Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody is talking about the evidence presented that he patently told his lawyer to go spend a bunch of money to hire bots to destroy public opinion of her and get in the way of her playing in aquaman. And JD directly talked to producers to try to take the job away from her.

That’s bonkers. Who does that? His texts about wanting to absolutely destroy her seem very real. It remains like that’s what this whole trial was about.

She ruined his career.

He is hoping to repay the favor.

They are both sad people.

Hahaha, no, HE ruined his career. It's pretty telling that the only role he could find recently was basically playing his crazy self as a pirate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you guys believe that he raped her like she says? I tend to think she's telling some truth and he's telling some truth--him maybe more so. I disagree that the jury would have to find for her if they found he verbally or emotionally abused her. The op ed said she was reporting sexual violence. I feel like there is a big difference in being a jackass and throwing things and engaging in mutual combat at times and being an abuser who beats your wife on a monthly rotation and has raped your wife with a glass bottle.

No, I don’t believe her. That’s what’s sad. I want to believe her but after watching the trial, I can’t. I think she was wrong to write the OP-Ed and she’s the one that opened the door to someone wanting to defend themselves. If she wanted to be left alone, she could have done it-easily. But she invited the paparazzi into her life-first when she filed for the TRO and second when she wrote the OP-ed.

And exhibit A. You’re a despicable person. No one “invites paparazzi into their life” - by which you really mean “invites creeps to mock and destroy her online in pathetic service to their fandom for her ex*” by writing an op-ed naming no one or getting a protective order.

I can’t wait for the verdict. AH doesn’t deserve this. Vicious creeps like you will have to find purpose in life.

She invited TMZ to the court house!!! How is that not inviting the paparazzi? She wanted to ruin him for leaving her. She has abandonment issues.

Very BPD. Just like filing restraining order, alleging abuse, but then crying and begging him, on tape, to hold her one last time. Cuckoo, cuckoo

As a prosecutor I worked with women who still loved men who had molested their children - still grieved the lost relationship and wished their reality was not their reality.

You simply exhibit that you have little experience of family trauma, which is lucky for you I guess except it has left you lacking in empathetic qualities. It is a very common thing for abused spouses to still love and miss the spouse who abused them, because as awful as the abuse was there was also love mixed in and human beings are complex and flawed. Real ones, anyway. Not plastic perfect DCUMford wives.

Except that AH was never that much in love and never truly believed that she would be with JD the rest of her life.

Yassss of course you know her emotions! It’s so sad he didn’t meet you, I’m sure you’d have gone the distance with Johnny the Crackhead Alcoholic.

Haha exactly! Who here wants to date JD next? Good luck! Charge that iphone up so your camera is at the ready when you need it.

[Anonymous]

It’s so obvious that they are both abusive and to blame.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s so obvious that they are both abusive and to blame.

This seems obvious to me too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you guys believe that he raped her like she says? I tend to think she's telling some truth and he's telling some truth--him maybe more so. I disagree that the jury would have to find for her if they found he verbally or emotionally abused her. The op ed said she was reporting sexual violence. I feel like there is a big difference in being a jackass and throwing things and engaging in mutual combat at times and being an abuser who beats your wife on a monthly rotation and has raped your wife with a glass bottle.

No, I don’t believe her. That’s what’s sad. I want to believe her but after watching the trial, I can’t. I think she was wrong to write the OP-Ed and she’s the one that opened the door to someone wanting to defend themselves. If she wanted to be left alone, she could have done it-easily. But she invited the paparazzi into her life-first when she filed for the TRO and second when she wrote the OP-ed.

And exhibit A. You’re a despicable person. No one “invites paparazzi into their life” - by which you really mean “invites creeps to mock and destroy her online in pathetic service to their fandom for her ex*” by writing an op-ed naming no one or getting a protective order.

I can’t wait for the verdict. AH doesn’t deserve this. Vicious creeps like you will have to find purpose in life.

She invited TMZ to the court house!!! How is that not inviting the paparazzi? She wanted to ruin him for leaving her. She has abandonment issues.

Very BPD. Just like filing restraining order, alleging abuse, but then crying and begging him, on tape, to hold her one last time. Cuckoo, cuckoo

As a prosecutor I worked with women who still loved men who had molested their children - still grieved the lost relationship and wished their reality was not their reality.

You simply exhibit that you have little experience of family trauma, which is lucky for you I guess except it has left you lacking in empathetic qualities. It is a very common thing for abused spouses to still love and miss the spouse who abused them, because as awful as the abuse was there was also love mixed in and human beings are complex and flawed. Real ones, anyway. Not plastic perfect DCUMford wives.

Except that AH was never that much in love and never truly believed that she would be with JD the rest of her life.

Yassss of course you know her emotions! It’s so sad he didn’t meet you, I’m sure you’d have gone the distance with Johnny the Crackhead Alcoholic.

