The Republican Party of Virginia mails out nude photos of a candidate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:21 pages and the title is a lie. They did not mail nude photos. End of story.

Pretty rich coming from the folks losing their mind about a D being removed from the ballot because they couldn't even state their address correctly.

You are are too literal. The anger is over any sort of mailing at all drawing attention to the sex work in such a prurient yet salacious manner (what with the trigger warning/teaser on the envelope).

Gibson didn’t hurt anyone. It isn’t relevant. And the fact that the party thinks it needs to use titillation to slut she is more disgusting than anything the did on camera.

Her own party has abandoned her as well. She herself removed all endorsements from her campaign page a month ago.

[Anonymous]

The former republican first ladies full naked pics are and were up on the web for all to see.

Not sure why there are different standards for Democrats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The former republican first ladies full naked pics are and were up on the web for all to see.

Not sure why there are different standards for Democrats.

Because...Democrats. Duh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The former republican first ladies full naked pics are and were up on the web for all to see.

Not sure why there are different standards for Democrats.

Democrats also didn’t physically mail out photos of her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The former republican first ladies full naked pics are and were up on the web for all to see.

Not sure why there are different standards for Democrats.

Democrats also didn’t physically mail out photos of her.

First Ladies don't run for office. It's not an elected position. Do you know anything about the US government, Vlad?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The former republican first ladies full naked pics are and were up on the web for all to see.

Not sure why there are different standards for Democrats.

Democrats also didn’t physically mail out photos of her.

First Ladies don't run for office. It's not an elected position. Do you know anything about the US government, Vlad?

Not Vlad, I'm a native Virginian. My ancestors have lived in Virginia since 1630.

It's disgusting we had a first lady who was lauded by republicans constantly, yet came here as a naked photo model from the former Soviet Union. Calling me "Vlad" doesn't disguise that.

All Democrats are held to higher standards, including Democrat first ladies. Republicans are hypocrites of the worst kind now, and I voted for Republican for decades until I couldn't take where the party was going.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The former republican first ladies full naked pics are and were up on the web for all to see.

Not sure why there are different standards for Democrats.

Democrats also didn’t physically mail out photos of her.

First Ladies don't run for office. It's not an elected position. Do you know anything about the US government, Vlad?

Not Vlad, I'm a native Virginian. My ancestors have lived in Virginia since 1630.

It's disgusting we had a first lady who was lauded by republicans constantly, yet came here as a naked photo model from the former Soviet Union. Calling me "Vlad" doesn't disguise that.

All Democrats are held to higher standards, including Democrat first ladies. Republicans are hypocrites of the worst kind now, and I voted for Republican for decades until I couldn't take where the party was going.

We got ourselves a colonizing slave owner here folks!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The former republican first ladies full naked pics are and were up on the web for all to see.

Not sure why there are different standards for Democrats.

Democrats also didn’t physically mail out photos of her.

First Ladies don't run for office. It's not an elected position. Do you know anything about the US government, Vlad?

You did report me to the manager. Called it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The former republican first ladies full naked pics are and were up on the web for all to see.

Not sure why there are different standards for Democrats.

Democrats also didn’t physically mail out photos of her.

First Ladies don't run for office. It's not an elected position. Do you know anything about the US government, Vlad?

Not Vlad, I'm a native Virginian. My ancestors have lived in Virginia since 1630.

It's disgusting we had a first lady who was lauded by republicans constantly, yet came here as a naked photo model from the former Soviet Union. Calling me "Vlad" doesn't disguise that.

All Democrats are held to higher standards, including Democrat first ladies. Republicans are hypocrites of the worst kind now, and I voted for Republican for decades until I couldn't take where the party was going.

We got ourselves a colonizing slave owner here folks!

Who has changed her ways, and is not her colonizer ancestor. But is American. Unlik the republicans who now prefer Vlad and Putin.

And love nekkid first ladies but hate naked Democrats.

[Anonymous]

Between republicans who are projecting and actually abusing children + to Youngkin who wants a 15 week abortion ban, there is only one way for women to vote and that's for the Democratic candidates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Between republicans who are projecting and actually abusing children + to Youngkin who wants a 15 week abortion ban, there is only one way for women to vote and that's for the Democratic candidates.

Women who engage in and distribute porn are not helping other women AT ALL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The former republican first ladies full naked pics are and were up on the web for all to see.

Not sure why there are different standards for Democrats.

Democrats also didn’t physically mail out photos of her.

First Ladies don't run for office. It's not an elected position. Do you know anything about the US government, Vlad?

Not Vlad, I'm a native Virginian. My ancestors have lived in Virginia since 1630.

It's disgusting we had a first lady who was lauded by republicans constantly, yet came here as a naked photo model from the former Soviet Union. Calling me "Vlad" doesn't disguise that.

