Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OP, yes. Part of the reason is absolutely a fear that teenagers will be sterilized with transgender surgeries and drugs before they have a chance to develop. And that this will cause a further decline in birth rates. Matt Walsh has repeatedly said on his podcast that he suspects the point of promoting transgenderism to kids is eugenics-- since there is a high rate of comorbidity between mental illness and identifying as gender nonconforming, it's a way for eugenicists to target vulnerable people.
Do you know what percentage of the population identifies as transgender? This is nonsense.
I don't understand your question. I'm answering OP's question and affirming that this is a concern among anti trans surgery advocates. Matt Walsh received the "homophobe of the year" award and therefore qualifies as a leading voice, and he specifically cites eugenics, birthrate, etc in his arguments.
Assuming you are just looking for more clarification, I'll offer that he thinks that pro trans advocates are marketing to kids and we will see increasing rates of trans identification. He also describes trans surgery on children as part of a wider agenda on the left to reduce birth by reducing marriage and birth rates, increase abortion, and then sterilize as many kids as possible through hormones and surgery.