Senate Democrats sending secret letter about Kavanaugh to FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was Feinstein hiding this for three months?

Because she isn’t find this story credible.

*doesn't

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was Feinstein hiding this for three months?

Because she isn’t find this story credible.

I agree ...... and because she came under fire from the left for not being aggressive enough during the hearings, she felt the need to surface this accusation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was Feinstein hiding this for three months?

Because she isn’t find this story credible.

I agree ...... and because she came under fire from the left for not being aggressive enough during the hearings, she felt the need to surface this accusation.

Enough with the trolls, she was trying to balance the woman’s desire to retain anonymity with the public interest in the allegation being investigated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was Feinstein hiding this for three months?

Because she isn’t find this story credible.

I agree ...... and because she came under fire from the left for not being aggressive enough during the hearings, she felt the need to surface this accusation.

Enough with the trolls, she was trying to balance the woman’s desire to retain anonymity with the public interest in the allegation being investigated.

Nice try. She could have redacted her name back in July when she received this information like she did a couple of days ago - but she didn’t.
Seems as if she thought this was a nothing burger from the start. Now, she looks more like an obstructionist than anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was Feinstein hiding this for three months?

Because she isn’t find this story credible.

I agree ...... and because she came under fire from the left for not being aggressive enough during the hearings, she felt the need to surface this accusation.

Enough with the trolls, she was trying to balance the woman’s desire to retain anonymity with the public interest in the allegation being investigated.

Nice try. She could have redacted her name back in July when she received this information like she did a couple of days ago - but she didn’t.
Seems as if she thought this was a nothing burger from the start. Now, she looks more like an obstructionist than anything.

I would not be surprised if the woman who alleges the incident is identified this coming week and there is an attempt by Democrats to have her appear as a witness before a final vote.

If she refuses to be identified and cross examined, it will not delay a vote to confirm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was Feinstein hiding this for three months?

Because she isn’t find this story credible.

I agree ...... and because she came under fire from the left for not being aggressive enough during the hearings, she felt the need to surface this accusation.

Enough with the trolls, she was trying to balance the woman’s desire to retain anonymity with the public interest in the allegation being investigated.

And this took 2 months?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was Feinstein hiding this for three months?

Because she isn’t find this story credible.

I agree ...... and because she came under fire from the left for not being aggressive enough during the hearings, she felt the need to surface this accusation.

Enough with the trolls, she was trying to balance the woman’s desire to retain anonymity with the public interest in the allegation being investigated.

And this took 2 months?

And why didn't she ask Kavanaugh about it in her private sessions with him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was Feinstein hiding this for three months?

Because she isn’t find this story credible.

I agree ...... and because she came under fire from the left for not being aggressive enough during the hearings, she felt the need to surface this accusation.

Enough with the trolls, she was trying to balance the woman’s desire to retain anonymity with the public interest in the allegation being investigated.

And this took 2 months?

And why didn't she ask Kavanaugh about it in her private sessions with him?

(raises hand)
Because she didn’t find the claim credible and/or worthy of investigation or reporting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was Feinstein hiding this for three months?

Because she isn’t find this story credible.

I agree ...... and because she came under fire from the left for not being aggressive enough during the hearings, she felt the need to surface this accusation.

Enough with the trolls, she was trying to balance the woman’s desire to retain anonymity with the public interest in the allegation being investigated.

And this took 2 months?

And why didn't she ask Kavanaugh about it in her private sessions with him?

Duh, same reason, plus,he has demonstrated an aversion to being truthful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[vimeo]k

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An anonymous accusation is not the same as credible. You get that, right?

FBI rolls eyes, says whatever and tucks claim away in a folder. Done.

Now, time to vote.

Absolutely. The Democrats cannot be rewarded for pulling eleventh hour dirty moves like this. They need to learn this kind of crap will not be tolerated. Take the vote as scheduled.

Pot meet Kettle.

BTW what is in those 100k documents concerning Kavanaugh the GOP withheld from the American people?? Shenanigans? Look in the mirror!!