All Democrats are held to higher standards, including Democrat first ladies. Republicans are hypocrites of the worst kind now, and I voted for Republican for decades until I couldn't take where the party was going.

We got ourselves a colonizing slave owner here folks!

More bad-faith trolling by our resident conservative hater of America.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

DP. You're really looking more and more foolish, with every faux outraged post. Spare us all. Had Susanna Gibson been a Republican, her FULLY NUDE pictures would already have been published everywhere, including sent to "unsuspecting people." Your hypocrisy is really quite entertaining.

It’s fantasy deflection time!

Back here in reality, we are talking about how real-life Republicans actually printed out explicit mailers and actually sent them out to thousands of people in VA.

Pretty crappy, huh?

Are you new here? Because it was established many pages back that nothing in the mailer showed Gibson nude - not even a little bit. Do you generally accuse others of "fantasy" while lying yourself?

They don’t show her full body but it’s a screen capture from her (nude) private adult chat.

Regardless, the mailers were EXPLICIT.

If anything, they were explicit because they detailed her very explicit and disgusting words. Oh well. Are you saying that voters should have been kept in the dark about her porn activities?

Not at all. Voters should be aware. Perhaps Republicans could find a way that doesn’t include mailing screenshots and language used from private chat rooms to thousands of homes, many with young kids.

Spare us all. There was nothing private about their porn - anyone was able to view it. You're just embarrassed (as you should be) that a Dem candidate was outed as being a porn provider.

There is a difference between being available online on porn websites vs showing up unannounced in your mailbox.

Exactly what porn showed up in your mailbox? Do you consider a photograph of a woman's head to be porn?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you’re a p*rn star you really can’t complain about that becoming an issue by your political opponents, WTH?

She isn’t a star. She is now notorious but in no world is she a “star.”

She starred in pornography ergo “porn star”

The word “Star” in commonly recognized nomenclature is synonymous with celebrity. She is no celebrity. She has some notoriety now due to the campaign. But you are carrying on like some Hollywood celebrity exposed her naughty bits in Playboy in 1989.

You’re really easily titillated too, aren’t you? I mean, wow. The pearl clutching…

DP. Let's all imagine for a second this woman was running as a Republican. There would be hundreds and hundreds of pages of LWNJs calling her a whore and worse. You know it, we all know it. Democrats are utter hypocrites.

Actually that seems like an incredibly unlikely scenario.

You really do lead an active fantasy life, don’t you?

Why do conservatives have such tenuous grips on reality? It’s weird

What seems unlikely? That Democrats would be hurling insults at any Republican woman who behaved as Gibson has? Please. All one has to do is look at the thread about a fully-clothed Lauren Boebert to see her being call all kinds of misogynist slurs. But nice gaslighting!

*checks notes* Boebert, who it is alleged was a prostitute for a time, has been elected to Congress twice. So why is the Republican Party slut-shaming a Democrat for sex work? That seems neither consistent nor strategically wise given outcomes elsewhere.

I've bolded the key word for you. I hope that helps in your completely earnest quest for answers.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/25/politics/fact-check-super-pac-lauren-boebert-escort-abortion-sugar-daddy/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you’re a p*rn star you really can’t complain about that becoming an issue by your political opponents, WTH?

She isn’t a star. She is now notorious but in no world is she a “star.”

She starred in pornography ergo “porn star”

The word “Star” in commonly recognized nomenclature is synonymous with celebrity. She is no celebrity. She has some notoriety now due to the campaign. But you are carrying on like some Hollywood celebrity exposed her naughty bits in Playboy in 1989.

You’re really easily titillated too, aren’t you? I mean, wow. The pearl clutching…

DP. Let's all imagine for a second this woman was running as a Republican. There would be hundreds and hundreds of pages of LWNJs calling her a whore and worse. You know it, we all know it. Democrats are utter hypocrites.

Actually that seems like an incredibly unlikely scenario.

You really do lead an active fantasy life, don’t you?

Why do conservatives have such tenuous grips on reality? It’s weird

What seems unlikely? That Democrats would be hurling insults at any Republican woman who behaved as Gibson has? Please. All one has to do is look at the thread about a fully-clothed Lauren Boebert to see her being call all kinds of misogynist slurs. But nice gaslighting!

*checks notes* Boebert, who it is alleged was a prostitute for a time, has been elected to Congress twice. So why is the Republican Party slut-shaming a Democrat for sex work? That seems neither consistent nor strategically wise given outcomes elsewhere.

Whataboutism is your actual argument?

+1
That's all they have - not only whataboutism, but FAKE whataboutism that has been disproven over and over. It's quite comical, actually.