Senate Democrats sending secret letter about Kavanaugh to FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh tried to rape a girl. He did not succeed. GOP is bent upon confirming him without releasing all his record. Why?

You are f’ing kidding me.
I hope you are never accused by some anonymous person of some “incident” that didn’t happen.

Why are you afraid of your records being public, if nothing happened?

Why doesn’t this so-called “victim” come forward if this really happened?

Based on this thread alone, I'd says she has a credible fear of being smeared by angry psychotic RWNJs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh tried to rape a girl. He did not succeed. GOP is bent upon confirming him without releasing all his record. Why?

You are f’ing kidding me.
I hope you are never accused by some anonymous person of some “incident” that didn’t happen.

Why are you afraid of your records being public, if nothing happened?

Why doesn’t this so-called “victim” come forward if this really happened?

Based on this thread alone, I'd says she has a credible fear of being smeared by angry psychotic RWNJs.

+1, look no further than this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chuck Grassley releasing letter from 65 women is the from the playbook of misogyny to parade other women who were not assaulted by a sexual assaulter to discredit an accuser. No wonder the woman does not want to come forward. She knows very well what a hell her life be.

An assaulter does not assault every single woman they come to cross his path. Why are the 65 women relevant?

Also, didn't Kavanaugh go to Georgetown prep, an all-boys school?

You didn’t read the letter, otherwise you would know the answer to your question.
No - the letter was written by these women because they see the dirty methods of the left to smear a man who is nothing but honorable.
If the accuser wants to be taken seriously, she can come forward and tell her story. But, she won’t. Because, it didn’t happen.

Perjury and gambling debts are now honorable? My goodness, how fall the GOP has fallen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chuck Grassley releasing letter from 65 women is the from the playbook of misogyny to parade other women who were not assaulted by a sexual assaulter to discredit an accuser. No wonder the woman does not want to come forward. She knows very well what a hell her life be.

An assaulter does not assault every single woman they come to cross his path. Why are the 65 women relevant?

Also, didn't Kavanaugh go to Georgetown prep, an all-boys school?

You didn’t read the letter, otherwise you would know the answer to your question.
No - the letter was written by these women because they see the dirty methods of the left to smear a man who is nothing but honorable.
If the accuser wants to be taken seriously, she can come forward and tell her story. But, she won’t. Because, it didn’t happen.

Perjury and gambling debts are now honorable? My goodness, how fall the GOP has fallen.

The only one lying here is you, pp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sen Grassley released a letter from 65 women who knew Kavanaugh in high school (showing Rs knew about this high-school rape allegation.) These women say Kavanaugh “behaved honorably and treated women with respect.”

So clearly the GOP, probably because Kavanaugh disclosed it during his internal vetting process, knew about this and prepared by getting these signatures, because there is no way that happened over the last 18 hours.

well as long as he didn't rape 65 women i guess we're cool with the allegations he assaulted one then

and yeah - that's a great point that the gop must have known this was coming

A tweet from one woman........

https://twitter.com/virginiahume/status/1040631218092625921


@virginiahume
Follow Follow @virginiahume
More
virginiahume Retweeted John Rogers
This is absurd. I signed the letter. I learned of it last night.

(In response to this tweet...."This. Regardless of how all this falls out, the fact Grassley had a list of 65 women from Kavanaugh's high school as character witnesses LINED UP is literally the biggest, dumbest tell that they knew this was coming down the pike. Even wait until Monday, for chrissake.)

Brit Hume's daughter - ya that's an independent voice.

[Anonymous]

I sincerely doubt that a man who went to a small all boys high school 30+ years ago would even know 65 women who knew him then well enough to testify to his credibility then or now.

[Anonymous]

You know, it is kinda unusual for the Senate to preemptively release a letter from all the women a supreme court nominee didn't assault...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh tried to rape a girl. He did not succeed. GOP is bent upon confirming him without releasing all his record. Why?

Allegedly, according to an anonymous accuser.

