Senate Democrats sending secret letter about Kavanaugh to FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She isn’t even alleging that he did anything sexual. He put his and on her mouth. Ok? How is that sexual? Was he *thinking* about sex at the time? Did he have his penis out and chase her around with it? Seems like we are clutching our pearls over nothing.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/a-sexual-misconduct-allegation-against-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaugh-stirs-tension-among-democrats-in-congress

The woman, who has asked not to be identified, first approached Democratic lawmakers in July, shortly after Trump nominated Kavanaugh. The allegation dates back to the early nineteen-eighties, when Kavanaugh was a high-school student at Georgetown Preparatory School, in Bethesda, Maryland, and the woman attended a nearby high school. In the letter, the woman alleged that, during an encounter at a party, Kavanaugh held her down, and that he attempted to force himself on her. She claimed in the letter that Kavanaugh and a classmate of his, both of whom had been drinking, turned up music that was playing in the room to conceal the sound of her protests, and that Kavanaugh covered her mouth with his hand. She was able to free herself. Although the alleged incident took place decades ago and the three individuals involved were minors, the woman said that the memory had been a source of ongoing distress for her, and that she had sought psychological treatment as a result.

How is it sexual? He tossed some girl on a bed? Ok? Did he try to take her panties off? No? Did he whip his unit out of his pants? No? Did he say “I am preparing to rape you, ma’am!” No? So what are we basing this on? Some sloppy wrestling session at a drunken teenage party?

It's such a puzzle why women are abandoning the Republican party. I have such a hard time figuring it out.

You’d prefer we just go back to the sexual mores of Victorian England or puritan Massachusetts, right?

?

[Anonymous]

Kavanaugh tried to rape a girl. He did not succeed. GOP is bent upon confirming him without releasing all his record. Why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She isn’t even alleging that he did anything sexual. He put his and on her mouth. Ok? How is that sexual? Was he *thinking* about sex at the time? Did he have his penis out and chase her around with it? Seems like we are clutching our pearls over nothing.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/a-sexual-misconduct-allegation-against-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaugh-stirs-tension-among-democrats-in-congress

The woman, who has asked not to be identified, first approached Democratic lawmakers in July, shortly after Trump nominated Kavanaugh. The allegation dates back to the early nineteen-eighties, when Kavanaugh was a high-school student at Georgetown Preparatory School, in Bethesda, Maryland, and the woman attended a nearby high school. In the letter, the woman alleged that, during an encounter at a party, Kavanaugh held her down, and that he attempted to force himself on her. She claimed in the letter that Kavanaugh and a classmate of his, both of whom had been drinking, turned up music that was playing in the room to conceal the sound of her protests, and that Kavanaugh covered her mouth with his hand. She was able to free herself. Although the alleged incident took place decades ago and the three individuals involved were minors, the woman said that the memory had been a source of ongoing distress for her, and that she had sought psychological treatment as a result.

How is it sexual? He tossed some girl on a bed? Ok? Did he try to take her panties off? No? Did he whip his unit out of his pants? No? Did he say “I am preparing to rape you, ma’am!” No? So what are we basing this on? Some sloppy wrestling session at a drunken teenage party?

Oh my god are you kidding me?

[Anonymous]

When I was 15, I was standing in the hall, leaning against my locker, when this boy I didn't know (but whose name I knew) came down the stairs, walked right up to me, and kissed me. Just like that....out of the blue.

If he ever decides to run for public office, oh boy.....trouble!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The women who signed that letter should be ashamed of themselves.

Why? Because they are willing to put out their names publicly in support of an honorable man?
Contrast that with some woman who anonymously makes a charge for which there is no proof or evidence.

[Anonymous]

Chuck Grassley releasing letter from 65 women is the from the playbook of misogyny to parade other women who were not assaulted by a sexual assaulter to discredit an accuser. No wonder the woman does not want to come forward. She knows very well what a hell her life be.

An assaulter does not assault every single woman they come to cross his path. Why are the 65 women relevant?

Also, didn't Kavanaugh go to Georgetown prep, an all-boys school?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh tried to rape a girl. He did not succeed. GOP is bent upon confirming him without releasing all his record. Why?

You are f’ing kidding me.
I hope you are never accused by some anonymous person of some “incident” that didn’t happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She isn’t even alleging that he did anything sexual. He put his and on her mouth. Ok? How is that sexual? Was he *thinking* about sex at the time? Did he have his penis out and chase her around with it? Seems like we are clutching our pearls over nothing.

If this is your take on it, my assumption is that you have some horrible boundaries around consent and you have probably done worse. Holy crap.

“Kavanaugh held her down, and that he attempted to force himself on her. She claimed in the letter that Kavanaugh and a classmate of his, both of whom had been drinking, turned up music that was playing in the room to conceal the sound of her protests, and that Kavanaugh covered her mouth with his hand. She was able to free herself.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Chuck Grassley releasing letter from 65 women is the from the playbook of misogyny to parade other women who were not assaulted by a sexual assaulter to discredit an accuser. No wonder the woman does not want to come forward. She knows very well what a hell her life be.

An assaulter does not assault every single woman they come to cross his path. Why are the 65 women relevant?

Also, didn't Kavanaugh go to Georgetown prep, an all-boys school?

You didn’t read the letter, otherwise you would know the answer to your question.
No - the letter was written by these women because they see the dirty methods of the left to smear a man who is nothing but honorable.
If the accuser wants to be taken seriously, she can come forward and tell her story. But, she won’t. Because, it didn’t happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh tried to rape a girl. He did not succeed. GOP is bent upon confirming him without releasing all his record. Why?

You are f’ing kidding me.
I hope you are never accused by some anonymous person of some “incident” that didn’t happen.

Why are you afraid of your records being public, if nothing happened?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The women who signed that letter should be ashamed of themselves.

Why? Because they are willing to put out their names publicly in support of an honorable man?
Contrast that with some woman who anonymously makes a charge for which there is no proof or evidence.

She said she sought psycological help in dealing with it. Lets see what the psychologist says.

[Anonymous]

My guess is she remains anonymous because she has credibility issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh tried to rape a girl. He did not succeed. GOP is bent upon confirming him without releasing all his record. Why?

You are f’ing kidding me.
I hope you are never accused by some anonymous person of some “incident” that didn’t happen.

Why are you afraid of your records being public, if nothing happened?

Why doesn’t this so-called “victim” come forward if this really happened?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My guess is she remains anonymous because she has credibility issues.

Or she doesn’t want crazy conservatives stalking her and threatening to kill and rape her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Chuck Grassley releasing letter from 65 women is the from the playbook of misogyny to parade other women who were not assaulted by a sexual assaulter to discredit an accuser. No wonder the woman does not want to come forward. She knows very well what a hell her life be.

An assaulter does not assault every single woman they come to cross his path. Why are the 65 women relevant?

Also, didn't Kavanaugh go to Georgetown prep, an all-boys school?

Check out the Holton-Arms 1983 yearbook - lots of pictures of parties with GP and Landon boys https://issuu.com/holtonarmsschool/docs/1983.compressed