aborting their child up until the moment of birth. Late-term abortions are tragic cases where a woman intended to have a baby, only to learn it would not be viable. I would recommend you read some of their stories - they are heartbreaking.

Stop lying. There was a story in the Washington Post about a young woman that was actively looking to abort her healthy 34 week old fetus because she decided she couldn't handle being a mother.

Luckily laws prevented that and the health child is now adopted by a family.

So no, not all abortions in the last trimester are tragic, some are elective. And if this woman had her way should have killed a viable fetus just for convenience. Stop lying.

Tired tired tired old talking point.

Data doesn’t lie.

Funnily enough Republican feminists have been asked repeatedly to provide data. Nothing. Except telling women to “be nice” of I will vote for Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican woman. The Republican Party speaks to a much broader range of my concerns. The democratic Party has less to offer. I'm interested in lower taxes, lower crime, a secure border, girls being able to have sports on an equal playing field, and things like respect for the American flag and military service. I'm very against terrorism, including Hamas, and I'm in favor of Israel being able to exist. The democrats offer me abortions. Lots of abortions, with greater access to abortions. It's a grim vision for the women of America.

Well said. This sums it up for me too. Democrats thinking that all I care about is abortion is insulting. Especially when they actively deny my existence as a woman in so many other cases.

+1

Though I suppose it makes sense. If the Democrats want to reduce women to a series of body parts, perhaps they only care about uteruses. In this, the Democrats are at least consistent. So women who are fine being referred to as uterus-havers or front holes can vote for the party that sees them that way.

Andrea said it best “to conservative men, women are private property. To liberal men, women are public property”

I’ll take my chances with the husband of my choosing over the state.

Conservative, liberal and anything in between....our daughters have the right to make their own reproductive decisions and deserve the protections of roe.

You just have to travel a little now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

NP. I’m the black woman who posted about my abortion and your comment is what it comes down to. There’s a lot more to consider than abortion. I’m so disgusted by Democrats’ positions on so many other issues that I won’t vote for Biden this election. It’s a measure of how far this country has fallen that we have to choose between a party that would allow adult male crossdressers, a disproportionate number of whom are sex offenders, into girls’ bathrooms versus a party that would force a raped girl to carry the crossdressing degenerate’s child to term.

Good grief woman. None of this is happening. You're being manipulated and they're using your bigotry to do it. One day the fascists will come to round up people that look like you and me, and you'll have empowered them because you were afraid of imaginary cross-dressing rapists. Get it together! There are real and present dangers, and I promise you trans people are not the danger you should fear.

BW Hold on. You mean the old man in a miniskirt and 4” clear stiletto heels who I encountered in the women’s bathroom at the YMCA three weeks ago wasn’t actually there? Or the at least 6’4 man with long hair who entered the women’s bathroom at the AMC movie theater while I was alone there three months ago also didn’t exist?

Wow, either Republicans have perfected a mind control ray that makes women see cross-dressing men in the bathroom or Democrats like you are lying, gaslighting, hateful pieces of sh!t who endanger women with this disgusting social agenda and then attack us when we speak plainly on what is happening.

While you figure that puzzle out, I’ll be voting Republican for the first time because of fools like you.

NP I never call troll until now. You shared your tragic abortion story a few pages back. Received shared sorrow and attention. You posted again and now. Let’s assume you’re a real person who had an abortion to save your life. The one who said, if it weren’t for the “pill” you would have used a “hanger to rip your daughter” out in order to live for your two kids. In your 2nd post, you said something like, “yeh I did it for my kids, but mostly did it for myself bc I had the right to live.” Ok, not mutually exclusive. Now here you are identifying yourself as a new poster, which you are not. Then going off on the “good grief” poster who responds rationally to you as a black woman herself.

You go from being calm, articulate, and measured in your 1st post to garner empathy and attention. Now you’re a raging Republican voter for the 1st time bc of fools like her? saying democrats are [i]hateful pieces of sh!t bc you allegedly encountered not 1, but 2 cross dressed men, one being old, and the other being 6’4” GUURRRL you’re trolling hard. Welcome to DCUM newbie where you will be called out for bullsh!t. I’m gonna guess you’re not voting for anyone. Probably a dude.


I've noticed that in most leftist replies to this self identified black woman who is planning to vote for Trump, they call her girl. Or in this case GUURRL. Is that what progressives call a micro-aggression, like calling a black man "boy"? Or do you honestly think that this obviously educated black woman will understand you better if you incorporate ebonics quirks, like "sista"? Do go on about how racist Republicans are, lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican woman. The Republican Party speaks to a much broader range of my concerns. The democratic Party has less to offer. I'm interested in lower taxes, lower crime, a secure border, girls being able to have sports on an equal playing field, and things like respect for the American flag and military service. I'm very against terrorism, including Hamas, and I'm in favor of Israel being able to exist. The democrats offer me abortions. Lots of abortions, with greater access to abortions. It's a grim vision for the women of America.

Well said. This sums it up for me too. Democrats thinking that all I care about is abortion is insulting. Especially when they actively deny my existence as a woman in so many other cases.

+1

Though I suppose it makes sense. If the Democrats want to reduce women to a series of body parts, perhaps they only care about uteruses. In this, the Democrats are at least consistent. So women who are fine being referred to as uterus-havers or front holes can vote for the party that sees them that way.

Andrea said it best “to conservative men, women are private property. To liberal men, women are public property”

I’ll take my chances with the husband of my choosing over the state.

Conservative, liberal and anything in between....our daughters have the right to make their own reproductive decisions and deserve the protections of roe.

You just have to travel a little now.

Even better, you just need to find a state that agrees with your values? Want lots of abortions? California wants to be a leader in abortion. Want fetuses to have legal protections from murder? A red state is for you. See how easy this is?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You can’t have it both ways Kamala. Either Dems are the party of WOMEN because they will always protect a WOMAN’S right to abort her own child up until the moment of birth- but then they aren’t exactly the party of WOMEN because if your daughter happens to survive her abortion, she’s no longer a WOMAN on the sports field, or if she’d prefer not to share a public bathroom with men.

You are utterly unhinged, like MTG unhinged.

But correct.

Nobody is aborting their child up until the moment of birth. Late-term abortions are tragic cases where a woman intended to have a baby, only to learn it would not be viable. I would recommend you read some of their stories - they are heartbreaking.

Stop lying. There was a story in the Washington Post about a young woman that was actively looking to abort her healthy 34 week old fetus because she decided she couldn't handle being a mother.

Luckily laws prevented that and the health child is now adopted by a family.

So no, not all abortions in the last trimester are tragic, some are elective. And if this woman had her way should have killed a viable fetus just for convenience. Stop lying.

I read that article too. What you didn't mention is that she lived in Texas, and was measured at 6 weeks and 4 days pregnant. She then traveled to Oklahoma to attempt a medication abortion, which failed. She purchased some pills from India, which also failed. You make it sound like she suddenly, at week 34, decided to terminate her pregnancy. That is not remotely true - she just had the misfortune of living in Texas.

You're not really making this sound better. At all. This is horrific and should be extremely illegal.