The “American people” are not clamoring or even interested in those 100k documents. Only a bunch of desperate nut jobs who have lost all credibility care.

This. The American people would like this disgusting witch hunt to end and confirmation of a good man to begin.

Actually only about a third of the people feel that way.

A quarter.

Most Americans do not know or care.

Only one in four Americans can name all three branches of our federal government and only one in three can name any branch of government.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/13/politics/poll-constitution/index.html

According to a 2017 C-SPAN poll, fifty-seven percent of likely voters cannot name ONE Supreme Court justice.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/03/21/people-have-absolutely-no-clue-who-is-on-the-supreme-court/?utm_term=.dd4026e5ccc7

A little over two weeks ago, according to another C-SPAN poll, sixty-five percent of likely voters could not identify who President Trump nominated to the Supreme Court. This is despite at least 90% of Americans believing that decisions made by the Supreme Court have an impact on their lives.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/29/cspan-poll-supreme-court/

[Anonymous]

She’s public now:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html

[Anonymous]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f19c8d916b25

She revealed herself.

I believe her.

No way he should be confirmed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s public now:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html

Start shaming her now Republican women! Liar, promiscuous, mentally ill. Repeat steps 1-3 as needed!

[Anonymous]

Wow. She seems legit. The day notes from several years ago. Passed a polygraph. She sounds real to me.

The question is— has the country moved forward since #MeToo? Confirm Kavanaugh and the Boue Wave becomes. Tsunami.

And yep. I bet there are other women out there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Y'all who are poo pooing this, need to ask, if there was no there there, why and how did the GOP anticipate needing 65 women (who didn't go to high school with Brett) to sign a letter saying he was a nice boy?

--w
No one said they anticipated it. Ever heard of social media? Pretty sure that the girls' school alums are likely pretty close knit, even today. How long would it take to put that together? Not long at all. Especially, if a few of them are very good friends of his. And, yes, the girls' schools and the boys' schools do socialize together.

But, I'm sure we will get more information when the woman gets her television interview.

As an alum of a DC girls' school, I can safely say it probably took 10 minutes to pull that list together. The DC Catholic and private school network is incredibly tight knit. I don't like Brett Kavanaugh, and definitely don't want him confirmed, but I know most of the women on that list. Hell, I've probably been to a party with Brett Kavanaugh.

But just because 65 women weren't sexually assaulted doesn't mean that one wasn't.

THANK YOU. I’m the PP who seriously doubted that someone who graduated from Prep 35+ years ago could find 65 women who even knew who he was in high school, much less could vouch for his character then. I went to NCS, still live in DC, have a dozen VERY close friends from high school and would have a hard time coming up with 65 MEN, who obviously didn’t actually go to high school with me, vouching for my high school character with two days notice. My husband, who went to the New Jersey Georgetown Prep equivalent, said the same thing. It’s not believable.

I think you've misunderstood the PP. She was saying it's completely believable that this list of women was pulled together very quickly.

Well yes, but also that it’s unbelievable that every single one of them knew him in high school and can personally vouch for his character at that time? Because that sounds like some bullsh!t.

Seems to me that when this many women organize themselves to write a letter, it speaks to his strong character and integrity. Combine that with the numerous other character statements already submitted and he seems to be a man above reproach.

Very strange that they had this letter all ready to go. Seems they were expecting an accusation of this nature.

You aren't keeping up, are you? They didn't have anything "ready to go." They organized and got the letter signed within ONE day of the accusatory letter coming out. It wasn't hard and it wasn't pre-planned.

Not true. I know one of the women in the letter. She agreed to be in it well before all of this. It was a general request and had nothing to do with this.

Bull$hit.

Easy to believe that signers may not have known why the letter was being drafted “well before all of this” was made public. But the people organizing this effort sure as hell did. It’s totally weird to draft such a letter unless you know that a serious allegation will be made about the nominee’s behavior in HS.