Do conservatives want to ban transgenderism for the same reasons they want to ban abortion?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have a trans brother who I love, and for whom it absolutely made sense for him to transition at the age of 19. There has never been a more obvious case in the world.

HOWEVER, what it happening today is scary. It's not unreasonable to question the parameters of gender treatment in children. Its a fact that many kids going in for treatment are tween girls on the autism spectrum. I know one, there has never been a single inkling of ANY gender dysphoria, but puberty freaked her out, and now she's on blockers.
The doctors IN CHARGE of transgender care, who are trans themselves, have begun to raise flags on the explosion of treatment. I urge you to read it. https://www.thefp.com/p/top-trans-doctors-blow-the-whistle

Why is this happening? Where did we cross a line into rubber stamping a decision with serious consequences?

In my children's DCPS kindergarten hallway, there is a literal poster with Malcolm Shanks on it in a hair wrap and five o'clock shadow that says, "Everybody has the right to choose their own gender by listening to their own heart and mind. Everyone gets to choose if they are a boy or a girl or neither or something else, and no one gets to choose for them."

I support the trans adults in my life. I acknowledge that being trans is real -- and rare. Introducing a five-year-old to a concept that likens gender to choosing an ice cream scoop is absolute madness.

I think if you've transitioned and there is some question on how you want to be identified, or specifically want people to know your pronouns, put them in a bio. Otherwise, can't we just be safe to assume? This is why people are freaked out. There is zero middle ground.

best summary I have read of what I personally believe is the majority view on this issue

[Anonymous]

^ which = "why can't we be compassionate and also rational"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a trans brother who I love, and for whom it absolutely made sense for him to transition at the age of 19. There has never been a more obvious case in the world.

HOWEVER, what it happening today is scary. It's not unreasonable to question the parameters of gender treatment in children. Its a fact that many kids going in for treatment are tween girls on the autism spectrum. I know one, there has never been a single inkling of ANY gender dysphoria, but puberty freaked her out, and now she's on blockers.
The doctors IN CHARGE of transgender care, who are trans themselves, have begun to raise flags on the explosion of treatment. I urge you to read it. https://www.thefp.com/p/top-trans-doctors-blow-the-whistle

Why is this happening? Where did we cross a line into rubber stamping a decision with serious consequences?

In my children's DCPS kindergarten hallway, there is a literal poster with Malcolm Shanks on it in a hair wrap and five o'clock shadow that says, "Everybody has the right to choose their own gender by listening to their own heart and mind. Everyone gets to choose if they are a boy or a girl or neither or something else, and no one gets to choose for them."

I support the trans adults in my life. I acknowledge that being trans is real -- and rare. Introducing a five-year-old to a concept that likens gender to choosing an ice cream scoop is absolute madness.

I think if you've transitioned and there is some question on how you want to be identified, or specifically want people to know your pronouns, put them in a bio. Otherwise, can't we just be safe to assume? This is why people are freaked out. There is zero middle ground.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable to question, but it is unreasonable to ban. Especially when so much of the “questioning” is not being done in good faith, the data is far from clear, and it is all being done in the media to serve a political purpose now that the GOP dog has caught the abortion car and is getting run over by it.

I, for one, and am sick of debating matters of people’s health and livelihood at gunpoint.

When the “data is far from clear,” procedures that render children sterile or cause lifelong medicalization should be considered to be last-resort treatments. But yet not here.

Medicine hasn’t policed itself and in fact has a terrible history of policing itself (opioid crisis, etc) which is why politics has come into the void. If medicine properly self-policed, none of this would be an issue.

Medicine is more capable of policing itself than the American right wing and that’s a fact. They have done nothing to earn credibility and trust on this issue, and don’t deserve to have a seat at this particular table.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a trans brother who I love, and for whom it absolutely made sense for him to transition at the age of 19. There has never been a more obvious case in the world.

HOWEVER, what it happening today is scary. It's not unreasonable to question the parameters of gender treatment in children. Its a fact that many kids going in for treatment are tween girls on the autism spectrum. I know one, there has never been a single inkling of ANY gender dysphoria, but puberty freaked her out, and now she's on blockers.
The doctors IN CHARGE of transgender care, who are trans themselves, have begun to raise flags on the explosion of treatment. I urge you to read it. https://www.thefp.com/p/top-trans-doctors-blow-the-whistle

Why is this happening? Where did we cross a line into rubber stamping a decision with serious consequences?

