Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ignorance of domestic violence in this thread is staggering. If you want to learn about the cycle of violence and the ways people may shorten aspects of the cycle google it. There are thousands of pieces of education available.

+1. I’m the former pro bono attorney, and it makes my heart ache to see so much misinformation and ignorance about abuse being promoted here. Thieve types of attitudes exhibited here are a big reason why domestic violence is so insidious.

Well, not that's not quite right. DV is insidious, the attitudes here are a reflection of a microcosm of ignorant and ill informed people.

Deliberately so. They aren’t normal. They are idiots reacting to a paid-for, multi-year social media campaign by Depp to destroy his ex. I’m not sad for these posters, they make me sick. And they can’t be reasoned with. I’m so sorry for anyone who suffered DV and reads this thread. The “female survivors who can’t help but support JD because Amber simply isn’t a victim!” can each burn in hell.

Why don’t you burn first!!!!!!!! Biatch

DP. You sound super rational and not at all abusive.

Maybe. Maybe not. Consider it provoking or fighting back against someone who said people who have a different opinion should burn in hell. Interesting how you did not call that poster abusive.

That poster was specifically referring to people who deny the reality of domestic violence in order to blame victims for abuse. If you are not one of those people, the comment wasn’t directed at you. But apparently you felt it was, which says more about you than the other poster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Am I in the minority here for thinking that based on the evidence I saw presented (and I've now watched the entire trial) they BOTH exhibited negative and sometimes abusive behavior and I wouldn't have been able to tolerated EITHER of them?

Like OMG!!!! Did he file suit to establish like who is cooler or behaves more badly!?? Or did he like claim he couldn’t work again because an oped which didn’t name him screwed him more than his own unprofessional behavior?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ignorance of domestic violence in this thread is staggering. If you want to learn about the cycle of violence and the ways people may shorten aspects of the cycle google it. There are thousands of pieces of education available.

+1. I’m the former pro bono attorney, and it makes my heart ache to see so much misinformation and ignorance about abuse being promoted here. Thieve types of attitudes exhibited here are a big reason why domestic violence is so insidious.

Well, not that's not quite right. DV is insidious, the attitudes here are a reflection of a microcosm of ignorant and ill informed people.

Deliberately so. They aren’t normal. They are idiots reacting to a paid-for, multi-year social media campaign by Depp to destroy his ex. I’m not sad for these posters, they make me sick. And they can’t be reasoned with. I’m so sorry for anyone who suffered DV and reads this thread. The “female survivors who can’t help but support JD because Amber simply isn’t a victim!” can each burn in hell.

Why don’t you burn first!!!!!!!! Biatch

DP. You sound super rational and not at all abusive.

Maybe. Maybe not. Consider it provoking or fighting back against someone who said people who have a different opinion should burn in hell. Interesting how you did not call that poster abusive.

That poster was specifically referring to people who deny the reality of domestic violence in order to blame victims for abuse. If you are not one of those people, the comment wasn’t directed at you. But apparently you felt it was, which says more about you than the other poster.

It sure does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I in the minority here for thinking that based on the evidence I saw presented (and I've now watched the entire trial) they BOTH exhibited negative and sometimes abusive behavior and I wouldn't have been able to tolerated EITHER of them?

I'm with you. Can't wait for the circus to leave town.

Same same same. I see no issue if neither of them works again and/or they both lose their suits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Am I in the minority here for thinking that based on the evidence I saw presented (and I've now watched the entire trial) they BOTH exhibited negative and sometimes abusive behavior and I wouldn't have been able to tolerated EITHER of them?

No, you are not in the minority.

[Anonymous]

Nobody is talking about the evidence presented that he patently told his lawyer to go spend a bunch of money to hire bots to destroy public opinion of her and get in the way of her playing in aquaman. And JD directly talked to producers to try to take the job away from her.

That’s bonkers. Who does that? His texts about wanting to absolutely destroy her seem very real. It remains like that’s what this whole trial was about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nobody is talking about the evidence presented that he patently told his lawyer to go spend a bunch of money to hire bots to destroy public opinion of her and get in the way of her playing in aquaman. And JD directly talked to producers to try to take the job away from her.

That’s bonkers. Who does that? His texts about wanting to absolutely destroy her seem very real. It remains like that’s what this whole trial was about.

She ruined his career.

He is hoping to repay the favor.

They are both sad people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you guys believe that he raped her like she says? I tend to think she's telling some truth and he's telling some truth--him maybe more so. I disagree that the jury would have to find for her if they found he verbally or emotionally abused her. The op ed said she was reporting sexual violence. I feel like there is a big difference in being a jackass and throwing things and engaging in mutual combat at times and being an abuser who beats your wife on a monthly rotation and has raped your wife with a glass bottle.