You're the one who talked about "spouses who still love and miss the spouse who abused them", so what's your point exactly if there's no way of knowing AH's emotions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s so obvious that they are both abusive and to blame.

Perhaps. But to say she is a survivor of sexual assault is too far for me to believe. She claims to be raped with a broken bottle and was bleeding for her vagina but she never went to a hospital or a doctor?

But I also don’t believe that she was beaten.

[Anonymous]

Again, stop with the name calling. It’s mean doesn’t help. It diminishes your arguments (if you care).

[Anonymous]

One outcome is that they both could be found guilty of defamation but no damages awarded. I think that’s unlikely but it could happen. More likely, I think there will be no guilty verdict in either the suit or counter suit.

The standard of legal defamation is quite high and it’s not clear either side met all the criteria.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you guys believe that he raped her like she says? I tend to think she's telling some truth and he's telling some truth--him maybe more so. I disagree that the jury would have to find for her if they found he verbally or emotionally abused her. The op ed said she was reporting sexual violence. I feel like there is a big difference in being a jackass and throwing things and engaging in mutual combat at times and being an abuser who beats your wife on a monthly rotation and has raped your wife with a glass bottle.

No, I don’t believe her. That’s what’s sad. I want to believe her but after watching the trial, I can’t. I think she was wrong to write the OP-Ed and she’s the one that opened the door to someone wanting to defend themselves. If she wanted to be left alone, she could have done it-easily. But she invited the paparazzi into her life-first when she filed for the TRO and second when she wrote the OP-ed.

Again, her filing a TrO and posting the OpEd never negated the fact that he was a nightmare to live with and probably engaged in some sort of abusive behavior towards her. Which is literally all that is in question in this trial. Why are people so easily distracted.

Well the Op ed said that she spoke up against sexual violence, not just some sort of abusive behavior

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you guys believe that he raped her like she says? I tend to think she's telling some truth and he's telling some truth--him maybe more so. I disagree that the jury would have to find for her if they found he verbally or emotionally abused her. The op ed said she was reporting sexual violence. I feel like there is a big difference in being a jackass and throwing things and engaging in mutual combat at times and being an abuser who beats your wife on a monthly rotation and has raped your wife with a glass bottle.

No, I don’t believe her. That’s what’s sad. I want to believe her but after watching the trial, I can’t. I think she was wrong to write the OP-Ed and she’s the one that opened the door to someone wanting to defend themselves. If she wanted to be left alone, she could have done it-easily. But she invited the paparazzi into her life-first when she filed for the TRO and second when she wrote the OP-ed.

And exhibit A. You’re a despicable person. No one “invites paparazzi into their life” - by which you really mean “invites creeps to mock and destroy her online in pathetic service to their fandom for her ex*” by writing an op-ed naming no one or getting a protective order.

I can’t wait for the verdict. AH doesn’t deserve this. Vicious creeps like you will have to find purpose in life.

She invited TMZ to the court house!!! How is that not inviting the paparazzi? She wanted to ruin him for leaving her. She has abandonment issues.

Very BPD. Just like filing restraining order, alleging abuse, but then crying and begging him, on tape, to hold her one last time. Cuckoo, cuckoo

As a prosecutor I worked with women who still loved men who had molested their children - still grieved the lost relationship and wished their reality was not their reality.

You simply exhibit that you have little experience of family trauma, which is lucky for you I guess except it has left you lacking in empathetic qualities. It is a very common thing for abused spouses to still love and miss the spouse who abused them, because as awful as the abuse was there was also love mixed in and human beings are complex and flawed. Real ones, anyway. Not plastic perfect DCUMford wives.

Except that AH was never that much in love and never truly believed that she would be with JD the rest of her life.

Yassss of course you know her emotions! It’s so sad he didn’t meet you, I’m sure you’d have gone the distance with Johnny the Crackhead Alcoholic.

I’m not the poster you are insulting here, but you sound crazy and just…not bright. Try using calm logic and facts in debate and people will respect you and be more likely to consider your point of view. Ranting and incoherent leaps and accusations that anyone who disagrees with you wants to date Johnny Depp is childish and makes you sound overly emotional and kind of stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you guys believe that he raped her like she says? I tend to think she's telling some truth and he's telling some truth--him maybe more so. I disagree that the jury would have to find for her if they found he verbally or emotionally abused her. The op ed said she was reporting sexual violence. I feel like there is a big difference in being a jackass and throwing things and engaging in mutual combat at times and being an abuser who beats your wife on a monthly rotation and has raped your wife with a glass bottle.

No, I don’t believe her. That’s what’s sad. I want to believe her but after watching the trial, I can’t. I think she was wrong to write the OP-Ed and she’s the one that opened the door to someone wanting to defend themselves. If she wanted to be left alone, she could have done it-easily. But she invited the paparazzi into her life-first when she filed for the TRO and second when she wrote the OP-ed.