In my children's DCPS kindergarten hallway, there is a literal poster with Malcolm Shanks on it in a hair wrap and five o'clock shadow that says, "Everybody has the right to choose their own gender by listening to their own heart and mind. Everyone gets to choose if they are a boy or a girl or neither or something else, and no one gets to choose for them."

I support the trans adults in my life. I acknowledge that being trans is real -- and rare. Introducing a five-year-old to a concept that likens gender to choosing an ice cream scoop is absolute madness.

I think if you've transitioned and there is some question on how you want to be identified, or specifically want people to know your pronouns, put them in a bio. Otherwise, can't we just be safe to assume? This is why people are freaked out. There is zero middle ground.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable to question, but it is unreasonable to ban. Especially when so much of the “questioning” is not being done in good faith, the data is far from clear, and it is all being done in the media to serve a political purpose now that the GOP dog has caught the abortion car and is getting run over by it.

I, for one, and am sick of debating matters of people’s health and livelihood at gunpoint.

When the “data is far from clear,” procedures that render children sterile or cause lifelong medicalization should be considered to be last-resort treatments. But yet not here.

Medicine hasn’t policed itself and in fact has a terrible history of policing itself (opioid crisis, etc) which is why politics has come into the void. If medicine properly self-policed, none of this would be an issue.

+1. This is the eugenics movement of the early 20th century, the Tuskeegee experiments of the 1940s, all back with a big bow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a trans brother who I love, and for whom it absolutely made sense for him to transition at the age of 19. There has never been a more obvious case in the world.

HOWEVER, what it happening today is scary. It's not unreasonable to question the parameters of gender treatment in children. Its a fact that many kids going in for treatment are tween girls on the autism spectrum. I know one, there has never been a single inkling of ANY gender dysphoria, but puberty freaked her out, and now she's on blockers.
The doctors IN CHARGE of transgender care, who are trans themselves, have begun to raise flags on the explosion of treatment. I urge you to read it. https://www.thefp.com/p/top-trans-doctors-blow-the-whistle

Why is this happening? Where did we cross a line into rubber stamping a decision with serious consequences?

In my children's DCPS kindergarten hallway, there is a literal poster with Malcolm Shanks on it in a hair wrap and five o'clock shadow that says, "Everybody has the right to choose their own gender by listening to their own heart and mind. Everyone gets to choose if they are a boy or a girl or neither or something else, and no one gets to choose for them."

I support the trans adults in my life. I acknowledge that being trans is real -- and rare. Introducing a five-year-old to a concept that likens gender to choosing an ice cream scoop is absolute madness.

I think if you've transitioned and there is some question on how you want to be identified, or specifically want people to know your pronouns, put them in a bio. Otherwise, can't we just be safe to assume? This is why people are freaked out. There is zero middle ground.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable to question, but it is unreasonable to ban. Especially when so much of the “questioning” is not being done in good faith, the data is far from clear, and it is all being done in the media to serve a political purpose now that the GOP dog has caught the abortion car and is getting run over by it.

I, for one, and am sick of debating matters of people’s health and livelihood at gunpoint.

When the “data is far from clear,” procedures that render children sterile or cause lifelong medicalization should be considered to be last-resort treatments. But yet not here.

Medicine hasn’t policed itself and in fact has a terrible history of policing itself (opioid crisis, etc) which is why politics has come into the void. If medicine properly self-policed, none of this would be an issue.

Medicine is more capable of policing itself than the American right wing and that’s a fact. They have done nothing to earn credibility and trust on this issue, and don’t deserve to have a seat at this particular table.

Really? That's hilarious. Are you always this gullible?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a trans brother who I love, and for whom it absolutely made sense for him to transition at the age of 19. There has never been a more obvious case in the world.

HOWEVER, what it happening today is scary. It's not unreasonable to question the parameters of gender treatment in children. Its a fact that many kids going in for treatment are tween girls on the autism spectrum. I know one, there has never been a single inkling of ANY gender dysphoria, but puberty freaked her out, and now she's on blockers.
The doctors IN CHARGE of transgender care, who are trans themselves, have begun to raise flags on the explosion of treatment. I urge you to read it. https://www.thefp.com/p/top-trans-doctors-blow-the-whistle

Why is this happening? Where did we cross a line into rubber stamping a decision with serious consequences?