No, I don’t believe her. That’s what’s sad. I want to believe her but after watching the trial, I can’t. I think she was wrong to write the OP-Ed and she’s the one that opened the door to someone wanting to defend themselves. If she wanted to be left alone, she could have done it-easily. But she invited the paparazzi into her life-first when she filed for the TRO and second when she wrote the OP-ed.

And exhibit A. You’re a despicable person. No one “invites paparazzi into their life” - by which you really mean “invites creeps to mock and destroy her online in pathetic service to their fandom for her ex*” by writing an op-ed naming no one or getting a protective order.

I can’t wait for the verdict. AH doesn’t deserve this. Vicious creeps like you will have to find purpose in life.

She invited TMZ to the court house!!! How is that not inviting the paparazzi? She wanted to ruin him for leaving her. She has abandonment issues.

[Anonymous]

I really hope the jury returns a verdict that wrongs both of them. Will that be possible? What’s the outcome to get them to both quit and realize they’re both at fault?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody is talking about the evidence presented that he patently told his lawyer to go spend a bunch of money to hire bots to destroy public opinion of her and get in the way of her playing in aquaman. And JD directly talked to producers to try to take the job away from her.

That’s bonkers. Who does that? His texts about wanting to absolutely destroy her seem very real. It remains like that’s what this whole trial was about.

She ruined his career.

He is hoping to repay the favor.

They are both sad people.

Except she didn't ruin his career, he did that all by himself. Just how many times do you think you can show up hours late to set, hung over and unprepared, before movie studios drop you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody is talking about the evidence presented that he patently told his lawyer to go spend a bunch of money to hire bots to destroy public opinion of her and get in the way of her playing in aquaman. And JD directly talked to producers to try to take the job away from her.

That’s bonkers. Who does that? His texts about wanting to absolutely destroy her seem very real. It remains like that’s what this whole trial was about.

She ruined his career.

He is hoping to repay the favor.

They are both sad people.

Except she didn't ruin his career, he did that all by himself. Just how many times do you think you can show up hours late to set, hung over and unprepared, before movie studios drop you?

That's not the chain of events I gleaned from the trial. I thought she made allegations, then his role got canceled. So he lost $50-$100m.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you guys believe that he raped her like she says? I tend to think she's telling some truth and he's telling some truth--him maybe more so. I disagree that the jury would have to find for her if they found he verbally or emotionally abused her. The op ed said she was reporting sexual violence. I feel like there is a big difference in being a jackass and throwing things and engaging in mutual combat at times and being an abuser who beats your wife on a monthly rotation and has raped your wife with a glass bottle.

No, I don’t believe her. That’s what’s sad. I want to believe her but after watching the trial, I can’t. I think she was wrong to write the OP-Ed and she’s the one that opened the door to someone wanting to defend themselves. If she wanted to be left alone, she could have done it-easily. But she invited the paparazzi into her life-first when she filed for the TRO and second when she wrote the OP-ed.

And exhibit A. You’re a despicable person. No one “invites paparazzi into their life” - by which you really mean “invites creeps to mock and destroy her online in pathetic service to their fandom for her ex*” by writing an op-ed naming no one or getting a protective order.

I can’t wait for the verdict. AH doesn’t deserve this. Vicious creeps like you will have to find purpose in life.

She invited TMZ to the court house!!! How is that not inviting the paparazzi? She wanted to ruin him for leaving her. She has abandonment issues.

Very BPD. Just like filing restraining order, alleging abuse, but then crying and begging him, on tape, to hold her one last time. Cuckoo, cuckoo

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you guys believe that he raped her like she says? I tend to think she's telling some truth and he's telling some truth--him maybe more so. I disagree that the jury would have to find for her if they found he verbally or emotionally abused her. The op ed said she was reporting sexual violence. I feel like there is a big difference in being a jackass and throwing things and engaging in mutual combat at times and being an abuser who beats your wife on a monthly rotation and has raped your wife with a glass bottle.

No, I don’t believe her. That’s what’s sad. I want to believe her but after watching the trial, I can’t. I think she was wrong to write the OP-Ed and she’s the one that opened the door to someone wanting to defend themselves. If she wanted to be left alone, she could have done it-easily. But she invited the paparazzi into her life-first when she filed for the TRO and second when she wrote the OP-ed.

And exhibit A. You’re a despicable person. No one “invites paparazzi into their life” - by which you really mean “invites creeps to mock and destroy her online in pathetic service to their fandom for her ex*” by writing an op-ed naming no one or getting a protective order.

I can’t wait for the verdict. AH doesn’t deserve this. Vicious creeps like you will have to find purpose in life.