And exhibit A. You’re a despicable person. No one “invites paparazzi into their life” - by which you really mean “invites creeps to mock and destroy her online in pathetic service to their fandom for her ex*” by writing an op-ed naming no one or getting a protective order.

I can’t wait for the verdict. AH doesn’t deserve this. Vicious creeps like you will have to find purpose in life.

She literally invited tmz to the courthouse

And leaked a video to TMZ...after editing out the parts that made her look bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you guys believe that he raped her like she says? I tend to think she's telling some truth and he's telling some truth--him maybe more so. I disagree that the jury would have to find for her if they found he verbally or emotionally abused her. The op ed said she was reporting sexual violence. I feel like there is a big difference in being a jackass and throwing things and engaging in mutual combat at times and being an abuser who beats your wife on a monthly rotation and has raped your wife with a glass bottle.

No, I don’t believe her. That’s what’s sad. I want to believe her but after watching the trial, I can’t. I think she was wrong to write the OP-Ed and she’s the one that opened the door to someone wanting to defend themselves. If she wanted to be left alone, she could have done it-easily. But she invited the paparazzi into her life-first when she filed for the TRO and second when she wrote the OP-ed.

And exhibit A. You’re a despicable person. No one “invites paparazzi into their life” - by which you really mean “invites creeps to mock and destroy her online in pathetic service to their fandom for her ex*” by writing an op-ed naming no one or getting a protective order.

I can’t wait for the verdict. AH doesn’t deserve this. Vicious creeps like you will have to find purpose in life.

The verdict doesn’t really matter. If Depp wins he knows she doesn’t have 50 million and never will and she probably won’t win either. I imagine they both walk away with nothing but Johnny Depp got what he wanted. She’ll never work again and is publicly disliked.

I hope JD never works again. His texts alone make him so vile that I’ll never watch a movie he’s in. And the images I have when I think of him now are him passed out in his own piss. Disgusting.

The texts do not mention any violence that was done toward her. Verbally venting your extreme anger to a friend is actually better than actually doing it like her hitting him and throwing things to injure his finger

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody is talking about the evidence presented that he patently told his lawyer to go spend a bunch of money to hire bots to destroy public opinion of her and get in the way of her playing in aquaman. And JD directly talked to producers to try to take the job away from her.

That’s bonkers. Who does that? His texts about wanting to absolutely destroy her seem very real. It remains like that’s what this whole trial was about.

She ruined his career.

He is hoping to repay the favor.

They are both sad people.

Except she didn't ruin his career, he did that all by himself. Just how many times do you think you can show up hours late to set, hung over and unprepared, before movie studios drop you?

Even if that’s why they dropped him he could arguably claim he had these problems in part because of the abuse he suffered at her hands and turned to drinking and drugs to self medicate during an abusive situation. She was doing drugs too during the relationship which can’t be helpful to an addict to be around another drug user.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody is talking about the evidence presented that he patently told his lawyer to go spend a bunch of money to hire bots to destroy public opinion of her and get in the way of her playing in aquaman. And JD directly talked to producers to try to take the job away from her.

That’s bonkers. Who does that? His texts about wanting to absolutely destroy her seem very real. It remains like that’s what this whole trial was about.

She ruined his career.

He is hoping to repay the favor.

They are both sad people.

Except she didn't ruin his career, he did that all by himself. Just how many times do you think you can show up hours late to set, hung over and unprepared, before movie studios drop you?

That's not the chain of events I gleaned from the trial. I thought she made allegations, then his role got canceled. So he lost $50-$100m.

DP. Then I guess you didn’t follow the trial all that much. There was plenty of evidence introduced of how his drinking and drug use disrupted production on past films. On the last Pirates film, the studio had someone tasked with monitoring him each day for when he finally woke up in the morning to then start preparing for the day’s filming so they didn’t pay everyone for hours just standing around on set waiting for him to show. Not only does the at drive up the production budget, but it very likely made him increasingly difficult to insure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody is talking about the evidence presented that he patently told his lawyer to go spend a bunch of money to hire bots to destroy public opinion of her and get in the way of her playing in aquaman. And JD directly talked to producers to try to take the job away from her.

That’s bonkers. Who does that? His texts about wanting to absolutely destroy her seem very real. It remains like that’s what this whole trial was about.

She ruined his career.

He is hoping to repay the favor.

They are both sad people.

Except she didn't ruin his career, he did that all by himself. Just how many times do you think you can show up hours late to set, hung over and unprepared, before movie studios drop you?

And he sure didn't ruin hers. We have the head honcho from WB testifying that they wanted to let her go because she got no chemistry with Jason Momoa, not because Johnny stepped in. Comparing her career trajectory with that of Jason or Gal Gadot was laughable