In my children's DCPS kindergarten hallway, there is a literal poster with Malcolm Shanks on it in a hair wrap and five o'clock shadow that says, "Everybody has the right to choose their own gender by listening to their own heart and mind. Everyone gets to choose if they are a boy or a girl or neither or something else, and no one gets to choose for them."

I support the trans adults in my life. I acknowledge that being trans is real -- and rare. Introducing a five-year-old to a concept that likens gender to choosing an ice cream scoop is absolute madness.

I think if you've transitioned and there is some question on how you want to be identified, or specifically want people to know your pronouns, put them in a bio. Otherwise, can't we just be safe to assume? This is why people are freaked out. There is zero middle ground.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable to question, but it is unreasonable to ban. Especially when so much of the “questioning” is not being done in good faith, the data is far from clear, and it is all being done in the media to serve a political purpose now that the GOP dog has caught the abortion car and is getting run over by it.

I, for one, and am sick of debating matters of people’s health and livelihood at gunpoint.

When the “data is far from clear,” procedures that render children sterile or cause lifelong medicalization should be considered to be last-resort treatments. But yet not here.

Medicine hasn’t policed itself and in fact has a terrible history of policing itself (opioid crisis, etc) which is why politics has come into the void. If medicine properly self-policed, none of this would be an issue.

+1. This is the eugenics movement of the early 20th century, the Tuskeegee experiments of the 1940s, all back with a big bow.

Don’t forget that at one point in time, lobotomies were considered life saving medical care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To show you how far things have been pushed some transwomen are attempting to breastfeed their baby despite no studies showing the safety of doing so. Chemical induced secretions produced by a male are in no way comparable to actual breastmilk a mother produces after giving birth. Once again science and safeguarding are ignored and people who point out their concerns on this issue are silenced.

The most completely and utterly insane male supremacist part about this is that breastfeeding mothers struggling with reduced supply have been denied domperidone for DECADES. I know women who had to smuggle it in from Mexico, because it is so tightly regulated and impossible to get in this country and outright illegal in Europe. The rational to denying to women is the safety of the child because random studies show that it could be harmful in a minority of cases.

Yet, the SAME doctors are advocating prescribing this drug to whole entire MEN so they can do what nature never intended the male body to do. The safety of babies is not even mentioned because it’s completely unimportant next to the whims of deeply disturbed men.

And transactivists will have us believe this whole movement is NOT a male supremacist movement to impose the fetishes of sick men at all costs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a trans brother who I love, and for whom it absolutely made sense for him to transition at the age of 19. There has never been a more obvious case in the world.

HOWEVER, what it happening today is scary. It's not unreasonable to question the parameters of gender treatment in children. Its a fact that many kids going in for treatment are tween girls on the autism spectrum. I know one, there has never been a single inkling of ANY gender dysphoria, but puberty freaked her out, and now she's on blockers.
The doctors IN CHARGE of transgender care, who are trans themselves, have begun to raise flags on the explosion of treatment. I urge you to read it. https://www.thefp.com/p/top-trans-doctors-blow-the-whistle

Why is this happening? Where did we cross a line into rubber stamping a decision with serious consequences?

In my children's DCPS kindergarten hallway, there is a literal poster with Malcolm Shanks on it in a hair wrap and five o'clock shadow that says, "Everybody has the right to choose their own gender by listening to their own heart and mind. Everyone gets to choose if they are a boy or a girl or neither or something else, and no one gets to choose for them."

I support the trans adults in my life. I acknowledge that being trans is real -- and rare. Introducing a five-year-old to a concept that likens gender to choosing an ice cream scoop is absolute madness.

I think if you've transitioned and there is some question on how you want to be identified, or specifically want people to know your pronouns, put them in a bio. Otherwise, can't we just be safe to assume? This is why people are freaked out. There is zero middle ground.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable to question, but it is unreasonable to ban. Especially when so much of the “questioning” is not being done in good faith, the data is far from clear, and it is all being done in the media to serve a political purpose now that the GOP dog has caught the abortion car and is getting run over by it.