She invited TMZ to the court house!!! How is that not inviting the paparazzi? She wanted to ruin him for leaving her. She has abandonment issues.

Very BPD. Just like filing restraining order, alleging abuse, but then crying and begging him, on tape, to hold her one last time. Cuckoo, cuckoo

As a prosecutor I worked with women who still loved men who had molested their children - still grieved the lost relationship and wished their reality was not their reality.

You simply exhibit that you have little experience of family trauma, which is lucky for you I guess except it has left you lacking in empathetic qualities. It is a very common thing for abused spouses to still love and miss the spouse who abused them, because as awful as the abuse was there was also love mixed in and human beings are complex and flawed. Real ones, anyway. Not plastic perfect DCUMford wives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you guys believe that he raped her like she says? I tend to think she's telling some truth and he's telling some truth--him maybe more so. I disagree that the jury would have to find for her if they found he verbally or emotionally abused her. The op ed said she was reporting sexual violence. I feel like there is a big difference in being a jackass and throwing things and engaging in mutual combat at times and being an abuser who beats your wife on a monthly rotation and has raped your wife with a glass bottle.

No, I don’t believe her. That’s what’s sad. I want to believe her but after watching the trial, I can’t. I think she was wrong to write the OP-Ed and she’s the one that opened the door to someone wanting to defend themselves. If she wanted to be left alone, she could have done it-easily. But she invited the paparazzi into her life-first when she filed for the TRO and second when she wrote the OP-ed.

And exhibit A. You’re a despicable person. No one “invites paparazzi into their life” - by which you really mean “invites creeps to mock and destroy her online in pathetic service to their fandom for her ex*” by writing an op-ed naming no one or getting a protective order.

I can’t wait for the verdict. AH doesn’t deserve this. Vicious creeps like you will have to find purpose in life.

She invited TMZ to the court house!!! How is that not inviting the paparazzi? She wanted to ruin him for leaving her. She has abandonment issues.

Very BPD. Just like filing restraining order, alleging abuse, but then crying and begging him, on tape, to hold her one last time. Cuckoo, cuckoo

As a prosecutor I worked with women who still loved men who had molested their children - still grieved the lost relationship and wished their reality was not their reality.

You simply exhibit that you have little experience of family trauma, which is lucky for you I guess except it has left you lacking in empathetic qualities. It is a very common thing for abused spouses to still love and miss the spouse who abused them, because as awful as the abuse was there was also love mixed in and human beings are complex and flawed. Real ones, anyway. Not plastic perfect DCUMford wives.

Except that AH was never that much in love and never truly believed that she would be with JD the rest of her life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you guys believe that he raped her like she says? I tend to think she's telling some truth and he's telling some truth--him maybe more so. I disagree that the jury would have to find for her if they found he verbally or emotionally abused her. The op ed said she was reporting sexual violence. I feel like there is a big difference in being a jackass and throwing things and engaging in mutual combat at times and being an abuser who beats your wife on a monthly rotation and has raped your wife with a glass bottle.

No, I don’t believe her. That’s what’s sad. I want to believe her but after watching the trial, I can’t. I think she was wrong to write the OP-Ed and she’s the one that opened the door to someone wanting to defend themselves. If she wanted to be left alone, she could have done it-easily. But she invited the paparazzi into her life-first when she filed for the TRO and second when she wrote the OP-ed.

And exhibit A. You’re a despicable person. No one “invites paparazzi into their life” - by which you really mean “invites creeps to mock and destroy her online in pathetic service to their fandom for her ex*” by writing an op-ed naming no one or getting a protective order.

I can’t wait for the verdict. AH doesn’t deserve this. Vicious creeps like you will have to find purpose in life.

She invited TMZ to the court house!!! How is that not inviting the paparazzi? She wanted to ruin him for leaving her. She has abandonment issues.

Very BPD. Just like filing restraining order, alleging abuse, but then crying and begging him, on tape, to hold her one last time. Cuckoo, cuckoo

As a prosecutor I worked with women who still loved men who had molested their children - still grieved the lost relationship and wished their reality was not their reality.

You simply exhibit that you have little experience of family trauma, which is lucky for you I guess except it has left you lacking in empathetic qualities. It is a very common thing for abused spouses to still love and miss the spouse who abused them, because as awful as the abuse was there was also love mixed in and human beings are complex and flawed. Real ones, anyway. Not plastic perfect DCUMford wives.

Except that AH was never that much in love and never truly believed that she would be with JD the rest of her life.

Yassss of course you know her emotions! It’s so sad he didn’t meet you, I’m sure you’d have gone the distance with Johnny the Crackhead Alcoholic.