[Anonymous]

The people in this thread suggesting that what Kavanaugh is accused of doing is fine because he didn't actual penetrate the accuser, is beyond disgusting and absurd. But then again, these are probably the same people who 1) wanted Al Franken's head on a platter and 2) though Roy Moore was fine because he was allegedly only *courting* 14 year olds and touching them over their underwear, not trying to have sex with them!

This allegation is but one thing in a now-growing list of reasons why this nominee needs to be looked into further before he is confirmed. Every single conservative/republican on this thread knows that if these issues had arisen for a SCOTUS (or ANY) nominee from a Democrat president that every GOP elected and republican citizen would be up in arms demanding these things be cleared up. To suggest otherwise is pathological.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My guess is she remains anonymous because she has credibility issues.

Your guess is uneducated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The women who signed that letter should be ashamed of themselves.

Why? Because they are willing to put out their names publicly in support of an honorable man?
Contrast that with some woman who anonymously makes a charge for which there is no proof or evidence.

She said she sought psycological help in dealing with it. Lets see what the psychologist says.

Great, so now we are listening to a *mentally-deranged* anonymous accuser.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My guess is she remains anonymous because she has credibility issues.

Or she doesn’t want crazy conservatives stalking her and threatening to kill and rape her.

Oh please. Liberal celebrities would be throwing her a Macy’s-sized parade if she successfully blocked Kavenaugh’s confirmation. She would get millions in sweetheart book deals. No way she wouldn’t be trying to cash out on this if she knew she’d be believable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The people in this thread suggesting that what Kavanaugh is accused of doing is fine because he didn't actual penetrate the accuser, is beyond disgusting and absurd. But then again, these are probably the same people who 1) wanted Al Franken's head on a platter and 2) though Roy Moore was fine because he was allegedly only *courting* 14 year olds and touching them over their underwear, not trying to have sex with them!

This allegation is but one thing in a now-growing list of reasons why this nominee needs to be looked into further before he is confirmed. Every single conservative/republican on this thread knows that if these issues had arisen for a SCOTUS (or ANY) nominee from a Democrat president that every GOP elected and republican citizen would be up in arms demanding these things be cleared up. To suggest otherwise is pathological.

A thousand times yes to this

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The people in this thread suggesting that what Kavanaugh is accused of doing is fine because he didn't actual penetrate the accuser, is beyond disgusting and absurd. But then again, these are probably the same people who 1) wanted Al Franken's head on a platter and 2) though Roy Moore was fine because he was allegedly only *courting* 14 year olds and touching them over their underwear, not trying to have sex with them!

This allegation is but one thing in a now-growing list of reasons why this nominee needs to be looked into further before he is confirmed. Every single conservative/republican on this thread knows that if these issues had arisen for a SCOTUS (or ANY) nominee from a Democrat president that every GOP elected and republican citizen would be up in arms demanding these things be cleared up. To suggest otherwise is pathological.

He didn’t even allegedly “attempt” to penetrate her. So what is he alleged to have done? Made some girl feel uncomfortable?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sen Grassley released a letter from 65 women who knew Kavanaugh in high school (showing Rs knew about this high-school rape allegation.) These women say Kavanaugh “behaved honorably and treated women with respect.”

So clearly the GOP, probably because Kavanaugh disclosed it during his internal vetting process, knew about this and prepared by getting these signatures, because there is no way that happened over the last 18 hours.

well as long as he didn't rape 65 women i guess we're cool with the allegations he assaulted one then

and yeah - that's a great point that the gop must have known this was coming

A tweet from one woman........

https://twitter.com/virginiahume/status/1040631218092625921


@virginiahume
Follow Follow @virginiahume
More
virginiahume Retweeted John Rogers
This is absurd. I signed the letter. I learned of it last night.

(In response to this tweet...."This. Regardless of how all this falls out, the fact Grassley had a list of 65 women from Kavanaugh's high school as character witnesses LINED UP is literally the biggest, dumbest tell that they knew this was coming down the pike. Even wait until Monday, for chrissake.)

Brit Hume's daughter