I, for one, and am sick of debating matters of people’s health and livelihood at gunpoint.

When the “data is far from clear,” procedures that render children sterile or cause lifelong medicalization should be considered to be last-resort treatments. But yet not here.

Medicine hasn’t policed itself and in fact has a terrible history of policing itself (opioid crisis, etc) which is why politics has come into the void. If medicine properly self-policed, none of this would be an issue.

Medicine is more capable of policing itself than the American right wing and that’s a fact. They have done nothing to earn credibility and trust on this issue, and don’t deserve to have a seat at this particular table.

Why are you so certain about the bolded? God knows there is a very long history of failures of medicine to police itself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I used to follow Buck Angel on Twitter. He is a trans man who has been very open about his opposition to some of the new age views on trans gender politics. He is against medical transition for trans youth. Trans adults have always had access to gender affirming care, including surgery. This is nothing new in the U.S. Most of the new trans issues are not about rights or access to healthcare, it's about validation. The new breed (of trans women) are only interested in validation - they NEED women and straight men to see them as women and this is part of the push to be in women's spaces. It's the reason why you don't here much about trans men. in any of these discussion.

Right. Because women are always quieter, less aggressive and often silenced in the discussion.

Funny how that works, isn’t it? Supposedly, transwomen are women and transmen are men. But it’s still the biological males dominating every conversation, getting violent, and forcibly restructuring society around their caprice without a single care for the safety of women, children, anyone. Funny how that Y chromosome and male privilege will always ”shine” through the dense fog of lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To show you how far things have been pushed some transwomen are attempting to breastfeed their baby despite no studies showing the safety of doing so. Chemical induced secretions produced by a male are in no way comparable to actual breastmilk a mother produces after giving birth. Once again science and safeguarding are ignored and people who point out their concerns on this issue are silenced.

The most completely and utterly insane male supremacist part about this is that breastfeeding mothers struggling with reduced supply have been denied domperidone for DECADES. I know women who had to smuggle it in from Mexico, because it is so tightly regulated and impossible to get in this country and outright illegal in Europe. The rational to denying to women is the safety of the child because random studies show that it could be harmful in a minority of cases.

Yet, the SAME doctors are advocating prescribing this drug to whole entire MEN so they can do what nature never intended the male body to do. The safety of babies is not even mentioned because it’s completely unimportant next to the whims of deeply disturbed men.

And transactivists will have us believe this whole movement is NOT a male supremacist movement to impose the fetishes of sick men at all costs.

Exactly. Women who struggle with breastfeeding can’t get this drug, but transwomen who want it for validation get it, with little concern for the health of the baby. It’s disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To show you how far things have been pushed some transwomen are attempting to breastfeed their baby despite no studies showing the safety of doing so. Chemical induced secretions produced by a male are in no way comparable to actual breastmilk a mother produces after giving birth. Once again science and safeguarding are ignored and people who point out their concerns on this issue are silenced.

The most completely and utterly insane male supremacist part about this is that breastfeeding mothers struggling with reduced supply have been denied domperidone for DECADES. I know women who had to smuggle it in from Mexico, because it is so tightly regulated and impossible to get in this country and outright illegal in Europe. The rational to denying to women is the safety of the child because random studies show that it could be harmful in a minority of cases.

Yet, the SAME doctors are advocating prescribing this drug to whole entire MEN so they can do what nature never intended the male body to do. The safety of babies is not even mentioned because it’s completely unimportant next to the whims of deeply disturbed men.

And transactivists will have us believe this whole movement is NOT a male supremacist movement to impose the fetishes of sick men at all costs.

Exactly. Women who struggle with breastfeeding can’t get this drug, but transwomen who want it for validation get it, with little concern for the health of the baby. It’s disgusting.

I literally just sent this page to two different moms of twins I know who were denied Domperidone and had to stop breastfeeding as a result. See, it’s one thing for nasty men to go all out in service of their fetishes. That is how porn-addicted degenerate men behave. But the doctors who go along with this disgusting regime that validates male sexual urges, while actively undermining ACTUAL mothers, deserve to go to prison.

How is a man pulling out all the stops to have a baby suck his nipples NOT a pedophile?

[Anonymous]

Having read this whole thread with my stomach absolutely churning with disgust, I have to say I’m rooting on conservatives to take the senate in 2026 and keep the house so they can end this madness once and for all.

Sterilizing children? Men raping women in prisons? Men forcing their nipples into hungry babies’ mouths? Transgenderism is a danger to civilization.

We need a law banning this circus with stiff criminal penalties for BOTH the doctors and activists immediately.

Before anyone starts carrying on about abortion:

—Roe has already fallen

—Conservatives are backing off a total ban

—Conservatives are moving towards 12-15 weeks, with a rape, incest, and life of the mom exemptions.

I’ll take that compromise on abortion to ensure no confused, autistic girl ever again gets her breasts cut off by a greedy doctor, no female inmate ever again gets raped by a man locked in a cell with her, and no baby ever gets fed whatever toxic, nuclear sludge is oozing from a chemically-altered man’s “breasts.” 🤢

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a trans brother who I love, and for whom it absolutely made sense for him to transition at the age of 19. There has never been a more obvious case in the world.

HOWEVER, what it happening today is scary. It's not unreasonable to question the parameters of gender treatment in children. Its a fact that many kids going in for treatment are tween girls on the autism spectrum. I know one, there has never been a single inkling of ANY gender dysphoria, but puberty freaked her out, and now she's on blockers.
The doctors IN CHARGE of transgender care, who are trans themselves, have begun to raise flags on the explosion of treatment. I urge you to read it. https://www.thefp.com/p/top-trans-doctors-blow-the-whistle

Why is this happening? Where did we cross a line into rubber stamping a decision with serious consequences?

In my children's DCPS kindergarten hallway, there is a literal poster with Malcolm Shanks on it in a hair wrap and five o'clock shadow that says, "Everybody has the right to choose their own gender by listening to their own heart and mind. Everyone gets to choose if they are a boy or a girl or neither or something else, and no one gets to choose for them."

I support the trans adults in my life. I acknowledge that being trans is real -- and rare. Introducing a five-year-old to a concept that likens gender to choosing an ice cream scoop is absolute madness.

I think if you've transitioned and there is some question on how you want to be identified, or specifically want people to know your pronouns, put them in a bio. Otherwise, can't we just be safe to assume? This is why people are freaked out. There is zero middle ground.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable to question, but it is unreasonable to ban. Especially when so much of the “questioning” is not being done in good faith, the data is far from clear, and it is all being done in the media to serve a political purpose now that the GOP dog has caught the abortion car and is getting run over by it.

I, for one, and am sick of debating matters of people’s health and livelihood at gunpoint.

When the “data is far from clear,” procedures that render children sterile or cause lifelong medicalization should be considered to be last-resort treatments. But yet not here.

Medicine hasn’t policed itself and in fact has a terrible history of policing itself (opioid crisis, etc) which is why politics has come into the void. If medicine properly self-policed, none of this would be an issue.

+1. This is the eugenics movement of the early 20th century, the Tuskeegee experiments of the 1940s, all back with a big bow.

Don’t forget that at one point in time, lobotomies were considered life saving medical care.

And they were all non-consensual treatments given without an an analysis of the risks and benefits, just like so-called “conversion therapies” which were the religious treatments of choice for gay/trans people.

You may not be smart enough to understand this, but all drugs and all treatments have side effects. The chemo that stops your slow moving breast cancer today may be planting the seeds for the leukemia that will kill you later. Your lifestyle drug may be contributing to eventual kidney failure.

The data shows that most patients are showing increased well being after being treated. Some people regret their choice. If anything it argues for better screening. But it doesn’t give you the right to substitute your judgment for theirs or their parents’ or doctor’s because someone might regret it. That argument stinks for abortion, and it stinks here too. Just because you have hang ups doesn’t mean they do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a trans brother who I love, and for whom it absolutely made sense for him to transition at the age of 19. There has never been a more obvious case in the world.

HOWEVER, what it happening today is scary. It's not unreasonable to question the parameters of gender treatment in children. Its a fact that many kids going in for treatment are tween girls on the autism spectrum. I know one, there has never been a single inkling of ANY gender dysphoria, but puberty freaked her out, and now she's on blockers.
The doctors IN CHARGE of transgender care, who are trans themselves, have begun to raise flags on the explosion of treatment. I urge you to read it. https://www.thefp.com/p/top-trans-doctors-blow-the-whistle

Why is this happening? Where did we cross a line into rubber stamping a decision with serious consequences?

In my children's DCPS kindergarten hallway, there is a literal poster with Malcolm Shanks on it in a hair wrap and five o'clock shadow that says, "Everybody has the right to choose their own gender by listening to their own heart and mind. Everyone gets to choose if they are a boy or a girl or neither or something else, and no one gets to choose for them."

I support the trans adults in my life. I acknowledge that being trans is real -- and rare. Introducing a five-year-old to a concept that likens gender to choosing an ice cream scoop is absolute madness.

I think if you've transitioned and there is some question on how you want to be identified, or specifically want people to know your pronouns, put them in a bio. Otherwise, can't we just be safe to assume? This is why people are freaked out. There is zero middle ground.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable to question, but it is unreasonable to ban. Especially when so much of the “questioning” is not being done in good faith, the data is far from clear, and it is all being done in the media to serve a political purpose now that the GOP dog has caught the abortion car and is getting run over by it.

I, for one, and am sick of debating matters of people’s health and livelihood at gunpoint.

When the “data is far from clear,” procedures that render children sterile or cause lifelong medicalization should be considered to be last-resort treatments. But yet not here.

Medicine hasn’t policed itself and in fact has a terrible history of policing itself (opioid crisis, etc) which is why politics has come into the void. If medicine properly self-policed, none of this would be an issue.

+1. This is the eugenics movement of the early 20th century, the Tuskeegee experiments of the 1940s, all back with a big bow.

Don’t forget that at one point in time, lobotomies were considered life saving medical care.

And they were all non-consensual treatments given without an an analysis of the risks and benefits, just like so-called “conversion therapies” which were the religious treatments of choice for gay/trans people.

You may not be smart enough to understand this, but all drugs and all treatments have side effects. The chemo that stops your slow moving breast cancer today may be planting the seeds for the leukemia that will kill you later. Your lifestyle drug may be contributing to eventual kidney failure.

The data shows that most patients are showing increased well being after being treated. Some people regret their choice. If anything it argues for better screening. But it doesn’t give you the right to substitute your judgment for theirs or their parents’ or doctor’s because someone might regret it. That argument stinks for abortion, and it stinks here too. Just because you have hang ups doesn’t mean they do.

Folks in this thread doing you the undeserved honor of debating you need to stop. You’re crazy and no one should even pretend to respect anything you’re saying.

We need to stop talking to the people pushing this crazy transgender agenda and just legislate/arrest them into oblivion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To show you how far things have been pushed some transwomen are attempting to breastfeed their baby despite no studies showing the safety of doing so. Chemical induced secretions produced by a male are in no way comparable to actual breastmilk a mother produces after giving birth. Once again science and safeguarding are ignored and people who point out their concerns on this issue are silenced.

The most completely and utterly insane male supremacist part about this is that breastfeeding mothers struggling with reduced supply have been denied domperidone for DECADES. I know women who had to smuggle it in from Mexico, because it is so tightly regulated and impossible to get in this country and outright illegal in Europe. The rational to denying to women is the safety of the child because random studies show that it could be harmful in a minority of cases.

Yet, the SAME doctors are advocating prescribing this drug to whole entire MEN so they can do what nature never intended the male body to do. The safety of babies is not even mentioned because it’s completely unimportant next to the whims of deeply disturbed men.

And transactivists will have us believe this whole movement is NOT a male supremacist movement to impose the fetishes of sick men at all costs.

Exactly. Women who struggle with breastfeeding can’t get this drug, but transwomen who want it for validation get it, with little concern for the health of the baby. It’s disgusting.

I literally just sent this page to two different moms of twins I know who were denied Domperidone and had to stop breastfeeding as a result. See, it’s one thing for nasty men to go all out in service of their fetishes. That is how porn-addicted degenerate men behave. But the doctors who go along with this disgusting regime that validates male sexual urges, while actively undermining ACTUAL mothers, deserve to go to prison.

How is a man pulling out all the stops to have a baby suck his nipples NOT a pedophile?